Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 3/2014

01-05-2014 | Original Article

Bottom-up influences of voice continuity in focusing selective auditory attention

Auteurs: Scott Bressler, Salwa Masud, Hari Bharadwaj, Barbara Shinn-Cunningham

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Selective auditory attention causes a relative enhancement of the neural representation of important information and suppression of the neural representation of distracting sound, which enables a listener to analyze and interpret information of interest. Some studies suggest that in both vision and in audition, the “unit” on which attention operates is an object: an estimate of the information coming from a particular external source out in the world. In this view, which object ends up in the attentional foreground depends on the interplay of top-down, volitional attention and stimulus-driven, involuntary attention. Here, we test the idea that auditory attention is object based by exploring whether continuity of a non-spatial feature (talker identity, a feature that helps acoustic elements bind into one perceptual object) also influences selective attention performance. In Experiment 1, we show that perceptual continuity of target talker voice helps listeners report a sequence of spoken target digits embedded in competing reversed digits spoken by different talkers. In Experiment 2, we provide evidence that this benefit of voice continuity is obligatory and automatic, as if voice continuity biases listeners by making it easier to focus on a subsequent target digit when it is perceptually linked to what was already in the attentional foreground. Our results support the idea that feature continuity enhances streaming automatically, thereby influencing the dynamic processes that allow listeners to successfully attend to objects through time in the cacophony that assails our ears in many everyday settings.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
go back to reference Alain, C., Arnott, S. R., & Picton, T. W. (2001). Bottom-up and top-down influences on auditory scene analysis: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(5), 1072–1089.PubMed Alain, C., Arnott, S. R., & Picton, T. W. (2001). Bottom-up and top-down influences on auditory scene analysis: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(5), 1072–1089.PubMed
go back to reference Alain, C., & Woods, D. L. (1997). Attention modulates auditory pattern memory as indexed by event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 34(5), 534–546.PubMedCrossRef Alain, C., & Woods, D. L. (1997). Attention modulates auditory pattern memory as indexed by event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 34(5), 534–546.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Baayen, R., Davidson, D., & Bates, D. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.CrossRef Baayen, R., Davidson, D., & Bates, D. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.CrossRef
go back to reference Best, V., Ozmeral, E. J., Kopco, N., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2008). Object continuity enhances selective auditory attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 105(35), 13174–13178.CrossRef Best, V., Ozmeral, E. J., Kopco, N., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2008). Object continuity enhances selective auditory attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 105(35), 13174–13178.CrossRef
go back to reference Best, V., Shinn-Cunningham, B. G., Ozmeral, E. J., & Kopco, N. (2010). Exploring the benefit of auditory spatial continuity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(6), EL258–264. Best, V., Shinn-Cunningham, B. G., Ozmeral, E. J., & Kopco, N. (2010). Exploring the benefit of auditory spatial continuity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(6), EL258–264.
go back to reference Box, G., & Tiao, G. (1992). Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. New York: Wiley.CrossRef Box, G., & Tiao, G. (1992). Bayesian inference in statistical analysis. New York: Wiley.CrossRef
go back to reference Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: the perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge: MIT Press. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: the perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Carlyon, R. P., Cusack, R., Foxton, J. M., & Robertson, I. H. (2001). Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 115–127.PubMed Carlyon, R. P., Cusack, R., Foxton, J. M., & Robertson, I. H. (2001). Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 115–127.PubMed
go back to reference Cusack, R., Deeks, J., Aikman, G., & Carlyon, R. P. (2004). Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 643–656.PubMed Cusack, R., Deeks, J., Aikman, G., & Carlyon, R. P. (2004). Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 643–656.PubMed
go back to reference Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.CrossRef Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.CrossRef
go back to reference Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(4), 501–517.CrossRef Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(4), 501–517.CrossRef
go back to reference Fritz, J. B., Elhilali, M., David, S. V., & Shamma, S. A. (2007). Auditory attention—focusing the searchlight on sound. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17(4), 437–455.PubMedCrossRef Fritz, J. B., Elhilali, M., David, S. V., & Shamma, S. A. (2007). Auditory attention—focusing the searchlight on sound. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17(4), 437–455.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hupe, J. M., Joffo, L. M., & Pressnitzer, D. (2008). Bistability for audiovisual stimuli: perceptual decision is modality specific. Journal of Vision, 8(7), 11–15. Hupe, J. M., Joffo, L. M., & Pressnitzer, D. (2008). Bistability for audiovisual stimuli: perceptual decision is modality specific. Journal of Vision, 8(7), 11–15.
go back to reference Jahnke, J. C. (1965). Primacy and recency effects in serial-position curves of immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 130–132.PubMedCrossRef Jahnke, J. C. (1965). Primacy and recency effects in serial-position curves of immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 130–132.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Jones, M. R. (1976). Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. [Research Support, US Gov’t, Non-PHS Review]. Psychological Review, 83(5), 323–355. Jones, M. R. (1976). Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. [Research Support, US Gov’t, Non-PHS Review]. Psychological Review, 83(5), 323–355.
go back to reference Kenward, M. G., & Roger, J. H. (1997). Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics, 53(3), 983–997.PubMedCrossRef Kenward, M. G., & Roger, J. H. (1997). Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics, 53(3), 983–997.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kidd, G, Jr, Arbogast, T. L., Mason, C. R., & Gallun, F. J. (2005). The advantage of knowing where to listen. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(6), 3804–3815.PubMedCrossRef Kidd, G, Jr, Arbogast, T. L., Mason, C. R., & Gallun, F. J. (2005). The advantage of knowing where to listen. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(6), 3804–3815.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lakatos, P., Musacchia, G., O’Connel, M. N., Falchier, A. Y., Javitt, D. C., & Schroeder, C. E. (2013). The spectrotemporal filter mechanism of auditory selective attention. Neuron, 77(4), 750–761.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lakatos, P., Musacchia, G., O’Connel, M. N., Falchier, A. Y., Javitt, D. C., & Schroeder, C. E. (2013). The spectrotemporal filter mechanism of auditory selective attention. Neuron, 77(4), 750–761.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Macken, W. J., Tremblay, S., Houghton, R. J., Nicholls, A. P., & Jones, D. M. (2003). Does auditory streaming require attention? Evidence from attentional selectivity in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 43–51.PubMed Macken, W. J., Tremblay, S., Houghton, R. J., Nicholls, A. P., & Jones, D. M. (2003). Does auditory streaming require attention? Evidence from attentional selectivity in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 43–51.PubMed
go back to reference Maddox, R. K., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2012). Influence of task-relevant and task-irrelevant feature continuity on selective auditory attention. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 13(1), 119–129.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Maddox, R. K., & Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2012). Influence of task-relevant and task-irrelevant feature continuity on selective auditory attention. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 13(1), 119–129.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Marrone, N., Mason, C. R., & Kidd, G. (2008). Tuning in the spatial dimension: evidence from a masked speech identification task. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(2), 1146–1158.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Marrone, N., Mason, C. R., & Kidd, G. (2008). Tuning in the spatial dimension: evidence from a masked speech identification task. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 124(2), 1146–1158.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pinheiro, J., & Bates, D. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS (Vol. Statistics and Computing Series). New York: Springer. Pinheiro, J., & Bates, D. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS (Vol. Statistics and Computing Series). New York: Springer.
go back to reference Pressnitzer, D., & Hupe, J. M. (2006). Temporal dynamics of auditory and visual bistability reveal common principles of perceptual organization. Current Biology, 16(13), 1351–1357.PubMedCrossRef Pressnitzer, D., & Hupe, J. M. (2006). Temporal dynamics of auditory and visual bistability reveal common principles of perceptual organization. Current Biology, 16(13), 1351–1357.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pressnitzer, D., Sayles, M., Micheyl, C., & Winter, I. M. (2008). Perceptual organization of sound begins in the auditory periphery. Current Biology, 18(15), 1124–1128.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Pressnitzer, D., Sayles, M., Micheyl, C., & Winter, I. M. (2008). Perceptual organization of sound begins in the auditory periphery. Current Biology, 18(15), 1124–1128.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schaalje, G., Mcbride, J., & Fellingham, G. (2002). Adequacy of approximations to distributions of test statistics in complex mixed linear models. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 7, 512–524.CrossRef Schaalje, G., Mcbride, J., & Fellingham, G. (2002). Adequacy of approximations to distributions of test statistics in complex mixed linear models. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 7, 512–524.CrossRef
go back to reference Shamma, S. A., Elhilali, M., & Micheyl, C. (2011). Temporal coherence and attention in auditory scene analysis. Trends in Neurosciences, 34(3), 114–123.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Shamma, S. A., Elhilali, M., & Micheyl, C. (2011). Temporal coherence and attention in auditory scene analysis. Trends in Neurosciences, 34(3), 114–123.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Shomstein, S., & Yantis, S. (2004). Control of attention shifts between vision and audition in human cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(47), 10702–10706.PubMedCrossRef Shomstein, S., & Yantis, S. (2004). Control of attention shifts between vision and audition in human cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(47), 10702–10706.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Sussman, E. S., Horvath, J., Winkler, I., & Orr, M. (2007). The role of attention in the formation of auditory streams. Perception and Psychophysics, 69(1), 136–152.PubMedCrossRef Sussman, E. S., Horvath, J., Winkler, I., & Orr, M. (2007). The role of attention in the formation of auditory streams. Perception and Psychophysics, 69(1), 136–152.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Zion Golumbic, E. M., Ding, N., Bickel, S., Lakatos, P., Schevon, C. A., McKhann, G. M., et al. (2013). Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a “cocktail party”. Neuron, 77(5), 980–991.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Zion Golumbic, E. M., Ding, N., Bickel, S., Lakatos, P., Schevon, C. A., McKhann, G. M., et al. (2013). Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a “cocktail party”. Neuron, 77(5), 980–991.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Bottom-up influences of voice continuity in focusing selective auditory attention
Auteurs
Scott Bressler
Salwa Masud
Hari Bharadwaj
Barbara Shinn-Cunningham
Publicatiedatum
01-05-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0555-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2014

Psychological Research 3/2014 Naar de uitgave