Abstract
In the present article, we investigated the effects of pitch height and the presented ear (laterality) of an auditory stimulus, irrelevant to the ongoing visual task, on horizontal response selection. Performance was better when the response and the stimulated ear spatially corresponded (Simon effect), and when the spatial—musical association of response codes (SMARC) correspondence was maintained—that is, right (left) response with a high-pitched (low-pitched) tone. These findings reveal an automatic activation of spatially and musically associated responses by task-irrelevant auditory accessory stimuli. Pitch height is strong enough to influence the horizontal responses despite modality differences with task target.
Article PDF
References
Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2003). Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus—response compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 45–73.
Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2005). Representing response position relative to display location: Influence on orthogonal stimulus—response compatibility. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 839–864. doi:10.1080/02724980443000359
Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Giraux, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396.
De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus—response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 731–750.
Deutsch, D. (1995). Musical illusions and paradoxes. La Jolla, CA: Philomel Records.
Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2003). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87, B87-B95. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00234-2
Ishihara, M., Keller, P. E., Rossetti, Y., & Prinz, W. (2008). Horizontal spatial representations of time: Evidence for the STEARC effect. Cortex, 44, 454–461. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.010
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus—response compatibility—A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.
Lidji, P., Kolinsky, R., Lochy, A., & Morais, J. (2007). Spatial associations for musical stimuli: A piano in the head? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33,1189–12077. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1189
Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207.
Mapelli, D., Rusconi, E., & Umiltà, C. (2003). The SNARC effect: An instance of the Simon effect? Cognition, 88, B1-B10. doi:10.1016/ S0010-0277(03)00042-8
Melara, R. D., & O’Brien, T. P. (1987). Interaction between synesthetically corresponding dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 323–336.
Mudd, S. A. (1963). Spatial stereotypes of four dimensions of pure tone. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 347–352.
Nishimura, A., & Yokosawa, K. (2006). Orthogonal stimulus—response compatibility effects emerge even when the stimulus position is task irrelevant. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1021–1032. doi:10.1080/17470210500416243
Nuerk, H.-C., Iversen, W., & Willmes, K. (2004). Notational modulation of SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 835–863. doi:10.1080/02724980343000512
Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416–442. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.416
Proctor, R. W., Pick, D. F., Vu, K.-P. L., & Anderson, R. E. (2005). The enhanced Simon effect for older adults is reduced when the irrelevant location information is conveyed by an accessory stimulus. Acta Psychologica, 119, 21–40. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.014
Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2006). Stimulus—response compatibility principles: Data, theory, and application. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 446–461.
Reynvoet, B., & Brysbaert, M. (1999). Single-digit and two-digit Arabic numerals address the same semantic number line. Cognition, 72, 191–201.
Rusconi, E., Kwan, B., Giordano, B. L., Umiltà, C., & Butterworth, B. (2006). Spatial representation of pitch height: The SMARC effect. Cognition, 99, 113–129. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.004
Santiago, J., Lupiáàez, J., Pérez, E., & Funes, M. J. (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 512–516.
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.
Wascher, E., Schatz, U., Kuder, T., & Verleger, R. (2001). Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 731–751.
Weeks, D. J., & Proctor, R. W. (1990). Salient-features coding in the translation between orthogonal stimulus and response dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 355–366.
Wiegand, K., & Wascher, E. (2007). The Simon effect for vertical S—R relations: Changing the mechanism by randomly varying the S—R mapping rule? Psychological Research, 71, 219–233. doi:10.1007/ s00426-005-0023-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The present study was supported by Grant 18-10669 from the Research Fellowships of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists to A.N., and by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 17330152 from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science awarded to K.Y. A.N. is now at Tohoku University
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nishimura, A., Yokosawa, K. Effects of laterality and pitch height of an auditory accessory stimulus on horizontal response selection: The Simon effect and the SMARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16, 666–670 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.666
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.4.666