Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 6/2018

16-06-2017 | Original Article

Action–effects enhance explicit sequential learning

Auteurs: Sarah Esser, Hilde Haider

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Different studies have shown that action–effect associations seem to enhance implicit learning of motor sequences. In a recent study (Haider et al., Conscious Cognit 26:145–161, 2014), we found indications that action–effect learning might play a special role in acquiring explicit knowledge within an implicit learning situation. The current study aims at directly manipulating the action–effect contingencies in a Serial Reaction Time Task and examining its impact on explicit sequence knowledge. For this purpose, we created a situation in which the participants’ responses led to a melodic tone sequence. For one group, these effect tones were contingently bound to the sequential responses and immediately followed the key press; for the second group, the tones were delayed by 400 ms. For a third group, the tones also followed the response immediately and resulted in the same melody but were not contingently bound to the responses. A fourth control group received no effect tones at all. Only the group that experienced contingent effect tones that directly followed the response showed an increase in explicit sequence knowledge. The results are discussed in terms of the multi-modal structure of action–effect associations and the ideomotor principle of action control.
Voetnoten
1
Following the advice of one reviewer we also re-calculated our main analysis of the test data including the persons that made too many errors according to our criterion as well as re-analyzing the data with the exclusion of the participants that made more than 10% errors (4 more participants). This proceeding did not alter any of the relevant results of the test data, most importantly the significant interaction of the wager data.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Baars, B. J. (1997). In the theatre of consciousness: Global workspace theory, a rigorous scientific theory of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4(4), 292–309. Baars, B. J. (1997). In the theatre of consciousness: Global workspace theory, a rigorous scientific theory of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4(4), 292–309.
go back to reference Balleine, B. W., & O’Doherty, J. (2010). Human and rodents homologies in action-control: Corticostriatal determinants of goal-directed and habitual action. Neuropsychopharmacology Reviews, 35, 48–69. doi:10.1038/npp.2009.131.CrossRefPubMed Balleine, B. W., & O’Doherty, J. (2010). Human and rodents homologies in action-control: Corticostriatal determinants of goal-directed and habitual action. Neuropsychopharmacology Reviews, 35, 48–69. doi:10.​1038/​npp.​2009.​131.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Blakemore, S. J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2002). Abnormalties in the awareness of action. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6(6), 237–242.CrossRef Blakemore, S. J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2002). Abnormalties in the awareness of action. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6(6), 237–242.CrossRef
go back to reference Cleeremans, A., & Jiménez, L. (2002). Implicit learning and consciousness: A graded, dynamic perspective. In R. M. French & A. Cleeremans (Eds.), Implicit Learning and Consciousness: An Empirical, Computational and Philosophical Consensus in the Making? (pp. 1–40). Hove: Psychology Press. Cleeremans, A., & Jiménez, L. (2002). Implicit learning and consciousness: A graded, dynamic perspective. In R. M. French & A. Cleeremans (Eds.), Implicit Learning and Consciousness: An Empirical, Computational and Philosophical Consensus in the Making? (pp. 1–40). Hove: Psychology Press.
go back to reference Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 391–398. doi:10.3758/BF03196171. Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 391–398. doi:10.​3758/​BF03196171.
go back to reference Dienes, Z. (2008). Subjective measures of unconscious knowledge. In R. Banerjee, B. K. Chakrabarti (Eds.), Models of Brain and Mind Physical, Computational and Psychological Approaches (pp. 49–64). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Dienes, Z. (2008). Subjective measures of unconscious knowledge. In R. Banerjee, B. K. Chakrabarti (Eds.), Models of Brain and Mind Physical, Computational and Psychological Approaches (pp. 49–64). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
go back to reference Donohue, S. E., Roberts, K. C., Grent-‘t-Jong, T., & Woldorff, M. (2011). The cross-modal spread of attention reveals differential constraints for the temporal and spatial linking of visual and auditory stimulus events. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(22), 7982–7990. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5298-10.2011.CrossRefPubMed Donohue, S. E., Roberts, K. C., Grent-‘t-Jong, T., & Woldorff, M. (2011). The cross-modal spread of attention reveals differential constraints for the temporal and spatial linking of visual and auditory stimulus events. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(22), 7982–7990. doi:10.​1523/​JNEUROSCI.​5298-10.​2011.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Eberhardt, K., Esser, S., & Haider, H. (2017). Abstract feature codes: The building blocks of the implicit learning system. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. doi:10.1037/xhp0000380. Eberhardt, K., Esser, S., & Haider, H. (2017). Abstract feature codes: The building blocks of the implicit learning system. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. doi:10.​1037/​xhp0000380.
go back to reference Frensch, P. A., Haider, H., Rünger, D., Neugebauer, U., Voigt, S., & Werg, J. (2003). The route from implicit learning to awareness of what has been learned. In L. Jiménez (Ed.), Attention and Implicit Learning (pp. 335–366). New York: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRef Frensch, P. A., Haider, H., Rünger, D., Neugebauer, U., Voigt, S., & Werg, J. (2003). The route from implicit learning to awareness of what has been learned. In L. Jiménez (Ed.), Attention and Implicit Learning (pp. 335–366). New York: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRef
go back to reference Haggard, P., Clark, S., & Kalogeras, J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature: Neursoscience, 5(4), 382–385. doi:10.1038/nn827. Haggard, P., Clark, S., & Kalogeras, J. (2002). Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature: Neursoscience, 5(4), 382–385. doi:10.​1038/​nn827.
go back to reference Haider, H., Eberhardt, K., Esser, S., & Rose, M. (2014). Implicit visual learning: How the task set modulates learning by determining the stimulus-response binding. Consciousness and Cognition, 26, 145–161.CrossRefPubMed Haider, H., Eberhardt, K., Esser, S., & Rose, M. (2014). Implicit visual learning: How the task set modulates learning by determining the stimulus-response binding. Consciousness and Cognition, 26, 145–161.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Haider, H., Eberhardt, K., Kunde, A., & Rose, M. (2012). Implicit visual learning and the expression of learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 82–98.CrossRefPubMed Haider, H., Eberhardt, K., Kunde, A., & Rose, M. (2012). Implicit visual learning and the expression of learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 22, 82–98.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Herwig, A., & Waszak, F. (2012). Action–effect bindings and ideomotor learning in intention- and stimulus-based actions. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(444), 1–18. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00444. Herwig, A., & Waszak, F. (2012). Action–effect bindings and ideomotor learning in intention- and stimulus-based actions. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(444), 1–18. doi:10.​3389/​fpsyg.​2012.​00444.
go back to reference Hoffmann, J., Sebald, A., & Stöcker, C. (2001). Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in serial reaction time tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(2), 470–482.CrossRefPubMed Hoffmann, J., Sebald, A., & Stöcker, C. (2001). Irrelevant response effects improve serial learning in serial reaction time tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(2), 470–482.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270–279. doi:10.1007/BF00419687.CrossRef Hommel, B. (1993). Inverting the Simon effect by intention: Determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychological Research, 55, 270–279. doi:10.​1007/​BF00419687.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878. doi:10.1007/s00426-009-0234-2.CrossRef Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878. doi:10.​1007/​s00426-009-0234-2.CrossRef
go back to reference James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt & Co. James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. New York: Holt & Co.
go back to reference Jeffreys, H. (1939). A Theory of Probability. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jeffreys, H. (1939). A Theory of Probability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Keele, S. W., Ivry, R., Mayr, U., Hazeltine, E., & Heuer, H. (2003). The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychological Review, 110, 352–339. Keele, S. W., Ivry, R., Mayr, U., Hazeltine, E., & Heuer, H. (2003). The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation. Psychological Review, 110, 352–339.
go back to reference Lau, H. (2008). A higher-order Bayesian decision theory of consciousness. In R. Banerjee & B. K. Chakrabarti (Eds.), Models of Brain and Mind: Physical, Computational and Psychological Approaches (pp. 35–48). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Lau, H. (2008). A higher-order Bayesian decision theory of consciousness. In R. Banerjee & B. K. Chakrabarti (Eds.), Models of Brain and Mind: Physical, Computational and Psychological Approaches (pp. 35–48). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
go back to reference Lotze, R. H. (1852). Medizinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele. Leipzig: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung. Lotze, R. H. (1852). Medizinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele. Leipzig: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.
go back to reference Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.CrossRef Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1–32.CrossRef
go back to reference Reed, J., & Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(3), 585–592. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.3.585.CrossRef Reed, J., & Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(3), 585–592. doi:10.​1037/​0278-7393.​20.​3.​585.CrossRef
go back to reference Remillard, G. (2003). Pure perceptual-based sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 581–597.CrossRefPubMed Remillard, G. (2003). Pure perceptual-based sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 581–597.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rosenthal, D. (1997). A theory of consciousness. In N. Block, O. Flanagan, & G. Güzeldere (Eds.), The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates (pp. 729–753). Cambridge: MIT Press. Rosenthal, D. (1997). A theory of consciousness. In N. Block, O. Flanagan, & G. Güzeldere (Eds.), The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates (pp. 729–753). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Rünger, D., & Frensch, P. A. (2010). Defining consciousness in the context of incidental sequence learning: theoretical considerations and empirical implications. Psychological Research, 74(2), 121–137. doi:10.1007/s00426-008-0225-8.CrossRefPubMed Rünger, D., & Frensch, P. A. (2010). Defining consciousness in the context of incidental sequence learning: theoretical considerations and empirical implications. Psychological Research, 74(2), 121–137. doi:10.​1007/​s00426-008-0225-8.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Schlaghecken, F., Stürmer, B., & Eimer, M. (2000). Chunking processes in the learning of event sequences: Electrophysiological indicators. Memory & Cognition, 28(5), 821–831. doi:10.3758/BF03198417.CrossRef Schlaghecken, F., Stürmer, B., & Eimer, M. (2000). Chunking processes in the learning of event sequences: Electrophysiological indicators. Memory & Cognition, 28(5), 821–831. doi:10.​3758/​BF03198417.CrossRef
go back to reference Scott, R. B., & Dienes, Z. (2008). The conscious, the unconscious, and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(5), 1264–1288. doi:10.1037/a0012943.CrossRefPubMed Scott, R. B., & Dienes, Z. (2008). The conscious, the unconscious, and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(5), 1264–1288. doi:10.​1037/​a0012943.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Shanks, D. R. (2005). Implicit Learning. In K. Lamberts & R. Goldstone (Eds.), Handbook of Cognition (pp. 202–220). London: Sage. Shanks, D. R. (2005). Implicit Learning. In K. Lamberts & R. Goldstone (Eds.), Handbook of Cognition (pp. 202–220). London: Sage.
go back to reference Shanks, D. R., & Johnstone, T. (1999). Evaluating the relationship between explicit and implicit knowledge in a serial reaction time task. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), 1435–1451.CrossRefPubMed Shanks, D. R., & Johnstone, T. (1999). Evaluating the relationship between explicit and implicit knowledge in a serial reaction time task. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), 1435–1451.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Willingham, D. B. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 105, 558–584.CrossRefPubMed Willingham, D. B. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 105, 558–584.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Willingham, D. B., Wells, L. A., Farrell, J. M., & Stemwedel, M. E. (2000). Implicit motor sequence learning represented in response locations. Memory & Cognition, 28(3), 366–375.CrossRef Willingham, D. B., Wells, L. A., Farrell, J. M., & Stemwedel, M. E. (2000). Implicit motor sequence learning represented in response locations. Memory & Cognition, 28(3), 366–375.CrossRef
go back to reference Ziessler, M. (1998). Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(4), 962–978.CrossRef Ziessler, M. (1998). Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(4), 962–978.CrossRef
go back to reference Ziessler, M., & Nattkemper, D. (2001). Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: Further evidence from a serial reaction time task. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(3), 595–613.CrossRefPubMed Ziessler, M., & Nattkemper, D. (2001). Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: Further evidence from a serial reaction time task. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(3), 595–613.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Action–effects enhance explicit sequential learning
Auteurs
Sarah Esser
Hilde Haider
Publicatiedatum
16-06-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0883-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2018

Psychological Research 6/2018 Naar de uitgave