Abstract
Previous work (Willingham, 1999) has indicated that implicit motor sequence learning is not primarily perceptual; that is, what is learned is not a sequence of stimuli. Still other work has indicated that implicit motor sequence learning is not specific to particular muscle groups or effectors. In the present work, we tested whether implicit motor sequence learning would be represented as a sequence of response locations. In Experiment 1, learning showed very poor transfer when the response locations were changed, even though the stimulus positions were unchanged. In Experiment 2, participants switched their hand positions at transfer, so that one group of participants pushed the same sequence of keys but used a different sequence of finger movements to do so, whereas another group pushed a different sequence of keys but used the same sequence of finger movements used at training. Knowledge of the sequence was shown at transfer only if the sequence of response locations was maintained, not the sequence of finger movements.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bridgeman, B. (1991). Separate visual representations for perception and for visually guided behavior. In S. Ellis, M. Kaiser, & A. Grunwald (Eds.),Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments (pp. 316–327). London: Taylor & Francis.
Cohen, A., Ivry, R. I., &Keele, S.W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 17–30.
Curran, T., &Keele, S. W. (1993). Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 189–202.
Graf, P., &Schacter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 501–518.
Grafton, S. T., Hazeltine, E., &Ivry, R. [B.] (1995). Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,7, 497–510.
Grafton, S. T., Hazeltine, E., Ivry, R. B. (1998). Abstract and effector-specific representations of motor sequences identified with PET.Journal of Neuroscience,18, 9420–9428.
Howard, J. H., Mutter, S. A., &Howard, D. V. (1992). Serial pattern learning by event observation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 1029–1039.
Jackson, G. M., Jackson, S. R., Harrison, J., Henderson, L., &Kennard, C. (1995). Serial reaction time learning and Parkinson’s disease: Evidence for a procedural learning deficit.Neuropsychologia,33, 577–593.
Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,17, 187–245.
Keele, S. W., Jennings, P., Jones, S., Caulton, S., Caulton, D., &Cohen, A. (1995). On the modularity of sequence representation.Journal of Motor Behavior,27, 17–30.
Marks, A. R., Cermak, L. S., & Grafman, J. (1998). Sequence learning in medial—temporal amnesic patients, Korsakoff amnesic patients, and patients with frontal-lobe lesions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Marks, A. R., Wild, K., Higgins, J., Massaquoi, S., & Grafman, J. (1998). Sequence learning in patients with cerebellar atrophy and patients with frontal-lobe damage: The effect of sequence length. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Mayr, U. (1996). Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: Evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 350–364.
Nissen, M. J., &Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures.Cognitive Psychology,19, 1–32.
Paillard, J. (1991). Motor and representational framing of space. In J. Paillard (Ed.),Brain and space (pp. 163–182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reed, J., &Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 584–594.
Sagar, H. J., Sullivan, E. V., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Corkin, S., &Growdon, J. H. (1988). Temporal ordering and short-term memory deficits in Parkinson’s disease.Brain,111, 525–539.
Salmon, D. P., Pow, F. K. Y., Heindel, W. C., Butters, N., &Thal, L. J. (1989). Differentiation of Alzheimer’s disease and Huntington’s disease with the dementia rating scale.Archives of Neurology,46, 1204–1208.
Shimamura, A. P., Janowsky, J. S., &Squire, L. R. (1990). Memory for the temporal order of events in patients with frontal lobe lesions and amnesic patients.Neuropsychologia,28, 803–813.
Welford, A. T. (1984). Psychomotor performance.Annual Review of Gerontology & Geriatrics,4, 237–273.
Willingham, D. B. (1998). A neuropsychological theory of motor skill learning.Psychological Review,105, 558–584.
Willingham, D. B. (1999). Implicit motor sequence learning is not purely perceptual.Memory & Cognition,27, 561–572.
Willingham, D. B., &Koroshetz, W. J. (1993). Evidence for dissociable motor skills in Huntington’s disease patients.Psychobiology,21, 173–182.
Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., &Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1047–1060.
Ziessler, M. (1994). The impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning.Psychological Research,57, 30–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Willingham, D.B., Wells, L.A., Farrell, J.M. et al. Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations. Memory & Cognition 28, 366–375 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198552
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198552