Top

Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

Gepubliceerd in:

14-02-2019

Is the Concept of Self-Regulation Useful for Supporting Effective Implementation in Community Settings?

Auteurs: Rebecca H. Roppolo, Jenna McWilliam, William A. Aldridge II, Robin H. Jenkins, Renee I. Boothroyd, LaTanya R. Moore

Gepubliceerd in: Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review | Uitgave 1/2019

Abstract

The literature and utility of self-regulation extends beyond individuals; a critical factor for successful and sustainable implementation of evidence-based programs in a community setting may be the capacity of teams to self-regulate implementation processes. The conceptual foundation of this proposal is explored and definitions of the five dimensions of self-regulation for implementation processes are provided. Practice examples illustrate how the provision of external implementation support to build self-regulatory capacity among implementation teams adopting and scaling-up EBPs in the local community setting has shaped and refined the proposed definitions to better reflect the work on-the-ground. The role of external implementation support providers in developing implementation team self-regulation is explored and practice strategies to promote self-regulation are provided. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.

vorige artikel Self-Regulation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Challenges and Future Directions

volgende artikel Self-Regulation Approach to Training Child and Family Practitioners

See Proctor et al. (2011) for a full discussion of implementation outcomes including intervention adoption, fidelity, reach, and sustainment and others (Meyers et al. 2012; Waltz et al. 2015; Aldridge et al. 2016a; Metz and Bartley 2012) for examples of effective strategies, capacities, and practices to achieve those outcomes.

Aarons, G. A., Hurlburt, M., & Horwitz, S. M. (2011). Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 38(1), 4.CrossRefPubMed

Aldridge, W. A., Boothroyd, I. I., Fleming, R. I., Jarboe, W. O. L., Morrow, K., Ritchie, J., G. F., et al (2016a). Transforming community prevention systems for sustained impact: Embedding active implementation and scaling functions. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 6(1), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13142-015-0351-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Aldridge, W. A., Murray, I. I., Prinz, D. W., R. J., & Veazey, C. A. (2016b). Final report and recommendations: The Triple P implementation evaluation, Cabarrus and Mecklenburg counties, NC. Chapel Hill: Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287.CrossRef

Bandura, A., & Jourden, F. J. (1991). Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 941.CrossRef

Brown, L. D., Feinberg, M. E., & Greenberg, M. T. (2010). Determinants of community coalition ability to support evidence-based programs. Prevention Science, 11(3), 287–297.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Butterfoss, F., & Kegler, M. C. (2002). Toward a comprehensive understanding of community coalitions: Moving from practice to theory. In R. DiClemente, R. Crosby & M. C. Kegler (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research: Strategies for improving public health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Chamberlain, P., Brown, C. H., & Saldana, L. (2011). Observational measure of implementation progress in community based settings: The stages of Implementation Completion (SIC). Implementation Science, 6, 116.CrossRefPubMed

Chinman, M., Acosta, J., Ebener, P., et al. (2012). Establishing and evaluating the key functions of an interactive systems framework using an assets-getting to outcomes intervention. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(3), 295–310.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 619–654.CrossRef

DiDonato, N. C. (2013). Effective self-and co-regulation in collaborative learning groups: An analysis of how students regulate problem solving of authentic interdisciplinary tasks. Instructional Science, 41(1), 25–47.CrossRef

Dunst, C. J., & Trivette, C. M. (2012). Moderators of the effectiveness of adult learning method practices. Journal of Social Sciences, 8(2), 143–148.CrossRef

Eccles, M. P., & Mittman, B. S. (2006). Welcome to implementation science. Implementation Science. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-1.

Fixsen, D., Blase, K., Metz, A., & Van Dyke, M. (2013). Statewide implementation of evidence-based programs. Exceptional Children, 79(2), 213–230.CrossRef

Fixsen, D. L., Blase, K. A., Timbers, G. D., & Wolf, M. M. (2001). In search of program implementation: 792 replications of the Teaching-Family Model. In G. A. Bernfeld, D. P. Farrington & A. W. Leschied (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice: Implementing and evaluating effective programs (pp. 149–166). London: Wiley.

Heifetz, R. A., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

Heifetz, R. A., & Laurie, D. L. (1997). The work of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 75(1), 124–134.PubMed

Higgins, M., Weiner, J., & Young, L. (2012). Implementation teams: A new lever for organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(3), 366–388.CrossRef

Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). Exploring socially shared regulation in the context of collaboration. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(3), 267.CrossRef

Kanfer, F. H. (1986). Implications of a self-regulation model of therapy for treatment of addictive behaviors. In W. R. Miller & N. Heather (Eds.), Treating addictive behaviors (pp. 29–47). Boston, MA: Springer.CrossRef

Karoly, P. (1993). Mechanisms of self-regulation: A systems view. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 23–52. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.44.1.23.CrossRef

Lasker, R. D., & Weiss, E. S. (2003). Creating partnership synergy: The critical role of community stakeholders. Journal of Health and Human Services Administration, 26(1), 119–139.PubMed

Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Self-regulation through goal setting. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 212–247.CrossRef

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

McWilliam, J., & Brown, J. (2012). Adapting implementation science to create an experience-informed implementation framework—The TPI implementation framework. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Implementation Conference.

McWilliam, J., Brown, J., Sanders, M. R., & Jones, L. (2016). The Triple P implementation framework: The role of purveyors in the implementation and sustainability of evidence-based programs. Prevention Science, 17(5), 636–645.CrossRefPubMed

Metz, A., & Bartley, L. (2012). Active implementation frameworks for program success. Zero to Three, 32(4), 11–18.

Meyers, D. C., Durlak, J. A., & Wandersman, A. (2012). The Quality Implementation Framework: A synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(3–4), 462–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x.CrossRefPubMed

Panadero, E., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Socially shared regulation of learning: A review. European Psychologist, 20(3), 190–203.CrossRef

Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., et al. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.CrossRefPubMed

Saldana, L., & Chamberlain, P. (2012). Supporting implementation: The role of community development teams to build infrastructure. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(3–4), 334–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9503-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Sanders, M. R. (2008). Triple P—Positive Parenting Program as a public health approach to strengthening parenting. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(4), 506–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.22.3.506.CrossRefPubMed

Sanders, M. R., & Mazzucchelli, T. G. (2013). The promotion of self-regulation through parenting interventions. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 16(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-013-0129-z.CrossRefPubMed

Spoth, R., & Greenberg, M. (2011). Impact challenges in community science-with-practice: Lessons from PROSPER on transformative practitioner-scientist partnerships and prevention infrastructure development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 48(1), 106–119.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Waltz, T. J., Powell, B. J., Matthieu, M. M., Damschroder, L. J., Chinman, M. J., Smith, J. L., et al. (2015). Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance: Results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study. Implementation Science, 10(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0295-0.CrossRefPubMed

Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Nonnan., R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 171–181.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Is the Concept of Self-Regulation Useful for Supporting Effective Implementation in Community Settings?
Auteurs: Rebecca H. Roppolo
Jenna McWilliam
William A. Aldridge II
Robin H. Jenkins
Renee I. Boothroyd
LaTanya R. Moore
Publicatiedatum: 14-02-2019
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review / Uitgave 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1096-4037
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2827
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-019-00286-0

Editorial

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Is the Concept of Self-Regulation Useful for Supporting Effective Implementation in Community Settings?

Abstract

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2019

An Integrated Model of Regulation for Applied Settings

Self-Regulation: A Critical Construct in Research and Application with Children and Families

Self-Regulation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Challenges and Future Directions

Towards Scalable, Integrative Assessment of Children’s Self-Regulatory Capabilities: New Applications of Digital Technology

Promoting Children’s Healthy Habits Through Self-Regulation Via Parenting

Self-Regulation Approach to Training Child and Family Practitioners

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

An Integrated Model of Regulation for Applied Settings

Self-Regulation: A Critical Construct in Research and Application with Children and Families

Self-Regulation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Challenges and Future Directions

Towards Scalable, Integrative Assessment of Children’s Self-Regulatory Capabilities: New Applications of Digital Technology

Promoting Children’s Healthy Habits Through Self-Regulation Via Parenting

Self-Regulation Approach to Training Child and Family Practitioners