Abstract
The present study investigated whether effects of implicit learning (IL) are due to well-learned and explicitly represented parts of the stimulus material (“chunks”). To this purpose, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded during an oddball-version of a serial reaction time (RT) task: At unpredictable positions within a 16-item letter sequence, single deviant items replaced an item of the repeatedly presented standard sequence. After acquisition, the “process dissociation procedure” (Jacoby, 1991) was adopted to identify explicitly learned sequence parts for each participant. Acquisition of sequence knowledge was reflected in faster RTs for standard items than for deviant items and in enhanced N2b and P3b components for deviant items. While the ERP effects were obtained for explicitly represented sequence parts only, RT effects were independent of subsequent reproduction performance. These results indicated that (1) ERPs are a valid measure of explicit knowledge, (2) implicit and explicit knowledge coexist in serial RT tasks, and (3) chunking processes play a major role in the acquisition of explicit knowledge about event sequences.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldwin, K. B., &Kutas, M. (1997). An ERP analysis of implicit structured sequence learning.Psychophysiology,34, 74–86.
Cohen, A., Ivry, R. I., &Keele, S. W. (1990). Attention and structure in sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 17–30.
Curran, T., &Keele, S. W. (1993). Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 189–202.
Donchin, E. (1981). Surprise … Surprise?Psychophysiology,18, 493–513.
Eimer, M., Goschke, T., Schlaghecken, F., &Stürmer, B. (1996). Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: Evidence from event-related brain potentials.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,22, 970–987.
Fendrich, D. W., Healy, A. F., &Bourne, L. E. (1991). Long-term repetition effects for motoric and perceptual procedures.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 137–151.
Gardiner, J. M., &Java, R. I. (1993). Recognising and remembering. In A. Collins, M. A. Conway, S. E. Gathercole, & P. E. Morris (Eds.),Theories of mind (pp. 163–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Grafton, S. T., Mazziotta, J. C., Presty, S., Friston, K. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., &Phelps, M. E. (1992). Functional anatomy of human procedural learning determined with regional cerebral blood flow and PET.Journal of Neuroscience,12, 2542–2548.
Hartman, M., Knopman, D. S., &Nissen, M. J. (1989). Implicit learning of new verbal associations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1070–1082.
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory.Journal of Memory & Language,30, 513–541.
Jenkins, I. H., Brooks, D. J., Nixon, P. D., Frackowiak, R. S. J., &Passingham, R. E. (1994). Motor sequence learning: A study with positron emission tomography.Journal of Neuroscience,14, 3775–3790.
Joordans, S., &Merikle, P. M. (1993). Independence or redundancy? Two models of conscious and unconscious influences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,4, 462–467.
Lewicki, P., Hill, T., &Bizot, E. (1988). Acquisition of procedural knowledge about a pattern of stimuli that cannot be articulated.Cognitive Psychology,20, 24–37.
Nissen, M. J., &Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures.Cognitive Psychology,19, 1–32.
Nissen, M. J., Willingham, D., &Hartman, M. (1989). Explicit and implicit remembering: When is learning preserved in amnesia?Neuropsychologia,27, 341–352.
Perruchet, P. (1994). Learning from complex rule-governed environments: On the proper functions of nonconscious and conscious processes. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 811–835). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Perruchet, P., &Amorim, M. A. (1992). Conscious knowledge and changes in performance in sequence learning: Evidence against dissociation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 785–800.
Picton, T. W., &Hillyard, S. A. (1988). Endogenous event-related potentials. In T.W. Picton (Ed.),Human event-related potentials: EEG handbook (rev. series, Vol. 3, pp. 361–426). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 219–235.
Reed, J., &Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 585–594.
Reingold, E. M., &Toth, J. P. (1996). Process dissociation versus task dissociation: A controversy in progress. In G. Underwood (Ed.),Implicit cognition (pp. 159–202). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ritter, W., Ford, J. M., Gaillard, A. K. W., Harter, M. R., Kutas, M., Näätänen, R., Polich, J., Renault, B., &Rohrbaugh, J. (1984). Cognition and event-related potentials: 1. The relationship of negative potentials and cognitive processes. In R. Karrer, J. Cohen, & P. Tueting (Eds.),Brain and information: Event-related potentials (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 425, pp. 24–38). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Roediger, H. L., III (1990a). Implicit memory: A commentary.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,28, 373–380.
Roediger, H. L., III (1990b). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering.American Psychologist,45, 1043–1056.
Ruchkin, D. S., Sutton, S., &Tueting, P. (1975). Emitted and evoked P300 potentials and variation in stimulus probability.Psychophysiology,12, 591–595.
Schacter, D. L. (1994). Priming and multiple memory systems: Perceptual mechanisms of implicit memory. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.),Memory systems 1994 (pp. 233–268). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Seger, C. A. (1994). Implicit learning.Psychological Bulletin,115, 163–196.
Shanks, D. R., Green, R. E. A., &Kolodny, J. (1994). A critical examination of the evidence for unconscious (implicit) learning. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.),Attention and performance XV: Conscious and nonconscious information processing (pp. 837–860). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shanks, D. R., &St. John, M. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,17, 367–447.
Squire, L. (1994). Declarative and nondeclarative memory: Multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.),Memory systems 1994 (pp. 203–232). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Squires, K. C., Donchin, E., Herning, R. I., &McCarthy, G. (1977). On the influence of task relevance and stimulus probability on eventrelated-potential components.Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology,42, 1–14.
Squires, K. C., Wickens, C., Squires, N. K., &Donchin, E. (1976). The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical eventrelated potential.Science,193, 1142–1146.
Stadler, M. A. (1989). On learning complex procedural knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1061–1069.
Stadler, M. A. (1993). Implicit serial learning: Questions inspired by Hebb (1961).Memory & Cognition,21, 819–827.
Willingham, D. B., Greeley, T., &Bardone, A. M. (1993). Dissociation in a serial response time task using a recognition measure: Comment on Perruchet and Amorim (1992).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1424–1430.
Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., &Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1047–1060.
Zießler, M. (1994). The impact of motor responses on serial-pattern learning.Psychological Research,57, 30–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The present experiment was conducted at the Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schlaghecken, F., StÜrmer, B. & Eimer, M. Chunking processes in the learning of event sequences: Electrophysiological indicators. Memory & Cognition 28, 821–831 (2000). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198417
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198417