Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Symmetric, target-directed, bimanual movements take less time to prepare than asymmetric movements (Diedrichsen et al. in Cerebral Cortex 16(12):1729–1738, 2006; Heuer and Klein in Psychol Res 70(4):229–244, 2006b). The preparation savings for symmetric movements may be related to the specification of symmetric amplitudes, target locations, or both. The goals of this study were to determine which symmetric movement parameters facilitate the preparation of bimanual movements and to compare the size of the facilitation for different parameters. Thirty participants performed bimanual reaching movements that varied in terms of the symmetry/asymmetry of starting locations, movement amplitudes, and target locations. Reaction time savings were examined by comparing movements that had one symmetric parameter (and two asymmetric parameters) to movements with all asymmetric parameters. We observed significant savings (~10 ms) for movements with symmetric amplitudes and movements with symmetric target locations. Reaction time costs were examined by comparing movements that had two asymmetric parameters (and one symmetric parameter) to movements with all symmetric parameters. We observed significant reaction time costs (~13 ms) for all movements with asymmetric amplitudes. These results suggest that movement preparation is facilitated when amplitudes or target locations are symmetric and that movement preparation suffers interference when amplitudes are asymmetric. The relative importance of the three parameters to movement preparation, from most to least important, is movement amplitudes, target locations, and then starting locations. Interference with asymmetric amplitudes or target locations may be caused by cross-talk between concurrent processes of parameter specification during response programming.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Blinch, J., Franks, I. M., Chua, R. (2013). Eliminating the preparation cost for bimanual asymmetric movements. Poster presented at the biannual meeting of Progress in Motor Control, Montreal, QC.
Heuer, H. (1986). Intermanual interactions during programming of finger movements: Transient effects of ‘homologous coupling’. In H. Heuer & C. Fromm (Eds.), Generation and modulation of action patterns (pp. 87–101). Berlin: Springer. CrossRef
Heuer, H. (2006). Simultaneous specification of amplitudes and directions of bimanual reversal movements. Journal of Motor Behaviour, 38(4), 285–298. CrossRef
Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4(1), 11–26. CrossRef
Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1976). Estimation of the box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in randomized block and split-plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1(1), 69–82. CrossRef
Kelso, J. A., Southard, D. L., & Goodman, D. (1979). On the coordination of two-handed movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5(2), 229–238. PubMed
Marteniuk, R. G., MacKenzie, C. L., & Baba, D. M. (1984). Bimanual movement control: Information processing and interaction effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36(A), 335–365. CrossRef
Spijkers, W., Heuer, H., Kleinsorge, T., & van der Loo, H. (1997). Preparation of bimanual movements with same and different amplitudes: specification interference as revealed by reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 96(3), 207–227. CrossRef
Stelmach, G. E., Amrhein, P. C., & Goggin, N. L. (1988). Age differences in bimanual coordination. Journal of Gerontology, 43(1), 18–23. CrossRef
Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extension of Donders’ method. In W. G. Koster (Ed.), Attention and Performance II (pp. 276-315). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Swinnen, S. P., Lee, T. D., Verschueren, S., Serrien, D. J., & Bogaerds, H. (1997). Interlimb coordination: learning and transfer under different feedback conditions. Human Movement Science, 16(6), 749–785. CrossRef
Weigelt, C., & Cardoso de Oliveira, S. (2003). Visuomotor transformations affect bimanual coupling. Experimental Brain Research, 148(4), 439–450. PubMed
- Facilitation and interference during the preparation of bimanual movements: contributions from starting locations, movement amplitudes, and target locations
Brendan D. Cameron
Ian M. Franks
Mark G. Carpenter
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg