Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Recently, there is increasing interest in the causal relationship between attentional breadth and emotion regulation. To test this causal relationship, attentional breadth needs to be manipulated stringently. The aim of the current research was to establish whether visual attentional breadth could be manipulated through experimental training procedures. We conducted two single-session training experiments and one multiple-session training experiment, all of which contained pre- and post-training assessments to test the direct transfer effects of training on attentional breadth construed in different measures. For the first single-session training (Experiment 1), no training effects were found to transfer to the subsequent attentional breadth measures in terms of global–local processing preference. For the second single-session training (Experiment 2) and the 5-day training (Experiment 3) which combined both trainings from Experiment 1 and 2, there were some indications that attentional breadth can be decreased, but there was no evidence that it could be increased neither in terms of global–local processing preference nor in terms of scope of visual perception. Bayesian analysis confirmed the null hypothesis of no increase in attentional breadth through delivery of these training procedures. Therefore, our findings do not support the hypothesis that training variants of the Global–Local attentional breadth task or of the visuospatial attentional breadth task can stably alter attentional breadth in healthy students. Possible explanations and implications are discussed.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Au, J., Sheehan, E., Tsai, N., Duncan, G. J., Buschkuehl, M., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2014). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22, 366–377. CrossRef
Barriopedro, M., & Botella, J. (1998). New evidence for the zoom lens model using the RSVP technique. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1406–1414. CrossRef
Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Derryberry, D., & Tucker, D. M. (1994). Motivating the focus of attention. In P. M. Niedentthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), The heart’s eye: Emotional influences in perception and attention (pp. 167–196). Diego, CA: Academic Press. CrossRef
Fenske, M. J., & Eastwood, J. D. (2003). Modulation of focused attention by faces expressing emotion: evidence from flanker tasks. Emotion (Washington, D. C.), 3, 327–343. CrossRef
Field, S. M., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Newell, B. R., Zeelenber, R., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2016). Two Bayesian tests of the GLOMOsys Model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, e81–e95. CrossRef
Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 359, 1367–1377. CrossRef
Grol, M., Hertel, P. T., Koster, E.H.W., & De Raedt, R. (2015). The effects of rumination induction on attentional breadth for self-related information. Clinical Psychological Science, 3, 607–618. CrossRef
Hüttermann, S., Memmert, D., & Simons, D. J. (2014). The size and shape of the attentional “spotlight” varies with differences in sports expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20, 147–157. PubMed
Jefferies, L. N., Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (2014). The flexible focus: whether spatial attention is unitary or divided depends on observer goals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 465–470. PubMed
Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kimchi, R., & Palmer, S. E. (1982). Form and texture in hierarchically constructed patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 521–535. PubMed
Love, J., Selker, R., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Dropmann, D., Verhagen, A. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2015). JASP (Version 0.7.1)[Computer software].
McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578–586. CrossRef
Mulder, J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2016). Editors’ introduction to the special issue “Bayes factors for testing hypotheses in psychological research: Practical relevance and new developments”. Journal of Mathematical Psychology (in press).
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees-Precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383. CrossRef
Peeters, F.P.M.L., Ponds, R.W.H.M., & Vermeeren, M.T.G. (1996). Affectiveiteit en zelfbeoordeling van depressie en angst. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie, 39, 240–250.
Rowe, G., Hirsh, J. B., & Anderson, A. K. (2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 383–388. CrossRef
vanDellen, M., Sanders, M. A., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2012). When local processing increase the appeal of healthy options. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1100–1105. CrossRef
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779–804. CrossRef
Zmigrod, S., Zmigrod, L., & Hommel, B. (2015). Zooming into creativity: individual differences in attentional global-local biases are linked to creative thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–8. CrossRef
- Can training change attentional breadth? Failure to find transfer effects
Rudi De Raedt
Ernst H. W. Koster
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg