Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

20-08-2020

Validation of the WHOQOL-Bref instrument in Brazilian sign language (Libras)

Auteurs: Soraya B. R. Duarte, Neuma Chaveiro, Adriana R. de Freitas, Maria Alves Barbosa, Suzi Camey, Marcelo P. Fleck, Celmo C. Porto, Cássio L. Rodrigues, Dolors Rodríguez-Martín

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 1/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

The recognition of the Brazilian Sign Language (Libras) as the official language of the Brazilian deaf, in 2002, reaffirms the linguistic and cultural particularities of the deaf population. Therefore, there is a lack of a validated instrument for assessing the Quality of Life of deaf people using Libras. With authorization from the World Health Organization (WHO), a version of the WHOQOL-Bref in Libras was developed, called WHOQOL-Bref/Libras. However, its psychometric properties have not been examined as yet. Therefore, the purpose of this work is to perform the psychometric validation of the WHOQOL-Bref/Libras.

Methods

WHOQOL-Bref/Libras and a sociodemographic questionnaire were applied to 311 deaf people from the five Brazilian regions. To assess temporal stability, the questionnaire was readministered to 52 deaf people, over an interval of 2 weeks.

Results

WHOQOL-Bref/Libras demonstrated satisfactory psychometric values for reliability, discriminant and construct validity, temporal stability, and internal consistency. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient showed satisfactory values for each of the WHOQOL-Bref domains: Physical health (0.641), Psychological (0.705), Environment (0.710), and Overall-Bref domains (0.873). The WHOQOL-Bref/Libras is the appropriate option to assess the quality of life of deaf people who communicate through Libras.

