Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 7/2019

24-04-2018 | Original Article

First unitary, then divided: the temporal dynamics of dividing attention

Auteurs: Lisa N. Jefferies, Joseph B. Witt

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 7/2019

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Whether focused visual attention can be divided has been the topic of much investigation, and there is a compelling body of evidence showing that, at least under certain conditions, attention can be divided and deployed as two independent foci. Three experiments were conducted to examine whether attention can be deployed in divided form from the outset, or whether it is first deployed as a unitary focus before being divided. To test this, we adapted the methodology of Jefferies, Enns, and Di Lollo (Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 40: 465, 2014), who used a dual-stream Attentional Blink paradigm and two letter-pair targets. One aspect of the AB, Lag-1 sparing, has been shown to occur only if the second target pair appears within the focus of attention. By presenting the second target pair at various spatial locations and assessing the magnitude of Lag-1 sparing, we probed the spatial distribution of attention. By systematically manipulating the stimulus-onset-asynchrony between the targets, we also tracked changes to the spatial distribution of attention over time. The results showed that even under conditions which encourage the division of attention, the attentional focus is first deployed in unitary form before being divided. It is then maintained in divided form only briefly before settling on a single location.
Literatuur
go back to reference Arnell, K. M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1999). The attentional blink across stimulus modalities: evidence for central processing limitations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 630. Arnell, K. M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1999). The attentional blink across stimulus modalities: evidence for central processing limitations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 630.
go back to reference Awh, E., & Pashler, H. (2000). Evidence for split attentional foci. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 834.PubMed Awh, E., & Pashler, H. (2000). Evidence for split attentional foci. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 834.PubMed
go back to reference Barriopedro, M. I., & Botella, J. (1998). New evidence for the zoom lens model using the RSVP technique. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1406–1414.CrossRef Barriopedro, M. I., & Botella, J. (1998). New evidence for the zoom lens model using the RSVP technique. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1406–1414.CrossRef
go back to reference Bay, M., & Wyble, B. (2014). The benefit of attention is not diminished when distributed over two simultaneous cues. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 1287–1297.CrossRef Bay, M., & Wyble, B. (2014). The benefit of attention is not diminished when distributed over two simultaneous cues. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 1287–1297.CrossRef
go back to reference Benso, M., Turatto, G., Mascetti, G., & Umiltà, C. (1998). The time course of attentional focusing. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 10(4), 373–388.CrossRef Benso, M., Turatto, G., Mascetti, G., & Umiltà, C. (1998). The time course of attentional focusing. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 10(4), 373–388.CrossRef
go back to reference Bichot, N. R., Cave, K. R., & Pashler, H. (1999). Visual selection mediated by location: Feature-based selection of noncontiguous locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(3), 403–423.CrossRef Bichot, N. R., Cave, K. R., & Pashler, H. (1999). Visual selection mediated by location: Feature-based selection of noncontiguous locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 61(3), 403–423.CrossRef
go back to reference Breitmeyer, B., & Öğmen, H. (2006). Visual masking: Time slices th unconscious vision (Vol no. 41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Breitmeyer, B., & Öğmen, H. (2006). Visual masking: Time slices th unconscious vision (Vol no. 41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Breitmeyer, B. G., Hoar, W. S., Randall, D. J., & Conte, F. P. (1984). Visual masking: an integrative approach. London, UK: Clarendon Press. Breitmeyer, B. G., Hoar, W. S., Randall, D. J., & Conte, F. P. (1984). Visual masking: an integrative approach. London, UK: Clarendon Press.
go back to reference Castiello, U., & Umiltà, C. (1992). Splitting focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 837.PubMed Castiello, U., & Umiltà, C. (1992). Splitting focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 837.PubMed
go back to reference Cave, K. R., Bush, W. S., & Taylor, T. G. (2010). Split attention as part of a flexible attentional system for complex scenes: comment on Jans, Peters, and De Weerd (2010). Cave, K. R., Bush, W. S., & Taylor, T. G. (2010). Split attention as part of a flexible attentional system for complex scenes: comment on Jans, Peters, and De Weerd (2010).
go back to reference Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109.PubMed Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109.PubMed
go back to reference Colzato, L. S., Spapé, M. M., Pannebakker, M. M., & Hommel, B. (2007). Working memory and the attentional blink: Blink size is predicted by individual differences in operation span. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1051–1057.CrossRef Colzato, L. S., Spapé, M. M., Pannebakker, M. M., & Hommel, B. (2007). Working memory and the attentional blink: Blink size is predicted by individual differences in operation span. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 1051–1057.CrossRef
go back to reference Deco, G., Pollatos, O., & Zihl, J. (2002). The time course of selective visual attention: theory and experiments. Vision Research, 42, 2925–2945.CrossRefPubMed Deco, G., Pollatos, O., & Zihl, J. (2002). The time course of selective visual attention: theory and experiments. Vision Research, 42, 2925–2945.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Desimone, R. (1998). Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 353, 1245–1255.CrossRef Desimone, R. (1998). Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 353, 1245–1255.CrossRef
go back to reference Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.CrossRefPubMed Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J. I., Ghorashi, S. S., & Enns, J. T. (2005). The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control? Psychological Research, 69, 191–200.CrossRefPubMed Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J. I., Ghorashi, S. S., & Enns, J. T. (2005). The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control? Psychological Research, 69, 191–200.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Dubois, J., Hamker, F. H., & VanRullen, R. (2009). Attentional selection of noncontiguous locations: The spotlight is only transiently “split”. Journal of Vision, 9, 3–3.CrossRefPubMed Dubois, J., Hamker, F. H., & VanRullen, R. (2009). Attentional selection of noncontiguous locations: The spotlight is only transiently “split”. Journal of Vision, 9, 3–3.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. (2002). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.CrossRef Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. (2002). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.CrossRef
go back to reference Egeth, H. E., & Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269–297.CrossRefPubMed Egeth, H. E., & Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269–297.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Egly, R., & Homa, D. (1984). Sensitization of the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 778.PubMed Egly, R., & Homa, D. (1984). Sensitization of the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 778.PubMed
go back to reference Eimer, M. (1999). Attending to quadrants and ring-shaped regions: ERP effects of visual attention in different spatial selection tasks. Psychophysiology, 36, 491–503.CrossRefPubMed Eimer, M. (1999). Attending to quadrants and ring-shaped regions: ERP effects of visual attention in different spatial selection tasks. Psychophysiology, 36, 491–503.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Eimer, M. (2000). An ERP study of sustained spatial attention to stimulus eccentricity. Biological Psychology, 52, 205–220.CrossRefPubMed Eimer, M. (2000). An ERP study of sustained spatial attention to stimulus eccentricity. Biological Psychology, 52, 205–220.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(5), 583.PubMed Eriksen, C. W., & Yeh, Y. Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11(5), 583.PubMed
go back to reference Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.CrossRef Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.CrossRef
go back to reference Fiebelkorn, I. C., Saalmann, Y. B., & Kastner, S. (2013). Rhythmic sampling within and between objects despite sustained attention at a cued location. Current Biology, 23, 2553–2558.CrossRefPubMed Fiebelkorn, I. C., Saalmann, Y. B., & Kastner, S. (2013). Rhythmic sampling within and between objects despite sustained attention at a cued location. Current Biology, 23, 2553–2558.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ghorashi, S. M. S., Jefferies, L. N., Kawahara, J.-I., & Wantanabe, K. (2008). Does attention accompany the conscious awareness of both location and identity of an object. Psyche, 14, 1–13. Ghorashi, S. M. S., Jefferies, L. N., Kawahara, J.-I., & Wantanabe, K. (2008). Does attention accompany the conscious awareness of both location and identity of an object. Psyche, 14, 1–13.
go back to reference Giesbrecht, B., & Di Lollo, V. (1998). Beyond the attentional blink: visual masking by object substitution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1454.PubMed Giesbrecht, B., & Di Lollo, V. (1998). Beyond the attentional blink: visual masking by object substitution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1454.PubMed
go back to reference Godijn, R., & Theeuwes, J. (2003). The relationship between exogenous and endogenous saccades and attention. In R. Radach, J. Hyona, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye: cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 3–26). Elsevier (ISBN: 0–444–51020–6). Godijn, R., & Theeuwes, J. (2003). The relationship between exogenous and endogenous saccades and attention. In R. Radach, J. Hyona, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind’s eye: cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 3–26). Elsevier (ISBN: 0–444–51020–6).
go back to reference Goodbourn, P. T., & Holcombe, A. O. (2015). “Pseudoextinction”: asymmetries in simultaneous attentional selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception And Performance, 41, 364.PubMed Goodbourn, P. T., & Holcombe, A. O. (2015). “Pseudoextinction”: asymmetries in simultaneous attentional selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception And Performance, 41, 364.PubMed
go back to reference Hamker, F. H. (2004). A dynamic model of how feature cues guide spatial attention. Vision Research, 44, 501–521.CrossRefPubMed Hamker, F. H. (2004). A dynamic model of how feature cues guide spatial attention. Vision Research, 44, 501–521.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hamker, F. H. (2005). The reentry hypothesis: The putative interaction of the frontal eye field, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and areas V4, IT for attention and eye movement. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 431–447.CrossRefPubMed Hamker, F. H. (2005). The reentry hypothesis: The putative interaction of the frontal eye field, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, and areas V4, IT for attention and eye movement. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 431–447.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hamker, F. H. (2006). Modeling feature-based attention as an active top-down inference process. Biosystems, 86, 91–99.CrossRefPubMed Hamker, F. H. (2006). Modeling feature-based attention as an active top-down inference process. Biosystems, 86, 91–99.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Heinze, H. J., Luck, S. J., Munte, T. F., Gös, A., Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: an electrophysiological analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 42–52.CrossRef Heinze, H. J., Luck, S. J., Munte, T. F., Gös, A., Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994). Attention to adjacent and separate positions in space: an electrophysiological analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 42–52.CrossRef
go back to reference Holländer, A., Corballis, M. C., & Hamm, J. P. (2005). Visual-field asymmetry in dual-stream RSVP. Neuropsychologia, 43, 35–40.CrossRefPubMed Holländer, A., Corballis, M. C., & Hamm, J. P. (2005). Visual-field asymmetry in dual-stream RSVP. Neuropsychologia, 43, 35–40.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hoogendorn, H., Carlson, T. A., VanRullen, R., & Verstraten, F. A. J. (2010). Timing divided attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 2059–2068.CrossRef Hoogendorn, H., Carlson, T. A., VanRullen, R., & Verstraten, F. A. J. (2010). Timing divided attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 2059–2068.CrossRef
go back to reference Huang, D., Xue, L., Wang, X., & Chen, Y. (2016). Using spatial uncertainty to manipulate the size of the attention focus. Scientific Reports, 6, 1–7.CrossRef Huang, D., Xue, L., Wang, X., & Chen, Y. (2016). Using spatial uncertainty to manipulate the size of the attention focus. Scientific Reports, 6, 1–7.CrossRef
go back to reference Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489–1506.CrossRefPubMed Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489–1506.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jans, B., Peters, J. C., & De Weerd, P. (2010). Visual spatial attention to multiple locations at once: the jury is still out. Psychological Review, 117, 637.CrossRefPubMed Jans, B., Peters, J. C., & De Weerd, P. (2010). Visual spatial attention to multiple locations at once: the jury is still out. Psychological Review, 117, 637.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jefferies, L. N., & Di Lollo, V. (2009). Linear changes in the spatial extent of the focus of attention across time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1020.PubMed Jefferies, L. N., & Di Lollo, V. (2009). Linear changes in the spatial extent of the focus of attention across time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1020.PubMed
go back to reference Jefferies, L. N., & Di Lollo, V. (2015). When can spatial attention be deployed in the form of an annulus? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 413–422.CrossRef Jefferies, L. N., & Di Lollo, V. (2015). When can spatial attention be deployed in the form of an annulus? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 413–422.CrossRef
go back to reference Jefferies, L. N., & Di Lollo, V. (2017). Deployment of spatial attention to a structural framework: exogenous (alerting) and endogenous (goal-directed) factors. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 1933–1944.CrossRef Jefferies, L. N., & Di Lollo, V. (2017). Deployment of spatial attention to a structural framework: exogenous (alerting) and endogenous (goal-directed) factors. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 1933–1944.CrossRef
go back to reference Jefferies, L. N., Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2014). The flexible focus: Whether spatial attention is unitary or divided depends on observer goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 465.PubMed Jefferies, L. N., Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2014). The flexible focus: Whether spatial attention is unitary or divided depends on observer goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 465.PubMed
go back to reference Jefferies, L. N., Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2017). The exogenous and endogenous control of attentional focusing. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 1–18. Jefferies, L. N., Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2017). The exogenous and endogenous control of attentional focusing. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 1–18.
go back to reference Jefferies, L. N., Ghorashi, S., Kawahara, J. I., & Di Lollo, V. (2007). Ignorance is bliss: The role of observer expectation in dynamic spatial tuning of the attentional focus. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1162–1174.CrossRef Jefferies, L. N., Ghorashi, S., Kawahara, J. I., & Di Lollo, V. (2007). Ignorance is bliss: The role of observer expectation in dynamic spatial tuning of the attentional focus. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1162–1174.CrossRef
go back to reference Jefferies, L. N., Gmeindl, L., & Yantis, S. (2014). Attending to illusory differences in object size. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 1393–1402.CrossRef Jefferies, L. N., Gmeindl, L., & Yantis, S. (2014). Attending to illusory differences in object size. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 1393–1402.CrossRef
go back to reference Jefferies, L. N., Roggeveen, A. B., Enns, J. T., Bennett, P. J., Sekuler, A. B., & Di Lollo, V. (2015). On the time course of attentional focusing in older adults. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 79, 28–41.CrossRefPubMed Jefferies, L. N., Roggeveen, A. B., Enns, J. T., Bennett, P. J., Sekuler, A. B., & Di Lollo, V. (2015). On the time course of attentional focusing in older adults. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 79, 28–41.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jonides, J. (1983). Further toward a model of the mind’s eye’s movement. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 247–250.CrossRef Jonides, J. (1983). Further toward a model of the mind’s eye’s movement. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 247–250.CrossRef
go back to reference Juola, J. F., Bouwhuis, D. G., Cooper, E. E., & Warner, C. B. (1991). Control of attention around the fovea. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 125–141.PubMed Juola, J. F., Bouwhuis, D. G., Cooper, E. E., & Warner, C. B. (1991). Control of attention around the fovea. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 125–141.PubMed
go back to reference Kawahara, J. I., & Yamada, Y. (2006). Two noncontiguous locations can be attended concurrently: evidence from the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 594–599.CrossRef Kawahara, J. I., & Yamada, Y. (2006). Two noncontiguous locations can be attended concurrently: evidence from the attentional blink. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 594–599.CrossRef
go back to reference Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., Pelli, D., Ingling, A., Murray, R., & Broussard, C. (2007). What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3. Perception, 36, 1. Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., Pelli, D., Ingling, A., Murray, R., & Broussard, C. (2007). What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3. Perception, 36, 1.
go back to reference Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4, 219–227.PubMed Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4, 219–227.PubMed
go back to reference Kramer, A. F., & Hahn, S. (1995). Splitting the beam: distribution of attention over noncontiguous regions of the visual field. Psychological Science, 381–386. Kramer, A. F., & Hahn, S. (1995). Splitting the beam: distribution of attention over noncontiguous regions of the visual field. Psychological Science, 381–386.
go back to reference Kristjánsson, Á, & Sigurdardottir, H. M. (2008). On the benefits of transient attention across the visual field. Perception, 37, 747–764.CrossRefPubMed Kristjánsson, Á, & Sigurdardottir, H. M. (2008). On the benefits of transient attention across the visual field. Perception, 37, 747–764.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference LaBerge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 371.PubMed LaBerge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 371.PubMed
go back to reference LaBerge, D. (1995). Attentional processing: the brain’s art of mindfulness (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRef LaBerge, D. (1995). Attentional processing: the brain’s art of mindfulness (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 9, 101.CrossRef LaBerge, D., & Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 9, 101.CrossRef
go back to reference Landau, A. N., & Fries, P. (2012). Attention samples stimuli rhythmically. Current Biology, 22, 1000–1004.CrossRefPubMed Landau, A. N., & Fries, P. (2012). Attention samples stimuli rhythmically. Current Biology, 22, 1000–1004.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Luck, S. J., Vogel, E. K., & Shapiro, K. L. (1996). Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature, 383, 616.CrossRefPubMed Luck, S. J., Vogel, E. K., & Shapiro, K. L. (1996). Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature, 383, 616.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lunau, R., & Olivers, C. N. (2010). The attentional blink and lag 1 sparing are nonspatial. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 317–325.CrossRef Lunau, R., & Olivers, C. N. (2010). The attentional blink and lag 1 sparing are nonspatial. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 317–325.CrossRef
