Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
To explore the role of temporal context on voluntary orienting of attention, we submitted healthy participants to a spatial cueing task in which cue-target stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) were organized according to two-dimensional parameters: range and central value. Three ranges of SOAs organized around two central SOA values were presented to six groups of participants. Results showed a complex pattern of responses in terms of spatial validity (faster responses to correctly cued target) and preparatory effect (faster responses to longer SOAs). Responses to validly and neutrally cued targets were affected by the increase in SOA duration if the difference between longer and shorter SOA was large. On the contrary, responses to invalidly cued targets did not vary according to SOA manipulations. The observed pattern of cueing effects does not fit in the typical description of spatial attention working as a mandatory disengaging–shifting–engaging routine. In contrast, results rather suggest a mechanism based on the interaction between context sensitive top-down processes and bottom-up attentional processes.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Alegria, J. (1974). The time course of preparation after a first peak: Some constraints of reacting mechanisms. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 622–632. CrossRef
Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P. (1970). Time uncertainty, number of alternatives and particular signal-response pair as determinants of choice reaction time. Acta Psychologica, 33, 36–44. CrossRef
Cheal, M. L., & Lyon, D. R. (1991). Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 859–880. CrossRef
Cheal, M. L., Lyon, D. R., & Gottlob, L. R. (1994). A framework for understanding the allocation of attention in location-precued discrimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 699–739. CrossRef
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Correa, A., Lupiáñez, J., & Tudela, P. (2005). Attentional preparation based on temporal expectancy modulates processing at the perceptual-level. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(2), 328–334. CrossRef
Davis, G. J., & Gibson, B. S. (2012). Going rogue in the spatial cuing paradigm: High spatial validity is insufficient to elicit voluntary shifts of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 1192–1201. PubMed
Elithorn, A., & Lawrence, C. (1955). Central inhibition: Some refractory observations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 211–220.
Gibbon, J., Church, R. M., & Meck, W. H. (1984). Scalar timing in memory. In J. Gibbon & L. G. Allan (Eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 423, Timing and time perception (pp. 52–77). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Gorea, A. (2011). Ticks per thought or thoughts per tick? A selective review of time perception with hints on future research. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 105, 153–163. CrossRef
Grondin, S. (2010a). Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(3), 561–582. CrossRef
Grondin, S. (2010b). Unequal Weber fractions for the categorization of brief temporal intervals. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(5), 1422–1430. CrossRef
Grondin, S., & Rammsayer, T. (2003). Variable foreperiods and temporal discrimination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 731–765. CrossRef
Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eyes. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Klein, R., & Hansen, E. (1990). Chronometric analysis of apparent spotlight failure in endogenous visual orienting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(4), 790–801. PubMed
Lambert, A., Naikar, N., McLachlan, K., & Aitken, V. (1999). A new component of visual orienting: Implicit effects of peripheral information and subthreshold cues on covert attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 321–340.
Los, S. A., & Van Den Heuvel, C. E. (2001). Intentional and unintentional contributions of nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(2), 370–386. PubMed
Müller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315–330. PubMed
Näätänen, R. (1972). Time uncertainty and occurrence uncertainty of the stimulus in a simple reaction time task. Acta Psychologica, 36, 492–503. CrossRef
Nakayama, K. (1990). The iconic bottleneck and the tenuous link between early visual processing and perception. In C. Blakemore (Ed.), Vision: Coding and efficiency (pp. 411–422). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Niemi, P., & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133–162. CrossRef
Nobre, A. C., Correa, A., & Coull, J. T. (2007). The hazards of time. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17, 1–6. CrossRef
Posner, M. I., & Boies, S. J. (1971). Components of attention. Psychological Review, 78, 391–408. CrossRef
Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Posner, M. I., Cohen, A., & Rafal, R. D. (1982). Neural systems control of spatial orienting. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B, 298, 187–198. CrossRef
Posner, M. I., Inhoff, A. W., Friedrich, F. J., & Cohen, A. (1987). Isolating attentional systems: a cognitive-anatomical analysis. Psychobiology, 15, 107–121.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109(2), 160–174. CrossRef
Sperling, G., & Reeves, A. (1980). Measuring the reaction time of a shift of visual attention. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VIII. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Tipples, J. (2002). Eye gaze is not unique: automatic orienting in response to uninformative arrows. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 314–318. CrossRef
Wearden, J. H., & Ferrara, A. (1996). Stimulus range effects in temporal bisection by humans. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 24–44. CrossRef
Yantis, S. (1988). On analog movements of visual attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 43(2), 203–206. CrossRef
Yantis, S. (1998). Control of visual attention. In H. Pashler (Ed.), attention (pp. 223–256). London, UK: University College Press.
- Timing the events of directional cueing
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg