Top

Psychological Research

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

10-06-2019 | Original Article

Pointing movements and visuo-spatial working memory in a joint setting: the role of motor inhibition

Auteurs: Divya Bhatia, Pietro Spataro, Ramesh Kumar Mishra, Vincenzo Cestari, Fabrizio Doricchi, Clelia Rossi-Arnaud

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 7/2020

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that, under specific conditions, arrays that have been pointed at encoding are recognized better than passively viewed ones. According to one interpretation, the superior recognition of pointed-to arrays can be explained by the motor inhibition of passively viewed arrays. The present study sought to determine whether a similar motor inhibition can be induced also when the participants observed a co-actor perform the pointing movements. Participants were presented with two spatial arrays, one of which was encoded via observation only (the no-move array), while the other was encoded with pointing movements (the move array); movements were performed either by the participant or by the experimenter. Experiment 1 replicated the advantage of self-pointed arrays over passively viewed arrays. Experiment 2 showed that, when participants passively observed the pointing movements performed by the experimenter, move arrays were recognized no better than no-move arrays. Finally, Experiment 3 demonstrated that, in a joint-action condition in which participants alternated with the experimenter in making pointing movements, the advantage of experimenter-pointed arrays over passively viewed arrays was significant and similar in size to the advantage produced by self-performed movements. Importantly, a series of cross-experiment comparisons indicated that the higher recognition of both self- and experimenter-pointed arrays in Experiment 3 could be explained by the motor inhibition of no-move arrays. We propose that, in a joint condition, the pointing movements performed by the experimenter were represented in the same functional way as self-performed movements and that this produced the motor inhibition of passively viewed arrays.

vorige artikel A serial-position curve in high-performance darts: The effect of visuomotor calibration on throwing accuracy

In line with the previous studies, we will use the terms ‘pointing movements’ to refer to actions performed by participants on one of the two arrays presented in each trial. However, it is worth noting that the actions described by Chum et al. (2007) and Dodd and Shumborski (2009) were actually tapping movements, as participants were instructed to touch the location of the presented items on the screen—“Moreover, participants were instructed that they would be passively viewing the location of each object for one of the arrays (no-move array) and tapping each object as it appeared on the screen in the other array (move array)” (Dodd & Shumborski, 2009, p. 1239). In the present study, we followed the same procedure, although we acknowledge that there may be important differences between pointing and tapping gestures. In fact, only pointing gestures represent social-communicative acts that signal the protagonist's intention to direct the perceiver's attention to the pointed information (Gliga & Csibra, 2009; Yoon, Johnson, & Csibra, 2008). To our knowledge, the question of whether these two types of gestures have different effects on spatial memory has not been investigated and represents an interesting avenue for future research.

Anderson, M. C., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2000). Retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a recall-specific mechanism. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 522–530. PubMedCrossRef

Atmaca, S., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2011). The joint flanker effect: Sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2709-9. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 47–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1. CrossRef

Brass, M., Bekkering, H., & Prinz, W. (2001). Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica, 106(1–2), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00024-X. PubMedCrossRef

Burgess, N. (2006). Spatial memory: How egocentric and allocentric combine. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(12), 551–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.005. PubMedCrossRef

Chum, M., Bekkering, H., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2007). Motor and visual codes interact to facilitate visuospatial memory performance. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(6), 1189–1193. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193111. PubMedCrossRef

Constable, M. D., Pratt, J., & Welsh, T. N. (2018). “Two Minds Don’t Blink Alike”: The Attentional blink does not occur in a joint context. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01714. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Decety, J., & Grèzes, J. (2006). The power of simulation: Imagining one’s own and other’s behavior. Brain Research, 1079(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.115. PubMedCrossRef

Denis, M., Engelkamp, J., & Mohr, G. (1991). Memory of imagined actions: Imagining oneself or another person. Psychological Research, 53(3), 246–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00941394. CrossRef

Dodd, M. D., & Shumborski, S. (2009). Examining the influence of action on spatial working memory: The importance of selection. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(6), 1236–1247. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802439869. PubMedCrossRef

Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2013). The (not so) social Simon effect: A referential coding account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5), 1248. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031031. PubMedCrossRef

Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1989). Memory for action events: A new field of research. Psychological Research, 51(4), 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309142. PubMedCrossRef

Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1997). Sensory factors in memory for subject-performed tasks. Acta Psychologica, 96(1–2), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(97)00005-X. CrossRef

Enticott, P. G., Johnston, P. J., Herring, S. E., Hoy, K. E., & Fitzgerald, P. B. (2008). Mirror neuron activation is associated with facial emotion processing. Neuropsychologia, 46(11), 2851–2854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.04.022. PubMedCrossRef

Eskenazi, T., Doerrfeld, A., Logan, G. D., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2013). Your words are my words: Effects of acting together on encoding. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(5), 1026–1034. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.725058. PubMedCrossRef

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). GPower 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146. PubMedCrossRef

Fischer, M. H., & Hoellen, N. (2004). Space- and object-based attention depend on motor intention. Journal of General Psychology, 131(4), 365–377. PubMed

Galantucci, B., & Sebanz, N. (2009). Joint action: Current perspectives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 255–259. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01017.x. PubMedCrossRef

Gliga, T., & Csibra, G. (2009). One-year-old infants appreciate the referential nature of deictic gestures and words. Psychological Science, 20(3), 347–353. PubMedCrossRef

Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15(1), 20–25. PubMedCrossRef

Grèzes, J., & Decety, J. (2001). Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 12(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0193(200101)12:1%3c1:AID-HBM10%3e3.0.CO;2-V. PubMedCrossRef

Hogeveen, J., & Obhi, S. S. (2012). Social interaction enhances motor resonance for observed human actions. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(17), 5984–5989. PubMedCrossRef

Holländer, A., Jung, C., & Prinz, W. (2011). Covert motor activity on NoGo trials in a task sharing paradigm: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 345–356. PubMedCrossRef

Humphreys, G. W., & Sui, J. (2016). Attentional control and the self: The Self-Attention Network (SAN). Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(1–4), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2015.1044427. PubMedCrossRef

Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology, 3(3), e79. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0030079. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage, 14(1), S103–S109. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0832. PubMedCrossRef

Kourtis, D., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2010). Favouritism in the motor system: Social interaction modulates action simulation. Biology Letters, 6(6), 758–761. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0478. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Kourtis, D., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2013). Predictive representation of other people’s actions in joint action planning: An EEG study. Social Neuroscience, 8(1), 31–42. PubMedCrossRef

Lange, N., Hollins, T. J., & Bach, P. (2017). Testing the motor simulation account of source errors for actions in recall. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1686. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01686. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Leynes, P. A., & Kakadia, B. (2013). Variations in retrieval monitoring during action memory judgments: Evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs). International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.01.004. PubMedCrossRef

Lindner, I., Echterhoff, G., Davidson, P. R., & Brand, M. (2010). Observation inflation: Your actions become mine. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1291–1299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610379860. PubMedCrossRef

Lindner, I., Schain, C., & Echterhoff, G. (2016). Other-self confusions in action memory: The role of motor processes. Cognition, 149, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.003. PubMedCrossRef

Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

Quinn, J. G. (2008). Movement and visual coding: The structure of visuo-spatial working memory. Cognitive Processing, 9(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-007-0184-9. PubMedCrossRef

Ramnani, N., & Miall, R. C. (2004). A system in the human brain for predicting the actions of others. Nature Neuroscience, 7(1), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1168. PubMedCrossRef

Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230. PubMedCrossRef

Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(2), 131–141. PubMedCrossRef

Rizzolatti, G., & Matelli, M. (2003). Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: Anatomy and functions. Experimental Brain Research, 153(2), 146–157. PubMedCrossRef

Rossi-Arnaud, C., Pieroni, L., Spataro, P., & Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory and individual differences in the encoding of vertical, horizontal and diagonal symmetry. Acta Psychologica, 141(1), 122–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.06.007. PubMedCrossRef

Rossi-Arnaud, C., Spataro, P., & Longobardi, E. (2012). Effects of pointing on the recall of simultaneous and sequential visuospatial arrays: A role for retrieval strategies? Psychological Research, 76(6), 699–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0394-8. PubMedCrossRef

Sapkota, R. P., Pardhan, S., & van der Linde, I. (2013). Manual tapping enhances visual short-term memory performance where visual and motor coordinates correspond. British Journal of Psychology, 104(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2012.02115.x. PubMedCrossRef

Save, E., & Moghaddam, M. (1996). Effects of lesions of the associative parietal cortex on the acquisition and use of spatial memory in egocentric and allocentric navigation tasks in the rat. Behavioral Neuroscience, 110(1), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7044.110.1.74. PubMedCrossRef

Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.009. CrossRef

Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others’ actions: Just like one’s own? Cognition, 88(3), B11–B21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00043-X. PubMedCrossRef

Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W., & Wascher, E. (2006). Twin peaks: An ERP study of action planning and control in coacting individuals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(5), 859–870. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.859. PubMedCrossRef

Sebanz, N., Rebbechi, D., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W., & Frith, C. D. (2007). Is it really my turn? An event-related fMRI study of task sharing. Social Neuroscience, 2(2), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910701237989. PubMedCrossRef

Spataro, P., Marques, V. S., Longobardi, E., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2015). Does pointing facilitate the recall of serial positions in visuospatial working memory? Cognitive Processing, 16(Suppl 1), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-015-0681-1. PubMedCrossRef

Sui, J., He, X., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012). Perceptual effects of social salience: Evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 1105. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029792. PubMedCrossRef

Tsai, C. C., Kuo, W. J., Jing, J. T., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2006). A common coding framework in self–other interaction: Evidence from joint action task. Experimental Brain Research, 175(2), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0557-9. PubMedCrossRef

Turk, D. J., Cunningham, S. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2008). Self-memory biases in explicit and incidental encoding of trait adjectives. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(3), 1040–1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.02.004. PubMedCrossRef

Vandierendonck, A., Kemps, E., Fastame, M. C., & Szmalec, A. (2004). Working memory components of the Corsi blocks task. British Journal of Psychology, 95(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712604322779460. PubMedCrossRef

Vesper, C., Butterfill, S., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Networks, 23(8–9), 998–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2010.06.002. PubMedCrossRef

Welsh, T. N., Elliott, D., Anson, J. G., Dhillon, V., Weeks, D. J., Lyons, J. L., & Chua, R. (2005). Does Joe influence Fred’s action? Inhibition of return across different nervous systems. Neuroscience Letters, 385(2), 99–104. PubMedCrossRef

Yoon, J. M., Johnson, M. H., & Csibra, G. (2008). Communication-induced memory biases in preverbal infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(36), 13690–13695. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0804388105. CrossRef

Zaehle, T., Jordan, K., Wüstenberg, T., Baudewig, J., Dechent, P., & Mast, F. W. (2007). The neural basis of the egocentric and allocentric spatial frame of reference. Brain Research, 113, 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.044. CrossRef

Titel: Pointing movements and visuo-spatial working memory in a joint setting: the role of motor inhibition
Auteurs: Divya Bhatia
Pietro Spataro
Ramesh Kumar Mishra
Vincenzo Cestari
Fabrizio Doricchi
Clelia Rossi-Arnaud
Publicatiedatum: 10-06-2019
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01209-y

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2020

David and Goliath—size does matter: size modulates feature–response binding of irrelevant features

Freezing in response to social threat: a replication

Distraction by deviant sounds: disgusting and neutral words capture attention to the same extent

Exploring attentional focus of older adult fallers during heightened postural threat

Yellow is for safety: perceptual and affective perspectives

Advantage of audition over vision in a perceptual timing task but not in a sensorimotor timing task