Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Past research has shown that when discrete responses are associated with a perceptual goal, performers may have difficulty detecting stimuli that are commensurate with that goal. Three experiments are reported here that test whether such effects extend to sequence production. In Experiment 1, participants performed 8-note melodies repeatedly, and on each trial a single tone could be altered with respect to its pitch and/or synchrony with actions. Results suggested a selective deficit of detection when feedback pitch was unchanged and the event was slightly delayed. Experiment 2 showed that this “deafness” to feedback is limited to rhythmic motor tasks that require sequencing, in that similar effects did not emerge when participants produced pitch sequences by tapping a single key repeatedly. A third experiment demonstrated similar results to Experiment 1 when the mapping of keys to pitches on the keyboard was reversed. Taken together, results suggest a selective deafness to response-congruent delayed feedback, consistent with the idea that performers suppress previously planned events during production.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Ellis, R. J., & Jones, M. R. (2009). The Role of Accent Salience and Joint Accent Structure in Meter Perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 264–280. PubMed
Finney, S. A. (2001). FTAP: A Linux-based program for tapping and music experiments. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 33, 65–72. CrossRef
Hébert, S., & Peretz, I. (1997). Recognition of music in long-term memory: Are melodic and temporal patterns equal partners? Memory & cognition, 25, 518–533. CrossRef
Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 849–937.
Howell, P. (2001). A model of timing interference to speech control in normal and altered listening conditions applied to the treatment of stuttering. In B. Maassen, W. Hulsijn, R. Kent, H. F. M. Peters & P. H. M. M. van-Lieshout (Eds.), Speech motor control in normal and disordered speech (pp. 291–294). Nijmegen: Uttgeverij Vantilt.
Howell, P., Powell, D. J., & Khan, I. (1983). Amplitude contour of the delayed signal and interference in delayed auditory feedback tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 772–784.
Hubbard, T. (2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 822–851. CrossRef
Johnston, H. M., & Jones, M. R. (2006). Higher order pattern structure influences auditory representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 2–17. PubMed
Jordan, M. I., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1992). Forward models: Supervised learning with a distal teacher. Cognitive Science, 16, 307–354. CrossRef
Kawato, M. (1999). Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Current Opinion in Biology, 9, 718–727.
Kempen, G., & Hoenkamp, E. (1987). An incremental procedural grammar for sentence formulation. Cognitive Science, 11, 201–258. CrossRef
Keppel, G., & Wickens, T. D. (2004). Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Large, E. W. (1993). Dynamic programming for the analysis of serial behaviors. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 238–241. CrossRef
Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. Psychological Review, 106, 119–159. CrossRef
Lashley, K. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior (pp. 112–136). New York: Wiley.
Lidji, P., Kolinsky, R., Lochy, A., & Morais, J. (2007). Spatial associations for musical stimuli: A piano in the head? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1189–1207. PubMed
MacKay, D. G. (1987). The organization of perception and action: A theory for language and other cognitive skills. New York: Springer-Verlag. CrossRef
Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997a). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861–872. PubMed
Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997b). Detecting and identifying response-compatible stimuli. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 125–129. CrossRef
Palmer, C., & van de Sande, C. (1995). Range of planning in music performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 947–962. PubMed
Pfordresher, P. Q. (2003). Auditory feedback in music performance: Evidence for a dissociation of sequencing and timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 949–964. PubMed
Pfordresher, P. Q. (2005). Auditory feedback in music performance: The role of melodic structure and musical skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1331–1345. PubMed
Pfordresher, P. Q. (2006). Coordination of perception and action in music performance. Advances in Cognitive Psychology. Special Issue: Music performance, 2, 183–198.
Pfordresher, P. Q., & Dalla-Bella, S. (2011). Delayed auditory feedback and movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 566–579. PubMed
Pfordresher, P. Q., & Kulpa, J. D. (2011). The dynamics of disruption from altered auditory feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 949–967. PubMed
Pfordresher, P. Q., Palmer, C., & Jungers, M. K. (2007). Speed, Accuracy, and Serial Order in Sequence Production. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 31, 1–36. CrossRef
Prince, J. B., Thompson, W. F., & Schmuckler, M. A. (2009b). Pitch and time, tonality and meter: How do musical dimensions combine? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1598–1617. PubMed
Smith, M., & Wheeldon, L. R. (1999). High level processing scope in spoken sentence production. Cognition, 73.
Stoet, G., & Hommel, B. (1999). Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25.
Vousden, J. I., & Brown, G. D. A. (1998). To repeat or not to repeat: The time course of response suppression in sequential behaviour. In J. A. Bullinaria, D. W. Glasspool, & G. Houghton (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth Neural Computation and Psychology Workshop: Connectionist Representations. London: Springer.
Wheeldon, L. R., Meyer, A. S., & Smith, M. (2002). Incrementality. In R. Goldstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science. London: Macmillan.
- “Deafness” effects in detecting alterations to auditory feedback during sequence production
Peter Q. Pfordresher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg