Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Getting along with peers becomes increasingly important to health and well-being during early adolescence (10–14 years). Young adolescents may succeed with peers when they are well-liked by and popular among the larger peer group (or at the group-level of social complexity). They might also fare well with peers when they are able to form numerous mutual and high quality friendships (at the dyadic-level of social complexity). Theory emphasizes the interrelatedness of different types of peer experiences, but few longitudinal studies have examined the interplay among and between group- and dyadic-level peer experiences in the same study. As a result, it is not known whether group-level peer experiences are predictors of dyadic-level peer experiences, and/or vice versa. To address this limitation, this study examined the prospective and reciprocal relations between four indices of peer experiences, preference (or being highly liked and not disliked by peers), popularity (or having a reputation as popular), friendship quantity (or having many mutual friends), and friendship or relationship quality, during early adolescence. Participants were 271 adolescents (49% girls; Mage = 11.52 years) who completed peer nominations of preference and popularity, a self-report measure of friendship quality, and nominated friends at two waves (Wave 1: November, Grade 6; Wave 2: October, Grade 7). Structural equation modeling indicated that friendship quantity predicted increases in preference and popularity and that friendship quality predicted increases in friendship quantity. Initial popularity was associated with decreases in preference. The importance of these findings for future research is discussed along with study limitations.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Asher, S. R., & McDonald, K. L. (2009). The behavioral basis of acceptance, rejection, and perceived popularity. In K. H. Rubin, W. Bukowski & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups: Social, emotional, and personality development in context (pp. 232–248). New York: Guilford Press.
Badaly, D., Schwartz, D., & Gorman, A. H. (2012). Social status, perceived social reputations, and perceived dyadic relationships in early adolescence. Social Development, 21, 482–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00646.x. CrossRef
Brendgen, M., Little, T. D., & Krappmann, L. (2000). Rejected children and their friends: A shared evaluation of friendship quality? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 45–70.
Bukowski, W. M., Hoza, B., & Boivin, M. (1994). Measuring friendship quality during pre- and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of the friendship qualities scales. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 471–484. CrossRef
Bukowski, W. M., Pizzamiglio, M. T., Newcomb, A. F., & Hoza, B. (1996). Popularity as an affordance for friendship: The link between group and dyadic experience. Social Development, 5, 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.1996.tb00080.x. CrossRef
Bukowski, W. M., Sippola, L. K., & Newcomb, A. F. (2000). Variations in patterns of attraction to same- and other-sex peers during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 36, 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1622.214.171.124. CrossRefPubMed
Cillessen, A. H. N. (2009). Sociometric methods. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups: Social, emotional, and personality development in context (pp. 82–99). New York: Guildford Press.
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Borch, C. (2006). Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: A growth curve modelling analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 935–959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.05.005. CrossRefPubMed
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x. CrossRefPubMed
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-16126.96.36.1997. CrossRef
Demir, M., & Urberg, K. A. (2004). Friendship and adjustment among adolescents. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1015/j.jecp.2004.02.006. CrossRefPubMed
Dijkstra, J. K., Cillessen, A. H. N., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2010). Basking in reflected glory and its limits: Why adolescents hang out with popular peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 942–958. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00671.x. CrossRef
Ellis, W., & Zarbatany, L. (2007). Explaining friendship formation and friendship stability: The role of children’s and friends’ aggression and victimization. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 53, 79–104. CrossRef
Gorman, A. H., Schwartz, D., Nakomoto, J., & Mayeux, L. (2011). Unpopularity and disliking among peers: Partially distinct dimensions of adolescents’ social experiences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2011.05.001. CrossRef
Harrell, Jr., F. E. (2001). Regression modeling strategies. New York: Springer-Verlag. CrossRef
Hinde, R. A. (1979). Towards understanding relationships. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Hinde, R. A. (1987). Individuals, relationships and culture. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guildford Press.
LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38, 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-16188.8.131.525. CrossRefPubMed
Landsford, J. E., Putallaz, M., Grimes, C. L., Schiro-Osman, K. A., Kupersmidt, J. B., & Coie, J. D. (2006). Perceptions of friendship quality and observed behaviors with friends: How do sociometrically rejected, average, and popular girls differ? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 694–719. CrossRef
Markovic, A., & Bowker, J. C. (2015). Social surrogacy and adjustment: Exploring the correlates of having a “social helper” for shy and non-shy young adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 176, 110–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2015.1007916. CrossRefPubMed
Markovic, A., & Bowker, J. C. (2017). Friends also matter: Examining friendship adjustment indices as moderators of anxious-withdrawal and trajectories of change in psychological maladjustment. Developmental Psychology, 53, 1462–1473. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000343. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Marks, P. E. L., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Crick, N. R. (2012). Popularity contagion among adolescents. Social Development, 21, 501–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00647.x. CrossRef
Mayeux, L., Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2008). Is being popular a risky proposition? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18, 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2008.00550.x. CrossRef
Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2011). Mplus user’s guide. 6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. .
Nangle, D. W., Erdley, C. A., Newman, J. E., Mason, C. A., & Carpenter, E. M. (2003). Popularity, friendship quantity, and friendship quality: Interactive influences on children’s loneliness and depression. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 32, 546–555. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424JCCP3204_7. CrossRef
Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and school dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29, 611–621. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-16184.108.40.2061. CrossRef
Pearlin, L. I. (1983). Role strains and personal stress. In H. B. Kaplan (Ed.), Psychosocial stress: Trends in theory and research. New York: Academic Press.
Poorthuis, A. M. G., Thomaes, S., Denissen, J. J. A., van Aken, M. A. G., & de Castro, B. O. (2012). Prosocial tendencies predict friendship quality, but not for popular children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112, 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.04.002. CrossRefPubMed
Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Rose, A. J., Swenson, L. P., & Carlson, W. (2004). Friendships of aggressive youth: Considering the influences of being disliked and of being perceived as popular. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 25–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2004.02.005. CrossRefPubMed
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Bowker, J. C. (2015). Children in peer groups. In M. Guha (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: vol. 4. Ecological settings and processes (7th ed.). (pp. 321–412). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed.). (pp. 571–645). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Schoffstall, C. L., & Cohen, R. (2011). Cyber aggression: The relation between online offenders and offline school competence. Social Development, 20, 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2011.00609.x. CrossRef
Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York, NY: Norton.
- An Examination of Reciprocal Associations Between Social Preference, Popularity, and Friendship during Early Adolescence
Miriam T. Stotsky
Julie C. Bowker
- Springer US