Abstract
When two sequential targets (T1 and T2) are presented within about 600 msec, perception of the second target is impaired. This attentional blink (AB) has been studied by means of two paradigms: rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), in which targets are embedded in a stream of central distractors, and the two-target paradigm, in which targets are presented eccentrically without distractors. We examined the role of distractors in the AB, using a modified two-target paradigm with a central stream of task-irrelevant distractors. In six experiments, the RSVP stream of distractors substantially impaired identification of both T1 and T2, but only when the distractors shared common characteristics with the targets. Without such commonalities, the distractors had no effect on performance. This points to the subjects’ attentional control setting as an important factor in the AB deficit and suggests a conceptual link between the AB and a form of nonspatial contingent capture attributable to distractor processing.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachmann, T., &Allik, J. (1976). Integration and interruption in the masking of form by form.Perception,5, 79–97.
Bacon, W. F., &Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.Perception & Psychophysics,55, 485–496.
Breitmeyer, B. G. (1984).Visual masking: An integrative approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Broadbent, D. E., &Broadbent, M. H. P. (1987). From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 105–113.
Chun, M. M., &Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 109–127.
Di Lollo, V. (1980). Temporal integration in visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 75–97.
Duncan, J. (1980). The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli.Psychological Review,87, 272–300.
Duncan, J., Ward, R., &Shapiro, K. L. (1994). Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision.Nature,369, 313–315.
Eriksen, C. W. (1995). The flankers task and response competition: A useful tool for investigating a variety of cognitive problems.Visual Cognition,2, 101–118.
Eriksen, C. W., &St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 225–240.
Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., &Egeth, H. E. (2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink.Perception & Psychophysics,64, 741–753.
Folk, C. L., &Remington, R. W. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 847–858.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R.W., &Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1030–1044.
Gatti, S. V., &Egeth, H. E. (1978). Failure of spatial selectivity in vision.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,11, 181–184.
Ghorashi, S. M. S., Zuvic, S. M., Visser, T. A. W., &Di Lollo, V. (2003). Focal distraction: Spatial shifts of attention are not required for contingent capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,29, 78–91.
Gibson, B. S., &Kelsey, E. M. (1998). Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 699–706.
Giesbrecht, B. L., &Di Lollo, V. (1998). Beyond the attentional blink: Visual masking by object substitution.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1454–1466.
Hoffman, J. E. (1979). A two-stage model of visual search.Perception & Psychophysics,25, 319–327.
Isaak, M. I., Shapiro, K. L., &Martin, J. (1999). The attentional blink reflects retrieval competition among multiple rapid serial visual presentation items: Tests of an interference model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 1774–1792.
Lavie, N., &Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 183–197.
Maki, W. S., Bussard, G., Lopez, K., &Digby, B. (2003). Sources of interference in the attentional blink: Target-distractor similarity revisited.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 188–201.
Milliken, B., Lupiáñez, J., Debner, J., &Abello, B. (1999). Automatic and controlled processing in Stroop negative priming: The role of attentional set.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 1384–1402.
Oyama, T., Watanabe, T., &Funakawa, M. (1983). Effects of test-mask similarity on forward and backward masking of pattern by patterns.Psychological Research,45, 303–313.
Pan, K., &Eriksen, C.W. (1993). Attentional distribution in the visual field duringsame-different judgments as assessed by response competition.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 134–144.
Potter, M. C., Chun, M. M., Banks, B. S., &Muckenhoupt, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink on an amodal task-switch deficit.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,24, 979–992.
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., &Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 849–860.
Scheerer, E. (1973). Integration, interruption and processing rate in visual backward masking.Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung,36, 71–93.
Shapiro, K. L., Arnell, K. M., &Raymond, J. E. (1997). The attentional blink.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,1, 291–296.
Shapiro, K. L., &Raymond, J. E. (1994). Temporal allocation of visual attention: Inhibition or interference? In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.),Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 151–188). San Diego: Academic Press.
Shapiro, K. L., Raymond, J. E., &Arnell, K. M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in RSVP.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 357–371.
Sperling, G., &Weichselgartner, E. (1995). Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention.Psychological Review,102, 503–532.
Visser, T. A. W., Bischof, W. F., &Di Lollo, V. (1999). Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains: Evidence from the attentional blink.Psychological Bulletin,125, 458–469.
Ward, R., Duncan, J., &Shapiro, K. (1997). Effects of similarity, difficulty, and nontarget presentation on the time course of visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics,59, 593–600.
Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1 202–238.
Yeh, Y. Y., &Eriksen, C.W. (1984). Name codes and features in the discrimination of letter forms.Perception & Psychophysics,36, 225–233.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by an Izaak Walton Killam Memorial Predoctoral Fellowship to the first author and by research grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to the second and third authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Visser, T.A.W., Bischof, W.F. & Di Lollo, V. Rapid serial visual distraction: Task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics 66, 1418–1432 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195008
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195008