Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Dual tasking, or the simultaneous execution of two continuous tasks, is frequently associated with a performance decline that can be explained within a capacity sharing framework. In this study, we assessed the effects of a concurrent motor task on the efficiency of visual information uptake based on the ‘theory of visual attention’ (TVA). TVA provides parameter estimates reflecting distinct components of visual processing capacity: perceptual threshold, visual processing speed, and visual short-term memory (VSTM) storage capacity. Moreover, goodness-of-fit values and bootstrapping estimates were derived to test whether the TVA-model is validly applicable also under dual task conditions, and whether the robustness of parameter estimates is comparable in single- and dual-task conditions. 24 subjects of middle to higher age performed a continuous tapping task, and a visual processing task (whole report of briefly presented letter arrays) under both single- and dual-task conditions. Results suggest a decline of both visual processing capacity and VSTM storage capacity under dual-task conditions, while the perceptual threshold remained unaffected by a concurrent motor task. In addition, goodness-of-fit values and bootstrapping estimates support the notion that participants processed the visual task in a qualitatively comparable, although quantitatively less efficient way under dual-task conditions. The results support a capacity sharing account of motor-cognitive dual tasking and suggest that even performing a relatively simple motor task relies on central attentional capacity that is necessary for efficient visual information uptake.
Boisgontier, M. P., Beets, I. A. M., Duysens, J., Nieuwboer, A., Krampe, R., & Swinnen, S. P. (2013). Age-related differences in attentional cost associated with postural dual-tasks: Increased recruitment of generic cognitive resources in older adults. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37, 1824–1837. CrossRef
Dick, A. O. (1974). Iconic memory and its relation to perceptual processing and other memory mechanisms. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 575–596. CrossRef
Dyrholm, M. (2012). LIBTVA user guide. Retrieved from http://cvc.psy.ku.dk/resources/matlab-toolbox-for-modeling/. Accessed 29 Nov 2017.
Dyrholm, M., Kyllingsbæk, S., Espeseth, T., & Bundesen, C. (2011). Generalizing parametric models by introducing trial-by-trial parameter variability: The case of TVA. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55, 416–429. CrossRef
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossRef
Finke, K., Matthias, E., Keller, I., Müller, H. J., Schneider, W. X., & Bublak, P. (2012). How does phasic alerting improve performance in patients with unilateral neglect? A systematic analysis of attentional processing capacity and spatial weighting mechanisms. Neuropsychologia, 50, 1178–1189. CrossRefPubMed
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall International.
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2000). Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: Limits on long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 336–358. PubMed
Kyllingsbæk, S. (2006). Modeling visual attention. Behavioural Research Methods, 38, 123–133. CrossRef
Lehrl, S. (1999). Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatz-Intelligenztest: Manual mit Block MWT-B. Balingen: Spitta Verlag.
MATLAB and Statistics Toolbox Release. (2012). The MathWorks, Inc., Natick.
Mioni, G., Grassi, M., Tarantino, V., Stablum, F., Grondin, S., & Bisiacchi, P. S. (2016). The impact of a concurrent motor task on auditory and visual temporal discrimination tasks. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 78, 742–748. CrossRef
Navon, D. (1984). Resources—A theoretical soupstone? Psychological Review, 91, 216–234. CrossRef
Shibuya, H., & Bundesen, C. (1988). Visual selection from multielement displays: Measuring and modeling effects of exposure duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 591–600. PubMed
Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 74, 1–29. CrossRef
Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2004). Virtually no evidence for virtually perfect time-sharing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 795–810. PubMed
Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Science, 3, 159–177. CrossRef
- Motor-cognitive dual-task performance: effects of a concurrent motor task on distinct components of visual processing capacity
E. C. S. Künstler
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg