Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Working memory updating (WMU) is a core mechanism in the human mental architecture and a good predictor of a wide range of cognitive processes. This study analyzed the benefits of two different WMU training procedures, near transfer effects on a working memory measure, and far transfer effects on nonverbal reasoning. Maintenance of any benefits a month later was also assessed. Participants were randomly assigned to: an adaptive training group that performed two numerical WMU tasks during four sessions; a non-adaptive training group that performed the same tasks but on a constant and less demanding level of difficulty; or an active control group that performed other tasks unrelated with working memory. After the training, all three groups showed improvements in most of the tasks, and these benefits were maintained a month later. The gain in one of the two WMU measures was larger for the adaptive and non-adaptive groups than for the control group. This specific gain in a task similar to the one trained would indicate the use of a better strategy for performing the task. Besides this nearest transfer effect, no other transfer effects were found. The adaptability of the training procedure did not produce greater improvements. These results are discussed in terms of the training procedure and the feasibility of training WMU.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Belacchi, C., Carretti, B., & Cornoldi, C. (2010). The role of working memory and updating in coloured raven matrices performance in typically developing children. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22(7), 1010–1020. CrossRef
Borella, E., & de Ribaupierre, A. (2014). The role of working memory, inhibition, and processing speed in text comprehension in children. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 86–92. CrossRef
Cattell, R. B., & Cattell, H. E. P. (1963). Measuring intelligence with the culture fair tests. Champaign: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
Chen, T., & Li, D. (2007). The roles of working memory updating and processing speed in mediating age-related differences in fluid intelligence. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14(6), 631–646. CrossRef
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., Corley, R. P., & Hewitt, J. K. (2008). Individual differences in executive functions are almost entirely genetic in origin. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 201–225. CrossRef
Jaeggi, S., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(19), 6829–6833. CrossRef
Küper, K., & Karbach, J. (2015). Increased training complexity reduces the effectiveness of brief working memory training: Evidence from short-term single and dual n-back training interventions. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 28(2), 199–208. CrossRef
Noack, H., Lövdén, M., Schmiedek, F., & Lindenberger, U. (2009). Cognitive plasticity in adulthood and old age: Gauging the generality of cognitive intervention effects. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 27(5), 435–453. PubMed
Passolunghi, M. C., & Pazzaglia, F. (2004). Individual differences in memory updating in relation to arithmetic problem solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 14(4), 219–230. CrossRef
Raven, J., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. C. (1977). Standard progressive matrices. London: H.K.Lewis.
Redick, T. S., Shipstead, Z., Harrison, T. L., Hicks, K. L., Fried, D. E., Hambrick, D. Z., Kane, M.J. & Engle, R, W., et al. (2013). No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: A randomized, placebo-controlled study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 359–379. CrossRef
Ruiz, M., Elosúa, M. R., & Lechuga, M. T. (2005). Old-fashioned responses in an updating memory task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(5), 887–908. CrossRef
Sandberg, P., Rönnlund, M., Nyberg, L., & Neely, A. S. (2014). Executive process training in young and old adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 21(5), 577–605. CrossRef
Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3(4), 207–217. CrossRef
Schmiedek, F., Hildebrandt, A., Lövdén, M., Wilhelm, O., & Lindenberger, U. (2009). Complex span versus updating tasks of working memory: The gap is not that deep. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(4), 1089–1096. PubMed
Shipstead, Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2010). Does working memory training generalize. Psychologica Belgica, 50(3–4), 245–276. CrossRef
Sprenger, A. M., Atkins, S. M., Bolger, D. J., Harbison, J. I., Novick, J. M., Chrabaszcz, J. S., Weems, S. A., Smith, V., Bobb, S., Bunting, M.F. & Dougherty, M. R. (2013). Training working memory: Limits of transfer. Intelligence, 41(5), 638–663. CrossRef
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task-dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 127–154. CrossRef
von Bastian, C., & Eschen, A. (2015). Does working memory training have to be adaptive? Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 80(2), 181–194. CrossRef
von Bastian, C., Langer, N., Jäncke, L., & Oberauer, K. (2013). Effects of working memory training in young and old adults. Memory and Cognition, 41, 611–624. CrossRef
von Bastian, C., & Oberauer, K. (2014). Effects and mechanisms of working memory training: A review. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 78, 803–820. CrossRef
Willis, S. L., Blieszner, R., & Baltes, P. B. (1981). Intellectual training research in aging: Modification of performance on the fluid ability of figural relations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(1), 41–50. CrossRef
- Training working memory updating in young adults
M. Teresa Lechuga
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg