Top

Psychological Research

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

29-05-2019 | Original Article

Does training mental rotation transfer to gains in mathematical competence? Assessment of an at-home visuospatial intervention

Auteurs: Chi-Ngai Cheung, Jenna Y. Sung, Stella F. Lourenco

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 7/2020

Abstract

The current study examined whether the effect of spatial training transfers to the math domain. Sixty-two 6- and 7-year-olds completed an at-home 1-week online training intervention. The spatial-training group received mental rotation training, whereas the active control group received literacy training in a format that matched the spatial training. Results revealed near transfer of mental rotation ability in the spatial-training group. More importantly, there was also far transfer to canonical arithmetic problems, such that children in the spatial-training group performed better on these math problems than children in the control group. Such far transfer could not be attributed to general cognitive improvement, since no improvement was observed for non-symbolic quantity processing, verbal working memory (WM), or language ability following spatial training. Spatial training may have benefitted symbolic arithmetic performance by improving visualization ability, access to the mental number line, and/or increasing the capacity of visuospatial WM.

vorige artikel The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching: a diffusion model analysis

volgende artikel What was that object? On the role of identity information in the formation of object files and conscious object perception

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Although the WJ-Calculation test includes more advanced problems such as calculus or algebra, none of the children in our study answered such problems. The questions on the WJ-Calculation test attempted by children in this study only included canonical arithmetic problems.

In the spatial-training group, the first session consisted of only translation problems since these problems have been found to elicit better performance than rotation problems (Levine et al., 1999). Subsequent training sessions contained an equal number of translation and rotation problems. In the control group, the first session consisted of stimulus words that were generally shorter than the other sessions.

Each choice array in the CMTT consists of four shapes such that each could be used to generate four different items (i.e., horizontal rotation; horizontal translation; diagonal rotation; diagonal translation).

All participants completed the first training session because it was part of the first laboratory visit. When excluding the first session, the mean number of completed at-home training sessions was 5.73 (out of 6). There were 10 participants who did not complete all remaining training sessions. Importantly, a comparison between the full sample of children (N = 62) with the reduced sample (N = 52) yielded comparable patterns of performance at post-test.

A portion of the training accuracy data (5.04%) was missing due to a technical problem. These sessions were excluded from the accuracy analysis.

One child was excluded from this analysis because the child only completed sessions 1–4. There were no data on the second half of training for this child.

One child in the spatial-training group did not complete this task and, thus, was excluded from this analysis.

Ackerman, P. L. (1988). Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 288–318.

Alibali, M. W. (1999). How children change their minds: Strategy change can be gradual or abrupt. Developmental Psychology, 35, 127–145. PubMed

Amalric, M., & Dehaene, S. (2016). Origins of the brain networks for advanced mathematics in expert mathematicians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 4909–4917.

Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29. PubMed

Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612–637. PubMed

Benson, N. F., Beaujean, A. A., Donohue, A., & Ward, E. (2016). W Scores. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36, 273–277.

Bonny, J. W., & Lourenco, S. F. (2013). The approximate number system and its relation to early math achievement: Evidence from the preschool years. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(3), 375–388. PubMed

Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 380–400.

Casey, B. M., Lombardi, C. M., Pollock, A., Fineman, B., & Pezaris, E. (2017). Girls’ spatial skills and arithmetic strategies in first grade as predictors of fifth-grade analytical math reasoning. Journal of Cognition and Development, 18, 530–555.

Caviola, S., Gerotto, G., & Mammarella, I. C. (2016). Computer-based training for improving mental calculation in third- and fifth-graders. Acta Psychologica, 171, 118–127. PubMed

Caviola, S., Mammarella, I. C., Lucangeli, D., & Cornoldi, C. (2014). Working memory and domain-specific precursors predicting success in learning written subtraction problems. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 92–100.

Cheng, Y.-L., & Mix, K. S. (2014). Spatial training improves children’s mathematics ability. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15, 2–11.

Christopher, M. E., et al. (2012). Predicting word reading and comprehension with executive function and speed measures across development: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 470–488.

Cornu, V., Schiltz, C., Pazouki, T., & Martin, R. (2017). Training early visuo-spatial abilities: A controlled classroom-based intervention study. Applied Developmental Science, 23, 1–21.

Crollen, V., Vanderclausen, C., Allaire, F., Pollaris, A., & Noël, M.-P. (2015). Spatial and numerical processing in children with non-verbal learning disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 47, 61–72. PubMed

Das, R., LeFevre, J. A., & Penner-Wilger, M. (2010). Negative numbers in simple arithmetic. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1943–1952.

Ehrlich, S. B., Levine, S. C., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2006). The importance of gesture in children’s spatial reasoning. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1259–1268. PubMed

European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training. (2014). Rising STEMs. Retrieved from http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/publications-and-resources/statistics-and-indicators/statistics-and-graphs/rising-stems. Retrieved 19 June 2018.

Fayer, S., Lacey, A., & Watson, A. (2017). STEM occupations: Past, present, and future. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2017/science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem-occupations-past-present-and-future/pdf/science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem-occupations-past-present-and-future.pdf. Retrieved 10 May 2018.

Fazio, L. K., Bailey, D. H., Thompson, C. A., & Siegler, R. S. (2014). Relations of different types of numerical magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 123, 53–72. PubMed

Friso-van den Bos, I., van der Ven, S. H. G., Kroesbergen, E. H., & van Luit, J. E. H. (2013). Working memory and mathematics in primary school children: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 10, 29–44.

Geary, D. C., & Burlingham-Dubree, M. (1989). External validation of the strategy choice model for addition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 47, 175–192.

Gebuis, T., & Reynvoet, B. (2011). Generating nonsymbolic number stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 981–986. PubMed

Giofrè, D., Mammarella, I. C., & Cornoldi, C. (2014). The relationship among geometry, working memory, and intelligence in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 123, 112–128. PubMed

Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Beilock, S. L., & Levine, S. C. (2012). The relation between spatial skill and early number knowledge: The role of the linear number line. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1229–1241. PubMed

Halberda, J., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Developmental change in the acuity of the ‘number sense’: The approximate number system in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1457–1465. PubMed

Hawes, Z., Moss, J., Caswell, B., Naqvi, S., & MacKinnon, S. (2017). Enhancing children’s spatial and numerical skills through a dynamic spatial approach to early geometry instruction: Effects of a 32-week intervention. Cognition and Instruction, 35, 1–29.

Hawes, Z., Moss, J., Caswell, B., & Poliszczuk, D. (2015). Effects of mental rotation training on children’s spatial and mathematics performance: A randomized controlled study. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 4, 60–68.

Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual–spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 684–689.

Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 435–448. PubMed

Huttenlocher, J., Jordan, N. C., & Levine, S. C. (1994). A mental model for early arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 284–296.

Hyun, J.-S., & Luck, S. J. (2007). Visual working memory as the substrate for mental rotation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 154–158.

Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Steiger, J. H. (2013). Creativity and technical innovation: Spatial ability’s unique role. Psychological Science, 24, 1831–1836. PubMed

Knops, A., Thirion, B., Hubbard, E. M., Michel, V., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Recruitment of an area involved in eye movements during mental arithmetic. Science, 324, 1583–1585. PubMed

Knuth, E. J., Stephens, A. C., McNeil, N. M., & Alibali, M. W. (2006). Does understanding the equal sign matter? Evidence from solving equations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 297–312.

Krisztian, A., Bernath, L., Gombos, H., & Vereczkei, L. (2015). Developing numerical ability in children with mathematical difficulties using Origami. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 121, 233–243. PubMed

Kucian, K., et al. (2011). Mental number line training in children with developmental dyscalculia. Neuroimage, 57, 782–795. PubMed

Laski, E. V., et al. (2013). Spatial skills as a predictor of first grade girls’ use of higher level arithmetic strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 23, 123–130.

Lauer, J. E., & Lourenco, S. F. (2016). Spatial processing in infancy predicts both spatial and mathematical aptitude in childhood. Psychological Science, 27, 1291–1298. PubMed

LeFevre, J.-A., Fast, L., Skwarchuk, S.-L., Smith-Chant, B. L., Bisanz, J., Kamawar, D., & Penner-Wilger, M. (2010). Pathways to mathematics: Longitudinal predictors of performance. Child Development, 81, 1753–1767. PubMed

Levine, S. C., Huttenlocher, J., Taylor, A., & Langrock, A. (1999). Early sex differences in spatial skill. Developmental Psychology, 35, 940–949. PubMed

Libertus, M. E., Feigenson, L., & Halberda, J. (2011). Preschool acuity of the approximate number system correlates with school math ability. Developmental Science, 14(6), 1292–1300. PubMedPubMedCentral

Lourenco, S. F., Cheung, C.-N., & Aulet, L. S. (2018). Is visuospatial reasoning related to early mathematical development? A critical review. In A. Henik & W. Fias (Eds.), Heterogeneity of function in numerical cognition (pp. 177–210). London: Academic Press.

Lourenco, S. F., & Longo, M. R. (2009). Multiple spatial representations of number: Evidence for co-existing compressive and linear scales. Experimental Brain Research, 193, 151–156. PubMed

Lowrie, T., Logan, T., & Ramful, A. (2017). Visuospatial training improves elementary students’ mathematics performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 170–186. PubMed

Mammarella, I. C., Lucangeli, D., & Cornoldi, C. (2010). Spatial working memory and arithmetic deficits in children with nonverbal learning difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 455–468. PubMed

Masson, N., Pesenti, M., & Dormal, V. (2017). Impact of optokinetic stimulation on mental arithmetic. Psychological Research, 81, 840–849. PubMed

Mathieu, R., et al. (2018). What’s behind a “+” sign? Perceiving an arithmetic operator recruits brain circuits for spatial orienting. Cerebral Cortex, 28, 1673–1684. PubMed

McCrink, K., Dehaene, S., & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2007). Moving along the number line: Operational momentum in nonsymbolic arithmetic. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 69, 1324–1333.

McCrink, K., & Opfer, J. E. (2014). Development of spatial-numerical associations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 439–445. PubMedPubMedCentral

Meyer, M. L., Salimpoor, V. N., Wu, S. S., Geary, D. C., & Menon, V. (2010). Differential contribution of specific working memory components to mathematics achievement in 2nd and 3rd graders. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 101–109. PubMedPubMedCentral

Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2013). Can spatial training improve long-term outcomes for gifted STEM undergraduates? Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 141–152.

Mix, K. S., & Cheng, Y.-L. (2012). The relation between space and math: Developmental and educational implications. In B. B. Janette (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 42, pp. 197–243). San Diego: Elsevier Inc.

Neuburger, S., Jansen, P., Heil, M., & Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2011). Gender differences in pre-adolescents’ mental-rotation performance: Do they depend on grade and stimulus type? Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 1238–1242.

Park, J., & Brannon, E. M. (2013). Training the approximate number system improves math proficiency. Psychological Science, 24, 2013–2019. PubMedPubMedCentral

Park, J., & Brannon, E. M. (2014). Improving arithmetic performance with number sense training: An investigation of underlying mechanism. Cognition, 133, 188–200. PubMedPubMedCentral

Piazza, M., Facoetti, A., Trussardi, A. N., Berteletti, I., Conte, S., Lucangeli, D., … Zorzi, M. (2010). Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia. Cognition, 116(1), 33–41. PubMed

Prime, D. J., & Jolicoeur, P. (2009). Mental rotation requires visual short-term memory: Evidence from human electric cortical activity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2437–2446.

Ramani, G. B., & Siegler, R. S. (2008). Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children’s numerical knowledge through playing number board games. Child Development, 79, 375–394. PubMed

Rodán, A., Gimeno, P., Elosúa, M. R., Montoro, P. R., & Contreras, M. J. (2019). Boys and girls gain in spatial, but not in mathematical ability after mental rotation training in primary education. Learning and Individual Differences, 70, 1–11.

