Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 9/2014

01-11-2014

Measurement of stable changes of self-management skills after rehabilitation: a latent state–trait analysis of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ™)

Auteurs: M. Schuler, G. Musekamp, J. Bengel, M. Schwarze, K. Spanier, Chr. Gutenbrunner, I. Ehlebracht-König, S. Nolte, R. H. Osborne, H. Faller

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 9/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

To assess stable effects of self-management programs, measurement instruments should primarily capture the attributes of interest, for example, the self-management skills of the measured persons. However, measurements of psychological constructs are always influenced by both aspects of the situation (states) and aspects of the person (traits). This study tests whether the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ™), an instrument assessing a wide range of proximal outcomes of self-management programs, is primarily influenced by person factors instead of situational factors. Furthermore, measurement invariance over time, changes in traits and predictors of change for each heiQ™ scale were examined.

Methods

Subjects were N = 580 patients with rheumatism, asthma, orthopedic conditions or inflammatory bowel disease, who filled out the heiQ™ at the beginning, the end of and 3 months after a disease-specific inpatient rehabilitation program in Germany. Structural equation modeling techniques were used to estimate latent trait-change models and test for measurement invariance in each heiQ™ scale. Coefficients of consistency, occasion specificity and reliability were computed.

Results

All scales showed scalar invariance over time. Reliability coefficients were high (0.80–0.94), and consistency coefficients (0.49–0.79) were always substantially higher than occasion specificity coefficients (0.14–0.38), indicating that the heiQ™ scales primarily capture person factors. Trait-changes with small to medium effect sizes were shown in five scales and were affected by sex, age and diagnostic group.

