Skip to main content

Mijn bibliotheek

Shop

Nieuws
Boeken
Tijdschriften
E-learning
Web-tv
Video
Audio

Tips voor Mijn BSL

UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 1/2021

20-08-2020

Associations between comorbidity and quality of life outcomes after total joint replacement

Auteurs: Deborah L. Snell, Jennifer A. Dunn, K. Anne Sinnott Jerram, C. Jean Hsieh, Gerben DeJong, Gary J. Hooper

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 1/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

We examined associations between self-reported and clinician-assessed comorbidity and quality of life (QOL) outcomes after hip and knee replacement.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based national survey. Participants aged 45 years or older (n = 409) were recruited from the New Zealand Joint Registry six months after a total hip (THR), total knee (TKR) or unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). The main outcome QOL was measured using an 8-item short form of the World Health Organisation Quality of Life (WHOQOL-Bref) questionnaire six months following joint replacement surgery. The WHOQOL is a generic and non-health condition specific measure of QOL.

Results

Participants were on average 68 years of age, with more men (54%) than women (46%). Number of coexisting conditions and body mass index were correlated with age, pain and function scores, and QOL (p < 0.01), but not with each other. Linear regression analyses showed that comorbidities such as number of comorbid conditions and BMI had moderate associations with QOL outcomes.

Conclusion

This study showed that general QOL outcomes following hip and knee joint replacement, while generally high, were associated with comorbidity burden and BMI. Future prospective research examining change in QOL before and following surgery would help to advance understandings of the various factors that contribute to patient satisfaction with their joint replacement.
vorige artikel Predictors for quality of life improvement after acute osteoporotic vertebral fracture: results of post hoc analysis of a prospective randomized study
volgende artikel Interpersonal and intrapersonal manifestations of HIV stigma and their impacts on psychological distress and life satisfaction among people living with HIV: Toward a dual-process model
Literatuur
1.
Collins, N., & Roos, E. (2012). Patient reported outcomes for total hip and knee arthroplasty: Commonly used instruments and attributes of a “good” measure. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 28, 367–394. CrossRef
2.
Jeffery, A., Wylde, V., Blom, A., & Horwood, J. (2011). “It's there and I'm stuck with it”: patients' experiences of chronic pain following total knee replacement surgery. Arthritis Care & Research, 63, 286–292. CrossRef
3.
Westby, M. D. (2012). Rehabilitation and total joint arthroplasty. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine, 28(3), 489–508. CrossRef
4.
Podmore, B., Hutchings, A., van der Meulen, J., Aggarwal, A., & Konan, S. (2018). Impact of comorbid conditions on outcomes of hip and knee replacement surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Medical Journal Open, 8, e021784.
5.
Judge, A., Arden, N., Batra, R., Thomas, G., Beard, D., Javaid, M., et al. (2013). The association of patient characteristics and surgical variables on symptoms of pain and function over 5 years following primary hip-replacement surgery: a prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal Open, 3, e002453.
6.
Shan, L., Shan, B., Graham, D., & Saxena, A. (2014). Total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis on mid-term quality of life. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 22, 389–406. CrossRef
7.
Hooper, N., Snell, D., Hooper, G., Maxwell, R., & Frampton, C. (2015). The five-year radiological results of the uncemented Oxford medial compartment knee arthroplasty. Bone and Joint Journal, 97B, 1358–1363. CrossRef
8.
Snell, D., Siegert, R., Hooper, G., Dunn, J., & Surgenor, L. (2016). Evaluating quality of life outcomes following joint replacement: validation of a short form of the WHOQOL-Bref. Quality of Life Research, 25(1), 51–61. CrossRef
9.
Canovas, F., & Dagneaux, L. (2018). Quality of life after total knee arthroplasty. Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 104, 541–546.
10.
The WHOQOL Group. (1998). The World Health Organisation quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Social Science and Medicine, 46(12), 1569–1585. CrossRef
11.
Glassou, E., Pedersen, A., Aalund, P., Mosegaard, S., & Hansen, T. (2018). Is gain in health-related quality of life after a total hip arthro- plasty depended on the comorbidity burden? Acta Orthopaedica, 89(4), 374–379. CrossRef
12.
Onggo, J., Onggo, J., de Steiger, R., & Hau, R. (2020). Greater risks of complications, infections, and revisions in the obese versus non-obese total hip arthroplasty population of 2,190,824 patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 28, 31–44. CrossRef
13.
Feinstein, A. (1970). The pre-therapeutic classification of co-morbidity in chronic disease. Journal of Chronic Disease, 23(7), 455–468. CrossRef
14.
Sarfati, D. (2012). Review of methods used to measure comorbidity in cancer populations: no gold standard exists. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65(9), 924–933. CrossRef
15.
Preen, D., Holman, C., Spilsbury, K., Semmens, J., & Brameld, K. (2006). Length of comorbidity lookback period affected regression model performance of administrative health data. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(9), 940–946. CrossRef
16.
Snell, D., Sinnott Jerram, K., Dunn, J., Hsieh, C.-H., De Jong, G., & Hooper, G. (2020). Use of rehabilitation after hip and knee replacement in New Zealand: a national survey. New Zealand Medical Journal, 133(1510), 45–55.
17.
Snell, D., Dunn, J., Sinnott, K., Hsieh, C.-H., De Jong, G., & Hooper, G. (2019). Joint replacement rehabilitation and the role of funding source. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 51(10), 770–778. CrossRef
18.
New Zealand Orthopaedic Association (NZOA). (2019). New Zealand joint registry: twenty year report (january 1999 to december 2018). Christchurch, New Zealand: New Zealand Orthopaedic Association.
19.
Dripps, R. (1963). New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology, 24, 111.
20.
Skevington, S., Lofty, M., & O’Connell, K. (2004). The World Health Organisation’s WHOQOL-Bref quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Quality of Life Research, 13, 299–310. CrossRef
21.
Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., & Carr, A. (1996). Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. Journal of Bone Joint Surgery, 78B, 185–190. CrossRef
22.
Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Murray, D., & Carr, A. (1998). Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. Journal of Bone Joint Surgery, 80, 863–869.
23.
Rolfson, O., Wissig, S., van Maasakkers, L., Stowell, C., Ackerman, I., Ayers, D., et al. (2016). Defining an international standard set of outcome measures for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: consensus of the international consortium for health outcomes measurement hip and knee osteoarthritis working group. Arthritis Care & Research, 68, 1631–1639. CrossRef
24.
Rolfson, O., Bohm, E., Franklin, P., Lyman, S., Dennissen, G., Dawson, J., et al. (2016). Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries: report of the patient-reported outcome measures working group of the international society of arthroplasty registries. Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis. Acta Orthopaedica, 87, 9–23. CrossRef
25.
Mayhew, D., Mendonca, V., & Murthy, B. (2019). A review of ASA physical status—historical perspectives and modern developments. Anaesthesia, 74, 373–379. CrossRef
26.
27.
McLawhorn, A., Steinhaus, M., Southren, D., Lee, Y.-Y., Dodwell, E., & Figgie, M. (2017). Body mass index class is independently associated with health-related quality of life after primary total hip arthroplasty: an institutional registry-based study. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 32, 143–149. CrossRef
28.
Lash, H., Hooper, G., Hooper, N., & Frampton, C. (2013). Should a patients BMI status be used to restrict access to total hip and knee arthroplasty? Functional outcomes of arthroplasty relative to BMI—single centre retrospective review. The Open Orthopaedics Journal, 7, 594–599. CrossRef
29.
Harmelink, K., Zeegers, A., Hullegie, W., Hoogeboom, T., Nijhuis-van der Sanden, M., & Staal, J. (2017). Are there prognostic factors for one-year outcome after total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 32, 3840–53. CrossRef
30.
Hofstede, S., Gademan, M., Vliet Vlieland, T., Nelissen, R., & Marangvan de Mheen, P. (2016). Preoperative predictors for outcomes after total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 17, 212–23. CrossRef
31.
Lizaur-Utrilla, A., Martinez-Mendez, D., Miralles-Muñoz, F., Marco-Gomez, L., & Lopez-Prats, F. (2017). Risk-benefit on quality of life after total knee arthroplasty in octogenarians. The Journal of Arthroplasty., 32, 2417–20. CrossRef
32.
Schilling, C., Dowsey, M., Petrie, D., Clarke, P., & Choong, P. (2017). Predicting the long-term gains in health-related quality of life after total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 32, 395–401. CrossRef
33.
Olomu, A., Corser, W., Stommel, M., Xie, Y., & Holmes-Rovner, M. (2012). Do self-report and medical record comorbidity data predict longitudinal functional capacity and quality of life health outcomes similarly? BMC Health Services Research, 12, 398–407. CrossRef
34.
Charlson, M., Pompei, P., Ales, K., & MacKenzie, C. (1987). A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. Journal of Chronic Disease, 40(5), 373–383. CrossRef
35.
Tay, K., Cher, E., Zhang, K., Tan, S., Howe, T., & Koh, J. (2017). Comorbidities have a greater impact than age alone in the outcomes of octogenarian total knee arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 32, 3373–3378. CrossRef
36.
Goodman, M., Mehta, B., Mirza, S., Figgie, M., Alexiades, M., Rodriguez, J., et al. (2020). Patients’ perspectives of outcomes after total knee and total hip arthroplasty: a nominal group study. BMC Rheumatology, 4, 3. CrossRef
37.
Hossain, F., Konan, S., Patel, S., Rodriguez-Merchan, E., & Haddad, F. (2015). The assessment of outcome after total knee arthroplasty. Are we there yet? The Bone and Joint Journal., 97-B, 3–9. CrossRef
38.
Pan, X., Wang, J., Lin, Z., Dai, W., & Hi, Z. (2019). Depression and anxiety are risk factors for postoperative pain-related symptoms and complications in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty in the United States. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 34, 2337–46. CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Associations between comorbidity and quality of life outcomes after total joint replacement
Auteurs
Deborah L. Snell
Jennifer A. Dunn
K. Anne Sinnott Jerram
C. Jean Hsieh
Gerben DeJong
Gary J. Hooper
Publicatiedatum
20-08-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02610-6

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2021

Quality of Life Research 1/2021 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Belief in a just world, health-related quality of life, and mental health among Chinese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

OriginalPaper

Randomized Clinical Trial on Reduction of Radiotherapy Dose to the Elective Neck in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Results on the Quality of Life

OriginalPaper

Living with hypoparathyroidism: development of the Hypoparathyroidism Patient Experience Scale-Impact (HPES-Impact)

OriginalPaper

Longitudinal analysis of health-related quality of life in cancer clinical trials: methods and interpretation of results

OriginalPaper

Psychometric testing of the Skull Base Inventory health-related quality of life questionnaire in a multi-institutional study of patients undergoing open and endoscopic surgery

OriginalPaper

Do reminder emails and past due notifications improve patient completion and institutional data submission for patient-reported outcome measures?