Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01202-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The current study examined whether the effect of spatial training transfers to the math domain. Sixty-two 6- and 7-year-olds completed an at-home 1-week online training intervention. The spatial-training group received mental rotation training, whereas the active control group received literacy training in a format that matched the spatial training. Results revealed near transfer of mental rotation ability in the spatial-training group. More importantly, there was also far transfer to canonical arithmetic problems, such that children in the spatial-training group performed better on these math problems than children in the control group. Such far transfer could not be attributed to general cognitive improvement, since no improvement was observed for non-symbolic quantity processing, verbal working memory (WM), or language ability following spatial training. Spatial training may have benefitted symbolic arithmetic performance by improving visualization ability, access to the mental number line, and/or increasing the capacity of visuospatial WM.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Supplementary material 1 (MP4 7786 kb)426_2019_1202_MOESM1_ESM.mp4
Supplementary material 2 (MP4 4908 kb)426_2019_1202_MOESM2_ESM.mp4
Supplementary material 3 (MP4 5163 kb)426_2019_1202_MOESM3_ESM.mp4
Supplementary material 4 (MP4 20080 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (MP4 18083 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (MP4 15337 kb)
Ackerman, P. L. (1988). Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 288–318. CrossRef
Amalric, M., & Dehaene, S. (2016). Origins of the brain networks for advanced mathematics in expert mathematicians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 4909–4917. CrossRef
Benson, N. F., Beaujean, A. A., Donohue, A., & Ward, E. (2016). W Scores. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36, 273–277. CrossRef
Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 380–400. CrossRef
Casey, B. M., Lombardi, C. M., Pollock, A., Fineman, B., & Pezaris, E. (2017). Girls’ spatial skills and arithmetic strategies in first grade as predictors of fifth-grade analytical math reasoning. Journal of Cognition and Development, 18, 530–555. CrossRef
Caviola, S., Mammarella, I. C., Lucangeli, D., & Cornoldi, C. (2014). Working memory and domain-specific precursors predicting success in learning written subtraction problems. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 92–100. CrossRef
Cheng, Y.-L., & Mix, K. S. (2014). Spatial training improves children’s mathematics ability. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15, 2–11. CrossRef
Christopher, M. E., et al. (2012). Predicting word reading and comprehension with executive function and speed measures across development: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 470–488. CrossRef
Cornu, V., Schiltz, C., Pazouki, T., & Martin, R. (2017). Training early visuo-spatial abilities: A controlled classroom-based intervention study. Applied Developmental Science, 23, 1–21. CrossRef
Das, R., LeFevre, J. A., & Penner-Wilger, M. (2010). Negative numbers in simple arithmetic. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1943–1952. CrossRef
European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training. (2014). Rising STEMs. Retrieved from http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/publications-and-resources/statistics-and-indicators/statistics-and-graphs/rising-stems. Retrieved 19 June 2018.
Fayer, S., Lacey, A., & Watson, A. (2017). STEM occupations: Past, present, and future. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2017/science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem-occupations-past-present-and-future/pdf/science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem-occupations-past-present-and-future.pdf. Retrieved 10 May 2018.
Friso-van den Bos, I., van der Ven, S. H. G., Kroesbergen, E. H., & van Luit, J. E. H. (2013). Working memory and mathematics in primary school children: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 10, 29–44. CrossRef
Geary, D. C., & Burlingham-Dubree, M. (1989). External validation of the strategy choice model for addition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 175–192. CrossRef
Hawes, Z., Moss, J., Caswell, B., Naqvi, S., & MacKinnon, S. (2017). Enhancing children’s spatial and numerical skills through a dynamic spatial approach to early geometry instruction: Effects of a 32-week intervention. Cognition and Instruction, 35, 1–29. CrossRef
Hawes, Z., Moss, J., Caswell, B., & Poliszczuk, D. (2015). Effects of mental rotation training on children’s spatial and mathematics performance: A randomized controlled study. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 4, 60–68. CrossRef
Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual–spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 684–689. CrossRef
Huttenlocher, J., Jordan, N. C., & Levine, S. C. (1994). A mental model for early arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 284–296. CrossRef
Hyun, J.-S., & Luck, S. J. (2007). Visual working memory as the substrate for mental rotation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 154–158. CrossRef
Knuth, E. J., Stephens, A. C., McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2006). Does understanding the equal sign matter? Evidence from solving equations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 297–312.
Laski, E. V., et al. (2013). Spatial skills as a predictor of first grade girls’ use of higher level arithmetic strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 123–130. CrossRef
Lourenco, S. F., Cheung, C.-N., & Aulet, L. S. (2018). Is visuospatial reasoning related to early mathematical development? A critical review. In A. Henik & W. Fias (Eds.), Heterogeneity of function in numerical cognition (pp. 177–210). London: Academic Press. CrossRef
McCrink, K., Dehaene, S., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2007). Moving along the number line: Operational momentum in nonsymbolic arithmetic. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 69, 1324–1333. CrossRef
Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2013). Can spatial training improve long-term outcomes for gifted STEM undergraduates? Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 141–152. CrossRef
Mix, K. S., & Cheng, Y.-L. (2012). The relation between space and math: Developmental and educational implications. In B. B. Janette (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 42, pp. 197–243). San Diego: Elsevier Inc.
Neuburger, S., Jansen, P., Heil, M., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2011). Gender differences in pre-adolescents’ mental-rotation performance: Do they depend on grade and stimulus type? Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1238–1242. CrossRef
Prime, D. J., & Jolicoeur, P. (2009). Mental rotation requires visual short-term memory: Evidence from human electric cortical activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2437–2446. CrossRef
Rodán, A., Gimeno, P., Elosúa, M. R., Montoro, P. R., & Contreras, M. J. (2019). Boys and girls gain in spatial, but not in mathematical ability after mental rotation training in primary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 70, 1–11. CrossRef
Schneider, M., et al. (2017). Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: A meta-analysis. Developmental Science, 20, e12372. CrossRef
Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604–614. CrossRef
Szűcs, D., & Myers, T. (2017). A critical analysis of design, facts, bias and inference in the approximate number system training literature: A systematic review. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 6, 187–203. CrossRef
Terlecki, M. S., Newcombe, N. S., & Little, M. (2008). Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: Gender differences in growth patterns. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 996–1013. CrossRef
Thurstone, T. G. (1974). PMA readiness level. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
Uttal, D. H., & Cohen, C. A. (2012). Spatial thinking and STEM education: When, why and how? Psychology of learning and motivation, 57, 147–181. CrossRef
Verdine, B. N., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Newcombe, N. S. (2017). Links between spatial and mathematical skills across the preschool years. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 82, 1–150. CrossRef
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817–835. CrossRef
Woodcock, R. W., Mather, N., & McGrew, K. S. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca: Riverside Publishing Company.
Woodcock, R. W., Mather, N., McGrew, K. S., & Schrank, F. A. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities. Itasca: Riverside Publishing Company.
Zhang, X., & Lin, D. (2015). Pathways to arithmetic: The role of visual-spatial and language skills in written arithmetic, arithmetic word problems, and nonsymbolic arithmetic. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 188–197. CrossRef
- Does training mental rotation transfer to gains in mathematical competence? Assessment of an at-home visuospatial intervention
Jenna Y. Sung
Stella F. Lourenco
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
An International Journal of Perception, Attention, Memory, and Action
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772