Top

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Gepubliceerd in:

01-05-2015 | Original Paper

Comparing Diagnostic Outcomes of Autism Spectrum Disorder Using DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 Criteria

Auteurs: Elizabeth B. Harstad, Jason Fogler, Georgios Sideridis, Sarah Weas, Carrie Mauras, William J. Barbaresi

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders | Uitgave 5/2015

Abstract

Controversy exists regarding the DSM-5 criteria for ASD. This study tested the psychometric properties of the DSM-5 model and determined how well it performed across different gender, IQ, and DSM-IV-TR sub-type, using clinically collected data on 227 subjects (median age = 3.95 years, majority had IQ > 70). DSM-5 was psychometrically superior to the DSM-IV-TR model (Comparative Fit Index of 0.970 vs 0.879, respectively). Measurement invariance revealed good model fit across gender and IQ. Younger children tended to meet fewer diagnostic criteria. Those with autistic disorder were more likely to meet social communication and repetitive behaviors criteria (p < .001) than those with PDD-NOS. DSM-5 is a robust model but will identify a different, albeit overlapping population of individuals compared to DSM-IV-TR.

vorige artikel The Use of Grammatical Morphemes by Mandarin-Speaking Children with High Functioning Autism

volgende artikel Emergence of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Children from Simplex Families: Relations to Parental Perceptions of Etiology

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

In essence favoring more complex models (Breivik and Olsson 2001).

The sample size adjusted BIC-SABIC was preferred to the corrected AIC (Hurvich and Tsai 1989) for the following reason: the AICc has proven useful for the time series autoregressive models for which it was originally developed. There is to date little evidence on its utility in other types of analyses (Brockwell and Davis 1991; McQuarrie and Tsai 1998). With small, less complex models and medium sample sizes, as was the present case, both AIC and AICc will generate similar estimates. Based on the early work of Rafterty (1995), Gignac and Watkins (2013) have recommended that effect sizes need to be suggested for AIC and BIC. They recommended that difference AIC/BIC values of 2, 6, 10 or >10 units reflect “weak”, “positive”, “strong”, and “very strong” effects in favor of the simpler model.

Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723.CrossRef

Akaike, H. (1980). Likelihood and the Bayes procedure. In J. M. Bernardo (Ed.), Bayesian Statistics (Vol. 31, pp. 143–166). Valencia: University Press.

American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV-Text Revision. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRef

Amir, R. E., Van den Veyver, I. B., Wan, M., Tran, C. Q., Francke, U., & Zoghbi, H. Y. (1999). Rett syndrome is caused by mutations in X-linked MECP2, encoding methyl-CpG-binding protein 2. Nature Genetics, 23(2), 185–188. doi:10.1038/13810.CrossRefPubMed

Barton, M. L., Robins, D. L., Jashar, D., Brennan, L., & Fein, D. (2013). Sensitivity and specificity of proposed DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorder in toddlers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(5), 1184–1195. doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1817-8.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Bayley, N. (2006). Manual for the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (3rd ed.). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.

Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.CrossRefPubMed

Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606.CrossRef

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRef

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Breivik, E., & Olsson, U. (2001). Adding variables to improve fit: the effect of model size on fit assessment in Lisrel. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sorbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 169–194). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

Brockwell, P. J., & Davis, R. A. (1991). Time series: theory and methods (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.CrossRef

Charan, S. H. (2012). Childhood disintegrative disorder. Journal of Pediatric Neurosciences, 7(1), 55–57. doi:10.4103/1817-1745.97627.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Elliott, C. (2007). Differential ability scales (2nd ed.). San Antonio: Pearson.

Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2008). The impact of misspecifying class-specific residual variances in growth mixture models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15, 75–95.CrossRef

Frazier, T. W., Youngstrom, E. A., Kubu, C. S., Sinclair, L., & Rezai, A. (2008). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the autism diagnostic interview-revised. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(3), 474–480. doi:10.1007/s10803-007-0415-z.CrossRefPubMed

Frazier, T. W., Youngstrom, E. A., Speer, L., Law, P., Constantino, J., Findling, R. L., et al. (2012). Validation of proposed DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(1), 28–40 e3. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2011.09.021.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Gibbs, V., Aldridge, F., Chandler, F., Witzlsperger, E., & Smith, K. (2012). Brief report: an exploratory study comparing diagnostic outcomes for autism spectrum disorders under DSM-IV-TR with the proposed DSM-5 revision. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(8), 1750–1756. doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1560-6.CrossRefPubMed

Gignac, G. E., & Watkins, M. W. (2013). Bifactor modeling and the estimation of model-based reliability in the WAIS-IV. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 48, 639–662.CrossRef

Gotham, K., Risi, S., Pickles, A., & Lord, C. (2007). The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule: revised algorithms for improved diagnostic validity. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(4), 613–627. doi:10.1007/s10803-006-0280-1.CrossRefPubMed

Guthrie, W., Swineford, L. B., Wetherby, A. M., & Lord, C. (2013). Comparison of DSM-IV and DSM-5 factor structure models for toddlers with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 52(8), 797–805 e2. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2013.05.004.CrossRefPubMed

Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer.CrossRef

Happe, F., Ronald, A., & Plomin, R. (2006). Time to give up on a single explanation for autism. Nature Neuroscience, 9(10), 1218–1220. doi:10.1038/nn1770.CrossRefPubMed

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). London: Sage.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424–453.CrossRef

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRef

Huerta, M., Bishop, S. L., Duncan, A., Hus, V., & Lord, C. (2012). Application of DSM-5 criteria for autism spectrum disorder to three samples of children with DSM-IV diagnoses of pervasive developmental disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 169(10), 1056–1064. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12020276.CrossRefPubMed

Hurvich, C. M., & Tsai, C.-L. (1989). Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika, 76(2), 297–307.CrossRef

Insel, T. R. (2014). The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Project: precision medicine for psychiatry. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 171(4), 395–397. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14020138.CrossRefPubMed

Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, P. S., Quinn, K., et al. (2010). Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(7), 748–751. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379.CrossRefPubMed

Joreskog, K. (1973). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In A. S. Goldberger & O. D. Duncan (Eds.), Structural equation models in the social sciences (pp. 85–112). New York: Seminar Press.

Kenny, D. A. (2012). Measuring model fit. Retrieved October 22, 2012 from http://www.davidakenny.net/cm/fit.htm.

Kent, R. G., Carrington, S. J., LeCouteur, A., Gould, J., Wing, L., Maljaars, J., et al. (2013). Diagnosing Autism Spectrum Disorder: who will get a DSM-5 diagnosis? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(11), 1242–1250. doi:10.1111/jcpp.12085.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Kim, Y. S., Fombonne, E., Koh, Y. J., Kim, S. J., Cheon, K. A., & Leventhal, B. L. (2014). A comparison of DSM-IV pervasive developmental disorder and DSM-5 autism spectrum disorder prevalence in an epidemiologic sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 53(5), 500–508. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2013.12.021.CrossRefPubMed

Kulage, K. M., Smaldone, A. M., & Cohn, E. G. (2014). How Will DSM-5 affect autism diagnosis? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(8), 1918–1932. doi:10.1007/s10803-014-2065-2.CrossRefPubMed

Lecavalier, L., Gadow, K. D., DeVincent, C. J., Houts, C., & Edwards, M. C. (2009). Deconstructing the PDD clinical phenotype: Internal validity of the DSM-IV. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(10), 1246–1254. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02104.x.CrossRefPubMed

Loehlin, J. C. (2004). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural equation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence.

Lord, C., & Jones, R. M. (2012). Annual research review: Re-thinking the classification of autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53(5), 490–509. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02547.x.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Lord, C., Petkova, E., Hus, V., Gan, W., Lu, F., Martin, D. M., et al. (2012). A multisite study of the clinical diagnosis of different autism spectrum disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 69(3), 306–313. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.148.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavare, P. C., et al. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3), 205–223.CrossRefPubMed

MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149.CrossRef

Maglione, M. A., Gans, D., Das, L., Timbie, J., & Kasari, C. (2012). Nonmedical interventions for children with ASD: Recommended guidelines and further research needs. Pediatrics, 130(Suppl 2), S169–S178. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-0900O.CrossRefPubMed

Mahoney, W. J., Szatmari, P., Maclean, J. E., Bryson, S. E., Bartolucci, G., Walter, S. D., et al. (1998). Reliability and accuracy of differentiating pervasive developmental disorder subtypes. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 37(3), 278–285. doi:10.1097/00004583-199803000-00012.CrossRefPubMed

Mandy, W. P., Charman, T., & Skuse, D. H. (2012). Testing the construct validity of proposed criteria for DSM-5 autism spectrum disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(1), 41–50. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2011.10.013.CrossRefPubMed

Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fit in structural equation models. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics. A Festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Matson, J. L., Hattier, M. A., & Williams, L. W. (2012a). How does relaxing the algorithm for autism affect DSM-V prevalence rates? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(8), 1549–1556. doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1582-0.CrossRefPubMed

Matson, J. L., Kozlowski, A. M., Hattier, M. A., Horovitz, H., & Sipes, M. (2012b). DSM-IV vs DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for toddlers with autism. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 15(3), 185–190. doi:10.3109/17518423.2012.672341.CrossRefPubMed

McPartland, J. C., Reichow, B., & Volkmar, F. R. (2012). Sensitivity and specificity of proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(4), 368–383. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2012.01.007.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

McQuarrie, A. D. R., & Tsai, C.-L. (1998). Regression and time series model selection. Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRef

Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide 4. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.

Norris, M., Lecavalier, L., & Edwards, M. C. (2012). The structure of autism symptoms as measured by the autism diagnostic observation schedule. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(6), 1075–1086. doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1348-0.CrossRefPubMed

Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163.CrossRef

Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Raykov, T. (2005). Studying group and time invariance in maximal reliability for multiple-component measuring instruments via covariance structure modelling. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 58(Pt 2), 301–317. doi:10.1348/000711005X38591.CrossRefPubMed

Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. (2000). A first course in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence.

Reise, S. (1990). A comparison of item and person fit methods of assessing model fit in IRT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 42, 127–137.CrossRef

Rieske, R. D., Matson, J. L., Beighley, J. S., Cervantes, P. E., Goldin, R. L., & Jang, J. (2013). Comorbid psychopathology rates in children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders according to the DSM-IV-TR and the proposed DSM-5. Developmental Neurorehabilitation: Advance online publication. doi:10.3109/17518423.2013.790519.

Rigdon, E. E. (1996). CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 3(4), 369–379.CrossRef

Ronald, A., Happe, F., Bolton, P., Butcher, M., Price, T. S., & Plomin, R. (2006). Genetic heterogeneity between the three components of the autism spectrum: A twin study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 45(6), 691–699. doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000215325.13058.9d.CrossRefPubMed

Schwarz, G. E. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464.CrossRef

Sideridis, G. D., Simos, P., Papanicolaou, A., & Fletcher, J. (2014). Using structural equation modeling to assess functional connectivity in the brain: Power and sample size considerations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74, 733–758.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed

Smith, E. V, Jr. (2002). Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. Journal of Applied Measurement, 3, 205–231.PubMed

Smith, R. M., Schumacker, R. E., & Bush, M. J. (1998). Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 2, 66–78.PubMed

Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173–180.CrossRef

Steiger, J. H. (2000). Point Estimation, hypothesis testing, and interval estimation using the RMSEA: Some comments and a reply to Hayduk and Glaser. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(2), 149–162.CrossRef

Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 893–898.CrossRef

Stuive, I., Kiers, H. A. L., Timmerman, M. E., & ten Berge, J. M. F. (2008). The empirical verification of an assignment of items to subtests: The oblique multiple group method versus the confirmatory common factor method. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(6), 923–939.CrossRef

Taheri, A., & Perry, A. (2012). Exploring the proposed DSM-5 criteria in a clinical sample. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42(9), 1810–1817. doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1599-4.CrossRefPubMed

Tofghi, D., & Enders, C. K. (2007). Identifying the correct number of classes in mixture models. In G. R. Hancock & K. M. Samulelsen (Eds.), Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp. 317–341). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrica, 38, 1–10.CrossRef

Widaman, K. F., & Thompson, J. S. (2003). On specifying the null model for incremental fit indices in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 8(1), 16–37.CrossRefPubMed

Worley, J. A., & Matson, J. L. (2012). Comparing symptoms of autism spectrum disorders using the current DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria and the proposed DSM-V diagnostic criteria. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 965–970.CrossRef

Young, R. L., & Rodi, M. L. (2013). Redefining Autism Spectrum Disorder Using DSM-5: The Implications of the Proposed DSM-5 Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(4), 758–765. doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1927-3.CrossRef

Titel: Comparing Diagnostic Outcomes of Autism Spectrum Disorder Using DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 Criteria
Auteurs: Elizabeth B. Harstad
Jason Fogler
Georgios Sideridis
Sarah Weas
Carrie Mauras
William J. Barbaresi
Publicatiedatum: 01-05-2015
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders / Uitgave 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0162-3257
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3432
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2306-4

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2015

Brief Report: Autistic Traits in Mothers and Children Associated with Child’s Gender Nonconformity

Validation of the Developmental, Dimensional and Diagnostic Interview (3Di) Among Chinese Children in a Child Psychiatry Clinic in Hong Kong

Identifying the Associated Factors of Mediation and Due Process in Families of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Does Curriculum Matter for Secondary Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Analyzing the NLTS2

The Use of Grammatical Morphemes by Mandarin-Speaking Children with High Functioning Autism

A Comprehensive Literature Review of Comprehension Strategies in Core Content Areas for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder