Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 7/2018

27-02-2018 | Original Paper

Scripted and Unscripted Science Lessons for Children with Autism and Intellectual Disability

Auteurs: Victoria F. Knight, Belva Collins, Amy D. Spriggs, Emily Sartini, Margaret Janey MacDonald

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders | Uitgave 7/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Both scripted lessons and unscripted task analyzed lessons have been used effectively to teach science content to students with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder. This study evaluated the efficacy, efficiency, and teacher preference of scripted and unscripted task analyzed lesson plans from an elementary science curriculum designed for students with intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder by evaluating both lesson formats for (a) student outcomes on a science comprehension assessment, (b) sessions to criterion, and (c) average duration of lessons. Findings propose both lesson types were equally effective, but unscripted task analyzed versions may be more efficient and were preferred by teachers to scripted lessons. Implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research are also discussed.
Literatuur
go back to reference Billingsley, F. F., White, O. R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229–241. Billingsley, F. F., White, O. R., & Munson, R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229–241.
go back to reference Browder, D. M., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Courtade, G., Gibbs, S. L., & Flowers, C. (2008). Evaluation of the effectiveness of an early literacy program for students with significant cognitive disabilities using group randomized trial research. Exceptional Children, 75, 33–52. CrossRef Browder, D. M., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Courtade, G., Gibbs, S. L., & Flowers, C. (2008). Evaluation of the effectiveness of an early literacy program for students with significant cognitive disabilities using group randomized trial research. Exceptional Children, 75, 33–52. CrossRef
go back to reference Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., Kame’enui, E. J., & Tarver, S. G. (Eds.). (2010). Direct instruction reading (5th edn.). Boston, MA: Merrill. Carnine, D. W., Silbert, J., Kame’enui, E. J., & Tarver, S. G. (Eds.). (2010). Direct instruction reading (5th edn.). Boston, MA: Merrill.
go back to reference Collins, B. (2012). Systematic instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Company. Collins, B. (2012). Systematic instruction for students with moderate and severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing Company.
go back to reference Cooke, N. L., Galloway, T. W., Kretlow, A. G., & Helf, S. (2011). Impact of the script in a supplemental reading program on instructional opportunities for student practice of specified skills. The Journal of Special Education, 45(1), 28–42. CrossRef Cooke, N. L., Galloway, T. W., Kretlow, A. G., & Helf, S. (2011). Impact of the script in a supplemental reading program on instructional opportunities for student practice of specified skills. The Journal of Special Education, 45(1), 28–42. CrossRef
go back to reference Courtade, G. R., Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., & DiBiase, W. (2010). Training teachers to use an inquiry-based task analysis to teach science to students with moderate and severe disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 378–399. Courtade, G. R., Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., & DiBiase, W. (2010). Training teachers to use an inquiry-based task analysis to teach science to students with moderate and severe disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 378–399.
go back to reference Engelmann, S., Hanner, S., & Johnson, G. (1989). Corrective reading series guide. New York: Macmillan/McGraw-Hill. Engelmann, S., Hanner, S., & Johnson, G. (1989). Corrective reading series guide. New York: Macmillan/McGraw-Hill.
go back to reference Engelmann, S., Johnson, G., Carnine, L., Meyer, L., Becker, W., & Eisele, J. (1999). Corrective reading decoding strategies B2. Columbus, OH: Science Research Associates. Engelmann, S., Johnson, G., Carnine, L., Meyer, L., Becker, W., & Eisele, J. (1999). Corrective reading decoding strategies B2. Columbus, OH: Science Research Associates.
go back to reference Englemann, S., & Bruner, E. (1988). Reading mastery I: DISTAR reading. Chicago: Science Research Associates. Englemann, S., & Bruner, E. (1988). Reading mastery I: DISTAR reading. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
go back to reference Englemann, S., Meyer, L., Johnson, G., & Carnine, L. (1999). Corrective reading skills decoding skills applications C. Columbus, OH: Science Research Associates. Englemann, S., Meyer, L., Johnson, G., & Carnine, L. (1999). Corrective reading skills decoding skills applications C. Columbus, OH: Science Research Associates.
go back to reference Gagne, R. M. (1962). The acquisition of knowledge. Psychological Review, 69(4), 355. CrossRef Gagne, R. M. (1962). The acquisition of knowledge. Psychological Review, 69(4), 355. CrossRef
go back to reference Gast, D. L., Lloyd, B. P., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single case research methodology in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd edn.). New York: Routledge Publishers. Gast, D. L., Lloyd, B. P., & Ledford, J. R. (2014). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In D. L. Gast & J. R. Ledford (Eds.), Single case research methodology in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd edn.). New York: Routledge Publishers.
go back to reference Huitt, W. G., Monetti, D. M., & Hummel, J. H. (2009). Direct approach to instruction. In C. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Volume III, building a common knowledge base (pp. 73–98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Huitt, W. G., Monetti, D. M., & Hummel, J. H. (2009). Direct approach to instruction. In C. Reigeluth & A. Carr-Chellman (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: Volume III, building a common knowledge base (pp. 73–98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
go back to reference Jimenez, B., Knight, V., & Browder, D. (2012). Early science curriculum. Verona, WI: Attainment Company. Jimenez, B., Knight, V., & Browder, D. (2012). Early science curriculum. Verona, WI: Attainment Company.
go back to reference Miller, B. T., Krockover, G. H., & Doughty, T. (2013). Using iPads to teach inquiry science to students with moderate to severe intellectual disability: A pilot study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 887–911. CrossRef Miller, B. T., Krockover, G. H., & Doughty, T. (2013). Using iPads to teach inquiry science to students with moderate to severe intellectual disability: A pilot study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 887–911. CrossRef
go back to reference Nowicki, B. L., Sullivan-Watts, B., Shim, M. K., Young, B., & Pockalny, R. (2013). Factors influencing science content accuracy in elementary inquiry science lessons. Research in Science Education, 43, 1135–1154. CrossRef Nowicki, B. L., Sullivan-Watts, B., Shim, M. K., Young, B., & Pockalny, R. (2013). Factors influencing science content accuracy in elementary inquiry science lessons. Research in Science Education, 43, 1135–1154. CrossRef
go back to reference Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., & Balla, D. A. (2005). Vineland adaptive behavior scales (2nd edn.). New York: Pearson. Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., & Balla, D. A. (2005). Vineland adaptive behavior scales (2nd edn.). New York: Pearson.
go back to reference Spooner, F., Knight, V., Browder, D. M., Jimenez, B., & DiBiase, W. (2011). Evaluating evidence-based practices in teaching science content to students with severe developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36, 62–75. CrossRef Spooner, F., Knight, V., Browder, D. M., Jimenez, B., & DiBiase, W. (2011). Evaluating evidence-based practices in teaching science content to students with severe developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 36, 62–75. CrossRef
go back to reference Stallings, J., & Kaskowitz, D. (1974). Follow through classroom observation evaluation, 1972–1973. Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute. Stallings, J., & Kaskowitz, D. (1974). Follow through classroom observation evaluation, 1972–1973. Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute.
go back to reference Watkins, C. L., & Slocum, T. A. (2004). The components of direct instruction. In N. E. Marchand-Martell, T. A. Slocum & R. C. Martella (Eds.), Introduction to direct instruction (pp. 28–65). Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon. Watkins, C. L., & Slocum, T. A. (2004). The components of direct instruction. In N. E. Marchand-Martell, T. A. Slocum & R. C. Martella (Eds.), Introduction to direct instruction (pp. 28–65). Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon.
go back to reference Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler adult intelligence scale—fourth edition (WAIS–IV). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. Wechsler, D. (2014). Wechsler adult intelligence scale—fourth edition (WAIS–IV). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Metagegevens
Titel
Scripted and Unscripted Science Lessons for Children with Autism and Intellectual Disability
Auteurs
Victoria F. Knight
Belva Collins
Amy D. Spriggs
Emily Sartini
Margaret Janey MacDonald
Publicatiedatum
27-02-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders / Uitgave 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0162-3257
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3432
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3514-0