Top

Gepubliceerd in:

26-12-2023 | Research

Emotion and prospective memory: effects of emotional targets and contexts

Auteurs: Cong Xin, Lin Zhang

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2024

Abstract

Event-based prospective memory (PM) refers to the ability to remember to perform a delayed and intended action when an event is encountered in the future. Whether emotional targets promote PM performance is still controversial. The reason for these inconsistent findings may be related to the degree of target arousal and context valence (the valence of ongoing task trials) in the previous studies. This study aimed to investigate the separate and combined effects of target valence, arousal, and context valence on event-based PM through two experiments. The results showed that the participants were faster and more accurate in responding to positive, negative, and high-arousal PM targets. Interestingly, an interaction effect of target valence, arousal, and context valence was observed, implying that their individual effects on PM performance cannot be understood in isolation. These findings demonstrate that positive, negative, and high-arousal PM targets can enhance PM performance. In addition, the results provided support for both the emotion enhancement account and the emotion-saliency account, depending upon whether the valence of the PM target matched or did not match the valence of the context. Moreover, context valence can modulate the effect of arousal on PM across different target valences.

vorige artikel The effects of emotion on retrospective duration memory using virtual reality

volgende artikel You do you: susceptibility of temporal binding to self-relevance

Adelman, J. S., & Estes, Z. (2013). Emotion and memory: A recognition advantage for positive and negative words independent of arousal. Cognition, 129(3), 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.014CrossRefPubMed

Albert, J., Lopez-Martin, S., & Carretie, L. (2010). Emotional context modulates response inhibition: Neural and behavioral data. NeuroImage, 49(1), 914–921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.045CrossRefPubMed

Altgassen, M., Henry, J. D., Buergler, S., & Kliegel, M. (2011). The influence of emotional target cues on prospective memory performance in depression. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33(8), 910–916. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2011.574607CrossRefPubMed

Altgassen, M., Phillips, L. H., Henry, J. D., Rendell, P. G., & Kliegel, M. (2010). Emotional target cues eliminate age differences in prospective memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(6), 1057–1064. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470211003770920CrossRef

Asgeirsson, A. G., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2019). Effects of arousal on biased competition in attention and short-term memory. Attention Perception and Psychophysics, 81(6), 1901–1912. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01756-xCrossRef

Bai, L., Ma, H., Huang, Y. X., & Luo, Y. J. (2005). The development of native Chinese affective picture system-a pretest in 46 college students [中国情绪图片系统的编制在46名中国大学生中的试用]. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 19(11), 719–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2005.02.001CrossRef

Ballhausen, N., Rendell, P. G., Henry, J. D., Joeffry, S., & Kliegel, M. (2015). Emotional valence differentially affects encoding and retrieval of prospective memory in older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 22(5), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2014.1001316CrossRef

Barrett, L. F. (1998). Discrete emotions or dimensions? The role of valence focus and arousal focus. Cognition and Emotion, 12(4), 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999398379574CrossRef

Brandt, K. R., Sünram-Lea, S. I., & Qualtrough, K. (2006). The effect of glucose administration on the emotional enhancement effect in recognition memory. Biological Psychology, 73(2), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.04.001CrossRefPubMed

Campbell, N. M., Dawel, A., Edwards, M., & Goodhew, S. C. (2021). Does motivational intensity exist distinct from valence and arousal? Emotion, 21(5), 1013–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000883CrossRefPubMed

Clark-Foos, A., Brewer, G. A., Marsh, R. L., Meeks, J. T., & Cook, G. I. (2009). The valence of event-based prospective memory cues or the context in which they occur affects their detection. American Journal of Psychology, 122(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/27784377CrossRefPubMed

Cona, G., Kliegel, M., & Bisiacchi, P. S. (2015). Differential effects of emotional cues on components of prospective memory: An ERP study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00010CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Cook, G. I., Rummel, J., & Dummel, S. (2015). Toward an understanding of motivational influences on prospective memory using value-added intentions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00278CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Dolcos, F., LaBar, K. S., & Cabeza, R. (2005). Remembering one year later: Role of the amygdala and the medial temporal lobe memory system in retrieving emotional memories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(7), 2626–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409848102CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 717–726. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.717CrossRefPubMed

Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). Retrieval processes in prospective memory: Theoretical approaches and some new findings. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2005). Prospective memory: Multiple retrieval processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(6), 286–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00382.xCrossRef

Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., & Breneiser, J. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(3), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.327CrossRefPubMed

Elliott, D., Strickland, L., Loft, S., & Heathcote, A. (2022). Integrated responding improves prospective memory accuracy. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 29, 934–942. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-02038-0CrossRefPubMed

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146CrossRefPubMed

Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000238CrossRefPubMed

Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2010). Implicit affective cues and attentional tuning: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 875–893. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020495CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Graf, P., & Yu, M. (2015). Valenced cues and contexts have different effects on event-based prospective memory. PLoS ONE, 10(2), e0116953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116953CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Greening, S. G., & Mather, M. (2015). How arousal influences neural competition: What dual competition does not explain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38, e77. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x14000910CrossRefPubMed

Guo, Y. F., Xue, L. M., Huang, X. T., Lin, B. X., & Qiu, J. J. (2019). The effect of negative emotion and delay on time-based prospective memory [负性情绪背景和延迟对时间性前瞻记忆的影响]. Journal of Psychological Science, 42(3), 543–549. https://doi.org/10.16719/j.cnki.1671-6981.20190305CrossRef

Hamann, S. (2001). Cognitive and neural mechanisms of emotional memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(9), 394–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01707-1CrossRefPubMed

Harmon-Jones, E., Gable, P. A., & Price, T. F. (2013). Does negative affect always narrow and positive affect always broaden the mind? Considering the influence of motivational intensity on cognitive scope. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413481353

Henry, J. D., Joeffry, S., Terrett, G., Ballhausen, N., Kliegel, M., & Rendell, P. G. (2015). Prospective memory function in late adulthood: Affect at encoding and resource allocation costs. PLoS ONE, 10(4), e0125124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125124CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hering, A., Kliegel, M., Bisiacchi, P. S., & Cona, G. (2018). The influence of emotional material on encoding and retrieving intentions: An ERP study in younger and older adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00114CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hostler, T. J., Wood, C., & Armitage, C. J. (2018). The influence of emotional cues on prospective memory: A systematic review with meta-analyses. Cognition and Emotion, 32(8), 1578–1596. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1423280CrossRefPubMed

Huntsinger, J. R. (2013). Does emotion directly tune the scope of attention? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 265–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413480364CrossRef

Huppert, F. A., & Beardsall, L. (1993). Prospective memory impairment as an early indicator of dementia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 15(5), 805–821. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688639308402597CrossRefPubMed

Kensinger, E. A. (2009). Remembering the details: Effects of emotion. Emotion Review, 1(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073908100432CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2003). Effect of negative emotional content on working memory and long-term memory. Emotion, 3(4), 378–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.3.4.378CrossRefPubMed

Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2004). Two routes to emotional memory: Distinct neural processes for valence and arousal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(9), 3310–3315. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0306408101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kensinger, E. A., & Schacter, D. L. (2006). Processing emotional pictures and words: Effects of valence and arousal. Cognitive Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 6(2), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.3758/cabn.6.2.110CrossRef

Kraemer, H. C., & Blasey, C. (1987). How many subjects? Statistical power analysis in research. Sage.

Kron, A., Pilkiw, M., Banaei, J., Goldstein, A., & Anderson, A. K. (2015). Are valence and arousal separable in emotional experience? Emotion, 15(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038474CrossRefPubMed

LaBar, K. S., & Cabeza, R. (2006). Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1825CrossRefPubMed

Lane, R. D., Chua, P. M. L., & Dolan, R. J. (1999). Common effects of emotional valence, arousal and attention on neural activation during visual processing of pictures. Neuropsychologia, 37(9), 989–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00017-2CrossRefPubMed

Lang, P. J. (1995). The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention. The American Psychologist, 50(5), 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.50.5.372CrossRefPubMed

LeDoux, J. E. (1994). Emotion, memory and the brain. Scientific American, 270(6), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0694-50CrossRefPubMed

Lee, T.-H., Itti, L., & Mather, M. (2012). Evidence for arousal-biased competition in perceptual learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 241. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00241CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lee, T.-H., Sakaki, M., Cheng, R., Velasco, R., & Mather, M. (2014). Emotional arousal amplifies the effects of biased competition in the brain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(12), 2067–2077. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lourenço, J. S., & Maylor, E. A. (2014). Is it relevant? Influence of trial manipulations of prospective memory context on task interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(4), 687–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.826257CrossRef

Lui, S. S. Y., Leung, S. S. W., Yang, T.-X., Ho, K. K. Y., Man, C. M. Y., Leung, K. H. L., Wong, J. O. Y., Wang, Y., Cheung, E. F. C., & Chan, R. C. K. (2021). The benefits of emotionally salient cues on event-based prospective memory in bipolar patients and schizophrenia patients. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 271(8), 1503–1511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-021-01235-1CrossRefPubMed

Marsh, R. L., Brewer, G. A., Jameson, J. P., Cook, G. I., Amir, N., & Hicks, J. L. (2009). Threat-related processing supports prospective memory retrieval for people with obsessive tendencies. Memory, 17(6), 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210903032762CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mather, M. (2007). Emotional arousal and memory binding an object-based framework. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00028.xCrossRefPubMed

Mather, M., & Sutherland, M. R. (2011). Arousal-biased competition in perception and memory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(2), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611400234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

May, C. P., Manning, M., Einstein, G. O., Becker, L., & Owens, M. (2015). The best of both worlds: Emotional cues improve prospective memory execution and reduce repetition errors. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 22(3), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2014.952263CrossRef

May, C., Owens, M., & Einstein, G. O. (2012). The impact of emotion on prospective memory and monitoring: No pain, big gain. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19(6), 1165–1171. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0301-3CrossRefPubMed

McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S127–S144. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.775CrossRef

McGaugh, J. L. (2000). Memory: A century of consolidation. Science, 287(5451), 248–251. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5451.248CrossRefPubMed

McGaugh, J. L. (2004). The amygdala modulates the consolidation of memories of emotionally arousing experiences. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144157CrossRefPubMed

Meier, B., & Graf, P. (2000). Transfer appropriate processing for prospective memory tests. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S11–S27. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.768CrossRef

Meinhardt, J., & Pekrun, R. (2003). Attentional resource allocation to emotional events: An ERP study. Cognition and Emotion, 17(3), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930244000039CrossRefPubMed

Mioni, G., Meligrana, L., Rendell, P. G., Bartolomei, L., Perini, F., & Stablum, F. (2015). Event-based prospective memory in patients with Parkinson’s disease: The effect of emotional valence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 427. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00427CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Murphy, N. A., & Isaacowitz, D. M. (2008). Preferences for emotional information in older and younger adults: A meta-analysis of memory and attention tasks. Psychology and Aging, 23(2), 263–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.23.2.263CrossRefPubMed

Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 466–478. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.466CrossRefPubMed

Phelps, E. A., Ling, S., & Carrasco, M. (2006). Emotion facilitates perception and potentiates the perceptual benefits of attention. Psychological Science, 17(4), 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01701.xCrossRefPubMed

Rea, M., Kullmann, S., Veit, R., Casile, A., Braun, C., Belardinelli, M. O., Birbaumer, N., & Caria, A. (2011). Effects of aversive stimuli on prospective memory. An event-related fMRI study. PLoS ONE, 6(10), e26290. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026290CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rendell, P. G., Henry, J. D., Phillips, L. H., de la Piedad Garcia, X., Booth, P., Phillips, P., & Kliegel, M. (2012). Prospective memory, emotional valence, and multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34(7), 738–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2012.670388CrossRefPubMed

Rendell, P. G., Phillips, L. H., Henry, J. D., Brumby-Rendell, T., de la Piedad Garcia, X., Altgassen, M., & Kliegel, M. (2011). Prospective memory, emotional valence and ageing. Cognition and Emotion, 25(5), 916–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.508610CrossRefPubMed

Robinson, M. D., Storbeck, J., Meier, B. P., & Kirkeby, B. S. (2004). Watch out! That could be dangerous: Valence-arousal interactions in evaluative processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(11), 1472–1484. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204266647CrossRefPubMed

Rummel, J., Boywitt, C. D., & Meiser, T. (2011). Assessing the validity of multinomial models using extraneous variables: An application to prospective memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(11), 2194–2210. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.586708CrossRef

Rummel, J., Hepp, J., Klein, S. A., & Silberleitner, N. (2012). Affective state and event-based prospective memory. Cognition and Emotion, 26(2), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.574873CrossRefPubMed

Rummel, J., Smeekens, B. A., & Kane, M. J. (2017). Dealing with prospective memory demands while performing an ongoing task: Shared processing, increased on-task focus, or both? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 43(7), 1047–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000359CrossRefPubMed

Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.145CrossRefPubMed

Sakaki, M., Fryer, K., & Mather, M. (2014). Emotion strengthens high-priority memory traces but weakens low-priority memory traces. Psychological Science, 25(2), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504784CrossRefPubMed

Saxton, B. T., Myhre, S. K., Siyaguna, T., & Rokke, P. D. (2020). Do arousal and valence have separable influences on attention across time? Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 84(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-0995-6CrossRefPubMed

Schaper, M. L., Horn, S. S., Bayen, U. J., Buchner, A., & Bell, R. (2022). Adaptive prospective memory for faces of cheaters and cooperators. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(6), 1358–1376. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001128CrossRefPubMed

Schnitzspahn, K. M., Horn, S. S., Bayen, U. J., & Kliegel, M. (2012). Age effects in emotional prospective memory: Cue valence differentially affects the prospective and retrospective component. Psychology and Aging, 27(2), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025021CrossRefPubMed

Schümann, D., Joue, G., Jordan, P., Bayer, J., & Sommer, T. (2020). Test-retest reliability of the emotional enhancement of memory. Memory, 28(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2019.1679837CrossRefPubMed

Schupp, H., Flaisch, T., Stockburger, J., & Junghofer, M. (2006). Emotion and attention: Event-related brain potential studies. Journal of Psychophysiology, 20(2), 115–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56002-9CrossRef

Scullin, M. K., McDaniel, M. A., & Shelton, J. T. (2013). The dynamic multiprocess framework: Evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability. Cognitive Psychology, 67(1–2), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.07.001CrossRefPubMed

Scullin, M. K., McDaniel, M. A., Shelton, J. T., & Lee, J. H. (2010). Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: Monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(3), 736–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018971CrossRefPubMed

Sharot, T., & Phelps, E. A. (2004). How arousal modulates memory: Disentangling the effects of attention and retention. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 4(3), 294–306. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.4.3.294CrossRef

Singh, D., & Sunny, M. M. (2017). Emotion induced blindness is more sensitive to changes in arousal as compared to valence of the emotional distractor. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1381. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01381CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Singh, T., & Kashyap, N. (2016). Effect of cue characteristics on event based prospective memory: Evaluating valence and presentation mode. Psychological Studies, 61(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-015-0331-9CrossRef

Smith, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(3), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.347CrossRefPubMed

Smith, R. E., & Bayen, U. J. (2004). A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(4), 756–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.756CrossRefPubMed

Smith, R. E., Hunt, R. R., McVay, J. C., & McConnell, M. D. (2007). The cost of event-based prospective memory: salient target events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 734–746. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.734

Strickland, L., Heathcote, A., Humphreys, M. S., & Loft, S. (2022). Target learning in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48(8), 1110–1126. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000900CrossRefPubMed

Strickland, L., Loft, S., & Heathcote, A. (2020). Investigating the effects of ongoing-task bias on prospective memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(9), 1495–1513. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820914915CrossRef

Szarras-Kudzia, K., & Niedźwieńska, A. (2022). Implementation intentions speed up young adults’ responses to prospective memory targets in everyday life. PLoS ONE, 17(1), e0260856. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260856CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Talmi, D., Schimmack, U., Paterson, T., & Moscovitch, M. (2007). The role of attention and relatedness in emotionally enhanced memory. Emotion, 7(1), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.89

Treese, A. C., Johansson, M., & Lindgren, M. (2011). Oh, it's you again: memory interference from irrelevant emotional and neutral faces. Cognition and Emotion, 25(5), 907–915. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.508608

Wachtel, P. L. (1967). Conceptions of broad and narrow attention. Psychological Bulletin, 68(6), 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025186CrossRefPubMed

Walter, N. T., & Bayen, U. J. (2016). Selective effects of acute alcohol intake on the prospective and retrospective components of a prospective-memory task with emotional targets. Psychopharmacology (berl), 233(2), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-015-4110-zCrossRefPubMed

Xian, J. H., Wang, Y., & Han, B. X. (2020). Effect of emotion on prospective memory in those of different age groups. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2020, 8859231. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8859231CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yang, T. X., Cui, X. L., Wang, Y., Huang, J., Lui, S. S. Y., Zhang, R. T., Cheung, E. F. C., & Chan, R. C. K. (2018). Effect of emotional cues on prospective memory performance in patients with schizophrenia and major depressive disorder. Schizophrenia Research, 201, 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2018.05.023CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Emotion and prospective memory: effects of emotional targets and contexts
Auteurs: Cong Xin
Lin Zhang
Publicatiedatum: 26-12-2023
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2024
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01903-y

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2024

Item-specific and relational encoding are effective at reducing the illusion of competence

The effects of emotion on retrospective duration memory using virtual reality

Representation of shared surface information and false memory for abstract versus concrete pictures in the conjoint recognition paradigm

Forward effects from action observation: the role of attentional focus

The impact of food stimuli and fasting on cognitive control in task switching

Semantic relatedness can impair memory for item locations