Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 2/2016

13-03-2015 | Original Article

Temporal processing characteristics of the Ponzo illusion

Auteurs: Filipp Schmidt, Anke Haberkamp

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 2/2016

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Many visual illusions result from assumptions of our visual system that are based on its long-term adaptation to our visual environment. Thus, visual illusions provide the opportunity to identify and learn about these fundamental assumptions. In this paper, we investigate the Ponzo illusion. Although many previous studies researched visual processing of the Ponzo illusion, only very few considered temporal processing aspects. However, it is well known that our visual percept is modulated by temporal factors. First, we used the Ponzo illusion as prime in a response priming task to test whether it modulates subsequent responses to the longer (or shorter) of two target bars. Second, we used the same stimuli in a perceptual task to test whether the Ponzo illusion is effective for very short presentation times (12 ms). We observed considerable priming effects that were of similar magnitude as those of a control condition. Moreover, the variations in the priming effects as a function of prime-target stimulus-onset asynchrony were very similar to that of the control condition. However, when analyzing priming effects as a function of participants’ response speed, effects for the Ponzo illusion increased in slower responses. We conclude that although the illusion is established rapidly within the visual system, the full integration of context information is based on more time-consuming and later visual processing.
Literatuur
go back to reference Bachmann, T. (2006). Microgenesis of perception: conceptual, psychophysical, and neurobiological aspects. In H. Öğmen & B. G. Breitmeyer (Eds.), The first half second: the microgenesis and temporal dynamics of unconscious and conscious visual processes (pp. 11–33). Cambridge: MIT Press. Bachmann, T. (2006). Microgenesis of perception: conceptual, psychophysical, and neurobiological aspects. In H. Öğmen & B. G. Breitmeyer (Eds.), The first half second: the microgenesis and temporal dynamics of unconscious and conscious visual processes (pp. 11–33). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Bruno, N. (2001). When does action resist visual illusions? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 379–382.CrossRefPubMed Bruno, N. (2001). When does action resist visual illusions? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 379–382.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: a simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45. Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: a simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45.
go back to reference de Brouwer, A. J., Brenner, E., Medendorp, W. P., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2014). Time course of the effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccades and perceptual judgments. Journal of Vision, 14(4), 1–11.CrossRef de Brouwer, A. J., Brenner, E., Medendorp, W. P., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2014). Time course of the effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on saccades and perceptual judgments. Journal of Vision, 14(4), 1–11.CrossRef
go back to reference de’Sperati, C., & Baud-Bovy, G. (2008). Blind saccades: an asynchrony between seeing and looking. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28(17), 4317–4321.CrossRefPubMed de’Sperati, C., & Baud-Bovy, G. (2008). Blind saccades: an asynchrony between seeing and looking. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28(17), 4317–4321.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Doherty, M. J., Campbell, N. M., Tsuji, H., & Phillips, W. A. (2010). The Ebbinghaus illusion deceives adults but not young children. Developmental Science, 13(5), 714–721.CrossRefPubMed Doherty, M. J., Campbell, N. M., Tsuji, H., & Phillips, W. A. (2010). The Ebbinghaus illusion deceives adults but not young children. Developmental Science, 13(5), 714–721.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Eagleman, D. M. (2001). Visual illusions and neurobiology. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 920–926.CrossRefPubMed Eagleman, D. M. (2001). Visual illusions and neurobiology. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 920–926.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Fang, F., Boyaci, H., Kersten, D., & Murray, S. O. (2008). Attention-dependent representation of a size illusion in human V1. Current Biology, 18, 1707–1712.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Fang, F., Boyaci, H., Kersten, D., & Murray, S. O. (2008). Attention-dependent representation of a size illusion in human V1. Current Biology, 18, 1707–1712.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Foster, R. M., & Franz, V. H. (2014). Superadditivity of the Ebbinghaus and Müller-Lyer illusions depends on the method of comparison used. Perception, 43, 783–795.CrossRefPubMed Foster, R. M., & Franz, V. H. (2014). Superadditivity of the Ebbinghaus and Müller-Lyer illusions depends on the method of comparison used. Perception, 43, 783–795.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gajewski, D. A., Philbeck, J. W., Pothier, S., & Chichka, D. (2010). From the most fleeting of glimpses: on the time course for the extraction of distance information. Psychological Science, 21, 1446–1453.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Gajewski, D. A., Philbeck, J. W., Pothier, S., & Chichka, D. (2010). From the most fleeting of glimpses: on the time course for the extraction of distance information. Psychological Science, 21, 1446–1453.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gregory, R. L. (1966). Eye and brain. The psychology of seeing. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson. Gregory, R. L. (1966). Eye and brain. The psychology of seeing. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
go back to reference Gregory, R. L. (2005). The Medawar lecture 2001 knowledge for vision: vision for knowledge. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360, 1231–1251.CrossRef Gregory, R. L. (2005). The Medawar lecture 2001 knowledge for vision: vision for knowledge. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 360, 1231–1251.CrossRef
go back to reference Hamburger, K., Hansen, T., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2007). Geometric-optical illusions at isoluminance. Vision Research, 47, 3276–3285.CrossRefPubMed Hamburger, K., Hansen, T., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2007). Geometric-optical illusions at isoluminance. Vision Research, 47, 3276–3285.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hegdé, J. (2008). Time course of visual perception: coarse-to-fine processing and beyond. Progress in Neurobiology, 84, 405–439.CrossRefPubMed Hegdé, J. (2008). Time course of visual perception: coarse-to-fine processing and beyond. Progress in Neurobiology, 84, 405–439.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hochstein, S., & Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the top: hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron, 36, 791–804.CrossRefPubMed Hochstein, S., & Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the top: hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron, 36, 791–804.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Howe, C. Q., & Purves, D. (2004). Size contrast and assimilation explained by the statistics of natural scene geometry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 90–102.CrossRefPubMed Howe, C. Q., & Purves, D. (2004). Size contrast and assimilation explained by the statistics of natural scene geometry. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 90–102.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Howe, C. Q., & Purves, D. (2005a). Natural-scene geometry predicts the perception of angles and line orientation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 102, 1228–1233.CrossRef Howe, C. Q., & Purves, D. (2005a). Natural-scene geometry predicts the perception of angles and line orientation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 102, 1228–1233.CrossRef
go back to reference Howe, C. Q., & Purves, D. (2005b). The Müller-Lyer illusion explained by the statistics of image-source relationships. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 102, 1234–1239.CrossRef Howe, C. Q., & Purves, D. (2005b). The Müller-Lyer illusion explained by the statistics of image-source relationships. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 102, 1234–1239.CrossRef
go back to reference Hu, Y., & Goodale, M. A. (2000). Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 856–868.CrossRefPubMed Hu, Y., & Goodale, M. A. (2000). Grasping after a delay shifts size-scaling from absolute to relative metrics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 856–868.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jacob, J., Breitmeyer, B. G., & Treviño, M. (2013). Tracking the first two seconds: three stages of visual information processing? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1114–1119.CrossRef Jacob, J., Breitmeyer, B. G., & Treviño, M. (2013). Tracking the first two seconds: three stages of visual information processing? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1114–1119.CrossRef
go back to reference Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Pohl, C., Berner, M. P., & Hoffmann, J. (2009). Playing chess unconsciously. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), 292–298.CrossRefPubMed Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., Pohl, C., Berner, M. P., & Hoffmann, J. (2009). Playing chess unconsciously. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(1), 292–298.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Klotz, W., Heumann, M., Ansorge, U., & Neumann, O. (2007). Electrophysiological activation by masked primes: independence of prime-related and target-related activities. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 449–465.PubMedCentralCrossRef Klotz, W., Heumann, M., Ansorge, U., & Neumann, O. (2007). Electrophysiological activation by masked primes: independence of prime-related and target-related activities. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 3, 449–465.PubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Klotz, W., & Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976–992. Klotz, W., & Neumann, O. (1999). Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 976–992.
go back to reference Klotz, W., & Wolff, P. (1995). The effect of a masked stimulus on the response to the masking stimulus. Psychological Research, 58, 92–101.CrossRefPubMed Klotz, W., & Wolff, P. (1995). The effect of a masked stimulus on the response to the masking stimulus. Psychological Research, 58, 92–101.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lamme, V. A. (2006). Towards a true neural stance on consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 494–501.CrossRefPubMed Lamme, V. A. (2006). Towards a true neural stance on consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 494–501.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lamme, V. A. F., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 571–579.CrossRefPubMed Lamme, V. A. F., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 571–579.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Levine, T. R., & Hullet, C. R. (2002). Eta squared, partial eta squared, and misreporting of effect sizes in communication research. Human Communication Research, 28, 612–625.CrossRef Levine, T. R., & Hullet, C. R. (2002). Eta squared, partial eta squared, and misreporting of effect sizes in communication research. Human Communication Research, 28, 612–625.CrossRef
go back to reference Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476–490.CrossRef Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476–490.CrossRef
go back to reference Luccio, R. (1969). The temporal maximum of Ponzo’s illusion in adults. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 94–96, 55–61. Luccio, R. (1969). The temporal maximum of Ponzo’s illusion in adults. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 94–96, 55–61.
go back to reference Mattler, U. (2005). Inhibition and decay of motor and nonmotor priming. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, 285–300.CrossRefPubMed Mattler, U. (2005). Inhibition and decay of motor and nonmotor priming. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, 285–300.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference McCarley, J. S., Kramer, A. F., & DiGirolamo, G. J. (2003). Differential effects of the Müller-Lyer illusion on reflexive and voluntary saccades. Journal of Vision, 3(11), 9.CrossRef McCarley, J. S., Kramer, A. F., & DiGirolamo, G. J. (2003). Differential effects of the Müller-Lyer illusion on reflexive and voluntary saccades. Journal of Vision, 3(11), 9.CrossRef
go back to reference Moore, C. M., & Egeth, H. (1997). Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 339–352.PubMed Moore, C. M., & Egeth, H. (1997). Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 339–352.PubMed
go back to reference Murray, S. O., Boyaci, H., & Kersten, D. (2006). The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 429–434.CrossRefPubMed Murray, S. O., Boyaci, H., & Kersten, D. (2006). The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 429–434.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nowak, L. G., & Bullier, J. (1997). The timing of information transfer in the visual system. In K. S. Rockland, J. H. Kaas, & A. Peters (Eds.), Cerebral cortex (volume 12 extrastriate cortex in primates) (pp. 205–241). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRef Nowak, L. G., & Bullier, J. (1997). The timing of information transfer in the visual system. In K. S. Rockland, J. H. Kaas, & A. Peters (Eds.), Cerebral cortex (volume 12 extrastriate cortex in primates) (pp. 205–241). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Ögmen, H., & Breitmeyer, B. G. (2006). The first half second: temporal dynamics of conscious and unconscious visual processing. Cambridge: MIT Press. Ögmen, H., & Breitmeyer, B. G. (2006). The first half second: temporal dynamics of conscious and unconscious visual processing. Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Oyama, T., & Morikawa, K. (1985). Temporal development of optical illusions. In J. L. McGaugh (Ed.), Contemporary psychology: biological processes and theoretical issues (pp. 385–393). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Oyama, T., & Morikawa, K. (1985). Temporal development of optical illusions. In J. L. McGaugh (Ed.), Contemporary psychology: biological processes and theoretical issues (pp. 385–393). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
go back to reference Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology (Vol. 1). Cambridge: MIT press. Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology (Vol. 1). Cambridge: MIT press.
go back to reference Piaget, J. (1969). The Mechanisms of. Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Piaget, J. (1969). The Mechanisms of. Perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
go back to reference Piaget, J., & Matalon, B. (1958). Note on the law of the temporal maximum of some optico-geometric illusions. The American Journal of Psychology, 71, 277–282.CrossRefPubMed Piaget, J., & Matalon, B. (1958). Note on the law of the temporal maximum of some optico-geometric illusions. The American Journal of Psychology, 71, 277–282.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Plewan, T., Weidner, R., & Fink, G. R. (2012). The influence of stimulus duration on visual illusions and simple reaction time. Experimental Brain Research, 223, 367–375.CrossRefPubMed Plewan, T., Weidner, R., & Fink, G. R. (2012). The influence of stimulus duration on visual illusions and simple reaction time. Experimental Brain Research, 223, 367–375.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ponzo, M. (1911). Intorno ad alcune illusioni nel campo delle sensazioni tattili sull’illusione di Aristotele e fenomeni analoghi [On some tactile illusions, Aristotle’s illusion, and similar phenomena]. Archive für die Gesamte Psychologie, 16, 307–345. Ponzo, M. (1911). Intorno ad alcune illusioni nel campo delle sensazioni tattili sull’illusione di Aristotele e fenomeni analoghi [On some tactile illusions, Aristotle’s illusion, and similar phenomena]. Archive für die Gesamte Psychologie, 16, 307–345.
go back to reference Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446–461.CrossRefPubMed Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446–461.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Reynolds, R. I. (1978). The microgenetic development of the Ponzo and Zöllner illusions. Perception and Psychophysics, 23, 231–236.CrossRefPubMed Reynolds, R. I. (1978). The microgenetic development of the Ponzo and Zöllner illusions. Perception and Psychophysics, 23, 231–236.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Roelfsema, P. R. (2006). Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping. Annual Reviews in Neuroscience, 29, 203–227.CrossRef Roelfsema, P. R. (2006). Cortical algorithms for perceptual grouping. Annual Reviews in Neuroscience, 29, 203–227.CrossRef
go back to reference Schenk, T., Franz, V., & Bruno, N. (2011). Vision-for-perception and vision-for-action: which model is compatible with the available psychophysical and neuropsychological data? Vision Research, 51, 812–818.CrossRefPubMed Schenk, T., Franz, V., & Bruno, N. (2011). Vision-for-perception and vision-for-action: which model is compatible with the available psychophysical and neuropsychological data? Vision Research, 51, 812–818.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Schenk, T., & McIntosh, R. D. (2010). Do we have independent visual streams for perception and action? Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 52–62.CrossRefPubMed Schenk, T., & McIntosh, R. D. (2010). Do we have independent visual streams for perception and action? Cognitive Neuroscience, 1, 52–62.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Schmidt, T., Haberkamp, A., Veltkamp, G. M., Weber, A., Seydell-Greenwald, A., & Schmidt, F. (2011b). Visual processing in rapid-chase systems: image processing, attention, and awareness. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 169.PubMedCentralPubMed Schmidt, T., Haberkamp, A., Veltkamp, G. M., Weber, A., Seydell-Greenwald, A., & Schmidt, F. (2011b). Visual processing in rapid-chase systems: image processing, attention, and awareness. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 169.PubMedCentralPubMed
go back to reference Schmidt, T., Miksch, S., Bulganin, L., Jäger, F., Lossin, F., Jochum, J., & Kohl, P. (2010). Response priming driven by local contrast, not subjective brightness. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72, 1556–1568.CrossRef Schmidt, T., Miksch, S., Bulganin, L., Jäger, F., Lossin, F., Jochum, J., & Kohl, P. (2010). Response priming driven by local contrast, not subjective brightness. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72, 1556–1568.CrossRef
go back to reference Schmidt, T., Niehaus, S., & Nagel, A. (2006a). Primes and targets in rapid chases: tracing sequential waves of motor activation. Behavioral Neuroscience, 120, 1005–1016.CrossRefPubMed Schmidt, T., Niehaus, S., & Nagel, A. (2006a). Primes and targets in rapid chases: tracing sequential waves of motor activation. Behavioral Neuroscience, 120, 1005–1016.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Schmidt, T., Niehaus, S., & Nagel, A. (2006b). Primes and targets in rapid chases: tracing sequential waves of motor activation. Behavioural Neuroscience, 120, 1005–1016.CrossRef Schmidt, T., Niehaus, S., & Nagel, A. (2006b). Primes and targets in rapid chases: tracing sequential waves of motor activation. Behavioural Neuroscience, 120, 1005–1016.CrossRef
go back to reference Schmidt, F., & Schmidt, T. (2013). Grouping principles in direct competition. Vision Research, 88, 9–21.CrossRefPubMed Schmidt, F., & Schmidt, T. (2013). Grouping principles in direct competition. Vision Research, 88, 9–21.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Schmidt, F., & Schmidt, T. (2014). Rapid processing of closure and viewpoint-invariant symmetry: behavioral criteria for feedforward processing. Psychological Research, 78, 37–54.CrossRefPubMed Schmidt, F., & Schmidt, T. (2014). Rapid processing of closure and viewpoint-invariant symmetry: behavioral criteria for feedforward processing. Psychological Research, 78, 37–54.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Schmidt, T., & Vorberg, D. (2006). Criteria for unconscious cognition: three types of dissociation. Perception and Psychophysics, 68(3), 489–504.CrossRefPubMed Schmidt, T., & Vorberg, D. (2006). Criteria for unconscious cognition: three types of dissociation. Perception and Psychophysics, 68(3), 489–504.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Schmidt, F., Weber, A., & Schmidt, T. (2014). Activation of response force by self-splitting objects: where are the limits of feedforward Gestalt processing? Journal of Vision, 14(9):20, 1–16.CrossRef Schmidt, F., Weber, A., & Schmidt, T. (2014). Activation of response force by self-splitting objects: where are the limits of feedforward Gestalt processing? Journal of Vision, 14(9):20, 1–16.CrossRef
