Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Journal of Child and Family Studies

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies 9/2015

01-09-2015 | Original Paper

Youth Who Have Sexually Offended: Using Strengths and Rapport to Engage Families in Treatment

Auteurs: Jamie Yoder, Donna Ruch

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 9/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

To address the problem of sexual offenses perpetrated by youth, a recognized treatment framework, risk, need, and responsivity delivers appropriate services according to youths’ relative risk level. Service programs espousing this framework intermittently integrate families. Little is known about how families become engaged in services, and research has yet to comprehensively identify family protective factors. Recognizing family engagement as an avenue by which risk can be mitigated, our qualitative study interviews providers throughout one western state (N = 19) on family engagement strategies. Using rigorous data collection and analyses methods, the results revealed that providers engage families through building rapport and a strength-based approach. Service engagement implications and study limitations are noted.
vorige artikel Family Formation Expectations and Early Pregnancy in Mexican Adolescents
volgende artikel A Qualitative Evaluation of an Intervention for Parents of Adolescents with Mental Disorders: The Parenting Challenging Adolescents Seminar
Literatuur
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2003). The psychology of criminal conduct (3rd ed.). Cincinnati: Anderson.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(1), 39–55. CrossRef
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19–52. CrossRef
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2011). The risk–need–responsivity (RNR) model: Does adding the good lives model contribute to effective crime prevention? Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(7), 735–755. CrossRef
Baker, A. J., Tabacoff, R., Tornusciolo, G., & Eisenstadt, M. (2003). Family secrecy: A comparative study of juvenile sex offenders and youth with conduct disorders. Family Process, 42(1), 105–116. PubMedCrossRef
Barbaree, H. E., & Langton, C. M. (2006). The effects of child sexual abuse and family environment. In H. E. Barbaree & W. L. Marshall (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (2nd ed., pp. 58–76). New York: Guilford Press.
Becker, J. V., & Hicks, S. J. (2003). Juvenile sexual offenders: Characteristics, interventions, and policy issues. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989(1), 397–410. PubMedCrossRef
Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantity, 36, 391–409. CrossRef
Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2007). Risk-need-responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Rehabilitation, 6, 1–22.
Bourke, M. L., & Donohue, B. (1996). Assessment and treatment of juvenile sex offenders: An empirical review. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 5(1), 47–71. CrossRef
Bove, S., & Rizzi, M. (2009). Listening to intuition: Reflections on unconscious processes in the therapeutic relationship. Transactional Analysis Journal, 39(1), 39–45. CrossRef
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Bremer, J. F. (1998). Challenges in the assessment and treatment of sexually abusive adolescents. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 19(1), 82–92. CrossRef
Cheung, M., & Brandes, B. J. (2011). Enhancing treatment outcomes for male adolescents with sexual behavior problems: Interactions and interventions. Journal of Family Violence, 26(5), 387–401. CrossRef
Cornille, T. A., Meyer, A. S., Mullis, A. K., Mullis, R. L., & Boroto, D. (2008). The family outreach model: Tools for engaging and working with families in distress. Journal of Family Social Work, 11(2), 185–201. CrossRef
Cunningham, P. B., & Henggeler, S. W. (1999). Engaging multi problem families in treatment: Lessons learned throughout the development of multisystemic therapy. Family Process, 38(3), 265–281.
DeFrain, J., & Asay, S. M. (2007). Strong families around the world: An introduction to the family strengths perspective. Marriage and Family Review, 41(1–2), 1–10. CrossRef
DiGiorgio-Miller, J. (1994). Clinical techniques in the treatment of juvenile sex offenders. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 21(1/2), 117–126. CrossRef
Duane, Y., & Morrison, T. (2004). Families of young people who sexually abuse: Characteristics, context, and considerations. In G. O’Reilly, A. Carr, & W. L. Marshall (Eds.), The handbook of clinical intervention with young people who sexually abuse (pp. 103–128). New York: Brunner-Routledge.
Efta-Breitbach, J., & Freeman, K. A. (2004). Treatment of juveniles who sexually offend: An overview. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 13(3/4), 125–138. PubMed
Etgar, T., & Shulstain-Elrom, H. (2009). A combined therapy model (individual and family) for children with sexual behavior problems. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53(5), 574–595. PubMedCrossRef
Flaskas, C. (1997). Engagement and the therapeutic relationship in systemic therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 19(3), 263–282. CrossRef
Geary, J., Lambie, I., & Seymour, F. (2011). Consumer perspectives of New Zealand community treatment programmes for sexually abusive youth. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17(2), 181–195. CrossRef
Gilligan, R. (2001). Promoting resilience: A resource guide on working with children in the care system. London: British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering.
Hempel, I., Buck, N., Cima, M., & Van Marle, H. (2013). Review of risk assessment instruments for juvenile sex offenders: What is next? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57(2), 208–228. PubMedCrossRef
Hunter, J., & Longo, R. E. (2004). Relapse prevention with juvenile sexual abusers: A holistic and integrated approach. In G. O’Reilly, W. L. Marshall, A. Carr, & R. C. Beckett (Eds.), The handbook of clinical intervention with young people who sexually abuse. Hove: Brunner-Routledge.
Karver, M., Shirk, S., Handelsman, J. B., Fields, S., Crisp, H., Gudmundsen, G., et al. (2008). Relationship process in youth psychotherapy: Measuring alliance, alliance-building behaviors, and client involvement. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16(1), 15–28. CrossRef
Kimonis, E. R., Fanniff, A., Borum, R., & Elliott, K. (2011). Clinician’s perceptions of indicators of amenability to sex offender-specific treatment in juveniles. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23(2), 193–211.
Kolko, D. J., Noel, C., Thomas, G., & Torres, E. (2005). Cognitive-behavioral treatment for adolescents who sexually offend and their families: Individual and family applications in a collaborative outpatient program. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 13(3/4), 157–192. CrossRef
Lambie, I., & McCarthy, J. (2004). Interviewing strategies with sexually abusive youth. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 13(3/4), 107–123. PubMed
Laursen, E. K., & Birmingham, S. M. (2003). Caring relationships as a protective factor for at risk youth: An ethnographic study. Families in Society, 84(2), 240–246. CrossRef
Letourneau, E., & Borduin, C. M. (2008). The effective treatment of juveniles who sexually offend: An ethical imperative. Ethics and Behavior, 18(2/3), 286–306. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Letourneau, E. J., Henggeler, S. W., Borduin, C. M., Schewe, P. A., McCart, M. R., Chapman, J. E., et al. (2009). Multisystemic therapy for juvenile sex offenders: 1-year results from a randomized effectiveness trial. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(1), 89–102. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Leversee, T., & Powell, K. M. (2012). Beyond risk management to a more holistic model for treating sexually abusive youth. In B. Schwartz (Ed.), The sex offender: Current trends in policy and treatment practice (Vol. 7, pp. 1–32). Kingston, NJ: Civic Research Institute.
Lipsey, M. W., & Derzon, J. H. (1998). Predictors of violent or serious delinquency in adolescence and earlyadulthood: A synthesis of longitudinal research. In R. Loeber & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Serious and violent juvenile offenders: Risk factors and successful interventions (pp. 86–105). London: Sage.
Longo, R. E. (2003). Emerging issues, policy changes, and the future of treating children with sexual behavior problems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 989(1), 502–514. PubMedCrossRef
Martinez, R., Flores, J., & Rosenfeld, B. (2007). Validity of the Juvenile Sex Offender Assessment Protocol-II (J-SOAP-II) in a sample of urban minority youth. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34(10), 1284–1295. CrossRef
McGrath, R. J., Cumming, G. F., Burchard, B. L., Zeoli, S., & Ellerby, L. (2010). Current practices and emerging trends in sexual abuser management. The Safer Society 2009 North American Survey. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.
McMackin, R. A., Leisen, M. B., Cusack, J. F., LaFratta, J., & Litwin, P. (2002). The relationship of trauma exposure to sex offending behavior among male juvenile offenders. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 11(2), 25–40. PubMedCrossRef
Metzner, J. L., Humphreys, S., & Ryan, G. (2009). Juveniles who sexually offend: Psychosocial intervention and treatment. In F. M. Saleh, A. J. Grudzinskas, J. M. Bradford, & D. J. Brodsky (Eds.), Sex offenders: Identification, risk assessment, treatment, and legal issues (pp. 241–261). New York: Oxford University Press.
Nahum, D., & Brewer, M. M. (2004). Multi-family group therapy for sexually abusive youth. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 13(3/4), 215–243. PubMed
Nickerson, A. B., Salamone, F. J., Brooks, J. L., & Colby, S. A. (2004). Promising approaches to engaging families and building strengths in residential treatment. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 22(1), 1–18. CrossRef
Osher, T. (2006). What families think of the juvenile justice system: Findings from the OJJDP multi-state study. Focal Point Research, Policy, and Practice in Children’s Mental Health, 20(2), 20–23.
Padget, D. K. & Henwood, B. F. (2012). Qualitative and mixed methods: Current approaches. School of Social Work, University of Denver, May 9, 2012.
Padgett, D. K. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Powell, K. M. (2010). Therapeutic relationships and the process of change. In G. Ryan, T. Leversee, & S. Lane (Eds.), Juvenile sex offending: Causes, consequences, and correction (3rd ed., pp. 253–262). New Jersey: Wiley.
Powell, K. M. (2011). Working effectively with at-risk youth: A strengths-based approach. In M. Calder (Ed.), Contemporary practice with young people who sexually abuse: Evidence-based developments (pp. 69–91). Holyoke, MA: NEARI Press.
Rich, P., & Longo, R. E. (2003). Juvenile sexual offenders: Understanding, assessing, and rehabilitating. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.
Righthand, S., & Welch, C. (2004). Characteristics of youth who sexually offend. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 13(3), 15–32. PubMed
Ronis, S. T., & Borduin, C. M. (2007). Individual, family, peer, and academic characteristics of male juvenile sexual offenders. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(2), 153–163. PubMedCrossRef
Ryan, G. (2010). The families of sexually abusive youth. In G. Ryan, T. Leversee, & S. Lane (Eds.), Juvenile sexual offending: Causes consequences and correction (3rd ed., pp. 147–164). New Jersey: Wiley.
Ryan, G., Leversee, T., & Lane, S. (2010). Integrating theory and method: Goal oriented treatment. In G. Ryan, T. Leversee, & S. Lane (Eds.), Juvenile sexual offending: Causes consequences and correction (3rd ed., pp. 263–310). New Jersey: Wiley.
Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Schladale, J. (2006). Family matters: The importance of engaging families in treatment with youth who have caused sexual harm. In R. Longo & D. Prescott (Eds.), Current perspective: Working with sexually aggressive youth and youth with sexual behavior problems (pp. 493–514). Holyoke, MA: NEARI Press.
Seto, M. S., & Lalumiere, M. L. (2010). What is so special about male adolescent sexual offending? A review and test of explanations through meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 526–575. PubMedCrossRef
Shirk, S., & Karver, M. (2003). Prediction of treatment outcome from relationship variables in child and adolescent therapy: A metaanalytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 452–464. PubMedCrossRef
Smallbone, S. W., Crissman, B., & Rayment-McHugh, S. (2009). Improving therapeutic engagement with adolescent sexual offenders. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 27, 862–877. PubMedCrossRef
Spice, A., Viljoen, J. L., Latzman, N. E., Scalora, M. J., & Ullman, D. (2013). Risk and protective factors for recidivism among juveniles who have offended sexually. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25(4), 347–369. CrossRef
Thomas, J. (2004). Family intervention with young people with sexually abusive behavior. In G. O’Reilly, A. Carr, & W. L. Marshall (Eds.), The handbook of clinical intervention with young people who sexually abuse (pp. 315–342). New York: Brunner-Routledge.
Thomas, J. (2010). Family therapy: A critical component in treatment of sexually abusive youth. In G. Ryan, T. Leversee, & S. Lane (Eds.), Juvenile sexual offending: Causes consequences and correction (3rd ed., pp. 357–379). New Jersey: Wiley.
Wanklyn, S. G., Ward, A. K., Cormier, N. S., Day, D. M., & Newman, J. E. (2012). Can we distinguish juvenile violent sex offenders, violent non-sex offenders, and versatile sex offenders based on childhood risk factors? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(11), 2128–2143. PubMedCrossRef
Ward, T., Melser, J., & Yates, P. M. (2007). Reconstructing the risk–need–responsivity model: A theoretical elaboration and evaluation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(2), 208–228. CrossRef
Worley, K. B., Church, J. K., & Clemmons, J. C. (2011). Parents of adolescents who have committed sexual offenses: Characteristics, challenges, and interventions. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(3), 433–448. PubMedCrossRef
Worling, J. R., & Curwen, T. (2000). Adolescent sexual offender recidivism: Success of specialized treatment and implications for risk prediction. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 965–982. PubMedCrossRef
Worling, J. R., & Langstrom, N. (2006). Risk of sexual recidivism in adolescents who offend sexually: Correlates and assessment. In H. E. Barbaree & W. L. Marshall (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (2nd ed., pp. 219–247). New York: Guilford Press.
Yoder, J. (2014). Service approaches for youth who commit sexual crimes: A call for family-oriented models [Special Issue, State of the evidence in juvenile justice]. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 11(4), 360–372.
Yoder, J., & Brown, S. (2014). Challenges facing families of sexually abusive youth: What prevents service engagement? Victims & Offenders: An International Journal of Evidence-based Research, Policy, and Practice. doi: 10.​1080/​15564886.​2013.​875969.
Zankman, S., & Bonomo, J. (2004). Working with Parents to Reduce Juvenile Sex Offender Recidivism. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 13(3/4), 139–156. PubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Youth Who Have Sexually Offended: Using Strengths and Rapport to Engage Families in Treatment
Auteurs
Jamie Yoder
Donna Ruch
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 9/2015
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-0054-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 9/2015

Journal of Child and Family Studies 9/2015 Naar de uitgave

Original Paper

Pathways Linking Victimization, Depression, Personal Mastery, and Perceptions of Parenting Competence Among Low-Income Women

Original Paper

Clinical and Family Correlates of Coercive–Disruptive Behavior in Children and Adolescents with Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder

Original Paper

DSM-IV Versus DSM-5 Autism Spectrum Disorder and Social Anxiety Disorder in Childhood: Similarities and Differences

Original Paper

A Qualitative Evaluation of an Intervention for Parents of Adolescents with Mental Disorders: The Parenting Challenging Adolescents Seminar

Original Paper

Multiple Family Groups for Children with Disruptive Behavior Disorders: Child Outcomes at 6-Month Follow-Up

Original Paper

Internalizing Problems in At-risk Preschoolers: Associations with Child and Mother Risk Factors