Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 7/2020

10-06-2019 | Original Article

Pointing movements and visuo-spatial working memory in a joint setting: the role of motor inhibition

Auteurs: Divya Bhatia, Pietro Spataro, Ramesh Kumar Mishra, Vincenzo Cestari, Fabrizio Doricchi, Clelia Rossi-Arnaud

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 7/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that, under specific conditions, arrays that have been pointed at encoding are recognized better than passively viewed ones. According to one interpretation, the superior recognition of pointed-to arrays can be explained by the motor inhibition of passively viewed arrays. The present study sought to determine whether a similar motor inhibition can be induced also when the participants observed a co-actor perform the pointing movements. Participants were presented with two spatial arrays, one of which was encoded via observation only (the no-move array), while the other was encoded with pointing movements (the move array); movements were performed either by the participant or by the experimenter. Experiment 1 replicated the advantage of self-pointed arrays over passively viewed arrays. Experiment 2 showed that, when participants passively observed the pointing movements performed by the experimenter, move arrays were recognized no better than no-move arrays. Finally, Experiment 3 demonstrated that, in a joint-action condition in which participants alternated with the experimenter in making pointing movements, the advantage of experimenter-pointed arrays over passively viewed arrays was significant and similar in size to the advantage produced by self-performed movements. Importantly, a series of cross-experiment comparisons indicated that the higher recognition of both self- and experimenter-pointed arrays in Experiment 3 could be explained by the motor inhibition of no-move arrays. We propose that, in a joint condition, the pointing movements performed by the experimenter were represented in the same functional way as self-performed movements and that this produced the motor inhibition of passively viewed arrays.
Voetnoten
1
In line with the previous studies, we will use the terms ‘pointing movements’ to refer to actions performed by participants on one of the two arrays presented in each trial. However, it is worth noting that the actions described by Chum et al. (2007) and Dodd and Shumborski (2009) were actually tapping movements, as participants were instructed to touch the location of the presented items on the screen—“Moreover, participants were instructed that they would be passively viewing the location of each object for one of the arrays (no-move array) and tapping each object as it appeared on the screen in the other array (move array)” (Dodd & Shumborski, 2009, p. 1239). In the present study, we followed the same procedure, although we acknowledge that there may be important differences between pointing and tapping gestures. In fact, only pointing gestures represent social-communicative acts that signal the protagonist's intention to direct the perceiver's attention to the pointed information (Gliga & Csibra, 2009; Yoon, Johnson, & Csibra, 2008). To our knowledge, the question of whether these two types of gestures have different effects on spatial memory has not been investigated and represents an interesting avenue for future research.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Anderson, M. C., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2000). Retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a recall-specific mechanism. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 522–530.PubMedCrossRef Anderson, M. C., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2000). Retrieval-induced forgetting: Evidence for a recall-specific mechanism. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 522–530.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Fischer, M. H., & Hoellen, N. (2004). Space- and object-based attention depend on motor intention. Journal of General Psychology, 131(4), 365–377.PubMed Fischer, M. H., & Hoellen, N. (2004). Space- and object-based attention depend on motor intention. Journal of General Psychology, 131(4), 365–377.PubMed
go back to reference Gliga, T., & Csibra, G. (2009). One-year-old infants appreciate the referential nature of deictic gestures and words. Psychological Science, 20(3), 347–353.PubMedCrossRef Gliga, T., & Csibra, G. (2009). One-year-old infants appreciate the referential nature of deictic gestures and words. Psychological Science, 20(3), 347–353.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15(1), 20–25.PubMedCrossRef Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15(1), 20–25.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hogeveen, J., & Obhi, S. S. (2012). Social interaction enhances motor resonance for observed human actions. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(17), 5984–5989.PubMedCrossRef Hogeveen, J., & Obhi, S. S. (2012). Social interaction enhances motor resonance for observed human actions. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(17), 5984–5989.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Holländer, A., Jung, C., & Prinz, W. (2011). Covert motor activity on NoGo trials in a task sharing paradigm: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 345–356.PubMedCrossRef Holländer, A., Jung, C., & Prinz, W. (2011). Covert motor activity on NoGo trials in a task sharing paradigm: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 345–356.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kourtis, D., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2013). Predictive representation of other people’s actions in joint action planning: An EEG study. Social Neuroscience, 8(1), 31–42.PubMedCrossRef Kourtis, D., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2013). Predictive representation of other people’s actions in joint action planning: An EEG study. Social Neuroscience, 8(1), 31–42.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
go back to reference Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(2), 131–141.PubMedCrossRef Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(2), 131–141.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rizzolatti, G., & Matelli, M. (2003). Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: Anatomy and functions. Experimental Brain Research, 153(2), 146–157.PubMedCrossRef Rizzolatti, G., & Matelli, M. (2003). Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: Anatomy and functions. Experimental Brain Research, 153(2), 146–157.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Welsh, T. N., Elliott, D., Anson, J. G., Dhillon, V., Weeks, D. J., Lyons, J. L., & Chua, R. (2005). Does Joe influence Fred’s action? Inhibition of return across different nervous systems. Neuroscience Letters, 385(2), 99–104.PubMedCrossRef Welsh, T. N., Elliott, D., Anson, J. G., Dhillon, V., Weeks, D. J., Lyons, J. L., & Chua, R. (2005). Does Joe influence Fred’s action? Inhibition of return across different nervous systems. Neuroscience Letters, 385(2), 99–104.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Pointing movements and visuo-spatial working memory in a joint setting: the role of motor inhibition
Auteurs
Divya Bhatia
Pietro Spataro
Ramesh Kumar Mishra
Vincenzo Cestari
Fabrizio Doricchi
Clelia Rossi-Arnaud
Publicatiedatum
10-06-2019
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01209-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2020

Psychological Research 7/2020 Naar de uitgave