Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Dominance in the peer group is important for adolescents. Resource Control Theory posits that both coercive and prosocial (positively assertive) strategies are associated with dominance. Combining Resource Control Theory with Socioanalytic Theory on personality, we hypothesized that inspiring group members would be an additional effective strategy. This study examined whether the three behavioral strategies and two types of social skills (social competence and manipulation) predicted dominance (resource control and popularity). Participants were 619 Dutch adolescents (Mage = 13.1; 47% female) in the first grade of secondary school. They completed peer reports (behavioral strategies and dominance) and self-reports (social skills). Only inspirational and coercive strategies substantially predicted dominance. Main effects of social skills emerged. Moderation between strategies and social skills was only observed for girls (e.g., coercive strategy use was associated with more popularity for girls with higher levels of social manipulation skills). This study furthered our understanding of the predictors of dominance in adolescence by including inspirational behavior and examining prosocial and antisocial skills.
Brown, B. B. (2011). Popularity in peer group perspective. The role of status in adolescent peer systems. In A. H. N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 165–192). New York, NY: Guilford.
Brown, B. B., & Larson, J. (2009). Peer relationships in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed.). (pp. 74–103). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Bukowski, W. M., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Velásquez, A. M. (2012). Peer ratings. In B. Laursen, T. D. Little & N. A. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods (pp. 211–228). New York, NY: Guilford.
Buss, D. M. (1996). The evolutionary psychology of human social strategies. In E. T. Higgens & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 3–71). New York, NY: Guilford.
Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta‐analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x. CrossRefPubMed
Cillessen, A. H. N. (2011). Toward a theory of popularity. In A. H. N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 273–299). New York, NY: Guilford.
Cillessen, A. H. N., & Marks, P. E. L. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring popularity. In A. H. N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 25–56). New York, NY: Guilford.
Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 3rd edn. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dyches, K. D., & Mayeux, L. (2015). Popularity and resource control goals as predictors of adolescent indirect aggression. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 176, 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2015.1048661. CrossRefPubMed
Eder, D., Evans, C. C., & Parker, S. (1995). School talk: Gender and adolescent culture.. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239. https://www.journals.elsevier.com/social-networks/ CrossRef
Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 273–309. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2003.0013.
Hawley, P. H. (2007). Social dominance in childhood and adolescence: Why social competence and aggression may go hand in hand. In P. H. Hawley, T. D. Little & P. C. Rodkin (Eds.), Aggression and adaptation: The bright side to bad behavior (pp. 1–30). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hawley, P. H., Johnson, S. E., Mize, J. A., & McNamara (2007). Physical attractiveness in preschoolers: Relationships with power, status, aggression and social skills. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 499–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.04.001. CrossRef
Hogan, R. (1983). A socioanalytic theory of personality. In M.M. Page (Ed.), 1982 Nebraska symposium on motivation: Personality—current theory and research (pp. 55–89). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Hogan, R., & Blickle, G. (in press). Socioanalytic theory: Basic concepts, supporting evidences, and practical implications. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T.K. Shackelford (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of personality and individual differences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Hogan, R., & Shelton, D. (1998). A socioanalytic perspective on job performance. Human Performance, 11, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.1998.9668028. CrossRef
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60. http://www.ejbrm.com/main.html
Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Kosalka, T. (2009). The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 855–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.004. CrossRef
Keith, T. Z. (2006). Multiple regression and beyond. Boston, MA: Pearson.
LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38, 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-16184.108.40.2065. CrossRefPubMed
Massey, A. R., Byrd-Craven, J., & Swearingen, C. L. (2014). Preschool power play: Resource control strategies associated with health. Child Development Research, 2014, 1–7. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/cdr/2014/706547/cta/ CrossRef
Merrell, K. W., Cohn, B. P., & Tom, K. M. (2011). Development and validation of a teacher report measure for assessing social-emotional strengths of children and adolescents. School Psychology Review, 40, 226–241. http://naspjournals.org/loi/spsr?code=naps-site
Olthof, T., Goossens, F. A., Vermande, M. M., Aleva, E. A., & van der Meulen, M. (2011). Bullying as strategic behaviour: Relations with desired and acquired dominance in the peer group. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2011.03.003. CrossRefPubMed
Ostrov, J. M., & Guzzo, J. L. (2015). Prospective associations between prosocial behavior and social dominance in early childhood: are sharers the best leaders? The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 176, 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2015.1018860. CrossRefPubMed
Pellegrini, A. D. (2007). Is aggression adaptive? Yes: Some kinds are and in some ways. In P. H. Hawley, T. D. Little & P. C. Rodkin (Eds.), Aggression and adaptation: The bright side to bad behavior (pp. 85–105). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pellegrini, A. D, Roseth, C. J, Ryzin, Van, M. J. & Solberg, D. W. (2011). Popularity as a form of social dominance: An evolutionary perspective. In A.H.N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz, & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system. (pp. 123–139). New York, NY: Guilford.
Preacher, K., Curran, P. J., Bauer, D. J. (2010–2017). Simple intercepts, simple slopes, and regions of significance in MLR 2-way interactions. Retrieved from http://www.quantpsy.org/interact/mlr2.htm
Richardson, J. T. E. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6, 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001. CrossRef
Rigby, K. (2007). Bullying in schools: and what to do about it (rev. ed.). Camberwell, Australia: Acer.
Riggio, R. E. (1986). Assessment of basic social skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 649–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.1998.9668028. CrossRef
Rose, A. J., Swenson, L. P., & Waller, E. M. (2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40, 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-16220.127.116.118. CrossRefPubMed
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W., & Bowker, J. (2015). Children in peer groups. In M. Bornstein & T. Leventhal (Volume Eds.) and R. M. Lerner (Series Ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science (formerly The Handbook of Child Psychology), (Vol. 4: Ecological settings and processes, 7th ed., pp. 175–22). New York, NY: Wiley.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Sibley, C. G. (2008). Utilities for examining interactions in multiple regression [computer software]. Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland.
Wargo Aikens, J., & Litwack, S. D. (2011). Prosocial skills, social competence, and popularity. In A. H. N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz & L. Mayeux (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 140–162). New York, NY: Guilford.
Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. New York, NY: Bloomsburry.
Willer, E. K., & Cupach, W. R. (2010). The meaning of social aggression in girls: Nasty or mastery? In W. R. Cupach & B. H. Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of close relationships (2nd Ed.). (pp. 297–326). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Yamano, T. (2009). Lecture notes on advanced econometrics. Lecture 9: Heteroskedasticity and robust estimators. Retrieved from http://studylib.net/doc/8680053/lecture-9--heteroskedasticity-and-robust-estimators.
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Collins, W. A. (2003). Autonomy development during adolescence. In G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 175–204). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
- Is Inspiring Group Members an Effective Predictor of Social Dominance in Early Adolescence? Direct and Moderated Effects of Behavioral Strategies, Social Skills, and Gender on Resource Control and Popularity
Marjolijn M. Vermande
Patricia A. Gilholm
Albert H. A. Reijntjes
Dave J. Hessen
Elisabeth H. M. Sterck
Anne M. Overduin-de Vries
- Springer US