Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

14-06-2019 | Original Article

When perception intrudes on 2D grasping: evidence from Garner interference

Auteurs: Tzvi Ganel, Aviad Ozana, Melvyn A. Goodale

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 8/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

When participants reach out to pick up a real 3-D object, their grip aperture reflects the size of the object well before contact is made. At the same time, the classical psychophysical laws and principles of relative size and shape that govern visual perception do not appear to intrude into the control of such movements, which are instead tuned only to the relevant dimension for grasping. In contrast, accumulating evidence suggests that grasps directed at flat 2D objects are not immune to perceptual effects. Thus, in 2D but not 3D grasping, the aperture of the fingers has been shown to be affected by relative and contextual information about the size and shape of the target object. A notable example of this dissociation comes from studies of Garner interference, which signals holistic processing of shape. Previous research has shown that 3D grasping shows no evidence for Garner interference but 2D grasping does (Freud & Ganel, 2015). In a recent study published in this journal (Löhr-Limpens et al., 2019), participants were presented with 2D objects in a Garner paradigm. The pattern of results closely replicated the previously published results with 2D grasping. Unfortunately, the authors, who appear to be unaware the potential differences between 2D and 3D grasping, used their findings to draw an overgeneralized and unwarranted conclusion about the relation between 3D grasping and perception. In this short methodological commentary, we discuss current literature on aperture shaping during 2D grasping and suggest that researchers should play close attention to the nature of the target stimuli they use before drawing conclusions about visual processing for perception and action.
Literatuur
go back to reference Ganel, T., Chajut, E., & Algom, D. (2008a). Visual coding for action violates fundamental psychophysical principles. Current Biology, 18(14), R599–R601.PubMedCrossRef Ganel, T., Chajut, E., & Algom, D. (2008a). Visual coding for action violates fundamental psychophysical principles. Current Biology, 18(14), R599–R601.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ganel, T., Chajut, E., Tanzer, M., & Algom, D. (2008b). Response: When does grasping escape Weber’s law? Current Biology, 18(23), R1090–R1091.CrossRef Ganel, T., Chajut, E., Tanzer, M., & Algom, D. (2008b). Response: When does grasping escape Weber’s law? Current Biology, 18(23), R1090–R1091.CrossRef
go back to reference Gescheider, G. A. (1985). Psychophysics: Method, theory, and application (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Gescheider, G. A. (1985). Psychophysics: Method, theory, and application (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
go back to reference Goodale, M. A., & Ganel, T. (2015). Different modes of visual organization for perception and for action. In J. Wagemans (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of perceptual organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Goodale, M. A., & Ganel, T. (2015). Different modes of visual organization for perception and for action. In J. Wagemans (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of perceptual organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15(1), 20–25.PubMedCrossRef Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15(1), 20–25.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Goodale, M. A., Westwood, D. A., & Milner, A. D. (2004). Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action. Progress in Brain Research, 144, 131–144.PubMedCrossRef Goodale, M. A., Westwood, D. A., & Milner, A. D. (2004). Two distinct modes of control for object-directed action. Progress in Brain Research, 144, 131–144.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Jakobson, L. S., & Goodale, M. A. (1991). Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: A kinematic analysis of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 86, 199–208.PubMedCrossRef Jakobson, L. S., & Goodale, M. A. (1991). Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: A kinematic analysis of human prehension. Experimental Brain Research, 86, 199–208.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Jeannerod, M. (1984). The timing of natural prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16(3), 235–254.PubMedCrossRef Jeannerod, M. (1984). The timing of natural prehension movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 16(3), 235–254.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Jeannerod, M. (1986). The formation of finger grip during prehension. A cortically mediated visuomotor pattern. Behavioral Brain Research, 19, 99–116.CrossRef Jeannerod, M. (1986). The formation of finger grip during prehension. A cortically mediated visuomotor pattern. Behavioral Brain Research, 19, 99–116.CrossRef
go back to reference Kwok, R. M., & Braddick, O. J. (2003). When does the Titchener Circles illusion exert an effect on grasping? Two- and three-dimensional targets. Neuropsychologia, 41(8), 932–940.PubMedCrossRef Kwok, R. M., & Braddick, O. J. (2003). When does the Titchener Circles illusion exert an effect on grasping? Two- and three-dimensional targets. Neuropsychologia, 41(8), 932–940.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Westwood, D. A., Chapman, C. D., & Roy, E. A. (2000). Pantomimed actions may be controlled by the ventral visual stream. Experimental Brain Research, 130(4), 545–548.PubMedCrossRef Westwood, D. A., Chapman, C. D., & Roy, E. A. (2000). Pantomimed actions may be controlled by the ventral visual stream. Experimental Brain Research, 130(4), 545–548.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
When perception intrudes on 2D grasping: evidence from Garner interference
Auteurs
Tzvi Ganel
Aviad Ozana
Melvyn A. Goodale
Publicatiedatum
14-06-2019
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 8/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01216-z

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2020

Psychological Research 8/2020 Naar de uitgave