Top

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Gepubliceerd in:

27-02-2018 | Original Paper

Scripted and Unscripted Science Lessons for Children with Autism and Intellectual Disability

Auteurs: Victoria F. Knight, Belva Collins, Amy D. Spriggs, Emily Sartini, Margaret Janey MacDonald

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders | Uitgave 7/2018

Abstract

Both scripted lessons and unscripted task analyzed lessons have been used effectively to teach science content to students with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder. This study evaluated the efficacy, efficiency, and teacher preference of scripted and unscripted task analyzed lesson plans from an elementary science curriculum designed for students with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder by evaluating both lesson formats for (a) student outcomes on a science comprehension assessment, (b) sessions to criterion, and (c) average duration of lessons. Findings propose both lesson types were equally effective, but unscripted task analyzed versions may be more efficient and were preferred by teachers to scripted lessons. Implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research are also discussed.

vorige artikel I Wanna Play Too: Factors Related to Changes in Social Behavior for Children With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder After Implementation of a Structured Outdoor Play Curriculum

volgende artikel Brief Report: Self-Injurious Behaviors in Preschool Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Compared to Other Developmental Delays and Disorders

Billingsley, F. F., White, O. R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229–241.

Browder, D. M., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Courtade, G., Gibbs, S. L., & Flowers, C. (2008). Evaluation of the effectiveness of an early literacy program for students with significant cognitive disabilities using group randomized trial research. Exceptional Children, 75, 33–52.CrossRef

Browder, D. M., Trela, K., Courtade, G., Jimenez, B., Knight, V., & Flowers, C. (2012). Teaching mathematics and science standards to students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 46(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466910369942.CrossRef

Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., Kame’enui, E. J., & Tarver, S. G. (Eds.). (2010). Direct instruction reading (5th edn.). Boston, MA: Merrill.

Collins, B. (2012). Systematic instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Company.

Cooke, N. L., Galloway, T. W., Kretlow, A. G., & Helf, S. (2011). Impact of the script in a supplemental reading program on instructional opportunities for student practice of specified skills. The Journal of Special Education, 45(1), 28–42.CrossRef

Courtade, G. R., Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., & DiBiase, W. (2010). Training teachers to use an inquiry-based task analysis to teach science to students with moderate and severe disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 378–399.

Engelmann, S., Hanner, S., & Johnson, G. (1989). Corrective reading series guide. New York: Macmillan/McGraw-Hill.

Engelmann, S., Johnson, G., Carnine, L., Meyer, L., Becker, W., & Eisele, J. (1999). Corrective reading decoding strategies B2. Columbus, OH: Science Research Associates.

Englemann, S., & Bruner, E. (1988). Reading mastery I: DISTAR reading. Chicago: Science Research Associates.

Englemann, S., Meyer, L., Johnson, G., & Carnine, L. (1999). Corrective reading skills decoding skills applications C. Columbus, OH: Science Research Associates.

Gagne, R. M. (1962). The acquisition of knowledge. Psychological Review, 69(4), 355.CrossRef

Gast, D. L., Lloyd, B. P., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single case research methodology in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd edn.). New York: Routledge Publishers.

Huitt, W. G., Monetti, D. M., & Hummel, J. H. (2009). Direct approach to instruction. In C. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Volume III, building a common knowledge base (pp. 73–98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Jimenez, B., Knight, V., & Browder, D. (2012). Early science curriculum. Verona, WI: Attainment Company.

Jimenez, B. A., Lo, Y., & Saunders, A. (2014). The additive effects of scripted lessons plus guided notes on science quiz scores of students with intellectual disabilities and autism. Journal of Special Education, 47, 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466912437937.CrossRef

Knight, V. F., Smith, B. R., Spooner, F., & Browder, D. M. (2011). Using explicit instruction to teach science descriptors to students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1258-1.

Miller, B. T., Krockover, G. H., & Doughty, T. (2013). Using iPads to teach inquiry science to students with moderate to severe intellectual disability: A pilot study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 887–911.CrossRef

NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards.

Nowicki, B. L., Sullivan-Watts, B., Shim, M. K., Young, B., & Pockalny, R. (2013). Factors influencing science content accuracy in elementary inquiry science lessons. Research in Science Education, 43, 1135–1154.CrossRef

Smith, B. R., Spooner, F., Jimenez, B., & Browder, D. M. (2013). Using an early science curriculum to teach science vocabulary and concepts to students with severe developmental disabilities. Education & Treatment of Children, 36, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2013.0002.CrossRef

Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., & Balla, D. A. (2005). Vineland adaptive behavior scales (2nd edn.). New York: Pearson.

Spooner, F., Knight, V., Browder, D. M., Jimenez, B., & DiBiase, W. (2011). Evaluating evidence-based practices in teaching science content to students with severe developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36, 62–75.CrossRef

Spooner, F., Knight, V. F., Browder, D. M., & Smith, B. R. (2011). Evidence-based practices for teaching academic skills to students with severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 374–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932511421634.CrossRef

Stallings, J., & Kaskowitz, D. (1974). Follow through classroom observation evaluation, 1972–1973. Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute.

Tweed, A. (2004). Direct instruction: Is it the most effective science teaching strategy? National Science Teachers Association Reports. Retrieved from http://www.nsta.org/publications/news/story.aspx?id=50045.

Watkins, C. L., & Slocum, T. A. (2004). The components of direct instruction. In N. E. Marchand-Martell, T. A. Slocum & R. C. Martella (Eds.), Introduction to direct instruction (pp. 28–65). Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon.

Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler adult intelligence scale—fourth edition (WAIS–IV). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

Titel: Scripted and Unscripted Science Lessons for Children with Autism and Intellectual Disability
Auteurs: Victoria F. Knight
Belva Collins
Amy D. Spriggs
Emily Sartini
Margaret Janey MacDonald
Publicatiedatum: 27-02-2018
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders / Uitgave 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0162-3257
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3432
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3514-0

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2018

Family Experiences with the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder: System Barriers and Facilitators of Efficient Diagnosis

Prediction of Autism at 3 Years from Behavioural and Developmental Measures in High-Risk Infants: A Longitudinal Cross-Domain Classifier Analysis

No Evidence Against Sketch Reinstatement of Context, Verbal Labels or the Use of Registered Intermediaries for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Response to Henry et al. (2017)

Characterizing Health Disparities in the Age of Autism Diagnosis in a Study of 8-Year-Old Children

Brief Report: Reliability of the Participation and Sensory Environment Questionnaire: Home Scales

Sex-Differences in Children Referred for Assessment: An Exploratory Analysis of the Autism Mental Status Exam (AMSE)