Skip to main content
Log in

A haptic size-contrast illusion affects size perception but not grasping

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Object features (e.g. size, shape and orientation) are relevant for recognition and identification, but also for the control of manual actions. Converging evidence suggests a dissociation between the visual systems that mediate object perception and object-directed action. Here we present evidence suggesting that a similar dissociation might exist in the haptic domain. We demonstrate that a haptic variation of a size-contrast illusion influences the perceived size of a target object, but not the degree to which the hand is opened when that object is the target of a grasping movement. This finding is consistent with the view that object perception is "scene-based" and takes into consideration not only the size of the target object but also the sizes of other nearby objects. In contrast, the control of object-directed action is primarily driven by the absolute size of the target object independent of the relative sizes of other objects in the environment, suggesting a "actor-based" frame of reference. The present findings suggest that dissociations between action and perception are not unique to the visual system, but might instead reflect a general organizational principle of sensory processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2. a
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aglioti S, DeSouza JF, Goodale MA (1995) Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand. Curr Biol 5:679–685

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amedi A, Malach R, Hendler T, Peled S, Zohary E (2001) Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway. Nat Neurosci 4:324–330

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen RA, Snyder LH, Bradley DC, Xing J (1997) Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Annu Rev Neurosci 20:303–330

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Binkofski F, Dohle C, Posse S, Stephan KM, Hefter H, Seitz RJ, Freund HJ (1998) Human anterior intraparietal area subserves prehension: a combined lesion and functional MRI activation study. Neurology 50:1253–1259

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman B, Aiken W, Allen J, Maresh TC (1997) Influence of acoustic context on sound localization: an auditory Roelofs effect. Psychol Res 60:238–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan JR, Beltzner MA (2000) Independence of perceptual and sensorimotor predictions in the size-weight illusion. Nat Neurosci 3:737–741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franz VH (2001) Action does not resist visual illusions. Trends Cogn Sci 5:457–459

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Franz VH, Gegenfurtner KR, Bulthoff HH, Fahle M (2000) Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action. Psychol Sci 11:20–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Chieffi S, Deprati E, Saetti MC, Toni I (1996) Visual illusion and action. Neuropsychologia 34:369–376

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gentilucci M, Daprati E, Gangitano M (1998) Haptic information differentially interferes with visual analysis in reaching-grasping control and in perceptual processes. Neuroreport 9:887–891

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glover S (2002) Visual illusions affect planning but not control. Trends Cogn Sci 6:288–292

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glover S, Dixon P (2002) Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping:support for a planning/control model of action. Percept Psychophys 64:266–278

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale MA, Haffenden A (1998) Frames of reference for perception and action in the human visual system. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22:161–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale MA, Humphrey GK (1998) The objects of action and perception. Cognition 67:181–207

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodale MA, Meenan JP, Bulthoff HH, Nicolle DA, Murphy KJ, Racicot CI (1994) Separate neural pathways for the visual analysis of object shape in perception and prehension. Curr Biol 4:604–610

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haffenden AM, Goodale MA (1998) The effect of pictorial illusion on prehension and perception. J Cogn Neurosci 10:122–136

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y, Goodale MA (2000) Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. J Cogn Neurosci 12:856–868

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iwamura Y (1998) Hierarchical somatosensory processing. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8:522–528

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • James TW, Humphrey GK, Gati JS, Servos P, Menon RS, Goodale MA (2002) Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas. Neuropsychologia 40:1706–1714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeannerod M (1986) The formation of finger grip during prehension: a cortically mediated visuomotor pattern. Behav Brain Res 19:99–116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaska JF, Scott SH, Cisek P, Sergio LE (1997) Cortical control of reaching movements. Curr Opin Neurobiol 7:849–859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milner AD, Goodale MA (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press, New York

  • Pavani F, Boscagli I, Benvenuti F, Rabuffetti M, Farne A (1999) Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion? Exp Brain Res 127:95–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeets JB, Brenner E (2001) Action beyond our grasp. Trends Cogn Sci 5:287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeets JBJ, Brenner E, de Grave DDJ, Cuijpers RH (2002) Illusions in action: consequences of inconsistent processing of spatial attributes. Exp Brain Res 147:135–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westwood DA, Heath M, Roy EA (2000) The effect of a pictorial illusion on closed-loop and open-loop prehension. Exp Brain Res 134:456–463

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Westwood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Westwood, D.A., Goodale, M.A. A haptic size-contrast illusion affects size perception but not grasping. Exp Brain Res 153, 253–259 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1599-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1599-x

Keywords

Navigation