Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 5/2011

01-09-2011 | Original Article

Trial-to-trial sequential dependencies in a social and non-social Simon task

Auteurs: Roman Liepelt, Dorit Wenke, Rico Fischer, Wolfgang Prinz

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 5/2011

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Recent research has shown that joint-action effects in a social Simon task provide a good index of action co-representation. The present study aimed to specify the mechanisms underlying joint action by considering trial-to-trial transitions. Using non-social stimuli, we assigned a Simon task to two participants. Each was responsible for only one of two possible responses. This task was performed alone (Individual go/nogo task) and in cooperation with another person who was sitting alongside (Joint go/nogo task). As a further control task, we added a Standard Simon task. Replicating previous findings (Sebanz et al. in Cognition 88:B11–B21, 2003), we found no spatial compatibility effect in the Individual go/nogo task but we did find one in the Joint go/nogo task. A more detailed analysis showed that a sequential modulation of the Simon effect was present in both the Joint and the Individual go/nogo tasks. We found reliable Simon effects in trials following Simon compatible trials not only in the Joint go/nogo task but also to a somewhat smaller extent in the Individual go/nogo task. For both these go/nogo tasks, sequential modulation effects were stronger for nogo/go transitions than for go/go transitions. This suggests that low-level feature binding and repetition mechanisms contribute to the social Simon effect related to the specific requirement not to respond on nogo trials.
Voetnoten
1
For an alternative explanation of sequential modulation effects holding that reduced interference after incompatible trials is due to increased cognitive control, see Botvinick, Braver, Barch, Carter, & Cohen (2001); Gratton et al. (1992); Stürmer et al. (2002); Winkel et al. (2009); Wühr (2005); Wühr & Ansorge (2005).
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Akçay, Ç., & Hazeltine, E. (2007). Conflict monitoring and feature overlap: Two sources of sequential modulations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 742–748.CrossRef Akçay, Ç., & Hazeltine, E. (2007). Conflict monitoring and feature overlap: Two sources of sequential modulations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 742–748.CrossRef
go back to reference Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 365–377.PubMedCrossRef Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 365–377.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.PubMedCrossRef Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Burle, B., Possamaï, C.-A., Vidal, F., Bonnet, M., & Hasbroucq, T. (2002). Executive control in the Simon effect: An electromyographic and distributional analysis. Psychological Research, 66, 324–339.PubMedCrossRef Burle, B., Possamaï, C.-A., Vidal, F., Bonnet, M., & Hasbroucq, T. (2002). Executive control in the Simon effect: An electromyographic and distributional analysis. Psychological Research, 66, 324–339.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus–response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750.PubMedCrossRef De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus–response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fischer, R., Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2008). Context-sensitive adjustments of cognitive control: Conflict-adaptation effects are modulated by processing demands of the ongoing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 712–718.PubMedCrossRef Fischer, R., Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2008). Context-sensitive adjustments of cognitive control: Conflict-adaptation effects are modulated by processing demands of the ongoing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 712–718.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategie control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506.CrossRef Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategie control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506.CrossRef
go back to reference Guagnano, D., Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C. A. (2010). Sharing a task or sharing space? On the effect of the confederate in action coding in a detection task. Cognition, 114, 348–355.PubMedCrossRef Guagnano, D., Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C. A. (2010). Sharing a task or sharing space? On the effect of the confederate in action coding in a detection task. Cognition, 114, 348–355.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280–290.CrossRef Hommel, B. (1993). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: Evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280–290.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus–response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216.CrossRef Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: Evidence for automatic integration of stimulus–response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2009). How social are task representations? Psychological Science, 20, 794–798.PubMedCrossRef Hommel, B., Colzato, L. S., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. M. (2009). How social are task representations? Psychological Science, 20, 794–798.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.PubMedCrossRef Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1–17.PubMedCrossRef Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1–17.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Liepelt, R., von Cramon, D. Y., & Brass, M. (2008). What is matched in direct matching? Intention attribution modulates motor priming effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 578–591.PubMedCrossRef Liepelt, R., von Cramon, D. Y., & Brass, M. (2008). What is matched in direct matching? Intention attribution modulates motor priming effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 578–591.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207.CrossRef Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207.CrossRef
go back to reference Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., Terry, K. M., & Gorfein, D. S. (1992). Persistence of negative priming. II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 993–1000.PubMedCrossRef Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., Terry, K. M., & Gorfein, D. S. (1992). Persistence of negative priming. II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 993–1000.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Newman-Norlund, R., van Schie, H. T., van Zuijlen, A., & Bekkering, H. (2007). The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 817–818.PubMedCrossRef Newman-Norlund, R., van Schie, H. T., van Zuijlen, A., & Bekkering, H. (2007). The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 817–818.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nieuwenhuis, S., Stins, J. F., Posthuma, D., Polderman, T. J. C., Boomsma, D. I., & De Geus, E. J. (2006). Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: Conflict adaptation or associative priming? Memory & Cognition, 34, 1260–1272.CrossRef Nieuwenhuis, S., Stins, J. F., Posthuma, D., Polderman, T. J. C., Boomsma, D. I., & De Geus, E. J. (2006). Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: Conflict adaptation or associative priming? Memory & Cognition, 34, 1260–1272.CrossRef
