Skip to main content
Log in

Role of auditory feedback in the control of successive keystrokes during piano playing

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the role of auditory feedback derived from one keystroke in the control of the rhythmicity and velocity of successive keystrokes during piano playing. We examined the effects of transient auditory perturbations with respect to the pitch, loudness, and timing of one tone on subsequent keystrokes while six pianists played short excerpts from three simple musical pieces having different tempi (“event rates”). Immediately after a delay in tone production, the inter-keystroke interval became shorter. This compensatory action depended on the tempo, being most prominent at the medium tempo. This indicates that temporal information provided by auditory feedback is utilized to regulate the timing of movement elements produced in a sequence. We also found that the keystroke velocity changed after the timing, pitch, or loudness of a tone was altered, although the response differed depending on the type of perturbation. While delaying the timing or altering the pitch led to an increase in the velocity, altering the loudness changed the velocity in an inconsistent manner. Furthermore, perturbing a tone elicited by the right hand also affected the rhythmicity and velocity of keystrokes with the left hand, indicating that bimanual coordination of tone production was maintained. Finally, altering the pitch sometimes resulted in striking an incorrect key, mostly in the slow piece, emphasizing the importance of pitch information for accurate planning and execution of sequential piano keystrokes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aschersleben G, Gehrke J, Prinz W (2001) Tapping with peripheral nerve block. A role for tactile feedback in the timing of movements. Exp Brain Res 136:331–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer JJ, Mittal J, Larson CR, Hain TC (2006) Vocal responses to unanticipated perturbations in voice loudness feedback: an automatic mechanism for stabilizing voice amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am 119:2363–2371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Black JW (1951) The effect of delayed sidetone upon vocal intensity and rate. J Speech Hear Disord 16:56–60

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ausilio A, Brunetti R, Delogu F, Santonico C, Belardinelli MO (2010) How and when auditory action effects impair motor performance. Exp Brain Res 201:323–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diedrichsen J (2007) Optimal task-dependent changes of bimanual feedback control and adaptation. Curr Biol 17:1675–1679

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz V (2002) Proprioception and locomotor disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 3:781–790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drost UC, Rieger M, Brass M, Gunter TC, Prinz W (2005) Action-effect coupling in pianists. Psychol Res 69:233–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finney SA (1997) Auditory feedback and musical keyboard performance. Music Percept 15:153–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney SA, Warren WH (2002) Delayed auditory feedback and rhythmic tapping: evidence for a critical interval shift. Percept Psychophys. 64:896–908

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flach R (2005) The transition from synchronization to continuation tapping. Hum Mov Sci 24:465–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gates A, Bradshaw J, Nettleton N (1974) Effect of different delayed auditory feedback intervals on a music performance task. Percept Psychophys 14:21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebl W, Palmer C (2008) Tactile feedback and timing accuracy in piano performance. Exp Brain Res 186:471–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon AM, Soechting JF (1995) Use of tactile afferent information in sequential finger movements. Exp Brain Res 107:281–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto Y, Sakai KL (2003) Brain activations during conscious self-monitoring of speech production with delayed auditory feedback: an fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 20:22–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howell P (1990) Changes in voice level caused by several forms of altered feedback in fluent speakers and stutterers. Lang Speech 33:325–338

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howell P (2004) Assessment of some contemporary theories of stuttering that apply to spontaneous speech. Contemp Issues Commun Sci Disord 31:122–139

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howell P, Archer A (1984) Susceptibility to the effects of delayed auditory feedback. Percept Psychophys 36:296–302

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howell P, Powell DJ (1987) Delayed auditory feedback with delayed sounds varying in duration. Percept Psychophys 42:166–172

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katahira K, Abla D, Masuda S, Okanoya K (2008) Feedback-based error monitoring processes during musical performance: an ERP study. Neurosci Res 61:120–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larson CR, Sun J, Hain TC (2007) Effects of simultaneous perturbations of voice pitch and loudness feedback on voice F0 and amplitude control. J Acoust Soc Am 121:2862–2872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaRue J, Bard C, Fleury M, Teasdale N, Paillard J, Forget R, Lamarre Y (1995) Is proprioception important for the timing of motor activities? Can J Physiol Pharmacol 73:255–261

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maidhof C, Vavatzanidis N, Prinz W, Rieger M, Koelsch S (2009) Processing expectancy violations during music performance and perception: an ERP study. J Cogn Neurosci (in press)

  • Munhall KG, MacDonald EN, Byrne SK, Johnsrude I (2009) Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not to compensate. J Acoust Soc Am 125:384–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mutha PK, Sainburg RL (2009) Shared bimanual tasks elicit bimanual reflexes during movement. J Neurophysiol 102(6):3142–3155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhoff JG (1998) Perceptual bias for rising tones. Nature 395:123–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfordresher PQ (2003) Auditory feedback in music performance: evidence for a dissociation of sequencing and timing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29:949–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfordresher PQ (2005) Auditory feedback in music performance: the role of melodic structure and musical skill. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 31:1331–1345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfordresher PQ (2006) Coordination of perception and action in music performance. Adv in Cog Psychol 2:183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfordresher PQ, Benitez B (2007) Temporal coordination between actions and sound during sequence production. Hum Mov Sci 26:742–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfordresher PQ, Palmer C (2002) Effects of delayed auditory feedback on timing of music performance. Psychol Res 66:71–79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell DW, Munhall KG (2006) Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 119:2288–2297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin E, Gordon AM (2004) Tactile feedback contributes to consistency of finger movements during typing. Exp Brain Res 155:362–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Repp BH (1999) Effects of auditory feedback deprivation on expressive piano performance. Music Percept 16:409–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz MH, Jabusch HC, Altenmüller E (2009) Detecting wrong notes in advance: neuronal correlates of error monitoring in pianists. Cereb Cortex 19:2625–2639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sainburg RL, Wang J (2002) Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information. Exp Brain Res 145:437–447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scheidt RA, Ghez C (2007) Separate adaptive mechanisms for controlling trajectory and final position in reaching. J Neurophysiol 98:3600–3613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer LH (1989) Cognition and affect in musical performance. Contemp Music Rev 4:381–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing AM (1977) Perturbations of auditory feedback delay and the timing of movement. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 3:175–186

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wing AM, Kristofferson AB (1973) Response delay and the timing of discrete motor responses. Percept Psychophys 14:5–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates AJ (1963) Delayed auditory feedback. Psychol Bull 60:213–232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zehr EP, Duysens J (2004) Regulation of arm and leg movement during human locomotion. Neuroscientist 10:347–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Martha Flanders for a careful reading of this manuscript and for her helpful suggestions during the course of this study. We also thank Drs. Michael Silverman and Noriko Kawai for their help of finding participants in this study. The work was supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grants NS-50256 and NS-15018.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinichi Furuya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Furuya, S., Soechting, J.F. Role of auditory feedback in the control of successive keystrokes during piano playing. Exp Brain Res 204, 223–237 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2307-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-010-2307-2

Keywords

Navigation