go back to reference Schwarzkopf, D. S., Song, C., & Rees, G. (2010). The surface area of human V1 predicts the subjective experience of object size. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 28–30.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Schwarzkopf, D. S., Song, C., & Rees, G. (2010). The surface area of human V1 predicts the subjective experience of object size. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 28–30.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Shi, Z., & de’Sperati, C. (2008). Motion-induced positional biases in the flash-lag configuration. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 1027–1038.CrossRefPubMed Shi, Z., & de’Sperati, C. (2008). Motion-induced positional biases in the flash-lag configuration. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 1027–1038.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Song, C., Schwarzkopf, D. S., & Rees, G. (2011). Interocular induction of illusory size perception. BMC Neuroscience, 12(27), 1–9. Song, C., Schwarzkopf, D. S., & Rees, G. (2011). Interocular induction of illusory size perception. BMC Neuroscience, 12(27), 1–9.
go back to reference Sugihara, T., Qiu, F. T., & von der Heydt, R. (2011). The speed of context integration in the visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 106, 374–385.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Sugihara, T., Qiu, F. T., & von der Heydt, R. (2011). The speed of context integration in the visual cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 106, 374–385.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference van Zoest, W., & Hunt, A. R. (2011). Saccadic eye movements and perceptual judgments reveal a shared visual representation that is increasingly accurate over time. Vision Research, 51, 111–119.CrossRefPubMed van Zoest, W., & Hunt, A. R. (2011). Saccadic eye movements and perceptual judgments reveal a shared visual representation that is increasingly accurate over time. Vision Research, 51, 111–119.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference van Zoest, W., Hunt, A. R., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Representations in Visual Cognition It’s About Time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 116–120.CrossRef van Zoest, W., Hunt, A. R., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Representations in Visual Cognition It’s About Time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 116–120.CrossRef
go back to reference Vath, N., & Schmidt, T. (2007). Tracing sequential waves of rapid visuomotor activation in lateralized readiness potentials. Neuroscience, 145, 197–208.CrossRefPubMed Vath, N., & Schmidt, T. (2007). Tracing sequential waves of rapid visuomotor activation in lateralized readiness potentials. Neuroscience, 145, 197–208.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 6275–6280.CrossRef Vorberg, D., Mattler, U., Heinecke, A., Schmidt, T., & Schwarzbach, J. (2003). Different time courses for visual perception and action priming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 6275–6280.CrossRef
go back to reference Weber, A., Noé, L., Hoffmann, L., Schmidt, T., & Schmidt, F. (2012). From physical to perceptual stimulus representations: Exploiting the Ebbinghaus illusion in a response priming paradigm. 35th European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP), Alghero, Italy. Weber, A., Noé, L., Hoffmann, L., Schmidt, T., & Schmidt, F. (2012). From physical to perceptual stimulus representations: Exploiting the Ebbinghaus illusion in a response priming paradigm. 35th European Conference on Visual Perception (ECVP), Alghero, Italy.
go back to reference Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view. In D. B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development (pp. 125–148). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Werner, H. (1957). The concept of development from a comparative and organismic point of view. In D. B. Harris (Ed.), The concept of development (pp. 125–148). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
go back to reference Zhou, H., Friedman, H. S., & von der Heydt, R. (2000). Coding of border ownership in monkey visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 6594–6611.PubMed Zhou, H., Friedman, H. S., & von der Heydt, R. (2000). Coding of border ownership in monkey visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 6594–6611.PubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Temporal processing characteristics of the Ponzo illusion
Auteurs
Filipp Schmidt
Anke Haberkamp
Publicatiedatum
13-03-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0659-8

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2016

Psychological Research 2/2016 Naar de uitgave