Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 1/2018

27-09-2017 | Original Article

Sources of interference in cross-modal action: response selection, crosstalk, and general dual-execution costs

Auteurs: Aleks Pieczykolan, Lynn Huestegge

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Performing several actions simultaneously usually yields interference, which is commonly explained by referring to theoretical concepts such as crosstalk and structural limitations associated with response selection. While most research focuses on dual-task scenarios (involving two independent tasks), we here study the role of response selection and crosstalk for the control of cross-modal response compounds (saccades and manual responses) triggered by a single stimulus. In two experiments, participants performed single responses and spatially compatible versus incompatible dual-response compounds (crosstalk manipulation) in conditions with or without response selection requirements (i.e., responses either changed randomly between trials or were constantly repeated within a block). The results showed that substantial crosstalk effects were only present when response (compound) selection was required, not when a pre-selected response compound was merely repeated throughout a block of trials. We suggest that cross-response crosstalk operates on the level of response selection (during the activation of response codes), not on the level of response execution (when participants can rely on pre-activated response codes). Furthermore, we observed substantial residual dual-response costs even when neither response incompatibility nor response selection requirements were present. This suggests additional general dual-execution interference that occurs on a late, execution-related processing stage and even for two responses in rather distinct (manual and oculomotor) output modules. Generally, the results emphasize the importance of considering oculomotor interference in theorizing on multiple-action control.

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijf je als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen jouw vak. Met het online abonnement heb je toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kun je op je gemak en wanneer het jou het beste uitkomt verdiepen in jouw vakgebied.

Voetnoten
1
We decided to report here the direct comparison of the incompatible conditions from both experiments. Additionally, we computed an analysis including the R–R incompatible condition of Experiment 2 with the R–R compatible condition of Experiment 1 (analogous to Experiment 1 analyses). The results do not contradict the findings in Experiment 1. Importantly, our main finding in Experiment 1, namely the interaction of response condition, RS, and R–R compatibility, was replicated showing that crosstalk has a larger impact on dual-response interference under increased RS demands and therefore operates rather on the level of RS than on the level of response execution.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396–403. CrossRefPubMed Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396–403. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Berlyne, D. E. (1957). Uncertainty and conflict: A point of contact between information-theory and behavior-theory concepts. Psychological Review, 64, 329–339. CrossRefPubMed Berlyne, D. E. (1957). Uncertainty and conflict: A point of contact between information-theory and behavior-theory concepts. Psychological Review, 64, 329–339. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Broadbent, D. E., & Gregory, M. (1967). Psychological refractory period and the length of time required to make a decision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 168, 181–193. CrossRefPubMed Broadbent, D. E., & Gregory, M. (1967). Psychological refractory period and the length of time required to make a decision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 168, 181–193. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Christina, R. W., Fischman, M. G., Vercruyssen, M. J. P., & Anson, J. G. (1982). Simple reaction time as a function of response complexity: Memory drum theory revisited. Journal of Motor Behavior, 74, 301–321. CrossRef Christina, R. W., Fischman, M. G., Vercruyssen, M. J. P., & Anson, J. G. (1982). Simple reaction time as a function of response complexity: Memory drum theory revisited. Journal of Motor Behavior, 74, 301–321. CrossRef
go back to reference Danek, R. H., & Mordkoff, J. T. (2011). Unequal motor durations under simple-, go/no-go, and choice-RT tasks: Extension of Miller and Low (2001). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1323–1329. PubMed Danek, R. H., & Mordkoff, J. T. (2011). Unequal motor durations under simple-, go/no-go, and choice-RT tasks: Extension of Miller and Low (2001). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1323–1329. PubMed
go back to reference Donders, F. C. (1869). Over de snelheid van psychische processen. Translated (1969): On the speed of mental processes. Acta Psychologica, 30, 412–431. CrossRef Donders, F. C. (1869). Over de snelheid van psychische processen. Translated (1969): On the speed of mental processes. Acta Psychologica, 30, 412–431. CrossRef
go back to reference Ellenbogen, R., & Meiran, N. (2010). Objects and events as determinants of parallel processing in dual tasks: Evidence from the backward compatibility effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 152–167. Ellenbogen, R., & Meiran, N. (2010). Objects and events as determinants of parallel processing in dual tasks: Evidence from the backward compatibility effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 152–167.
go back to reference Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. (1992). Making two responses to a single object: Implications for the central attentional bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1058–1079. PubMed Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. (1992). Making two responses to a single object: Implications for the central attentional bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1058–1079. PubMed
go back to reference Garry, M. I., & Franks, I. M. (2000). Reaction time differences in spatially constrained bilateral and unilateral movements. Experimental Brain Research, 131, 236–243. CrossRefPubMed Garry, M. I., & Franks, I. M. (2000). Reaction time differences in spatially constrained bilateral and unilateral movements. Experimental Brain Research, 131, 236–243. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Herman, L. M., & Kantowitz, B. H. (1970). The psychological refractory period effect: Only half the double-stimulation story? Psychological Bulletin, 73, 74–88. CrossRef Herman, L. M., & Kantowitz, B. H. (1970). The psychological refractory period effect: Only half the double-stimulation story? Psychological Bulletin, 73, 74–88. CrossRef
go back to reference Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11–26. CrossRef Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11–26. CrossRef
go back to reference Holender, D. (1980). Interference between a vocal and a manual response to the same stimulus. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 421–431). Amsterdam: North Holland. CrossRef Holender, D. (1980). Interference between a vocal and a manual response to the same stimulus. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior (pp. 421–431). Amsterdam: North Holland. CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368–1384. PubMed Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368–1384. PubMed
go back to reference Hommel, B., & Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 66, 260–273. CrossRefPubMed Hommel, B., & Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 66, 260–273. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Huestegge, L. (2011). The role of saccades in multitasking: Towards an output-related view of eye movements. Psychological Research, 75, 452–465. CrossRefPubMed Huestegge, L. (2011). The role of saccades in multitasking: Towards an output-related view of eye movements. Psychological Research, 75, 452–465. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Huestegge, L., & Hazeltine, E. (2011). Crossmodal action: Modality matters. Psychological Research, 75, 445–451. CrossRefPubMed Huestegge, L., & Hazeltine, E. (2011). Crossmodal action: Modality matters. Psychological Research, 75, 445–451. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Huestegge, L., & Koch, I. (2009). Dual-task crosstalk between saccades and manual responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 352–562. PubMed Huestegge, L., & Koch, I. (2009). Dual-task crosstalk between saccades and manual responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 352–562. PubMed
go back to reference Huestegge, L., & Koch, I. (2010). Crossmodal action selection: Evidence from dual-task compatibility. Memory & Cognition, 38, 493–501. CrossRef Huestegge, L., & Koch, I. (2010). Crossmodal action selection: Evidence from dual-task compatibility. Memory & Cognition, 38, 493–501. CrossRef
go back to reference Huestegge, L., & Koch, I. (2013). Constraints in task-set control: Modality dominance patterns among effector systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 633–637. CrossRef Huestegge, L., & Koch, I. (2013). Constraints in task-set control: Modality dominance patterns among effector systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 633–637. CrossRef
go back to reference Huestegge, L., Pieczykolan, A., & Koch, I. (2014). Talking while looking: On the encapsulation of output system representations. Cognitive Psychology, 73, 72–91. CrossRefPubMed Huestegge, L., Pieczykolan, A., & Koch, I. (2014). Talking while looking: On the encapsulation of output system representations. Cognitive Psychology, 73, 72–91. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Janczyk, M. (2016). Sequential modulation of backward crosstalk and task-shielding in dual-tasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 631–647. PubMed Janczyk, M. (2016). Sequential modulation of backward crosstalk and task-shielding in dual-tasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 631–647. PubMed
go back to reference Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Hommel, B., & Kunde, W. (2014). Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response-from goal-conflict in dual-task performance. Cognition, 132, 30–43. CrossRefPubMed Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Hommel, B., & Kunde, W. (2014). Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response-from goal-conflict in dual-task performance. Cognition, 132, 30–43. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Karlin, L., & Kestenbaum, R. (1968). Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 167–178. CrossRefPubMed Karlin, L., & Kestenbaum, R. (1968). Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 167–178. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Koch, I., & Prinz, W. (2002). Process interference and code overlap in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 192–201. Koch, I., & Prinz, W. (2002). Process interference and code overlap in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 192–201.
go back to reference Kveraga, K., Boucher, L., & Hughes, H. C. (2002). Saccades operate in violation of Hick’s law. Experimental Brain Research, 146, 307–314. CrossRefPubMed Kveraga, K., Boucher, L., & Hughes, H. C. (2002). Saccades operate in violation of Hick’s law. Experimental Brain Research, 146, 307–314. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lien, M.-C., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1260–1280. PubMed Lien, M.-C., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1260–1280. PubMed
go back to reference Lien, M.-C., & Proctor, R. W. (2002). Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 212–238. CrossRef Lien, M.-C., & Proctor, R. W. (2002). Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 212–238. CrossRef
go back to reference Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393–434. CrossRefPubMed Logan, G. D., & Gordon, R. D. (2001). Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. Psychological Review, 108, 393–434. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1072–1090. PubMed Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1072–1090. PubMed
go back to reference Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3–65. CrossRefPubMed Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3–65. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Miller, J. (2006). Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: Effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies. Psychological Research, 70, 484–493. CrossRefPubMed Miller, J. (2006). Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: Effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies. Psychological Research, 70, 484–493. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Miller, J., & Alderton, M. (2006). Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 149–165. PubMed Miller, J., & Alderton, M. (2006). Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 149–165. PubMed
go back to reference Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human-processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214–255. CrossRef Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human-processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214–255. CrossRef
go back to reference Navon, D., & Miller, J. (1987). Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 435–448. PubMed Navon, D., & Miller, J. (1987). Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 435–448. PubMed
go back to reference Navon, D., & Miller, J. (2002). Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 193–251. CrossRefPubMed Navon, D., & Miller, J. (2002). Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 193–251. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244. CrossRefPubMed Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pieczykolan, A., & Huestegge, L. (2014). Oculomotor dominance in multitasking: Mechanisms of conflict resolution in cross-modal action. Journal of Vision, 14, 1–17. CrossRef Pieczykolan, A., & Huestegge, L. (2014). Oculomotor dominance in multitasking: Mechanisms of conflict resolution in cross-modal action. Journal of Vision, 14, 1–17. CrossRef
go back to reference Pieczykolan, A., & Huestegge, L. (2017). Cross-modal action complexity: Action- and rule-related memory retrieval in dual-response control. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 529. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pieczykolan, A., & Huestegge, L. (2017). Cross-modal action complexity: Action- and rule-related memory retrieval in dual-response control. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 529. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Reynolds, D. (1966). Time and event uncertainty in unisensory reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 286–293. CrossRefPubMed Reynolds, D. (1966). Time and event uncertainty in unisensory reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 286–293. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., & Umiltá, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 31–40. CrossRefPubMed Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., Dascola, I., & Umiltá, C. (1987). Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 31–40. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Schneider, W. X., & Deubel, H. (2002). Selection-for-perception and selection-for-spatial-motor-action are coupled by visual attention: A review of recent findings and new evidence from stimulus-driven saccade control. Attention and Performance XIX: Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action, 19, 609–627. Schneider, W. X., & Deubel, H. (2002). Selection-for-perception and selection-for-spatial-motor-action are coupled by visual attention: A review of recent findings and new evidence from stimulus-driven saccade control. Attention and Performance XIX: Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action, 19, 609–627.
go back to reference Schubert, T. (1999). Processing differences between simple and choice reactions affect bottleneck localization in overlapping tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 408–425. Schubert, T. (1999). Processing differences between simple and choice reactions affect bottleneck localization in overlapping tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 408–425.
go back to reference Schubert, T., Fischer, R., & Stelzel, C. (2008). Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 376–397. PubMed Schubert, T., Fischer, R., & Stelzel, C. (2008). Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 376–397. PubMed
go back to reference Thomson, S. J., Watter, S., & Finkelshtein, A. (2010). Parallel response selection in dual-task situations via automatic category-to-response translation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1791–1802. CrossRef Thomson, S. J., Watter, S., & Finkelshtein, A. (2010). Parallel response selection in dual-task situations via automatic category-to-response translation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1791–1802. CrossRef
go back to reference Tombu, M., & Jolicœur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual- task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 3–18. PubMed Tombu, M., & Jolicœur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual- task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 3–18. PubMed
go back to reference Watter, S., & Logan, G. D. (2006). Parallel response selection in dual-task situations. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 254–277. CrossRef Watter, S., & Logan, G. D. (2006). Parallel response selection in dual-task situations. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 254–277. CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Sources of interference in cross-modal action: response selection, crosstalk, and general dual-execution costs
Auteurs
Aleks Pieczykolan
Lynn Huestegge
Publicatiedatum
27-09-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0923-1