Conclusion

WHOQOL-Bref/Libras had a satisfactory psychometric performance; therefore, it is a valid option that will provide autonomous participation for the deaf in quality of life investigations.
vorige artikel Psychometric testing of the Skull Base Inventory health-related quality of life questionnaire in a multi-institutional study of patients undergoing open and endoscopic surgery
Literatuur
1.
Fellinger, J., Holzinger, D., Gerich, J., & Goldberg, D. (2007). Mental distress and quality of life in the hard of hearing. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 115(3), 243–245.CrossRef
2.
Padden, Carol, & Humphries, Tom. (2006). Inside deaf culture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
3.
Ladd, P. (2003). Understanding deaf culture: In search of deafhood. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRef
4.
Skliar, C. (1998). A Surdez: um olhar sobre as diferenças. Editora Mediação: Porto Alegre.
5.
Duarte, S. B. R., Chaveiro, N., de Freitas, A. R., Barbosa, M. A., Porto, C. C., & de Almeida Fleck, M. P. (2013). Aspectos históricos e socioculturais da população surda. Hist. cienc. saude-Manguinhos, 20, 1713–1734.CrossRef
6.
Kuenburg, A., Fellinger, P., & Fellinger, J. (2015). Health care access among deaf people. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 21(1), 1–10.CrossRef
7.
Martins, K. P., da Costa, T. F., Medeiros, T. M., Fernandes, M. G. M., França, I. S. X. D., & MacêdoCosta, K. N. F. (2016). Internal structure of family health units: Access for peoplewith disabilities. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 21, 3153–3160.CrossRef
8.
Sheppard, K. (2014). Deaf adults and health care: Giving voice to their stories. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 26(9), 504–510.CrossRef
9.
10.
Anderson, M. L., Riker, T., Hakulin, S., Meehan, J., Gagne, K., Higgins, T., et al. (2019). Deaf ACCESS: Adapting consent through community engagement and state-of-the-art simulation. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 25(1), 115–125.CrossRef
11.
Pendergrass, K. M., Newman, S. D., Jones, E., & Jenkins, C. H. (2019). Deaf: A concept analysis from a cultural perspective using the wilson method of concept analysis development. Clinical Nursing Research, 28(1), 79–93.CrossRef
12.
Haraldstad, K., Wahl, A., Andenæs, R., Andersen, J. R., Andersen, M. H., Beisland, E., et al. (2019). A systematic review of quality of life research in medicine and health sciences. Quality of Life Research An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation: An Official Journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research, 28(06), 2641–2650.CrossRef
13.
Harper, A., Power, M., Orley, J., Herrman, H., Schofield, H., Murphy, B., et al. (1998). Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 551–558. 5.CrossRef
14.
Cieza, A., & Stucki, G. (2005). Content comparison of health-related quality of life (hrqol) instruments based on the international classification of functioning, disability and health (icf). Quality of Life Research An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation - An Official Journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research, 14, 1225–1237.
15.
Fellinger, J., Holzinger, D., Dobner, U., Gerich, J., Lehner, R., Lenz, G., et al. (2005). An innovative and reliable way to measure health-related quality of life and mental distress in the deaf community. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 40, 245–50.CrossRef
16.
Henning, M. A., Krägeloh, C. U., Sameshima, S., Shepherd, D., Shepherd, G., & Billington, R. (2011). Access to New Zealand sign language interpreters and quality of life for the deaf: A pilot study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(25–26), 2559–2566.CrossRef
17.
Jaiyeola, M. T., & Adeyemo, A. A. (2018). Quality of life of deaf and hard of hearing students in ibadan metropolis, Nigeria. PLoS ONE, 13(1), 1–11.CrossRef
18.
Chaveiro, N., Duarte, S. B. R., Freitas, A. R. D., Barbosa, M. A., Porto, C. C., & Almeida, F. M. P. D. (2013). Instruments in Brazilian Sign Language for assessing the quality of life of the deaf population. Revista de Saúde Pública, 47, 616–623.CrossRef
19.
Chaveiro, N., Rodrigues, C. L., Duarte, S. B., Rodrigues, de Oliveira Garcia, R., Ribeiro de Freitas, A., Rodrigues de Oliveira, L., Rocha Gomes da Silva, K., Porto C. C.(2018). A tool to evaluate the quality of life of deaf people using WHOQOL instruments. In 2018 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics (SMC) (pp. 3871–3876).
20.
Skevington, S. M., Lotfy, M., & O’Connell, K. A. (2004). The World Health Organisation’s WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial—A report from the WHOQOL Group. Quality of Life Research, 13(2), 299–310.CrossRef
21.
Barnidge, M., Homero, G. (2017). Amos (Software) (p. 11).
22.
Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Structural Equation Modeling-a Multidisciplinary Journal—STRUCT EQU MODELING, 15, 01.
23.
R Development Core Team. (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.
24.
Torchiano, M. (2016). Effsize: Efficient effect size computation. R package version 0.6.1.
25.
Rogmann, J. J. (2013). Ordinal dominance statistics (orddom): An R Project for Statistical Computing package to compute ordinal, nonparametric alternatives to mean comparison (Version 3.1)
26.
Kelley, K. (2017). Confidence intervals for standardized effect sizes: Theory, application, and implementation. j-J-STAT-SOFT, 20(8), 1–24.
27.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference (14th ed.). New York: Routledge.CrossRef
28.
Verma, J. P., & Abdel-Salam, A.-S. (2019). Testing statistical assumptions in research. New York: Wiley.CrossRef
29.
Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99–103.CrossRef
30.
Fleck, M., Louzada, S., Xavier, M., Chachamovich, E., Vieira, G., Santos, L., et al. (2000). Application of the Portuguese version of the abbreviated instrument of quality life WHOQOL-Bref. Revista de Saúde Pública, 34(2), 178–183.CrossRef
31.
Ohaeri, J. U., Awadalla, A., El-Abassi, A.-H., & Jacob, A. (2007). Confirmatory factor analytical study of the WHOQOL-Bref: Experience with sudanese general population and psychiatric samples. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7, 37.CrossRef
32.
Cruz, L., Polanczyk, C., Camey, S., Hoffmann, J., & Fleck, M. (2011). Quality of life in Brazil: Normative values for the WHOQOL-Bref in a southern general population sample. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 20, 1123–9.CrossRef
33.
Fleck, M. P. D. A., Leal, O. F., Louzada, S., Xavier, M., Chachamovich, E., Vieira, G., et al. (1999). Development of the Portuguese version of the OMS evaluation instrument of quality of life. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, 21, 19–28.CrossRef
34.
BRAZIL. MINISTRY OF HEALTH. Resolution 196/96 of the National Health Council / MS on Guidelines and Regulatory Standards for Research involving humans. Official Gazette, October 10, 1996.
Metagegevens
Titel
Validation of the WHOQOL-Bref instrument in Brazilian sign language (Libras)
Auteurs
Soraya B. R. Duarte
Neuma Chaveiro
Adriana R. de Freitas
Maria Alves Barbosa
Suzi Camey
Marcelo P. Fleck
Celmo C. Porto
Cássio L. Rodrigues
Dolors Rodríguez-Martín
Publicatiedatum
20-08-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02611-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2021

Longitudinal analysis of health-related quality of life in cancer clinical trials: methods and interpretation of results

Randomized Clinical Trial on Reduction of Radiotherapy Dose to the Elective Neck in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Results on the Quality of Life

Interpersonal and intrapersonal manifestations of HIV stigma and their impacts on psychological distress and life satisfaction among people living with HIV: Toward a dual-process model

Quality of life in parents of seriously Ill/injured children: a prospective longitudinal study

Does the selective attrition of a panel survey of older people affect the multivariate estimations of subjective well-being?

Belief in a just world, health-related quality of life, and mental health among Chinese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease