Abstract
The conflict-control loop theory proposes that the detection of conflict in information processing triggers an increase in cognitive control, resulting in improved performance on the subsequent trial. This theory seems consistent with the robust finding that conflict susceptibility is reduced following correct trials associated with high conflict: the conflict adaptation effect. However, despite providing favorable conditions for eliciting and detecting conflict-triggered performance adjustments, none of the five experiments reported here provide unequivocal evidence of such adjustments. Instead, the results corroborate and extend earlier findings by demonstrating that the conflict adaptation effect, at least in the flanker task, is only present for a specific subset of trial sequences that is characterized by a response repetition. This pattern of results provides strong evidence that the conflict adaptation effect reflects associative stimulus-response priming instead of conflict-driven adaptations in cognitive control.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bish, J. P., Ferrante, S. M., McDonald-McGinn, D., Zackai, E., &Simon, T. J. (2005). Maladaptive conflict monitoring as evidence for executive dysfunction in children with chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.Developmental Science,8, 36–43.
Boomsma, D. I. (1998). Twin registers in Europe: An overview.Twin Research,1, 34–51.
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., &Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.Psychological Review,108, 624–652.
Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., &Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8, 539–546.
Botvinick, M. [M.], Nystrom, L. E., Fissell, K., Carter, C. S., &Cohen, J. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex.Nature,402, 179–181.
Burle, B., Allain, S., Vidal, F., &Hasbroucq, T. (2005). Sequential compatibility effects and cognitive control: Does conflict really matter?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,31, 831–837.
de Bruijn, E. R. A., Hulstijn, W., Verkes, R. J., Ruigt, G. S. F., &Sabbe, B. G. C. (2004). Drug-induced stimulation and suppression of action monitoring in healthy volunteers.Psychopharmacology,177, 151–160.
Durston, S., Davidson, M. C., Thomas, K. M., Worden, M. S., Tottenham, N., Martinez, A., et al. (2003). Parametric manipulation of conflict and response competition using rapid mixed-trial eventrelated fMRI.NeuroImage,20, 2135–2141.
Egner, T., &Hirsch, J. (2005). The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task.NeuroImage,24, 539–547.
Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149.
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., &Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 480–506.
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E. J., Eriksen, C. W., &Donchin, E. (1988). Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,14, 331–344.
Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8, 494–500.
Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., &Vu, K.-P. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task.Psychological Research,68, 1–17.
Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., III,Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., &Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control.Science,303, 1023–1026.
Kopp, B., Rist, F., &Mattler, U. (1996). N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control.Psychophysiology,33, 282–294.
Leuthold, H. (2004). Action monitoring and control: In search of common principles. In M. Ullsperger & M. Falkenstein (Eds.),Errors, conflicts, and the brain: Current opinions on performance monitoring (pp. 70–76). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science.
Mattler, U. (2003). Delayed flanker effects on lateralized readiness potentials.Experimental Brain Research,151, 272–288.
Mayr, U., Awh, E., &Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control.Nature Neuroscience,6, 450–452.
McNeely, H. E., West, R., Christensen, B. K., &Alain, C. (2003). Neurophysiological evidence for disturbances of conflict processing in patients with schizophrenia.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,112, 679–688.
Müller, H. J., Heller, D., &Ziegler, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions.Perception & Psychophysics,57, 1–17.
Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., Van den Wildenberg, W., &Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency.Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,3, 17–26.
Notebaert, W., Soetens, E., &Melis, A. (2001). Sequential analysis of a Simon task: Evidence for an attention-shift account.Psychological Research,65, 170–184.
Pashler, H., &Baylis, G. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded choice tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 33–48.
Posthuma, D., Mulder, E. J. C. M., Boomsma, D. I., &de Geus, E. J. C. (2002). Genetic analysis of IQ, processing speed and stimulus-response incongruency effects.Biological Psychology,61, 157–182.
Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A., &Nieuwenhuis, S. (2004). The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control.Science,306, 443–447.
Stadler, M. A., &Hogan, M. E. (1996). Varieties of positive and negative priming.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 87–90.
Stins, J. F., Polderman, J. C., Boomsma, D. I., &de Geus, E. J. C. (2005). Response interference and working memory in 12-year-old children.Child Neuropsychology,11, 191–201.
Stürmer, B.,Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., &Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.Journal of Ex perimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,28, 1345–1363.
Ullsperger, M., Bylsma, L. M., &Botvinick, M. M. (2005). The conflict adaptation effect: It’s not just priming.Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,5, 467–472.
Wascher, E., Reinhard, M., Wauschkuhn, B., &Verleger, R. (1999). Spatial S-R compatibility with centrally presented stimuli: An event-related asymmetry study on dimensional overlap.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,11, 214–229.
Wühr, P., &Ansorge, U. (2005). Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,58A, 705–731.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO-MaGW VENI 451-02-010 & NWO-MW 904-57-94) and the Human Frontier of Science Program Organization (rg0154/1998-B).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nieuwenhuis, S., Stins, J.F., Posthuma, D. et al. Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: Conflict adaptation or associative priming?. Memory & Cognition 34, 1260–1272 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193270
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193270