Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Individuals with autism or autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) are known to have difficulties discriminating animacy and are less likely to attend to animate stimuli, which may underlie the social deficits of autism. For individuals without ASD, animacy also affects word order choices: speakers choose syntactic structures (active vs. passive) that place animate entities as the grammatical subject, as a result of their conceptual salience. This study tested whether highly verbal adults with ASD would show sensitivity to animacy in a picture description task. Results showed that individuals with ASD were as sensitive to animacy as controls, and overwhelmingly placed animate entities as the grammatical subject. One stimulus proved an exception, where only individuals with ASD placed an inanimate entity (a clock) in subject position in preference to an animate one (a boy), which coincides with previous observations that individuals with autism find clocks highly salient. This study provides converging evidence of the role of conceptual salience in word order choices, and furthermore shows animate entities to be highly salient for individuals with ASD, at least as it pertains to these word order choices.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Altmann, L. J. P., & Kemper, S. (2006). Effects of age, animacy and activation order on sentence production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 322–354. CrossRef
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV) (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Baltaxe, C. (1977). Pragmatic deficits in the language of autistic adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 2, 176–180. CrossRef
Bettelheim, B. (1968). The empty fortress. Chicago, Illinois: The Free Press.
Clark, H. H. (1965). Some structural properties of simple active and passive sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 4, 365–370. CrossRef
Goldman-Eisler, F., & Cohen, M. (1970). Is N, P, and PN difficulty a valid criterion of transformational operations? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 9, 161–166. CrossRef
Harris, M. (1978). Noun animacy and the passive voice: A developmental approach. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 495–504. CrossRef
Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., & Risi, S. (1999). Autism diagnostic observation schedule. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
Moore, C. (2004). George and Sam. London, UK: Penguin.
Weber, E. G. (2003). Nominal information flow in the talk of two boys with autism. In J. W. DuBois, L. E. Kumpf, & W. J. Ashby (Eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function (pp. 353–383). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Wetherby, A., & Prutting, C. (1984). Profiles of communicative and cognitive social abilities in autistic children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 27, 364–377. PubMed
- Brief Report: Animacy and Word Order in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Johanna K. Lake
Karin R. Humphreys
- Springer US