Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Memory for action events: A new field of research

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Psychological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bäckman, L. (1985). Compensation and recoding: A framework for aging and memory research. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 26, 193–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckman, L. (1985). Further evidence for the lack of adult age differences on free recall of subject-performed tasks: The importance of motor acction. Human Learning, 4, 79–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäckman, L., & Nilsson, L.-G. (1984). Aging effects in free recall: An exception to the rule. Human Learning, 3, 53–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1981). On the generality of some memory laws. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 22, 267–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1983). The effect of encoding variables on the free recall of words and action events. Memory & Cognition, 11, 575–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R. L. (1985). On the generality of the laws of memory. In L. G. Nilsson & T. Archer, Animal learning and human memory. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, M., Engelkamp, J., & Richardson, T. E. (1988) (Eds.), Cognitive and neuropsychological approaches to mental imagery. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J. (1985). Aktivationsprozesse im motorischen Gedächtnis. In D. Albert (Ed.) Bericht über den 34. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Wien. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J. (1986(a)). Nouns and verbs in paired-associate learning: Instructional effects. Psychological Research, 48, 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J. (1986(b)). Differences between imaginal and motor encoding. In F. Klix & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J. (1987). Modalitätsspezifische Gedächtnissysteme im Kontext sprachlicher Informationsverarbeitung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 195, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp J. (1989). Sind motorische Prozesse Teil des Enkodierens? In W. Schönpflug, Bericht über den 36. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Berlin 1988. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., & Krumnacker, H. (1980). Imaginale und motorische Prozesse beim Behalten verbalen Materials. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 27, 511–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1983). Zum Einfluß von Wahrnehmen und Tun auf das Behalten von Verb-Objekt-Phrasen. Sprache & Kognition, 2, 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1984). Motor program information as a separable memory unit. Psychological Research, 46, 283–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., & Zimmer, H. D. (1985). Motor programs and their relation to semantic memory. German Journal of Psychology, 9, 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H. D., & Denis, M. (1989). Paired associate learning of action verbs with visual or motor imaginal encoding instructions. Psychological Research, 50, 257–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruneberg, M. M., Morris, P. E., & Sykes, R. N. (1988) (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: current research and issues, Vol. 1. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helstrup, T. (1986). Separate memory laws for recall of performed acts? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 27, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helstrup, T. (1987). One, two, or three memories? A problem-solving approach to memory for performed acts. Acta Psychologica, 66, 37–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helstrup T. (1989). Memory for performed and imaged noun pairs and verb pairs. Psychological Research, 50, 237–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, R. R., & Einstein, G. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 497–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, T. S., & Jenkins, J. J. (1969). The differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 472–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kausler, D. H., & Hakami, M. K. (1983). Memory for activities: Adult age differences and intentionality. Developmental Psychology, 19, 889–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kausler, D. H., Lichty, W., & Davis, R. T. (1985). Temporal memory for performed activities: Intentionality and adult age differences. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1132–1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knopf, M., & Neidhardt, E. (1989). Gedächtnis für Handlungen. Sprache & Kognition (in press).

  • Marschark, M., Richman, C. L., Yuille, J. C., & Hunt, R. R. (1987). The role of imagery in memory: On shared and distinctive information. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 28–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., & Lollis, T. (1988). Qualitative and quantitative considerations in encoding difficulty effect. Memory & Cognition, 16, 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, L. G., & Cohen, R. L. (1988). Enrichment and generation in the recall of enacted and non-enacted instructions. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (pp. 427–432). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrig, W. (1988). Image versus motor encoding. In M. Denis, J. Engelkamp, & T. E. Richardson (Eds.), Cognitive and neuropsychological approaches to mental imagery (pp. 307–316). Dordrecht: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltz, E., & Donnenwerth-Nolan, S. (1981). Does motoric imagery facilitate memory for sentences? A selective interference test. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 322–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltz E. (1988). The role of motoric enactment (M-processing) in memory for words and sentences. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris & R. N. Sykes (Eds.). Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues, Vol. 1. Chichester: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltz E., & Dixon D. (1982). Let's pretend: The role of motoric imagery in memory for sentences and words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E., & Wiseman, S. (1975). Relation between recognition and recognition failure of recallable words. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 6, 79–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wippich, W., Peter, H. J., & Mecklenbräuker, S. (1987). Vorstellungsprozesse beim Buchstabieren: Implizite und explizite Erfahrungsnachwirkungen einen Tag später. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 34, 649–673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wippich, W., Schumacher, S., & Mecklenbräuker, S. (1987). Implizite und explizite Erinnerungen: Wort- und Bedeutungsvorstellungen beim Buchstabieren und Wiedererkennen. Archiv für Psychologie, 139, 271–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D. (1984). Enkodierung, Rekodierung, Retrieval und die Aktivation motorischer Programme (Arbeiten der FR Psychologie, No. 91). Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D. (1985). Die Differenzierung sprachlicher Bedeutung durch die Aktivation motorischer Komponenten. In D. Albert (Ed.), Bericht über den 34. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Wien (pp. 234–237). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D. (1986). The memory trace of semantic or motor processing. In F. Klix, & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities (pp. 215–223). Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D. (1987). Argumente für ein motorisches Gedächtnissystem. In J. Engelkamp, K. Lorenz, & B. Sandig (Eds.), Wissensrepräsentation und Wissensaustausch (pp. 49–72). St Ingbert: Röhrig-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1984). Planungs- und Ausführungsanteile motorischer Gedächtniskomponenten und ihre Wirkung auf das Behalten ihrer verbalen Bezeichnungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 192, 379–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1985). An attempt to distinguish between kinematic and motor memory components. Acta Psychologica, 58, 81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1989) One, two, or three memories: Some comments and new findings. Acta Psychologica, 70, 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D., Engelkamp, J., Mohr, M., & Mohr, G. (1988). Organisation und Behalten im multimodalen Modell (Arbeiten der Fachrichtung Psychologie der Universität des Saarlandes, No. 125). Saarbrücken: Universität.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, H. D., Engelkamp, J., & Sieloff, U. (1984). Motorische Gedächtniskomponenten als partiell unabhängige Komponenten des Engramms verbaler Handlungsbeschreibungen. Sprache & Kognition, 3, 70–85.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of the Saarland, D-6600, Saarbrücken 11, Federal Republic of Germany

    J. Engelkamp & H. D. Zimmer

Authors
  1. J. Engelkamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. D. Zimmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H.D. Memory for action events: A new field of research. Psychol. Res 51, 153–157 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309142

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309142

Search

Navigation