go back to reference Notebaert, W., Soetens, E., & Melis, A. (2001). Sequential analysis of a Simon task-evidence for an attention-shift account. Psychological Research, 65, 170–184.PubMedCrossRef Notebaert, W., Soetens, E., & Melis, A. (2001). Sequential analysis of a Simon task-evidence for an attention-shift account. Psychological Research, 65, 170–184.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Philipp, A. M., & Prinz, W. (2010). Evidence for a role of the responding agent in the joint compatibility effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 1–13. Philipp, A. M., & Prinz, W. (2010). Evidence for a role of the responding agent in the joint compatibility effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 1–13.
go back to reference Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129–154.CrossRef Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129–154.CrossRef
go back to reference Ramnani, N., & Miall, R. C. (2004). A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 85–90.PubMedCrossRef Ramnani, N., & Miall, R. C. (2004). A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 85–90.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ridderinkhof, K. R., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Wijnen, J., & Burle, B. (2004). Response inhibition in conflict tasks is revealed in delta plots. In M. Posner (Ed.), Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention. New York: Guilford Press. Ridderinkhof, K. R., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Wijnen, J., & Burle, B. (2004). Response inhibition in conflict tasks is revealed in delta plots. In M. Posner (Ed.), Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention. New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint actions: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 70–76.PubMedCrossRef Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint actions: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 70–76.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others’ actions: Just like one’s own? Cognition, 88, B11–B21.PubMedCrossRef Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others’ actions: Just like one’s own? Cognition, 88, B11–B21.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2005). How two share a task: Corepresenting stimulus–response mappings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1234–1246.PubMedCrossRef Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2005). How two share a task: Corepresenting stimulus–response mappings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1234–1246.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Advances in Psychology (vol. 65, pp. 31–86) Amsterdam: North-Holland. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Advances in Psychology (vol. 65, pp. 31–86) Amsterdam: North-Holland.
go back to reference Simon, J. R., Hinrichs, J. V., & Craft, J. L. (1970). Auditory S–R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 97–102.PubMedCrossRef Simon, J. R., Hinrichs, J. V., & Craft, J. L. (1970). Auditory S–R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 97–102.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S–R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304.PubMedCrossRef Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S–R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon Task: Behavioral and Electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363.PubMedCrossRef Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon Task: Behavioral and Electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tsai, C. C., & Brass, M. (2007). Does the human motor system simulate Pinocchio’s actions? Co-acting with a human hand versus a wooden hand in a dyadic interaction. Psychological Science, 18, 1058–1062.PubMedCrossRef Tsai, C. C., & Brass, M. (2007). Does the human motor system simulate Pinocchio’s actions? Co-acting with a human hand versus a wooden hand in a dyadic interaction. Psychological Science, 18, 1058–1062.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tsai, C.-C., Kuo, W. J., Jing, J. T., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2006). The common coding framework in self-other interaction: Evidence from joint action task. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 353–362.CrossRef Tsai, C.-C., Kuo, W. J., Jing, J. T., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2006). The common coding framework in self-other interaction: Evidence from joint action task. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 353–362.CrossRef
go back to reference van Schie, H. T., Mars, R. B., Coles, M. G. H., & Bekkering, H. (2004). Modulation of activity in medial frontal and motor cortices during error observation. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 549–554.PubMedCrossRef van Schie, H. T., Mars, R. B., Coles, M. G. H., & Bekkering, H. (2004). Modulation of activity in medial frontal and motor cortices during error observation. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 549–554.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wallace, R. A. (1971). S–R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354–360.PubMedCrossRef Wallace, R. A. (1971). S–R compatibility and the idea of a response code. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 88, 354–360.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wendt, M., Kluwe, R. H., & Peters, A. (2006). Sequential modulations of interference evoked by processing task-irrelevant stimulus features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 644–667.PubMedCrossRef Wendt, M., Kluwe, R. H., & Peters, A. (2006). Sequential modulations of interference evoked by processing task-irrelevant stimulus features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 644–667.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Winkel, J., Wijnen, J. G., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Groen, I., Derrfuss, J., Danielmeier, C., et al. (2009). Your conflict matters to me! Behavioral and neural manifestations of control adjustments after self-experienced and observed decision-conflict. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 1–8.CrossRef Winkel, J., Wijnen, J. G., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Groen, I., Derrfuss, J., Danielmeier, C., et al. (2009). Your conflict matters to me! Behavioral and neural manifestations of control adjustments after self-experienced and observed decision-conflict. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 1–8.CrossRef
go back to reference Wühr, P. (2005). Evidence for gating of direct response activation in the Simon task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 282–288.CrossRef Wühr, P. (2005). Evidence for gating of direct response activation in the Simon task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 282–288.CrossRef
go back to reference Wühr, P., & Ansorge, U. (2005). Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect. Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 58, 705–731. Wühr, P., & Ansorge, U. (2005). Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect. Quaterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 58, 705–731.
Metagegevens
Titel
Trial-to-trial sequential dependencies in a social and non-social Simon task
Auteurs
Roman Liepelt
Dorit Wenke
Rico Fischer
Wolfgang Prinz
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2011
Uitgeverij
Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 5/2011
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-010-0314-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2011

Psychological Research 5/2011 Naar de uitgave