Abstract
When stimulus-response (S-R) sets vary along horizontal and vertical dimensions, a right-left prevalence effect is often obtained in which the horizontal compatibility effect is larger than the vertical compatibility effect. Vu and Proctor (2001) showed that the prevalence effect varies as a function of the dimension made salient by the response configuration. A salient features coding interpretation of this result implies that manipulating the salience of the stimulus display should produce similar results and that S-R translation should be fastest when salient features of the stimulus and the response sets correspond. Experiment 1 manipulated spatial proximity to make the vertical or the horizontal stimulus dimension salient. Neutral displays yielded a typical right-left prevalence effect, and this effect was enhanced by horizontal-salient displays and eliminated by vertical-salient displays. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that the benefit for horizontal (or vertical) compatibility was larger when the salient features of both the stimulus and the response sets emphasized the horizontal (or the vertical) dimension than when only one did. The results support salient features coding as an explanation for the prevalence effect obtained with two-dimensional S-R arrangements.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beyak, B., Weeks, D., & Chua, R. (2000).Salience of response features in the spatial precuing task. Unpublished manuscript.
Heister, G., Schroeder-Heister, P., &Ehrenstein, W. H. (1990). Spatial coding and spatio-anatomical mapping: Evidence for a hierarchical model of spatial stimulus-response compatibility. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.),Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective (pp. 117–143). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hommel, B. (1996). No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 102–110.
Hommel, B., &Prinz, W. (Eds.) (1997).Theoretical issues in stimulus— response compatibility. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Nicoletti, R., &Umiltà, C. (1984). Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility.Perception & Psychophysics,35, 333–343.
Nicoletti, R., &Umiltà, C. (1985). Responding with hand and foot: The right/left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still present.Perception & Psychophysics,38, 211–216.
Nicoletti, R., Umiltà, C., Tressoldi, E. P., &Marzi, C. A. (1988). Why are left-right spatial codes easier to form than above-below ones?Perception & Psychophysics,43, 287–292.
Proctor, R. W., &Dutta, A. (1993). Do the same stimulus-response relations influence choice reactions initially and after practice?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 922–930.
Proctor, R. W., &Reeve, T. G. (1985). Compatibility effects in the assignment of symbolic stimuli to discrete finger response.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,11, 623–639.
Proctor, R. W., &Reeve, T. G. (1986). Salient-feature coding operations in spatial precuing tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,12, 277–285.
Proctor, R. W., &Reeve, T. G. (Eds.) (1990).Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Reeve, T. G., Proctor, R. W., Weeks, D. J., &Dornier, L. (1992). Salience of stimulus and response features in choice-reaction tasks.Perception & Psychophysics,52, 453–460.
Shaffer, L. H. (1965). Choice reaction with variable S-R mapping.Journal of Experimental Psychology,70, 284–288.
Vu, K.-P. L., &Proctor, R. W. (2001). Determinants of right-left and top-bottom prevalence for two-dimensional spatial compatibility.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,27, 813–828.
Vu, K.-P. L., Proctor, R. W., &Pick, D. F. (2000). Horizontal versus vertical compatibility: Right-left prevalence with bimanual responses.Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung,64, 25–40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research also benefited from valuable suggestions made by Jim Nairne, David Pick, and Howard Zelaznik.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vu, KP.L., Proctor, R.W. The prevalence effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response compatibility is a function of the relative salience of the dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics 64, 815–828 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194748
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194748