Abstract
It is argued that in order to most directly investigate perceptual processes and thereby to evaluate competing theories, one must observe the (microgenetic) development of the percept. In different experiments, variations of the Ponzo and Zöllner illusions were tachistoscopically presented, followed, after a variable ISI, by a disrupting pattern. The interaction responsible for an illusion of magnitude in the Ponzo and an illusory displacement in the ZSllner occur only after 150 msec of processing time (SOA), Prior to the illusion’s onset, the parts of the figure are clearly and accurately perceived, indicating that the parts of the figure are first processed independently, followed by the interaction of those parts. It is suggested how the application of information processing techniques to traditional perceptual material may, in future experiments, yield a positive theoretical statement about perceptual processes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Flavell, J. H., &Draguns, J. A microgenetic approach to perception and thought.JPsychological Bulletin, 1957,54, 197–217.
Haber, R. N., &Hershenson, M. The effects of repeated brief exposures on the growth of a percept.Journal of Expenmental Psychology, 1965,69, 40–46.
Kahneman, D. Method, findings and theory in studies of visual masking.JPsychological Bulletin, 1968,70, 404–425.
Rock, L., &Engelstein, P. A study of memory, visual form.JAmerican Journal of Psychology, 1959,72, 221–229.
Werner, H. Microgenesis and aphasia.Journal of Abnormal Soctal Psychology, 195b,52, 347–353.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reynolds, R.I. The microgenetic development of the Ponzo and Zöllner illusions. Perception & Psychophysics 23, 231–236 (1978). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204131
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204131