Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
In a series of experiments, we tested the hypothesis that severely degraded viewing conditions during locomotion distort the perception of distance traveled. Some research suggests that there is little-to-no systematic error in perceiving closer distances from a static viewpoint with severely degraded acuity and contrast sensitivity (which we will refer to as blur). However, several related areas of research—extending across domains of perception, attention, and spatial learning—suggest that degraded acuity and contrast sensitivity would affect estimates of distance traveled during locomotion. In a first experiment, we measured estimations of distance traveled in a real-world locomotion task and found that distances were overestimated with blur compared to normal vision using two measures: verbal reports and visual matching (Experiments 1 a, b, and c). In Experiment 2, participants indicated their estimate of the length of a previously traveled path by actively walking an equivalent distance in a viewing condition that either matched their initial path (e.g., blur/blur) or did not match (e.g., blur/normal). Overestimation in blur was found only when participants learned the path in blur and made estimates in normal vision (not in matched blur learning/judgment trials), further suggesting a reliance on dynamic visual information in estimates of distance traveled. In Experiment 3, we found evidence that perception of speed is similarly affected by the blur vision condition, showing an overestimation in perception of speed experienced in wheelchair locomotion during blur compared to normal vision. Taken together, our results demonstrate that severely degraded acuity and contrast sensitivity may increase people’s tendency to overestimate perception of distance traveled, perhaps because of an increased perception of speed of self-motion.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Bochsler, T. M., Legge, G. E., Gage, R., & Kallie, C. S. (2013). Recognition of ramps and steps by people with low vision. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 54(1), 288–294. CrossRef
Frenz, H., Lappe, M., Kolesnik, M., & Bülhrmann, T. (2007). Estimation of travel distance from visual motion in virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 4(1), 1–18. CrossRef
Kalia, A. A., Schrater, P. R., & Legge, G. E. (2013). Combining path integration and remembered landmarks when navigating without vision. PLoS ONE, 8(9), e72170.
Kuyk, T., & Elliott, J. L. (1999). Visual factors and mobility in persons with age-related macular degeneration. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 36(4), 303–312. PubMed
Lappin, J. S., Shelton, A. L., & Rieser, J. J. (2006). Environmental context influences visually perceived distance. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(4), 571–581. CrossRef
Larish, J. F., & Flach, J. M. (1990). Sources of optical information useful for perception of speed of rectilinear self-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(2), 295. PubMed
Loomis, J. M., Silva, J. A. D., Fujita, N., & Fukusima, S. S. (1992). Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 906–921. PubMed
Magel, S. G., & Sadalla, E. K. (1980). The perception of traversed distance. Environment and Behavior, 12(1), 65–79. CrossRef
Mohler, B. J., Thompson, W. B., Creem-Regehr, S. H., Willemsen, P., Pick, H. L. Jr., & Rieser, J. J. (2007). Calibration of locomotion resulting from visual motion in a treadmill-based virtual environment. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 4(1), 1–15. CrossRef
Pelli, D. G. (1987). The visual requirements of mobility. Low vision: principles and applications, (pp. 134–146).
Pretto, P., & Chatziastros, A. (2006). Changes in optic flow and scene contrast affect the driving speed Driving Simulation Conference Europe, (pp. 263–272).
Rand, K. M., Barhorst-Cates, E. M., & Creem-Regehr, S. H. (2016). Overestimation of distance traveled with degraded vision: Evidence from walking and wheeling. Poster presented at Spatial Cognition 2016, Philadelphia.
Rand, K. M., Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Thompson, W. B. (2015). Spatial learning while navigating with severely degraded viewing: The role of attention and mobility monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 41(3), 649–664.
Sargent, J. Q., Zacks, J. M., Philbeck, J. W., & Flores, S. (2013). Distraction shrinks space. Memory & Cognition, 41(5), 769–780. CrossRef
Stone, L. S., & Thompson, P. (1992). Human speed perception is contrast dependent. Vision Research, 12(8), 1535–1549. CrossRef
Sun, H.-J., Lee, A., Campos, J. L., Chan, G. S. W., & Zhang, D. H. (2003). Multisensory integration in speed estimation during self-motion in a virtual environment. CyberPsychology and Behaviour, 6(5), 509–518. CrossRef
Tarampi, M. R., Creem-Regehr, S. H., & Thompson, W. B. (2010). Intact spatial updating with severely degraded vision. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(1), 23–27. CrossRef
Thompson, W. B., Legge, G. E., Kersten, D. J., Shakespeare, R. A., & Lei, Q. (2017). Simulating visibility under reduced acuity and contrast sensitivity. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. Optics and Image Science, 34(4), 583–593. CrossRef
Turano, K. A., Broman, A. T., Bandeen-Roche, K., Munoz, B., Rubin, G. S., & West, S. K. (2004). Association of visual field loss and mobility performance in older adults: Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study. Optometry & Vision Science, 81(5), 298–307. CrossRef
Warren, W. H., & Hannon, D. J. (1988). Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical flow. Nature, 336, 162–163. CrossRef
- Going the distance and beyond: simulated low vision increases perception of distance traveled during locomotion
Kristina M. Rand
Erica M. Barhorst-Cates
William B. Thompson
Sarah H. Creem-Regehr
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
An International Journal of Perception, Attention, Memory, and Action
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772