Schneider, M., et al. (2017). Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: A meta-analysis. Developmental Science, 20, e12372.

Schneider, M., et al. (2018). Associations of number line estimation with mathematical competence: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 89, 1467–1484. PubMed

Shea, D. L., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604–614.

Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701. PubMed

Siegler, R. S., & Booth, J. L. (2004). Development of numerical estimation in young children. Child Development, 75(2), 428–444. PubMed

Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. E. (2003). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14, 237–243. PubMed

Siegler, R. S., & Ramani, G. B. (2008). Playing linear numerical board games promotes low-income children’s numerical development. Developmental Science, 11, 655–661. PubMed

Simons, D. J., et al. (2016). Do “brain-training” programs work? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17, 103–186. PubMed

Skagerlund, K., & Träff, U. (2016). Processing of space, time, and number contributes to mathematical abilities above and beyond domain-general cognitive abilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 143, 85–101. PubMed

Szűcs, D., & Myers, T. (2017). A critical analysis of design, facts, bias and inference in the approximate number system training literature: A systematic review. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 6, 187–203.

Terlecki, M. S., Newcombe, N. S., & Little, M. (2008). Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: Gender differences in growth patterns. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 996–1013.

Thompson, C. A., & Opfer, J. E. (2016). Learning linear spatial-numeric associations improves accuracy of memory for numbers. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 24. PubMedPubMedCentral

Thurstone, T. G. (1974). PMA readiness level. Chicago: Science Research Associates.

Uttal, D. H., & Cohen, C. A. (2012). Spatial thinking and STEM education: When, why and how? Psychology of learning and motivation, 57, 147–181.

Uttal, D. H., et al. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 352–402. PubMed

Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599–604. PubMed

Venneri, A., Cornoldi, C., & Garuti, M. (2003). Arithmetic difficulties in children with visuospatial learning disability (VLD). Child Neuropsychology, 9, 175–183. PubMed

Verdine, B. N., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Newcombe, N. S. (2017). Links between spatial and mathematical skills across the preschool years. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 82, 1–150.

Verdine, B. N., et al. (2014). Deconstructing building blocks: Preschoolers’ spatial assembly performance relates to early mathematical skills. Child Development, 85, 1062–1076. PubMed

Viarouge, A., Hubbard, E. M., Dehaene, S., & Sackur, J. (2010). Number line compression and the illusory perception of random numbers. Experimental Psychology, 57, 446–454. PubMed

Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 817–835.

Woodcock, R. W., Mather, N., & McGrew, K. S. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca: Riverside Publishing Company.

Woodcock, R. W., Mather, N., McGrew, K. S., & Schrank, F. A. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities. Itasca: Riverside Publishing Company.

Zhang, X., & Lin, D. (2015). Pathways to arithmetic: The role of visual-spatial and language skills in written arithmetic, arithmetic word problems, and nonsymbolic arithmetic. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 188–197.

Titel: Does training mental rotation transfer to gains in mathematical competence? Assessment of an at-home visuospatial intervention
Auteurs: Chi-Ngai Cheung
Jenna Y. Sung
Stella F. Lourenco
Publicatiedatum: 29-05-2019
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01202-5

Mijn bibliotheek

Shop

Tips voor Mijn BSL

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Does training mental rotation transfer to gains in mathematical competence? Assessment of an at-home visuospatial intervention

Abstract

Mijn bibliotheek

Shop

Tips voor Mijn BSL

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2020

Exploring attentional focus of older adult fallers during heightened postural threat

Multiple processing limitations underlie multitasking costs

The validity of the online thought-probing procedure of mind wandering is not threatened by variations of probe rate and probe framing

David and Goliath—size does matter: size modulates feature–response binding of irrelevant features

The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching: a diffusion model analysis

Pointing movements and visuo-spatial working memory in a joint setting: the role of motor inhibition