Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Recent literature has established a directional influence of irrelevant numerical magnitude on actions performed toward neutral objects. For example, fingers’ aperture during grasping is larger when associated with large compared with small numerical digits. This interaction between symbolic magnitude and visuomotor control has been attributed to the planning stage of the action prior to motor execution. However, this assumption has not been directly tested. In two experiments, we tested whether the effects of numerical magnitude on grasping derive from action planning or from action execution. Participants were asked to grasp an object following a short visual (Experiment 1) or auditory (Experiment 2) presentation of small (1/2) or large (8/9) digits. Grasping was performed under either closed-loop (CL) or open-loop (OL) visuomotor control, for which online vision was prevented during action execution. Digit magnitude affected grip apertures in the CL condition, when online vision was allowed. However, magnitude had no effects on grip aperture in the OL condition. This pattern of results strongly suggests that the processing of numerical magnitude originates from interactions between numerical magnitude and real object size during online motor execution. Unlike previously assumed, the findings also suggest that the effect of magnitude on visuomotor control is not likely to be attributed to the motor planning stage prior to action initiation.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Binetti, N., Hagura, N., Fadipe, C., Tomassini, A., Walsh, V., & Bestmann, S. (2015). Binding space and time through action. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 282(1805), 20150381.
Chiou, R. Y.-C., Wu, D. H., Tzeng, O. J.-L., Hung, D. L., & Chang, E. C. (2012). Relative size of numerical magnitude induces a size-contrast effect on the grip scaling of reach-to-grasp movements. Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 48(8), 1043–1051. CrossRefPubMed
Dormal, V., & Pesenti, M. (2012). Processing magnitudes within the parietal cortex. Horizons in Neuroscience Research, 8, 107–140.
Gianelli, C., Ranzini, M., Marzocchi, M., Micheli, L. R., & Borghi, A. M. (2012). Influence of numerical magnitudes on the free choice of an object position. Cognitive Processing, 13(1), 185–188. CrossRef
Glover, S. (2004). Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(01), 3–24. PubMed
Glover, S., & Dixon, P. (2001a). Motor adaptation to an optical illusion. Experimental Brain Research, 137(2), 254–258.
Glover, S., & Dixon, P. (2001b). The role of vision in the on-line correction of illusion effects on action. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/ Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 55(2), 96.
Glover, S., & Dixon, P. (2002a). Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: support for a planning/control model of action. Perception & Psychophysics, 64(2), 266–278.
Glover, S., & Dixon, P. (2002b). Semantics affect the planning but not control of grasping. Experimental Brain Research, 146(3), 383–387.
Glover, S. R., & Dixon, P. (2001c). Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: Evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(3), 560–572.
Goodale, M. A., & Ganel, T. (2016). Different modes of visual organization for perception and for action. In J. Wagemans (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of perceptual organization (pp. 672–690). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jeannerod, M. (1988). The neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements (Vol. xii). New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
Kadosh, R. C., Henik, A., Rubinsten, O., Mohr, H., Dori, H., van de Ven, V., et al. (2005). Are numbers special?: The comparison systems of the human brain investigated by fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 43(9), 1238–1248. CrossRef
Lindemann, O., Abolafia, J. M., Girardi, G., & Bekkering, H. (2007). Getting a grip on numbers: numerical magnitude priming in object grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(6), 1400. PubMed
Namdar, G., Tzelgov, J., Algom, D., & Ganel, T. (2014). Grasping numbers: evidence for automatic influence of numerical magnitude on grip aperture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(3), 830–835. CrossRef
Rinaldi, L., Lega, C., Cattaneo, Z., Girelli, L., & Bernardi, N. F. (2016). Grasping the sound: Auditory pitch influences size processing in motor planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(1), 11–22. PubMed
Seegelke, C., Güldenpenning, I., Dettling, J., & Schack, T. (2016). Visuomotor priming of action preparation and motor programming is similar in visually guided and memory-guided actions. Neuropsychologia.
- Numerical magnitude affects online execution, and not planning of visuomotor control
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg