Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 3/2014

01-05-2014 | Review

The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review

Auteur: Fabrice B. R. Parmentier

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated that rare and unexpected changes in an otherwise repetitive or structured sound sequence ineluctably break through selective attention and impact negatively on performance in an unrelated task. While the electrophysiological responses to unexpected sounds have been extensively studied, behavioral distraction has received relatively less attention until recently. In this paper, I review work examining the cognitive underpinnings of behavioral distraction by deviant sounds and highlight some of its key determinants. Evidence indicates that deviance distraction (1) derives from the time penalty associated with the involuntary orientation of attention to and away from the deviant sound and from resulting effects such as the reactivation of the relevant task set upon the presentation of the target stimulus; and (2) is mediated by a number of factors (some increasing distraction, such as aging or induced emotions; some decreasing it, such as a memory load or cognitive control). Contrary to the received view that deviants ineluctably elicit distraction, recent work demonstrates that it is contingent upon auditory distractors acting as unspecific warning signals in the service of goal-oriented behavior, and that deviants do not elicit distraction because they are rare but because they violate the cognitive system’s predictions (which can be manipulated through implicit rule learning or explicit cueing). Evidence is also presented indicating that the capture of attention by spoken deviant sounds is followed by an involuntary evaluation of their semantic properties, the outcome of which can be robust enough to linger in working memory and interfere with subsequent behavior. Finally, I review studies suggesting that behavioral deviance distraction is not the mere byproduct of the mismatch negativity, P3a and re-orientation negativity electrophysiological responses and highlight a number of outstanding questions for future research.
Voetnoten
1
I thank Erich Schröger and Alexandra Bendixen for encouraging me to take on this endeavor.
 
2
I thank János Horváth for pointing this out during the review process.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Ahveninen, J., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Pekkonen, E., Hallberg, A., Hietanen, M., Näätänen, R., et al. (2000). Increased distractibility by task-irrelevant sound changes in abstinent alcoholics. Clinical Experimental Research, 24, 1850–1854. Ahveninen, J., Jääskeläinen, I. P., Pekkonen, E., Hallberg, A., Hietanen, M., Näätänen, R., et al. (2000). Increased distractibility by task-irrelevant sound changes in abstinent alcoholics. Clinical Experimental Research, 24, 1850–1854.
go back to reference Andrés, P., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Escera, C. (2006). The effect of age on the involuntary capture of attention by irrelevant sounds: A test of the frontal hypothesis of aging. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2564–2568.PubMed Andrés, P., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Escera, C. (2006). The effect of age on the involuntary capture of attention by irrelevant sounds: A test of the frontal hypothesis of aging. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2564–2568.PubMed
go back to reference Bendixen, A., Grimm, S., Deouell, L. Y., Wetzel, N., Mädebach, A., & Schröger, E. (2010). The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2131–2139. Bendixen, A., Grimm, S., Deouell, L. Y., Wetzel, N., Mädebach, A., & Schröger, E. (2010). The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2131–2139.
go back to reference Bendixen, A., Prinz, W., Horváth, J., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., & Schröger, E. (2008). Rapid extraction of auditory feature contingencies. Neuroimage, 41, 1111–1119.PubMed Bendixen, A., Prinz, W., Horváth, J., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., & Schröger, E. (2008). Rapid extraction of auditory feature contingencies. Neuroimage, 41, 1111–1119.PubMed
go back to reference Bendixen, A., Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2007). Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory stimulus sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1664–1677.PubMed Bendixen, A., Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2007). Regularity extraction and application in dynamic auditory stimulus sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1664–1677.PubMed
go back to reference Bendixen, A., SanMiguel, I., & Schröger, E. (2013). Early electrophysiological indicators of predictive processing in audition: A review. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 120–131. Bendixen, A., SanMiguel, I., & Schröger, E. (2013). Early electrophysiological indicators of predictive processing in audition: A review. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 120–131.
