Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
School engagement is an important theoretical and practical cornerstone to the promotion of academic accomplishments. This article used a tripartite—behavioral, emotional, and cognitive—model of school engagement to assess the relationship between school engagement and academic success among high school students, and to determine whether a reciprocal relationship exists between these constructs. Data were derived from 710 youth (69 % female) who took part in Waves 6 through 8 (Grades 10 through 12) of the 4-H study of positive youth development. Longitudinal confirmatory factor analyses confirmed the invariance of the tripartite model of school engagement. Results of a structural equation model showed that the components of school engagement and academic achievement were mutually predictive and that these predictions varied from grade to grade. Future possibilities for evaluating the relationship between school engagement and academic achievement, as well as the implications for educational policy and practice, are discussed.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Balfanz, R., & Byrnes, V. (2006). Closing the mathematics achievement gap in high poverty middle schools: Enablers and constraints. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk,11, 143–159. CrossRef
Balfanz, R., Bridgeland, J. M., Moore, L. A., & Fox, J. H. (2010). Building a grad nation: Progress and challenge in ending the high school dropout epidemic. Washington DC: America’s Promise Alliance, Civic Enterprises Everyone Graduates Center at Johns Hopkins University.
Bowers, E. P., Geldhof, G. J., Johnson, S. K., Lerner, J. V., &, Lerner, R. M. (in press). Thriving across the adolescent years: A view of the issues. Journal of Youth and Adolescence.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
Cameron, R. G. (1989). The common yardstick: A case for the SAT. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
Cassady, J. C., (2001). Self-reported GPA and SAT: A methodological note. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 7(12). http://ericae.net/pare/getvn.asp?v57&n512.
Chavez, E. L., Oetting, E. R., & Swaim, R. C. (1994). Dropout and delinquency: Mexican-American and Caucasian non-Hispanic youth. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology,23(10), 47–55. CrossRef
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling,9, 233–255. CrossRef
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York: Springer Science.
Crosnoe, R., Johnson, M. K., & Elder, G. H. (2004). Intergenerational bonding in school: The behavioral and contextual correlates of student-teacher relationships. Sociology of Education,77, 60–81. CrossRef
Eccles, J. S., & Midgley, C. (1989). Stage/environment fit: Developmentally appropriate classrooms for early adolescents. In R. E. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 3, pp. 139–186). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Eccles, J., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence,21, 225–241. CrossRef
Finn, J. D., & Voelkl, K. E. (1993). School characteristics related to school engagement. Journal of Negro Education,62, 249–268. CrossRef
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research,74, 59–109. CrossRef
Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationship to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence,13, 21–43. CrossRef
Hauser-Cram, P., Warfield, M. E., Stadler, J., Sirin, S. R., Huston, A. C., & Ripke, M. N. (2006). School environments and the diverging pathways of students living in poverty (pp. 198–216). Developmental contexts in middle childhood: Bridges to adolescence and adulthood.
Heaven, P. C. L., Mak, A., Barry, J., & Ciarrochi, J. (2002). Personality and family influences on adolescent attitudes to school and self-rated academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences,32, 453–462. CrossRef
Heckman, J. J., & Masterov, D. V. (2006). The productivity argument for investing in young children, discussion paper: Early Childhood Research Collaborative, University of Minnesota.
Larson, R. W., & Rusk, N. (2011). Intrinsic motivation and positive development. In R. M. Lerner, J. V. Lerner, & J. B. Benson (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior: Positive youth development (pp. 89–130). Oxford, UK: Elsevier. CrossRef
Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J., Theokas, C., Phelps, E., Gestsdóttir, S., et al. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of fifth-grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H study of positive youth development. Journal of Early Adolescence,25(1), 17–71. CrossRef
Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., von Eye, A., Bowers, E. P., & Lewin-Bizan, S. (Eds.) (2011). Individual and contextual bases of thriving in adolescence: Findings from the 4-H study of positive youth development. Journal of Adolescence, 34(6), 1107–1228.
Lerner, J. V., Phelps, E., Forman, Y., & Bowers, E. P. (2009a). Positive youth development. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology, Individual bases of adolescent development (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 524–558). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. CrossRef
Lerner, R. M., von Eye, A., Lerner, J. V., Lewin-Bizan, S., & Bowers, E. P. (2010). The meaning and measurement of thriving in adolescence: Findings from the 4-H study of positive youth development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(7), 113–143.
Lerner, R. M., von Eye, A., Lerner J., & Lewin-Bizan, S. (Eds.) (2009b). Foundations and functions on thriving in adolescence: Findings from the 4-H study of positive youth development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 567–648.
Li, Y., (2010). School engagement in adolescence: Theoretical structure, measurement equivalence, and developmental trajectories. (Doctoral dissertation, Tufts University).
Lindner, J. R., Murphy, T. H., & Briers, G. E. (2001). Handling nonresponse in social science research. Journal of Agricultural Education,42(4), 43–53. CrossRef
Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research,32, 53–76. CrossRef
Little, T. D. (2013). Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Marsh, H. W. (1990). Causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: A multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology,82, 646–656. CrossRef
McNeeley, C. A., Nonnemaker, J. M., & Blum, R. W. (2002). Promoting school connectedness: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study Of Adolescent Health. Journal of School Health,72, 138–146. CrossRef
Meehan, B. T., Hughes, J. N., & Cavell, T. A. (2003). Teacher-student relationships as compensatory resources for aggressive children. Child Development,60, 981–992.
Murray, C., & Greenberg, M. (2001). Relationships with teachers and bonds with school: Social emotional adjustment correlates for children with and without disabilities. Psychology in the Schools,38, 25–41. CrossRef
Muthén, L. K., & Muthen, B. (2010). Mplus 6.0. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Phelps, E., Balsano, A., Fay, K., Peltz, J., Zimmerman, S., Lerner, R. M., et al. (2007). Nuances in early adolescent development trajectories of positive and of problematic/risk behaviors: Findings from the 4-H study of positive youth development. Child and Adolescent Clinics of North America,16(2), 473–496. CrossRef
Scheidler, M. J. (2012). The Relationship Between Student Engagement and Standardized Test Scores of Middle School Students: Does Student Engagement Increase Academic Achievement? (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota).
Shernoff, D. J., & Schmidt, J. A. (2008). Further evidence of an engagement-achievement paradox among U.S. high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,37, 564–580. CrossRef
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement,69, 493–525. CrossRef
Theokas, C., & Lerner, R. M. (2006). Observed ecological assets in families, schools, and neighborhoods: Conceptualization, measurement and relations with positive and negative developmental outcomes. Applied Developmental Science,10, 61–74. CrossRef
U.S. Census Bureau (2010). American fact finder. http://factfinder2.census.gov/.
Voelkl, K. E. (1997). Identification with school. American Journal of Education,105, 204–319. CrossRef
Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review,6, 49–78. CrossRef
Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review,30(1), 1–35. CrossRef
Woolley, M., & Grogan-Kaylor, A. (2006). Protective family factors in the context of neighborhood: Promoting positive school outcomes. Family Relations,55, 93–104. CrossRef
Wothke, W. (2000). Longitudinal and multigroup modeling with missing data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data (pp. 219–240). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Academic Achievement in the High School Years: The Changing Role of School Engagement
Paul A. Chase
Lacey J. Hilliard
G. John Geldhof
Daniel J. A. Warren
Richard M. Lerner
- Springer US