Abstract
The notion that the melody (i.e., pitch structure) of familiar music is more recognizable than its accompanying rhythm (i.e., temporal structure) was examined with the same set of nameable musical excerpts in three experiments. In Experiment 1, the excerpts were modified so as to keep either their original pitch variations, whereas durations were set to isochrony (melodic condition) or their original temporal pattern while played on a single constant pitch (rhythmic condition). The subjects, who were selected without regard to musical training, were found to name more tunes and to rate their feeling of knowing the musical excerpts far higher in the melodic condition than in the rhythmic condition. These results were replicated in Experiment 2, wherein the melodic and rhythmic patterns of the musical excerpts were interchanged to create chimeric mismatched tunes. The difference in saliency of the melodic pattern and the rhythmic pattern also emerged with a music-title-verification task in Experiment 3, hence discarding response selection as the main source of the discrepancy. The lesser effectiveness of rhythmic structure appears to be related to its lesser encoding distinctiveness relative to melodic structure. In general, rhythm was found to be a poor cue for the musical representations that are stored in long-term memory. Nevertheless, in all three experiments, the most effective cue for music identification involved the proper combination of pitches and durations. Therefore, the optimal code of access to long-term memory for music resides in a combination of rhythm and melody, of which the latter would be the most informative.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altmann, G., Wathanasin, S., Birkett, T., &Russell, P. (1992).Experimenter [Computer program]. Sussex, U.K.: Network Analysis Ltd., University of Sussex.
Balzano, G. (1987). Measuring music. In A. Gabrielsson (Ed.),Action and perception in rhythm and music (pp. 177–199). Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Music.
Bigand, E., &Pineau, M. (1996). Context effects on melody recognition: A dynamic interpretation.Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive,15, 121–134.
Boltz, M. [G.] (1989a). Perceiving the end: Effects of tonal relationships on melodic completion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 749–761.
Boltz, M. [G.] (1989b). Rhythm and “good endings”: Effects of temporal structure on tonality judgments.Perception & Psychophysics,46, 9–17.
Boltz, M. [G.] (1989c). Time judgments of musical endings: Effects of expectancies on the “filled interval effect.”Perception & Psychophysics,46, 409–418.
Boltz, M. [G.] (1991). Some structural determinants of melody recall.Memory & Cognition,19, 239–251.
Boltz, M. G. (1993). The generation of temporal and melodic expectancies during musical listening.Perception & Psychophysics,53, 585–600.
Boltz, M. G. (1995). Effects of event structure on retrospective duration judgments.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 1080–1096.
Boltz, M. [G.], &Jones, M. R. (1986). Does rule recursion make melodies easier to reproduce? If not, what does?Cognitive Psychology,18, 389–431.
Desroches, M., &Benoist, J. (1983). Tambours de l’Inde à la Martinique: Structure sonore d’un espace sacré [Drums from India to Martinique Island: Sound structure of a sacred space].Études Créoles,5, 39–58.
Deutsch, D. (1980). The processing of structured and unstructured tonal sequences.Perception & Psychophysics,28, 381–389.
Dowling, W. J., &Fujitani, D. S. (1971). Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,49, 524–531.
Dowling, W. J., Lung, K. M.-T., &Herrbold, S. (1987). Aiming attention in pitch and time in the perception of interleaved melodies.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 642–656.
Fraisse, P. (1974).Psychologie du rythme [Psychology of rhythm]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Fraisse, P. (1982). Rhythm and tempo. In D. Deutsch (Ed.),The psychology of music (pp. 149–180). New York: Academic Press.
Gabrielsson, A. (1993). The complexities of rhythm. In T. Tighe & W. J. Dowling (Eds.),Psychology of music. The understanding of melody and rhythm (pp. 93–120). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Goodman, L. A., &Kruskal, W. H. (1954). Measures of association for cross classifications.Journal of the American Statistical Association,49, 732–764.
Halpern, A. R. (1984). Organization in memory for familiar songs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 496–512.
Jones, M. R. (1987). Dynamic pattern structure in music: Recent theory and research.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 621–634.
Jones, M. R., &Boltz, M. [G.] (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time.Psychological Review,96, 459–491.
Jones, M. R., Boltz, M. [G.], &Kidd, G. (1982). Controlled attending as a function of melodic and temporal context.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 211–218.
Jones, M. R., &Ralston, J. T. (1991). Some influences of accent structure on melody recognition.Memory & Cognition,19, 8–20.
Jones, M. R., Summerell, L., &Marshburn, E. (1987). Recognizing melodies: A dynamic interpretation.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,39A, 89–121.
Kidd, G., Boltz, M. [G.], &Jones, M. R. (1984). Some effects of rhythmic context on melody recognition.American Journal of Psychology,97, 153–173.
Koriat, A. (1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowling.Psychological Review,100, 609–639.
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967).ogical foundations of language New York: Wiley.
Leonesio, R. J., &Nelson, T. O. (1990). Do different metamemory judgments tap the same underlying aspects of memory?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 464–470.
Monahan, C. B., &Carterette, E. C. (1985). Pitch and duration as determinants of musical space.Music Perception,3, 1–32.
Monahan, C. B., Kendall, R. A., &Carterette, E. C. (1987). The effect of melodic and temporal contour on recognition memory for pitch change.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 576–600.
Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.Psychological Bulletin,95, 109–133.
Palmer, C., &Krumhansl, C. (1987a). Independent temporal and pitch structures in determination of musical phrases.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,13, 116–126.
Palmer, C., &Krumhansl, C. L. (1987b). Pitch and temporal contributions to musical phrase perception: Effects of harmony, performance timing, and familiarity.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 505–518.
Peretz, I. (1990). Processing of local and global musical information in unilateral brain-damaged patients.Brain,113, 1185–1205.
Peretz, I., Babaï, M., Lussier, I., Hébert, S., &Gagnon, L. (1995). Corpus de 144 extraits musicaux: Indices de familiarité, d’évocation verbale et d’âge d’acquisition.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,49, 211–239.
Peretz, I., &Kolinsky, R. (1993). Boundaries of separability between melody and rhythm in music discrimination: A neuropsychological perspective.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,46A, 301–325.
Peretz, I., Kolinsky, R., Tramo, M., Labrecque, R., Hublet, C., Demeurisse, G., &Belleville, S. (1994). Functional dissociations following bilateral lesions of auditory cortex.Brain,117, 1283–1302.
Piston, W. (1978).Harmony (4th ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.
Pitt, M. A., &Monahan, C. B. (1987). The perceived similarity of auditory polyrhythms.Perception & Psychophysics,41, 534–546.
Schmuckler, M. A., &Boltz, M. G. (1994). Harmonic and rhythmic influences on musical expectancy.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 313–325.
Smith, K., &Cuddy, L. L. (1989). Effects of metric and harmonic rhythm on the detection of pitch alterations in melodic sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 457–471.
Snodgrass, J., &Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,117, 34–50.
Sturges, P. T., &Martin, J. G. (1974). Rhythmic structure in auditory temporal pattern perception and immediate memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology,102, 377–383.
Thompson, W. F. (1994). Sensitivity to combinations of musical parameters: Pitch with duration, and pitch pattern with durational pattern.Perception & Psychophysics,56, 363–374.
Thompson, W., &Sinclair, D. (1993). Pitch pattern, durational pattern, and timbre: A study of the perceptual integration of auditory qualities.Psychomusicology,12, 29–47.
Warren, R. M., Gardner, D. A., Brubaker, B. S., &Bashford, J. A., Jr. (1991). Melodic and nonmelodic sequences of tones: Effects of duration on perception.Music Perception,8, 277–290.
White, B. W. (1960). Recognition of distorted melodies.American Journal of Psychology,73, 100–107. (Manuscript received August 2, 1995; revision accepted for publication August 6, 1996.)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Order of authors is alphabetical since both authors equally contributed to the paper. This research was supported by a predoctoral fellowship to the first author and by a research grant to the second author, both from the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hébert, S., Peretz, I. Recognition of music in long-term memory: Are melodic and temporal patterns equal partners?. Mem Cogn 25, 518–533 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201127
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201127