go back to reference McMains, S. A., & Somers, D. C. (2004). Multiple spotlights of attentional selection in human visual cortex. Neuron, 42, 677–686.CrossRefPubMed McMains, S. A., & Somers, D. C. (2004). Multiple spotlights of attentional selection in human visual cortex. Neuron, 42, 677–686.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference McMains, S. A., & Somers, D. C. (2005). Processing efficiency of divided spatial attention mechanisms in human visual cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25(41), 9444–9448.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McMains, S. A., & Somers, D. C. (2005). Processing efficiency of divided spatial attention mechanisms in human visual cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25(41), 9444–9448.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315.PubMed Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315.PubMed
go back to reference Müller, M. M., Malinowski, P., Gruber, T., & Hillyard, S. A. (2003). Sustained division of the attentional spotlight. Nature, 424(6946), 309–312.CrossRefPubMed Müller, M. M., Malinowski, P., Gruber, T., & Hillyard, S. A. (2003). Sustained division of the attentional spotlight. Nature, 424(6946), 309–312.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nebel, K., Wiese, H., Stude, P., de Greiff, A., Diener, H. C., & Keidel, M. (2005). On the neural basis of focused and divided attention. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 760–776.CrossRefPubMed Nebel, K., Wiese, H., Stude, P., de Greiff, A., Diener, H. C., & Keidel, M. (2005). On the neural basis of focused and divided attention. Cognitive Brain Research, 25, 760–776.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.CrossRefPubMed Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25.CrossRefPubMed Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160.CrossRef Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 160.CrossRef
go back to reference Potter, M. C., Chun, M. M., Banks, B. S., & Muckenhoupt, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: the visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 979.PubMed Potter, M. C., Chun, M. M., Banks, B. S., & Muckenhoupt, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: the visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 979.PubMed
go back to reference Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849.PubMed Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849.PubMed
go back to reference Scalf, P. E., Banich, M. T., Kramer, A. F., Narechania, K., & Simon, C. D. (2007). Double take: parallel processing by the cerebral hemispheres reduces attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 298.PubMed Scalf, P. E., Banich, M. T., Kramer, A. F., Narechania, K., & Simon, C. D. (2007). Double take: parallel processing by the cerebral hemispheres reduces attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 298.PubMed
go back to reference Seiffert, A. E., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Low-level masking in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 23, 1061. Seiffert, A. E., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Low-level masking in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 23, 1061.
go back to reference Shapiro, K. L., Caldwell, J., & Sorensen, R. E. (1997). Personal names and the attentional blink: a visual” cocktail party” effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 23, 504–514.CrossRefPubMed Shapiro, K. L., Caldwell, J., & Sorensen, R. E. (1997). Personal names and the attentional blink: a visual” cocktail party” effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 23, 504–514.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Shih, S. I. (2000). Recall of two visual targets embedded in RSVP streams of distractors depends on their temporal and spatial relationship. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1348–1355.CrossRef Shih, S. I. (2000). Recall of two visual targets embedded in RSVP streams of distractors depends on their temporal and spatial relationship. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1348–1355.CrossRef
go back to reference Śmigasiewicz, K., & Möller, F. (2011). Mechanisms underlying the left visual-field advantage in the dual stream RSVP task: Evidence from N2pc, P3, and distractor-evoked VEPs. Psychophysiology, 48, 1096–1106.CrossRefPubMed Śmigasiewicz, K., & Möller, F. (2011). Mechanisms underlying the left visual-field advantage in the dual stream RSVP task: Evidence from N2pc, P3, and distractor-evoked VEPs. Psychophysiology, 48, 1096–1106.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Śmigasiewicz, K., Shalgi, S., Hsieh, S., Möller, F., Jaffe, S., Chang, C. C., & Verleger, R. (2010). Left visual-field advantage in the dual-stream RSVP task and reading-direction: a study in three nations. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2852–2860.CrossRefPubMed Śmigasiewicz, K., Shalgi, S., Hsieh, S., Möller, F., Jaffe, S., Chang, C. C., & Verleger, R. (2010). Left visual-field advantage in the dual-stream RSVP task and reading-direction: a study in three nations. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2852–2860.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Spalek, T. M., Falcon, L. J., & Di Lollo, V. (2006). Attentional blink and attentional capture: endogenous versus exogenous control over paying attention to two important events in close succession. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 674–684.CrossRef Spalek, T. M., Falcon, L. J., & Di Lollo, V. (2006). Attentional blink and attentional capture: endogenous versus exogenous control over paying attention to two important events in close succession. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 674–684.CrossRef
go back to reference Standage, D. I., Trappenberg, T. P., & Klein, R. M. (2005). Modelling divided visual attention with a winner-take-all network. Neural Networks, 18, 620–627.CrossRefPubMed Standage, D. I., Trappenberg, T. P., & Klein, R. M. (2005). Modelling divided visual attention with a winner-take-all network. Neural Networks, 18, 620–627.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Trappenberg, T. P., & Standage, D. I. (2005). Multi-packet regions in stabilized continuous attractor networks. Neurocomputing, 65, 617–622.CrossRef Trappenberg, T. P., & Standage, D. I. (2005). Multi-packet regions in stabilized continuous attractor networks. Neurocomputing, 65, 617–622.CrossRef
go back to reference Verleger, R., Sprenger, A., Gebauer, S., Fritzmannova, M., Friedrich, M., Kraft, S., & Jaśkowski, P. (2009). On why left events are the right ones: neural mechanisms underlying the left-hemifield advantage in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 474–488.CrossRefPubMed Verleger, R., Sprenger, A., Gebauer, S., Fritzmannova, M., Friedrich, M., Kraft, S., & Jaśkowski, P. (2009). On why left events are the right ones: neural mechanisms underlying the left-hemifield advantage in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 474–488.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Visser, T. A., Bischof, W. F., & Di Lollo, V. (1999). Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains: Evidence from the attentional blink. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 458.CrossRef Visser, T. A., Bischof, W. F., & Di Lollo, V. (1999). Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains: Evidence from the attentional blink. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 458.CrossRef
go back to reference Visser, T. A., Bischof, W. F., & Di Lollo, V. (2004). Rapid serial visual distraction: task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(8), 1418–1432.CrossRef Visser, T. A., Bischof, W. F., & Di Lollo, V. (2004). Rapid serial visual distraction: task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(8), 1418–1432.CrossRef
go back to reference Visser, T. A., Zuvic, S. M., Bischof, W. F., & Di Lollo, V. (1999). The attentional blink with targets in different spatial locations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 432–436.CrossRef Visser, T. A., Zuvic, S. M., Bischof, W. F., & Di Lollo, V. (1999). The attentional blink with targets in different spatial locations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 432–436.CrossRef
go back to reference Vogel, E. K., Luck, S. J., & Shapiro, K. L. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1656.PubMed Vogel, E. K., Luck, S. J., & Shapiro, K. L. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1656.PubMed
go back to reference Ward, R., Duncan, J., & Shapiro, K. (1996). The slow time-course of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 79–109.CrossRefPubMed Ward, R., Duncan, J., & Shapiro, K. (1996). The slow time-course of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 79–109.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Weichselgartner, E., & Sperling, G. (1987). Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. Science, 238, 778–780.CrossRefPubMed Weichselgartner, E., & Sperling, G. (1987). Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. Science, 238, 778–780.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wyble, B., Bowman, H., & Potter, M. C. (2009). Categorically defined targets trigger spatiotemporal visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 324–337.PubMed Wyble, B., Bowman, H., & Potter, M. C. (2009). Categorically defined targets trigger spatiotemporal visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 324–337.PubMed
go back to reference Yamada, Y., & Kawahara, J. I. (2007). Dividing attention between two different categories and locations in rapid serial visual presentations. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1218–1229.CrossRef Yamada, Y., & Kawahara, J. I. (2007). Dividing attention between two different categories and locations in rapid serial visual presentations. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1218–1229.CrossRef
go back to reference Zirnsak, M., Beuth, F., & Hamker, F. H. (2011). Split of spatial attention as predicted by a systems-level model of visual attention. European Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 2035–2045.CrossRefPubMed Zirnsak, M., Beuth, F., & Hamker, F. H. (2011). Split of spatial attention as predicted by a systems-level model of visual attention. European Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 2035–2045.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
First unitary, then divided: the temporal dynamics of dividing attention
Auteurs
Lisa N. Jefferies
Joseph B. Witt
Publicatiedatum
24-04-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 7/2019
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1018-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2019

Psychological Research 7/2019 Naar de uitgave