Conclusion

The heiQ™ can be used to assess stable effects in important outcomes of self-management programs over time, e.g., changes in self-management skills or emotional well-being.
vorige artikel Assessing individual and neighborhood social factors in child oral health-related quality of life: a multilevel analysis
volgende artikel Determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in subjective well-being in later life: a cross-country comparison in England and the USA
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Lorig, K. R. (2003). Self-management education: More than a nice extra. Medical Care, 41(6), 699–701.PubMed
2.
Lorig, K. R., & Holman, H. (2003). Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 26(1), 1–7.CrossRef
3.
Osborne, R. H., Spinks, J. M., & Wicks, I. P. (2004). Patient education and self-management programs in arthritis. Medical Journal of Australia, 180(5 Suppl), S23–S26.PubMed
4.
Faller, H., Reusch, A., & Meng, K. (2011). DGRW-Update: Patientenschulung. Rehabilitation, 50(5), 284–291.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Steyer, R., Schmitt, M., & Eid, M. (1999). Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences. European Journal of Personality, 13(5, Spec Issue), 389–408.CrossRef
6.
Nesselroade, J. R. (2004). Intraindividual variability and short-term change. Gerontology, 50(1), 44–47.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Eid, M. (1995). Modelle der Messung von Personen in Situationen. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
8.
Steyer, R., Ferring, D., & Schmitt, M. J. (1992). States and traits in psychological assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 8(2), 79–98.
9.
Steyer, R., Geiser, C., & Fiege, C. (2012). Latent state–trait models. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 291–308)., Data analysis and research publication Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10.
Geiser, C., & Lockhart, G. (2012). A comparison of four approaches to account for method effects in latent state–trait analyses. Psychological Methods, 17(2), 255–283.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
11.
Courvoisier, D. S., Agoritsas, T., Glauser, J., Michaud, K., Wolfe, F., Cantoni, E., et al. (2012). Pain as an important predictor of psychosocial health in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care & Research, 64(2), 190–196.CrossRef
12.
Courvoisier, D. S., Eid, M., & Nussbeck, F. W. (2007). Mixture distribution latent state–trait analysis: Basic ideas and applications. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 80–104.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Eid, M., & Hoffmann, L. (1998). Measuring variability and change with an item response model for polytomous variables. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23(3), 193–215.CrossRef
14.
Steyer, R., Krambeer, S., & Hannöver, W. (2004). Modeling latent trait-change. In K. Van Montfort, H. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Recent developments on structural equation modeling: Theory and applications (pp. 337–357). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Press.CrossRef
15.
Osborne, R. H., Elsworth, G. R., & Whitfield, K. (2007). The Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ): An outcomes and evaluation measure for patient education and self-management interventions for people with chronic conditions. Patient Education and Counseling, 66(2), 192–201.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Osborne, R. H., Batterham, R., & Livingston, J. (2011). The evaluation of chronic disease self-management support across settings: The international experience of the health education impact questionnaire quality monitoring system. The Nursing clinics of North America, 46(3), 255–270.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Epstein, J., Osborne, R. H., Elsworth, G. R., Beaton, D. E., & Guillemin, F. (2013). Cross-cultural adaptation of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire: Experimental study showed expert committee, not back-translation, added value. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. doi: 10.​1016/​j.​jclinepi.​2013.​07.​013
18.
Schuler, M., Musekamp, G., Faller, H., Ehlebracht-Konig, I., Gutenbrunner, C., Kirchhof, R., et al. (2013). Assessment of proximal outcomes of self-management programs: Translation and psychometric evaluation of a German version of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ). Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 22(6), 1391–1403.CrossRef
19.
Ehlebracht-König, I., & Bönisch, A. (2007). Beispiel einer qualitätsgesicherten Schulung bei Patienten mit Spondylitis ankylosans. Praxis Klinische Verhaltensmedizin und Rehabilitation, 75, 15–20.
20.
Ehlebracht-König, I., Bönisch, A., & Pönicke, J. (2009). Fraktionierte rehabilitation: Ergebnisse einer randomisierten, kontrollierten Studie. Rehabilitation, 48, 30–38.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Schultz, K., Petro, W., Müller, C., & Schwiersch, M. (2000). Asthma-Verhaltenstraining mit Erwachsenen: Konzepte und Materialien. In F. Petermann & P. Warschburger (Eds.), Asthma bronchiale (pp. 275–294). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
22.
Schultz, K., Schwiersch, M., Petro, W., Mühlig, S., & Petermann, F. (2000). Individualisiertes, modular strukturiertes Patientenverhaltenstraining bei obstruktiven Atemwegserkrankungen in der stationären Rehabilitation. Pneumologie, 54, 296–305.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund. (2011). Reha Therapiestandards Chronischer Rückenschmerz. Berlin: Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund.
24.
Widaman, K. F., Ferrer, E., & Conger, R. D. (2010). Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: Measuring the same construct across time. Child Development Perspectives, 4(1), 10–18.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
25.
Jelitte, M., & Schuler, M. (2012). Messen wir immer das Gleiche? Zur Invarianz von Messungen und Response-Shift in der Rehabilitation - Teil 2. Die Rehabilitation, 51(6), 415–423.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Meredith, W., & Horn, J. (2001). The role of factorial invariance in modeling growth and change. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 203–240). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
27.
Schuler, M., & Jelitte, M. (2012). Messen wir bei allen Personen das Gleiche? Zur Invarianz von Messungen und Response Shift in der Rehabilitation - Teil 1. Die Rehabilitation, 51(5), 332–339.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Geiser, C., Eid, M., West, S. G., Lischetzke, T., & Nussbeck, F. W. (2012). A comparison of method effects in two confirmatory factor models for structurally different methods. Structural Equation Modeling, 19(3), 409–436.CrossRef
29.
Eid, M. (2000). A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions. Psychometrika, 65(2), 241–261.CrossRef
30.
Yoon, M., & Millsap, R. E. (2007). Detecting violations of factorial invariance using data-based specification searches: A Monte Carlo study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 453–463.
31.
32.
Steinmetz, H. (2013). Analyzing observed composite differences across groups is partial measurement invariance enough? Methodology-European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 9(1), 1–12.CrossRef
33.
Saris, W. E., Satorra, A., & van der Veld, W. M. (2009). Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modeling, 16(4), 561–582.CrossRef
34.
van der Veld, W. M., & Saris, W. E. (2011). Causes of generalized social trust. In E. Davidov, P. Schmidt, & J. Billiet (Eds.), European association for methodology series (pp. 207–247). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
35.
Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Muthen, B. (1989). Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures—The issue of partial measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 456–466.CrossRef
36.
Steyer, R., Eid, M., & Schwenkmezger, P. (1997). Modeling true intraindividual change: True change as a latent variable. Methods of Psychological Research, 2(1), 21–33.
37.
Leonhart, R. (2004). Effektgrößenberechnung bei Interventionsstudien. Die Rehabilitation, 43(4), 241–246.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Kazis, L. E., Anderson, J. J., & Meenan, R. F. (1989). Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Medical Care, 27(3 Suppl), S178–S189.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2., 2 print. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ u.a.: Erlbaum.
40.
West, S. G., Aiken, L. S., & Krull, J. L. (1996). Experimental personality designs: Analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality, 64(1), 1–48.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Eid, M., & Diener, E. (2004). Global judgments of subjective well-being: Situational variability and long-term stability. Social Indicators Research, 65(3), 245–277.CrossRef
42.
Eid, M., & Diener, E. (1999). Intraindividual variability in affect: Reliability, validity, and personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 662–676.CrossRef
43.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. (2010). Mplus user;s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
44.
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRef
45.
Chen, F., Bollen, K. A., Paxton, P., Curran, P. J., & Kirby, J. B. (2001). Improper solutions in structural equation models: Causes, consequences, and strategies. Sociological Methods & Research, 29(4), 468–508.CrossRef
46.
Mohiyeddini, C., Hautzinger, M., & Bauer, S. (2002). A latent state–trait analysis on assessing trait and state components of three instruments for measuring depression: ADS, BDI, and SDS. Diagnostica, 48(1), 12–18.CrossRef
47.
Kolenikov, S., & Bollen, K. A. (2012). Testing negative error variances: Is a Heywood case a symptom of misspecification? Sociological Methods & Research, 41(1), 124–167.CrossRef
48.
Muhlig, S., Schultz, K., de Vries, U., & Petermann, F. (2000). Grundlagen der Patientenschulung bei Asthma. In F. Petermann & P. Warschburger (Eds.), Asthma bronchiale (pp. Seiten 147–174). Gottingen: Hogrefe.
49.
Nolte, S., Elsworth, G. R., Sinclair, A. J., & Osborne, R. H. (2009). Tests of measurement invariance failed to support the application of the “then-test”. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(11), 1173–1180.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Oort, F. J. (2005). Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change. Quality of Life Research, 14(3), 587–598.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Measurement of stable changes of self-management skills after rehabilitation: a latent state–trait analysis of the Health Education Impact Questionnaire (heiQ™)
Auteurs
M. Schuler
G. Musekamp
J. Bengel
M. Schwarze
K. Spanier
Chr. Gutenbrunner
I. Ehlebracht-König
S. Nolte
R. H. Osborne
H. Faller
Publicatiedatum
01-11-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 9/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0693-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 9/2014

Quality of Life Research 9/2014 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Self-reported health and satisfaction of patients with chronic diseases who meditate: a case–control study

OriginalPaper

Vitamin D and health-related quality of life in a community sample of older Canadians

OriginalPaper

Social constraints and quality of life among chinese-speaking breast cancer survivors: a mediation model

Brief Communication

Adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Patient-Oriented Prostate Utility Scale (PORPUS)

Brief Communication

Longitudinal changes in health-related quality of life in normal glucose tolerance, prediabetes and type 2 diabetes: results from the KORA S4/F4 cohort study

OriginalPaper

Exploring factors influencing residents’ health outcomes in long-term care facilities: 1-year follow-up using latent growth curve model