Abstract
When two targets are embedded in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream of distractors, perception of the second target is impaired if the intertarget lag is relatively short (less than 500 msec). This phenomenon, calledattentional blink, has been attributed to a temporal inability of attentional resources. Nevertheless, a recent study found that observers could monitor two RSVP streams concurrently for up to four items presented in close succession, suggesting a much larger visual capacity limit. However, such high-capacity performance could be obtained by a rapid shift of attention, rather than concurrent monitoring of multiple locations. Therefore, the present study examined these alternatives. Results from six experiments indicate that observers can concurrently monitor two noncontiguous locations, even when targets and distractors are from different categories, such as digits, English alphabet letters, Japanese characters, and pseudocharacters. These results can be explained in terms of a modified input-filtering model in which a multidimensional attentional set can be flexibly configured at different spatial locations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnell, K. M., &Jolicoeur, P. (1999). The attentional blink across stimulus modalities: Evidence for central processing limitations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,25, 630–648.
Awh, E., &Pashler, H. (2000). Evidence for split attentional foci.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,26, 834–846.
Bowman, H., &Wyble, B. (2007). The simultaneous type, serial token model of temporal attention and working memory.Psychological Review,114, 38–70.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox.Spatial Vision,10, 433–436.
Broadbent, D. E., &Broadbent, M. H. P. (1987). From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 105–113.
Chun, M. M., &Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 109–127.
Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J., Ghorashi, S. M. S., &Enns, J. T. (2005). The attentional blink: Resource limitation or temporary loss of control?Psychological Research,69, 191–200.
Dux, P. E., &Coltheart, V. (2005). The meaning of the mask matters: Evidence of conceptual interference in the attentional blink.Psychological Science,16, 775–779.
Egly, R., &Homa, D. (1991). Reallocation of visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 142–159.
Eriksen, C. W., &Murphy, T. D. (1987). Movement of attentional focus across the visual field: A critical look at the evidence.Perception & Psychophysics,42, 299–305.
Evans, K. K., &Treisman, A. (2005). Perception of objects in natural scenes: Is it really attention free?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,31, 1476–1492.
Giesbrecht, B., &Di Lollo, V. (1998). Beyond the attentional blink: Visual masking by object substitution.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1454–1466.
Hahn, S., &Kramer, A. F. (1998). Further evidence of division of attention over noncontiguous visual field.Visual Cognition,5, 217–256.
Jolicoeur, P., &Dell’Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of shortterm consolidation.Cognitive Psychology,36, 138–202.
Joseph, J. S., Chun, M. M., &Nakayama, K. (1997). Attentional requirements in a “preattentive” feature search task.Nature,387, 805–807.
Kawahara, J. (2002). Facilitation of local information processing in the attentional blink as indexed by the shooting line illusion.Psychological Research,66, 116–123.
Kawahara, J., Kumada, T., &Di Lollo, V. (2006). The attentional blink is governed by a temporary loss of control.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,13, 886–890.
Kawahara, J., &Yamada, Y. (2006). Two noncontiguous locations can be attended concurrently: Evidence from the attentional blink.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,13, 594–599.
Kawahara, J., Zuvic, S. M., Enns, J. T., &Di Lollo, V. (2003). Task switching mediates the attentional blink even without backward masking.Perception & Psychophysics,65, 339–351.
Kirchner, H., &Thorpe, S. J. (2006). Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: Visual processing speed revisited.Vision Research,46, 1762–1776.
Kramer, A. F., &Hahn, S. (1995) Splitting the beam: Distribution of attention over noncontiguous regions of the visual field.Psychological Science,6, 381–386.
Kunar, M. A., Shapiro, K. L., &Humphreys, G. W. (2006). Top-up search and the attentional blink: A two-stage account of the preview effect in search.Visual Cognition,13, 677–699.
LaBerge, D. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 371–379.
Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 451–468.
Li, F. F., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., &Perona, P. (2002). Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,99, 9596–9601.
Luck, S. J., &Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.Nature,390, 279–281.
Mack, A., &Rock, I. (1998).Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Most, S. B., Scholl, B. J., Clifford, E. R., &Simons, D. J. (2005). What you see is what you set: Sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness.Psychological Review,112, 217–242.
Olivers, C. N., Van der Stigchel, S., &Hulleman, J. (2007). Spreading the sparing: Against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink.Psychological Research,71, 126–139.
Pashler, H. E. (1997).The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Peterson, L. R., &Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items.Journal of Experimental Psychology,58, 193–109.
Potter, M. C., Staub, A., &O’Connor, D. H. (2002). The time course of competition for attention: Attention is initially labile.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 1149–1162.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1989). The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial indexing model.Cognition,32, 65–97.
Rodriguez-Fornells, A., Rotte, M., Heinze, H.-J., Nösselt, T., &Münte, T. F. (2002). Brain potential and functional MRI evidence for how to handle two languages with one brain.Nature,415, 1026–1029.
Rogers, R. D., &Monsell, S. (1995). The costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 207–231.
Ryan, T. A. (1960). Significance tests for multiple comparison of proportions, variances, and other statistics.Psychological Bulletin,57, 318–328.
Sagi, D., &Julesz, B. (1985). “Where” and “what” in vision.Science,228, 1217–1219.
Shapiro, K. [L.] (2001).The limits of attention: Temporal constraints in human information processing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shapiro, K. L., Arnell, K. M., &Raymond, J. E. (1997). The attentional blink.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,1, 291–296.
Shapiro, K. L., Raymond, J. E., &Arnell, K. M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 357–371.
Simons, D. J., &Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events.Perception,28, 1059–1074.
Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations.Psychological Monographs,74, 1–29.
Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., &Johnston, W. A. (2003). Cell phoneinduced failures of visual attention during simulated driving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,9, 23–32.
Tsal, Y. (1983). Movements of attention across the visual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,9, 523–530.
Visser, T. A. W., Bischof, W. F., &Di Lollo, V. (1999). Attentional switching in spatial and non-spatial domains: Evidence from the attentional blink.Psychological Bulletin,125, 458–469.
Visser, T. A., Bischof, W. F., &Di Lollo, V. (2004). Rapid serial visual distraction: Task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink.Perception & Psychophysics,66, 1418–1432.
Ward, R., Duncan, J., &Shapiro, K. (1996). The slow time-course of visual attention.Cognitive Psychology,30, 79–109.
Xu, Y., &Chun, M. M. (2006). Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects.Nature,440, 91–95.
Yokosawa, K., &Kumada, T. (2003). Voluntary aspects of attentional control setting for detecting a feature-defined target.Japanese Psychological Research,45, 1–14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yamada, Y., Kawahara, JI. Dividing attention between two different categories and locations in rapid serial visual presentations. Perception & Psychophysics 69, 1218–1229 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193957
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193957