Skip to main content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 3/2014

01-05-2014 | Original Article

Influence of auditory and audiovisual stimuli on the right–left prevalence effect

Auteurs: Kim-Phuong L. Vu, Katsumi Minakata, Mary Kim Ngo

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

When auditory stimuli are used in two-dimensional spatial compatibility tasks, where the stimulus and response configurations vary along the horizontal and vertical dimensions simultaneously, a right–left prevalence effect occurs in which horizontal compatibility dominates over vertical compatibility. The right–left prevalence effects obtained with auditory stimuli are typically larger than that obtained with visual stimuli even though less attention should be demanded from the horizontal dimension in auditory processing. In the present study, we examined whether auditory or visual dominance occurs when the two-dimensional stimuli are audiovisual, as well as whether there will be cross-modal facilitation of response selection for the horizontal and vertical dimensions. We also examined whether there is an additional benefit of adding a pitch dimension to the auditory stimulus to facilitate vertical coding through use of the spatial-musical association of response codes (SMARC) effect, where pitch is coded in terms of height in space. In Experiment 1, we found a larger right–left prevalence effect for unimodal auditory than visual stimuli. Neutral, non-pitch coded, audiovisual stimuli did not result in cross-modal facilitation, but did show evidence of visual dominance. The right–left prevalence effect was eliminated in the presence of SMARC audiovisual stimuli, but the effect influenced horizontal rather than vertical coding. Experiment 2 showed that the influence of the pitch dimension was not in terms of influencing response selection on a trial-to-trial basis, but in terms of altering the salience of the task environment. Taken together, these findings indicate that in the absence of salient vertical cues, auditory and audiovisual stimuli tend to be coded along the horizontal dimension and vision tends to dominate audition in this two-dimensional spatial stimulus–response task.
Literatuur
go back to reference Chan, C. W. L., & Chan, A. H. S. (2005). Spatial S–R compatibility of visual and auditory signals: implications for human-machine interface design. Displays, 26, 109–119. CrossRef Chan, C. W. L., & Chan, A. H. S. (2005). Spatial S–R compatibility of visual and auditory signals: implications for human-machine interface design. Displays, 26, 109–119. CrossRef
go back to reference Colavita, F. B. (1974). Human sensory dominance. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 409–412. CrossRef Colavita, F. B. (1974). Human sensory dominance. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 409–412. CrossRef
go back to reference Eimer, M., & Schröger, E. (1998). ERP effects of intermodal attention and cross-modal links in spatial attention. Psychophysiology, 35, 313–327. PubMedCrossRef Eimer, M., & Schröger, E. (1998). ERP effects of intermodal attention and cross-modal links in spatial attention. Psychophysiology, 35, 313–327. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Haas, E., & Edworthy, J. (2006). An introduction to auditory warnings and alarms. In M. S. Wogalter (Ed.), Handbook of warnings (pp. 189–198). Mahwah: Erlbaum. Haas, E., & Edworthy, J. (2006). An introduction to auditory warnings and alarms. In M. S. Wogalter (Ed.), Handbook of warnings (pp. 189–198). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Heister, G., Ehrenstein, W. H., & Schroeder-Heister, P. (1986). Spatial SR compatibility effects with unimanual two-finger choice reactions for prone and supine hand positions. Perception and Psychophysics, 40(4), 271–278. PubMedCrossRef Heister, G., Ehrenstein, W. H., & Schroeder-Heister, P. (1986). Spatial SR compatibility effects with unimanual two-finger choice reactions for prone and supine hand positions. Perception and Psychophysics, 40(4), 271–278. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1996). No prevalence of right–left over top–bottom spatial codes. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 102–110. CrossRef Hommel, B. (1996). No prevalence of right–left over top–bottom spatial codes. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 102–110. CrossRef
go back to reference Keller, P. E., & Koch, I. (2006). Exogenous and endogenous response priming with auditory stimuli. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2(4), 269–276. CrossRef Keller, P. E., & Koch, I. (2006). Exogenous and endogenous response priming with auditory stimuli. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2(4), 269–276. CrossRef
go back to reference Lee, F. C. H., & Chan, A. H. S. (2007). Attending visual and auditory signals: ergonomics recommendations with consideration of signal modality and spatial stimulus–response (S–R) compatibility. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37, 197–206. CrossRef Lee, F. C. H., & Chan, A. H. S. (2007). Attending visual and auditory signals: ergonomics recommendations with consideration of signal modality and spatial stimulus–response (S–R) compatibility. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37, 197–206. CrossRef
go back to reference Lidji, P., Kolinsky, R., Lochy, A., & Morais, J. (2007). Spatial associations for musical stimuli: a piano in the head? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1189–1207. PubMed Lidji, P., Kolinsky, R., Lochy, A., & Morais, J. (2007). Spatial associations for musical stimuli: a piano in the head? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1189–1207. PubMed
go back to reference Meredith, M. A., & Stein, B. E. (1986). Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in the superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. Journal of Neurophysiology, 56, 640–662. PubMed Meredith, M. A., & Stein, B. E. (1986). Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in the superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. Journal of Neurophysiology, 56, 640–662. PubMed
go back to reference Ngo, M. K., Sinnett, S., Soto-Faraco, S., & Spence, C. (2010). Repetition blindness and the Colavita effect. Neuroscience Letters, 480, 186–190. PubMedCrossRef Ngo, M. K., Sinnett, S., Soto-Faraco, S., & Spence, C. (2010). Repetition blindness and the Colavita effect. Neuroscience Letters, 480, 186–190. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1984). Right–left prevalence in spatial compatibility. Perception and Psychophysics, 35, 333–343. PubMedCrossRef Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1984). Right–left prevalence in spatial compatibility. Perception and Psychophysics, 35, 333–343. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1985). Responding with hand and foot: the right/left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still present. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 211–216. PubMedCrossRef Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1985). Responding with hand and foot: the right/left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still present. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 211–216. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nicoletti, R., Umiltà, C., Tressoldi, E. P., & Marzi, C. A. (1988). Why are right–left spatial codes easier to form than above-below ones? Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 287–292. PubMedCrossRef Nicoletti, R., Umiltà, C., Tressoldi, E. P., & Marzi, C. A. (1988). Why are right–left spatial codes easier to form than above-below ones? Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 287–292. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nishimura, A., & Yokosawa, K. (2009). Effects of laterality and pitch height of an auditory accessory stimulus on horizontal response selection: the Simon effect and the SMARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 666–670. PubMedCrossRef Nishimura, A., & Yokosawa, K. (2009). Effects of laterality and pitch height of an auditory accessory stimulus on horizontal response selection: the Simon effect and the SMARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 666–670. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Perrott, D. R., & Saberi, K. (1990). Minimum audible angle thresholds for sources varying in both elevation and azimuth. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 1728. PubMedCrossRef Perrott, D. R., & Saberi, K. (1990). Minimum audible angle thresholds for sources varying in both elevation and azimuth. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 1728. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2006). Stimulus-response compatibility principles: data theory and application. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2006). Stimulus-response compatibility principles: data theory and application. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
go back to reference Rubichi, S., Vu, K.-P. L., Nicoletti, R., & Proctor, R. W. (2006). Spatial coding in two dimensions. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 201–216. PubMedCrossRef Rubichi, S., Vu, K.-P. L., Nicoletti, R., & Proctor, R. W. (2006). Spatial coding in two dimensions. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 201–216. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rusconi, E., Kwana, B., Giordano, B. L., Umiltà, C., & Butterworth, B. (2006). Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect. Cognition, 99, 113–129. PubMedCrossRef Rusconi, E., Kwana, B., Giordano, B. L., Umiltà, C., & Butterworth, B. (2006). Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect. Cognition, 99, 113–129. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Santagelo, V., & Spence, C. (2008). Capturing spatial attention with multisensory cues. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 398–403. CrossRef Santagelo, V., & Spence, C. (2008). Capturing spatial attention with multisensory cues. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 398–403. CrossRef
go back to reference Scharf, B. (1998). Auditory attention: the psychoacoustical approach. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 75–118). East Sussex: Psychology Press. Scharf, B. (1998). Auditory attention: the psychoacoustical approach. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 75–118). East Sussex: Psychology Press.
go back to reference Sinnett, S., Spence, C., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2007). Visual dominance and attention: the Colavita effect revisited. Perception and Psychophysics, 69, 673–686. PubMedCrossRef Sinnett, S., Spence, C., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2007). Visual dominance and attention: the Colavita effect revisited. Perception and Psychophysics, 69, 673–686. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2001). Determinants of right–left and top-bottom prevalence for two-dimensional spatial compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 813–828. PubMed Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2001). Determinants of right–left and top-bottom prevalence for two-dimensional spatial compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 813–828. PubMed
go back to reference Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2002). The prevalence effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response compatibility as a function of the relative salience of the dimensions. Perception and Psychophysics, 64, 815–828. PubMedCrossRef Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2002). The prevalence effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response compatibility as a function of the relative salience of the dimensions. Perception and Psychophysics, 64, 815–828. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Vu, K.-P. L., Proctor, R. W., & Pick, D. F. (2000). Horizontal versus vertical compatibility: right–left prevalence with bimanual responses. Psychological Research, 64, 25–40. PubMedCrossRef Vu, K.-P. L., Proctor, R. W., & Pick, D. F. (2000). Horizontal versus vertical compatibility: right–left prevalence with bimanual responses. Psychological Research, 64, 25–40. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 638. PubMedCrossRef Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 638. PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Influence of auditory and audiovisual stimuli on the right–left prevalence effect
Auteurs
Kim-Phuong L. Vu
Katsumi Minakata
Mary Kim Ngo
Publicatiedatum
01-05-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0518-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2014

Psychological Research 3/2014 Naar de uitgave