Top

Quality of Life Research

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

25-08-2020

Does the selective attrition of a panel survey of older people affect the multivariate estimations of subjective well-being?

Auteurs: M. Soledad Herrera, Denisse Devilat, M. Beatriz Fernández, Raúl Elgueta

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 1/2021

Abstract

Purpose

The increased population aging has resulted in a growing need for longitudinal studies about the quality of life among older people. Nevertheless, the results of these investigations could be biased because more disadvantaged people leave the original sample. The purpose of this study is to examine how the selective attrition observed in a panel survey affect multivariate models of subjective well-being (SWB). The question is if we could do reliable longitudinal investigations concerning the predictors of SWB in old age.

Methods

This paper examines attrition in a panel of older people in Chile. Attrition was evaluated in the variables that affect elderly SWB. Probit models were fitted to compare dropouts with nondropouts. Then, multivariate probit models were estimated on satisfaction and depressive symptoms, comparing dropouts and nondropouts. Finally, we compared weighted and unweighted multivariate probit models on SWB.

Results

The attrition rate in 2 years was 38.8%, including deaths and 32.9%, excluding them. Survey dropouts had lower satisfaction but not higher depressive symptoms. Among SWB predictors, people without a partner and with lower self-efficacy abandoned more the study. When applying the Becketti, Gould, Lillard, and Welch test, the probit coefficients of the predictor variables on SWB outcome variables were similar for dropouts and nondropouts. Finally, the comparison of multivariate models on SWB with weighting methods did not find substantial differences in the explanatory coefficients.

Conclusion

Although some predictors of attrition were associated with SWB, attrition did not produce biased estimates in multivariate models of life satisfaction life or depressive symptoms in old age.

vorige artikel International guidance on the selection of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical trials: a review

volgende artikel Adolescents’ sleep quality in relation to peer, family and school factors: findings from the 2017/2018 HBSC study in Flanders

Chandola, T., & O’Shea, S. (2013). Innovative approaches to methodological challenges facing ageing cohort studies. National Centre for Research Methods (NCRM) discussion paper report.

Banks, J., Muriel, A., & Smith, J. P. (2011). Attrition and health in ageing studies: Evidence from ELSA and HRS. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies. https://doi.org/10.14301/llcs.v2i2.115. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Chatfield, M. D., Brayne, C. E., & Matthews, F. E. (2005). A systematic literature review of attrition between waves in longitudinal studies in the elderly shows a consistent pattern of dropout between differing studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 13–19. PubMed

Bhaskaran, K., & Smeeth, L. (2014). What is the difference between missing completely at random and missing at random? International Journal of Epidemiology, 43, 1336–1339. PubMedPubMedCentral

Iglesias, K., Gazareth, P., & Suter, C. (2017). Explaining the decline in subjective well-being over time in panel data. In: G. Brulé & F. Magging (Eds.), Metrics of subjective well-being: Limits and improvements. Springer, pp 85–105.

Lacey, R. J., Jordan, K. P., & Croft, P. R. (2013). Does attrition during follow-up of a population cohort study inevitably lead to biased estimates of health status? PLoS One, 8(12), e83948. PubMedPubMedCentral

Groves, R. M., & Peytcheva, E. (2008). The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias: A meta-analysis. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn011. CrossRef

Ahern, K., & Le Brocque, R. (2005). Methodological issues in the effects of attrition: Simple solutions for social scientists. Field Methods, 17, 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X04271006. CrossRef

Li, C. P. (2017). Selective attrition in life satisfaction among elderly people: The harmonisation of longitudinal data. EDP Sciences, p. 01059.

10.

Potočnik, K., & Sonnentag, S. (2013). A longitudinal study of well-being in older workers and retirees: The role of engaging in different types of activities. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, 497–521.

11.

Rafnsson, S. B., Shankar, A., & Steptoe, A. (2015). Longitudinal influences of social network characteristics on subjective well-being of older adults: Findings from the ELSA study. J Aging Health, 27, 919–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264315572111. CrossRefPubMed

12.

Tampubolon, G. (2015). Delineating the third age: Joint models of older people’s quality of life and attrition in Britain 2002–2010. Aging & Mental Health, 19, 576–583.

13.

Ward, M., McGarrigle, C. A., & Kenny, R. A. (2019). More than health: Quality of life trajectories among older adults—Findings from The Irish Longitudinal Study of Ageing (TILDA). Quality of Life Research, 28, 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1997-y. CrossRefPubMed

14.

Brett, C. E., Dykiert, D., Starr, J. M., & Deary, I. J. (2019). Predicting change in quality of life from age 79 to 90 in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1921. Quality of Life Research, 28, 737–749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2056-4. CrossRefPubMed

15.

Palgi, Y., Shrira, A., & Zaslavsky, O. (2015). Quality of life attenuates age-related decline in functional status of older adults. Quality of Life Research, 24, 1835–1843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-0918-6. CrossRefPubMed

16.

Webb, E., Blane, D., McMunn, A., & Netuveli, G. (2011). Proximal predictors of change in quality of life at older ages. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 65, 542–547.

17.

Kempen, G. I., & van Sonderen, E. (2002). Psychological attributes and changes in disability among low-functioning older persons: Does attrition affect the outcomes? Journal of clinical epidemiology, 55, 224–229. PubMed

18.

Yu, B., Steptoe, A., Niu, K., et al. (2018). Prospective associations of social isolation and loneliness with poor sleep quality in older adults. Quality of Life Research, 27, 683–691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1752-9. CrossRefPubMed

19.

Goodman, J. S., & Blum, T. C. (1996). Assessing the non-random sampling effects of subject attrition in longitudinal research. Journal of Management, 22, 627–652.

20.

Rothenbühler, M., & Voorpostel, M. (2016). Attrition in the Swiss Household Panel: Are vulnerable groups more affected than others? In M. Oris, C. Roberts, D. Joye, & M. Ernst Stähli (Eds.), Surveying human vulnerabilities across the life course (pp. 221–242). Switzerland: Springer Nature.

21.

Vega, S., Benito-León, J., Bermejo-Pareja, F., et al. (2010). Several factors influenced attrition in a population-based elderly cohort: Neurological disorders in Central Spain Study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.005. CrossRefPubMed

22.

Behr, A., Bellgardt, E., & Rendtel, U. (2005). Extent and determinants of panel attrition in the European Community Household Panel. European Sociological Review, 21, 489–512.

23.

Satherley, N., Milojev, P., Greaves, L. M., et al. (2015). Demographic and psychological predictors of panel attrition: Evidence from the New Zealand attitudes and values study. PLoS One, 10(3), e0121950. PubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Uhrig, S. N. (2008). The nature and causes of attrition in the British Household Panel Survey. Essex: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex Colchester.

25.

Nicole, W., & Mark, W. (2013). Re-engaging with survey non-respondents: Evidence from three household panels. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 177, 499–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12024. CrossRef

26.

Voorpostel, M. (2009). Attrition in the Swiss Household Panel by demographic characteristics and levels of social involvement. Lausanne: FORS.

27.

Hansen, T., & Slagsvold, B. (2012). The age and subjective well-being paradox revisited: A multidimensional perspective. Norsk epidemiologi, 22, 187–195.

28.

Berg, A. I., Hoffman, L., Hassing, L. B., et al. (2009). What matters, and what matters most, for change in life satisfaction in the oldest-old? A study over 6 years among individuals 80+. Aging & Mental Health, 13, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860802342227. CrossRef

29.

Zaninotto, P., Falaschetti, E., & Sacker, A. (2009). Age trajectories of quality of life among older adults: Results from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Quality of Life Research, 18, 1301–1309. PubMed

30.

Carmel, S., Raveis, V. H., O'Rourke, N., & Tovel, H. (2017). Health, coping and subjective well-being: Results of a longitudinal study of elderly Israelis. Aging & Mental Health, 21, 616–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2016.1141285. CrossRef

31.

Hajek, A., & König, H. (2019). The role of optimism, self-esteem, and self-efficacy in moderating the relation between health comparisons and subjective well-being: Results of a nationally representative longitudinal study among older adults. British Journal of Health Psychology, 24, 547–570. PubMed

32.

Kunzmann, U., Little, T. D., & Smith, J. (2000). Is age-related stability of subjective well-being a paradox? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the Berlin Aging Study. Psychology and Aging, 15, 511. PubMed

33.

Jonker, A. A. G. C., Comijs, H. C., Knipscheer, K. C. P. M., & Deeg, D. J. H. (2008). Persistent Deterioration of Functioning (PDF) and change in well-being in older persons. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 20, 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03325153. CrossRefPubMed

34.

Neubauer, A. B., Schilling, O. K., & Wahl, H.-W. (2015). What do we need at the end of life? Competence, but not autonomy, predicts intraindividual fluctuations in subjective well-being in very old age. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72, 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv052. CrossRef

35.

Gerstorf, D., Heckhausen, J., Ram, N., et al. (2014). Perceived personal control buffers terminal decline in well-being. Psychology and Aging, 29, 612. PubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Bowling, A., & Iliffe, S. (2011). Psychological approach to successful ageing predicts future quality of life in older adults. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, 13. PubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Wahrendorf, M., & Siegrist, J. (2010). Are changes in productive activities of older people associated with changes in their well-being? Results of a longitudinal European study. European Journal of Ageing, 7, 59–68. PubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Huxhold, O., Miche, M., & Schüz, B. (2014). Benefits of having friends in older ages: Differential effects of informal social activities on well-being in middle-aged and older adults. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69, 366–375.

39.

Hillygus, D. S., & Snell, S. A. (2015). Longitudinal surveys: Issues and opportunities. In L. Atkeson & R. Alvarez (Eds.), Oxford handbook on polling and polling methods (pp. 28–52). New York: Oxford Universituy Press.

40.

Brilleman, S. L., Pachana, N. A., & Dobson, A. J. (2010). The impact of attrition on the representativeness of cohort studies of older people. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 71. PubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Feng, D., Silverstein, M., Giarrusso, R., et al. (2006). Attrition of older adults in longitudinal surveys: Detection and correction of sample selection bias using multigenerational data. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61, S323–S328.

42.

Kuhn, U. (2009). Attrition analysis of income data. Lausanne: FORS.

43.

Matthews, F. E., Chatfield, M., Freeman, C., et al. (2004). Attrition and bias in the MRC cognitive function and ageing study: An epidemiological investigation. BMC Public Health, 4, 12. PubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Van Beijsterveldt, C., Van Boxtel, M., Bosma, H., et al. (2002). Predictors of attrition in a longitudinal cognitive aging study: The Maastricht Aging Study (MAAS). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55, 216–223. PubMed

45.

Weuve, J., Tchetgen, E. J. T., Glymour, M. M., et al. (2012). Accounting for bias due to selective attrition: The example of smoking and cognitive decline. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass), 23, 119.

46.

Young, A. F., Powers, J. R., & Bell, S. L. (2006). Attrition in longitudinal studies: Who do you lose? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 30, 353–361. PubMed

47.

Weir, D., Faul, J., & Langa, K. (2011). Proxy interviews and bias in the distribution of cognitive abilities due to non-response in longitudinal studies: A comparison of HRS and ELSA. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 2, 170–184. https://doi.org/10.14301/llcs.v2i2.116. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., et al. (2009). New measures of well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being. The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 247–266). Dordrecht: Springer.

49.

U. C. & Caja-Los-Andes (2017). Chile y sus Mayores. 10 años de la Encuesta Calidad de Vida en la Vejez UC - Caja Los Andes. Santiago de Chile. https://adultomayor.uc.cl/docs/Libro_CHILE_Y_SUS_MAYORES_2016.pdf.

50.

Carrasco, M., Herrera, S., Fernández, B., & Barros, C. (2013). Impacto del apoyo familiar en la presencia de quejas depresivas en personas mayores de Santiago de Chile. Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología, 48, 9–14. PubMed

51.

Hoyl, T., Valenzuela, E., & Marín, P. (2000). Depresión en el adulto mayor: evaluación preliminar de la efectividad, como instrumento de tamizaje, de la versión de 5 ítems de la Escala de Depresión Geriátrica. Revista Médica de Chile, 128, 1199–1204. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872000001100003. CrossRefPubMed

52.

Herrera, M. S., Barros, C., & Fernández, M. B. (2011). Predictors of quality of life in old age: A multivariate study in Chile. Journal of Population Ageing, 4, 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-011-9043-7. CrossRef

53.

Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.

54.

Herrera, M. S., Fernández, M. B., & Barros, C. (2014). Older Chileans, quality of life. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 4477–4481). Dordrecht: Springer.

55.

Keng, S.-H., & Wu, S.-Y. (2014). Living happily ever after? The effect of Taiwan’s National Health Insurance on the happiness of the elderly. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 783–808.

56.

Pinquart, M., & Sorensen, S. (2000). Influences of socioeconomic status, social network, and competence on subjective well-being in later life: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 15, 187–224. PubMed

57.

Fernández-Ballesteros, R., Dolores Zamarrón, M., & Angel Ruíz, M. (2001). The contribution of socio-demographic and psychosocial factors to life satisfaction. Ageing and Society, 21, 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X01008078. CrossRef

58.

Chen, G., Gully, S., & Even, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004. CrossRef

59.

Smilkstein, G. (1978). The family APGAR: A proposal for a family function test and its use by physicians. Journal of Family Practice, 6, 1231–1239.

60.

Russel, D., Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472. CrossRef

61.

Hughes, M., Waite, L., Hawkley, L., & Cacioppo, J. (2004). A short scale for measuring loneliness in large surveys. Research on Aging, 26, 655–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027504268574. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

62.

Perissinotto, C. M., Cenzer, I. S., & Covinsky, K. E. (2012). Loneliness in older persons: A predictor of functional decline and death. Archives of Internal Medicine, 172, 1078–1084. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1993. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

63.

Alderman, H., Behrman, J. R., Kohler, H.-P., et al. (1999). Attrition in longitudinal household survey data: Some tests for three developing-country samples. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

64.

Outes-Leon, I., & Dercon, S. (2008). Survey attrition and attrition bias in Young Lives. Yong Lives Technical Note, 51.

65.

Becketti, S., Gould, W., Lillard, L., & Welch, F. (1988). The panel study of income dynamics after fourteen years: An evaluation. Journal of Labor Economics, 6, 472–492.

66.

Fitzgerald, J., Gottschalk, P., & Moffitt, R. (1998). An analysis of sample attrition in panel data. The Journal of Human Resources, 33, 251–299.

67.

Razafindratsima, N., & Kishimba, N. (2004). Attrition in the COCON cohort between 2000 and 2002. Population, 59, 357–385. https://doi.org/10.3917/popu.403.0419. CrossRef

68.

Arif, G. M., & Bilquees, F. (2006). An Analysis of sample attrition in the PSES panel data. Islamabad: Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.

69.

Baulch, B., & Quisumbing, A. (2011). Testing and adjusting for attrition in household panel data. CPRC Toolkit Note.

70.

Pape, A. (2004). How does attrition affect the Women’s Employment Study data. Unpublished manuscript available online at: https://www.fordschool.umich.edu/research/pdf/WES_Attrition-oct-edit.pdf.

71.

Ayala, L., Navarro, C., & Sastre, M. (2006). Cross-country income mobility comparisons under panel attrition: The relevance of weighting schemes. ECINEQ Working Paper 47.

72.

Kalton, G., & Brick, M. (2000). Weighting schemes for household panel surveys. In D. Rose (Ed.), Researching social and economic change. The uses of household panel studies (pp. 96–112). London: Routledge.

73.

Valliant, R., Dever, J. A., & Kreuter, F. (2013). Practical tools for designing and weighting survey samples. New York: Springer.

74.

Nicoletti, C., & Buck, N. (2004). Explaining interviewee contact and co-operation in the British and German household panels. ISER Working Paper Series, 6

75.

Herrera, M. S., Fernández, M. B., & Barros, C. (2017). Estrategias de afrontamiento en relación con los eventos estresantes que ocurren al envejecer. Ansiedad y Estrés, 24, 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anyes.2017.10.008. CrossRef

76.

Gerry, C., & Papadopoulos, G. (2015). Sample attrition in the RLMS, 2001–10. Economics of Transition, 23, 425–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12063. CrossRef

77.

Rindfuss, R. R., Choe, M. K., Tsuya, N. O., et al. (2015). Do low survey response rates bias results? Evidence from Japan. Demographic Research, 32, 797–828. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.26. CrossRef

78.

Jacomb, P. A., Jorm, A. F., Korten, A. E., et al. (2002). Predictors of refusal to participate: A longitudinal health survey of the elderly in Australia. BMC Public Health, 2, 4. PubMedPubMedCentral

79.

Matthews, F. E., Chatfield, M., & Brayne, C. (2006). An investigation of whether factors associated with short-term attrition change or persist over ten years: Data from the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (MRC CFAS). BMC Public Health, 6, 185. PubMedPubMedCentral

80.

Voorpostel, M., & Lipps, O. (2011). Attrition in the Swiss Household Panel: Is change associated with drop-out? Journal of Official Statistics, 27, 301–328.

81.

Olson, K., & Witt, L. (2011). Are we keeping the people who used to stay? Changes in correlates of panel survey attrition over time. Social Science Research, 40, 1037–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.03.001. CrossRef

Titel: Does the selective attrition of a panel survey of older people affect the multivariate estimations of subjective well-being?
Auteurs: M. Soledad Herrera
Denisse Devilat
M. Beatriz Fernández
Raúl Elgueta
Publicatiedatum: 25-08-2020
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02612-4

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2021

Quality of life in parents of seriously Ill/injured children: a prospective longitudinal study

The development and validation of the CARe Burn Scale: Child Form: a parent-proxy-reported outcome measure assessing quality of life for children aged 8 years and under living with a burn injury

Belief in a just world, health-related quality of life, and mental health among Chinese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Longitudinal analysis of health-related quality of life in cancer clinical trials: methods and interpretation of results

International guidance on the selection of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical trials: a review

Randomized Clinical Trial on Reduction of Radiotherapy Dose to the Elective Neck in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Results on the Quality of Life