Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
This study explored the mechanisms that underlie asymmetries for the horizontal vertical illusion (HVI), which deceives length perception, so that a vertical line is perceived as longer than a horizontal line of equivalent length. In Experiment 1, university students (n = 14) made length judgements for vertical and horizontal lines. The vertical line was shifted in eight steps from the far left of the horizontal line (⌊) to the far right (⌋). An HVI was observed for the medial positions (⊥), which diminished towards the lateral positions. The HVI was also stronger when the vertical line was on the left. Because the left/right asymmetry changed as a function of lateral/medial position, the asymmetry within the HVI stimulus is most likely the result of pseudoneglect, which affects judgements of horizontal length. In Experiment 2, participants (n = 15) made judgements for HVI stimuli presented to the left- and right-hemispace and the midline. The HVI was stronger in the left hemispace. Because the asymmetry between the left- and right-hemispaces did not interact with the asymmetry within the stimuli, it was concluded that the asymmetry between hemispatial positions was the result of right hemisphere susceptibility to illusory geometrical effects whereas the asymmetry within the stimulus is related to an object-centred attentional asymmetry. The HVI is affected by asymmetries in length judgements and susceptibility to illusions and may provide interesting insights into attentional disorders in clinical populations, such as neglect.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Armstrong, L., & Marks, L. E. (1997). Differential effects of stimulus context on perceived length: implications for the horizontal-vertical illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1200–1213. CrossRef
Charles, J., Sahraie, A., & McGeorge, P. (2007). Hemispatial asymmetries in judgment of stimulus size. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 687–698. CrossRef
Clem, R. K., & Pollack, R. H. (1975). Illusion magnitude as a function of visual field exposure. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 450–454. CrossRef
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., Shulman, G. L., & Petersen, S. E. (1993). A PET study of visuospatial attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 1202–1226. PubMed
Daini, R., Angelelli, P., Antonucci, G., Cappa, S. F., & Vallar, G. (2002). Exploring the syndrome of spatial unilateral neglect through an illusion of length. Experimental Brain Research, 144, 224–237. CrossRef
Driver, J., & Halligan, P. W. (1991). Can visual neglect operate in object-centered co-ordinates? An affirmative single case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 475–496. CrossRef
Gregory, R. L. (1998). Eye and Brain, The Psychology of Seeing (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heilman, K. M., Watson, R. T., & Valenstein, E. (1993). Neglect and related disorders. In K. M. Heilman & E. Valenstein (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology (pp. 279–336). New York: Oxford University Press.
Kubi, E., & Slotnick, B. M. (1993). The horizontal-vertical illusion: transfer of illusion decrement. Perceptual Motor Skills, 77, 339–347.
Loftus, G. R., & Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476–490. CrossRef
Mattingley, J. B., Bradshaw, J. L., & Bradshaw, J. A. (1995). The effects of unilateral visuospatial neglect on perception of Müller-Lyer illusory figures. Perception & Psychophysics, 24, 415–433.
McCourt, M. E., Garlinghouse, M., & Slater, J. (2000). Centripetal versus centrifugal bias in visual line bisection: focusing attention on two hypotheses. Frontiers in Bioscience, 5, d58–d71. PubMed
Nicholls, M. E. R., Hughes, G., Mattingley, J. B., & Bradshaw, J. L. (2004). Are object and space-based attentional biases both important to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries? Experimental Brain Research, 154, 513–520. CrossRef
Ota, H., Fujii, T., Suzuki, K., Fukatsu, R., & Yamadori, A. (2001). Dissociation of body-centred and stimulus-centred representations in unilateral neglect. Neurology, 57, 2064–2069. PubMed
Prinzmetal, W., & Gettleman, L. (1993). Vertical-horizontal illusion: one eye is better than two. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 81–88. CrossRef
Richter, H. O., Wennberg, P., & Raudsepp, J. (2007). The effects of inverting prisms on the horizontal–vertical illusion: a systematic effect of downward gaze. Experimental Brain Research, 183, 9–15. CrossRef
Rothwell, B., & Zaidel, E. (1990). Visual field differences in the magnitude of the Opel-Kundt illusion vary with processing time. Perception & Psychophysics, 47, 180–190. CrossRef
Wolfe, U., Maloney, L. T., & Tam, M. (2005). Distortions of perceived length in the frontoparallel plane: tests of perspective theories. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 967–979. CrossRef
- Left of centre: asymmetries for the horizontal vertical line illusion
Elisha K. Josev
Jason D. Forte
Michael E. R. Nicholls