go back to reference Bendixen, A., & Schröger, E. (2008). Memory trace formation for abstract auditory features and its consequences in different attention contexts. Biological Psychology, 78, 231–241.PubMed Bendixen, A., & Schröger, E. (2008). Memory trace formation for abstract auditory features and its consequences in different attention contexts. Biological Psychology, 78, 231–241.PubMed
go back to reference Bendixen, A., Schröger, E., & Winkler, I. (2009). I heard that coming: Event-related potential evidence for stimulus-driven prediction in the auditory system. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8447–8451.PubMed Bendixen, A., Schröger, E., & Winkler, I. (2009). I heard that coming: Event-related potential evidence for stimulus-driven prediction in the auditory system. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8447–8451.PubMed
go back to reference Berti, S. (2008a). Cognitive control after distraction: Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) dissociate between different processes of attentional allocation. Psychophysiology, 45, 608–620.PubMed Berti, S. (2008a). Cognitive control after distraction: Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) dissociate between different processes of attentional allocation. Psychophysiology, 45, 608–620.PubMed
go back to reference Berti, S. (2008b). Object switching within working memory is reflected in the human event-related brain potential. Neuroscience Letters, 434, 200–205.PubMed Berti, S. (2008b). Object switching within working memory is reflected in the human event-related brain potential. Neuroscience Letters, 434, 200–205.PubMed
go back to reference Berti, S. (2012). Automatic processing of rare versus novel auditory stimuli reveal different mechanisms of auditory change detection. NeuroReport, 23, 441–446.PubMed Berti, S. (2012). Automatic processing of rare versus novel auditory stimuli reveal different mechanisms of auditory change detection. NeuroReport, 23, 441–446.PubMed
go back to reference Berti, S., Grunwald, M., & Schröger, E. (2013). Age dependent changes of distractibility and reorienting of attention revisited: An event-related potential study. Brain Research, 1491, 156–166.PubMed Berti, S., Grunwald, M., & Schröger, E. (2013). Age dependent changes of distractibility and reorienting of attention revisited: An event-related potential study. Brain Research, 1491, 156–166.PubMed
go back to reference Berti, S., Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2004). Bottom-up influences on working memory: Behavioral and electrophysiological distraction varies with distractor strength. Experimental Psychology, 51, 249–257.PubMed Berti, S., Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2004). Bottom-up influences on working memory: Behavioral and electrophysiological distraction varies with distractor strength. Experimental Psychology, 51, 249–257.PubMed
go back to reference Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2004). Distraction effects in vision: Behavioral and event-related potential indices. NeuroReport, 15, 665–669.PubMed Berti, S., & Schröger, E. (2004). Distraction effects in vision: Behavioral and event-related potential indices. NeuroReport, 15, 665–669.PubMed
go back to reference Bodenhausen, G. V., Gabriel, S., & Lineberger, M. (2000). Sadness and susceptibility to judgmental bias: The case of anchoring. Psychological Science, 11, 320–323. Bodenhausen, G. V., Gabriel, S., & Lineberger, M. (2000). Sadness and susceptibility to judgmental bias: The case of anchoring. Psychological Science, 11, 320–323.
go back to reference Boll, S., & Berti, S. (2009). Distraction of task-relevant information processing by irrelevant changes in auditory, visual, and bimodal stimulus features: A behavioral and event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 46, 645–654.PubMed Boll, S., & Berti, S. (2009). Distraction of task-relevant information processing by irrelevant changes in auditory, visual, and bimodal stimulus features: A behavioral and event-related potential study. Psychophysiology, 46, 645–654.PubMed
go back to reference Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539–546.PubMed Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539–546.PubMed
go back to reference Boulter, L. R. (1977). Attention and reaction times to signals of uncertain modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 379–388.PubMed Boulter, L. R. (1977). Attention and reaction times to signals of uncertain modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 379–388.PubMed
go back to reference Bubic, A., von Cramon, D. Y., Jacobsen, T., Schröger, E., & Schubotz, R. I. (2008). Violation of expectation: Neural correlate reflect bases of prediction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 155–168. Bubic, A., von Cramon, D. Y., Jacobsen, T., Schröger, E., & Schubotz, R. I. (2008). Violation of expectation: Neural correlate reflect bases of prediction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 155–168.
go back to reference Buchner, A., Zabal, A., & Mayr, S. (2003). Auditory, visual, and cross-modal negative priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 917–923. Buchner, A., Zabal, A., & Mayr, S. (2003). Auditory, visual, and cross-modal negative priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 917–923.
go back to reference Bugg, J. M., Jacoby, L. L., & Toth, J. P. (2008). Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task. Memory& Cognition, 36, 1484–1494. Bugg, J. M., Jacoby, L. L., & Toth, J. P. (2008). Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task. Memory& Cognition, 36, 1484–1494.
go back to reference Bush, G., Whalen, P. J., Rosen, B. R., Jenike, M. A., McInerney, S. C., & Rauch, S. L. (1998). The counting stroop: An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—validation study with functional MRI. Human Brain Mapping, 6, 270–282.PubMed Bush, G., Whalen, P. J., Rosen, B. R., Jenike, M. A., McInerney, S. C., & Rauch, S. L. (1998). The counting stroop: An interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging—validation study with functional MRI. Human Brain Mapping, 6, 270–282.PubMed
go back to reference Cashdollar, N., Fukuda, K., Bocklage, A., Aurtenetxe, S., Vogel, E. K., & Gazzaley, A. (2013). Prolonged disengagement from attentional capture in normal aging. Psychology and Aging, 28, 77–86.PubMedCentralPubMed Cashdollar, N., Fukuda, K., Bocklage, A., Aurtenetxe, S., Vogel, E. K., & Gazzaley, A. (2013). Prolonged disengagement from attentional capture in normal aging. Psychology and Aging, 28, 77–86.PubMedCentralPubMed
go back to reference Cheal, M., & Gregory, M. (1997). Evidence of limited capacity and noise reduction with single-element displays in the location-cuing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 51–71.PubMed Cheal, M., & Gregory, M. (1997). Evidence of limited capacity and noise reduction with single-element displays in the location-cuing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 51–71.PubMed
go back to reference Chiu, Y.-C., Aron, A. R., & Verbruggen, F. (2012). Response suppression by automatic retrieval of stimulus–stop association: Evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1908–1918.PubMed Chiu, Y.-C., Aron, A. R., & Verbruggen, F. (2012). Response suppression by automatic retrieval of stimulus–stop association: Evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 24, 1908–1918.PubMed
go back to reference Costa-Faidella, J., Grimm, S., Slabu, L., Díaz-Santaella, F., & Escera, C. (2011). Multiple time scales of adaptation in the auditory system as revealed by human evoked potentials. Psychophysiology, 48, 774–783.PubMed Costa-Faidella, J., Grimm, S., Slabu, L., Díaz-Santaella, F., & Escera, C. (2011). Multiple time scales of adaptation in the auditory system as revealed by human evoked potentials. Psychophysiology, 48, 774–783.PubMed
go back to reference Czigler, I., Cox, T. J., Gyimesi, K., & Horváth, J. (2007). Event-related potential study to aversive auditory stimuli. Neuroscience Letters, 420, 251–256.PubMed Czigler, I., Cox, T. J., Gyimesi, K., & Horváth, J. (2007). Event-related potential study to aversive auditory stimuli. Neuroscience Letters, 420, 251–256.PubMed
go back to reference Czigler, I., & Winkler, I. (2012). Evidence from auditory and visual event-related potential (ERP) studies of deviance detection (MMN and vMMN) linking predictive coding theories and perceptual object representations. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 132–143.PubMed Czigler, I., & Winkler, I. (2012). Evidence from auditory and visual event-related potential (ERP) studies of deviance detection (MMN and vMMN) linking predictive coding theories and perceptual object representations. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 132–143.PubMed
go back to reference Domínguez-Borràs, J., Garcia-Garcia, M., & Escera, C. (2008). Emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. European Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 1199–1206.PubMed Domínguez-Borràs, J., Garcia-Garcia, M., & Escera, C. (2008). Emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. European Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 1199–1206.PubMed
go back to reference Drazin, D. H. (1961). Effects of foreperiod, variability, and probability of stimulus occurrence on simple reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 43–50.PubMed Drazin, D. H. (1961). Effects of foreperiod, variability, and probability of stimulus occurrence on simple reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 43–50.PubMed
go back to reference Elliott, E. M., & Cowan, N. (2001). Habituation to auditory distracters in a cross-modal, color–word interference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 654–667.PubMed Elliott, E. M., & Cowan, N. (2001). Habituation to auditory distracters in a cross-modal, color–word interference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 654–667.PubMed
go back to reference Elliott, E. M., Cowan, N., & Valle-Inclan, F. (1998). The nature of cross-modal color–word interference effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 761–767. Elliott, E. M., Cowan, N., & Valle-Inclan, F. (1998). The nature of cross-modal color–word interference effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 761–767.
go back to reference Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 590–604.PubMed Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 590–604.PubMed
go back to reference Escera, C., Yago, E., & Alho, K. (2001). Electrical responses reveal the temporal dynamics of brain events during involuntary attention switching. European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 877–883.PubMed Escera, C., Yago, E., & Alho, K. (2001). Electrical responses reveal the temporal dynamics of brain events during involuntary attention switching. European Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 877–883.PubMed
go back to reference Escera, C., Yago, E., Corral, M. J., Corbera, S., & Nuñez, M. I. (2003). Attention capture by auditory significant stimuli: Semantic analysis follows attention switching. European Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 2408–2412.PubMed Escera, C., Yago, E., Corral, M. J., Corbera, S., & Nuñez, M. I. (2003). Attention capture by auditory significant stimuli: Semantic analysis follows attention switching. European Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 2408–2412.PubMed
go back to reference Fan, J., Flombaum, J. J., McCandliss, B. D., Thomas, K. M., & Posner, M. I. (2003). Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict. Neuroimage, 18, 42–57.PubMed Fan, J., Flombaum, J. J., McCandliss, B. D., Thomas, K. M., & Posner, M. I. (2003). Cognitive and brain consequences of conflict. Neuroimage, 18, 42–57.PubMed
go back to reference Fan, J., Kolster, R., Ghajar, J., Suh, M., Knight, R. T., Sarkar, R., et al. (2007). Response anticipation and response conflict: An event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 2272–2282. Fan, J., Kolster, R., Ghajar, J., Suh, M., Knight, R. T., Sarkar, R., et al. (2007). Response anticipation and response conflict: An event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 2272–2282.
go back to reference Frangos, J., Ritter, W., & Friedman, D. (2005). Brain potentials to sexually suggestive whistles show meaning modulates the mismatch negativity. NeuroReport, 16, 1313–1317.PubMedCentralPubMed Frangos, J., Ritter, W., & Friedman, D. (2005). Brain potentials to sexually suggestive whistles show meaning modulates the mismatch negativity. NeuroReport, 16, 1313–1317.PubMedCentralPubMed
go back to reference Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Dziobek, I. (2003). Cross-form conceptual relations between sounds and words: Effects on the novelty P3. Cognitive Brain Research, 18, 58–64.PubMed Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Dziobek, I. (2003). Cross-form conceptual relations between sounds and words: Effects on the novelty P3. Cognitive Brain Research, 18, 58–64.PubMed
go back to reference Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 355–373.PubMed Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 355–373.PubMed
go back to reference Getzmann, S., Gajewski, P. D., & Falkenstein, M. (2013). Does age increase auditory distraction? Electrophysiological correlates of high and low performance in seniors. Neurobiology of Aging, 34, 1952–1962.PubMed Getzmann, S., Gajewski, P. D., & Falkenstein, M. (2013). Does age increase auditory distraction? Electrophysiological correlates of high and low performance in seniors. Neurobiology of Aging, 34, 1952–1962.PubMed
go back to reference Grillon, C., Courchesne, E., Ameli, R., Geyer, M., & Braff, D. L. (1990). Increased distractibility in schizophrenic patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 171–179.PubMed Grillon, C., Courchesne, E., Ameli, R., Geyer, M., & Braff, D. L. (1990). Increased distractibility in schizophrenic patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 171–179.PubMed
go back to reference Grimm, S., Bendixen, A., Deouell, L. Y., & Schröger, S. (2009). Distraction in a visual multi-deviant paradigm: Behavioral and event-related potential effects. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72, 260–266.PubMed Grimm, S., Bendixen, A., Deouell, L. Y., & Schröger, S. (2009). Distraction in a visual multi-deviant paradigm: Behavioral and event-related potential effects. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 72, 260–266.PubMed
go back to reference Grimm, S., Schröger, E., Bendixen, A., Bäß, P., Roye, A., & Deouell, L. Y. (2008). Optimizing the auditory distraction paradigm: Behavioral and event-related potential effects in a lateralized multi-deviant approach. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119, 934–947.PubMed Grimm, S., Schröger, E., Bendixen, A., Bäß, P., Roye, A., & Deouell, L. Y. (2008). Optimizing the auditory distraction paradigm: Behavioral and event-related potential effects in a lateralized multi-deviant approach. Clinical Neurophysiology, 119, 934–947.PubMed
go back to reference Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 224–237. Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 224–237.
go back to reference Haenschel, C., Vernon, D. J., Dwivedi, P., Gruzelier, J. H., & Baldeweg, T. (2005). Event-related brain potential correlates of human auditory sensory memory-trace formation. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 10494–10501. Haenschel, C., Vernon, D. J., Dwivedi, P., Gruzelier, J. H., & Baldeweg, T. (2005). Event-related brain potential correlates of human auditory sensory memory-trace formation. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 10494–10501.
go back to reference Hanauer, J. B., & Brooks, P. J. (2003). Developmental change in the cross-modal Stroop effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 359–366. Hanauer, J. B., & Brooks, P. J. (2003). Developmental change in the cross-modal Stroop effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 359–366.
go back to reference Harvey, N. (1980). Non-informative effects of stimuli functioning as cues. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 413–425.PubMed Harvey, N. (1980). Non-informative effects of stimuli functioning as cues. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 413–425.PubMed
go back to reference Ho, C., & Spence, C. (2006). Verbal interface design: Do verbal directional cues automatically orient visual spatial attention? Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 733–748. Ho, C., & Spence, C. (2006). Verbal interface design: Do verbal directional cues automatically orient visual spatial attention? Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 733–748.
go back to reference Hölig, C., & Berti, S. (2010). To switch of not to switch: Brain potential indices of attentional control after task-relevant and task-irrelevant changes of stimulus features. Brain Research, 1345, 164–175.PubMed Hölig, C., & Berti, S. (2010). To switch of not to switch: Brain potential indices of attentional control after task-relevant and task-irrelevant changes of stimulus features. Brain Research, 1345, 164–175.PubMed
go back to reference Horváth, J., & Bendixen, A. (2012). Preventing distraction by probabilistic cueing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 342–347.PubMed Horváth, J., & Bendixen, A. (2012). Preventing distraction by probabilistic cueing. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83, 342–347.PubMed
go back to reference Horváth, J., & Burgyán, A. (2011). Distraction and the auditory attentional blink. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73, 695–701. Horváth, J., & Burgyán, A. (2011). Distraction and the auditory attentional blink. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73, 695–701.
go back to reference Horváth, J., Czigler, I., Birkás, E., Winkler, I., & Gervai, J. (2009). Age-related differences in distraction and reorientation in an auditory task. Neurobiology of Aging, 30, 1157–1172.PubMed Horváth, J., Czigler, I., Birkás, E., Winkler, I., & Gervai, J. (2009). Age-related differences in distraction and reorientation in an auditory task. Neurobiology of Aging, 30, 1157–1172.PubMed
go back to reference Horváth, J., Roeber, U., Bendixen, A., & Schröger, E. (2008a). Specific or general? The nature of attention set changes triggered by distracting auditory events. Brain Research, 1229, 193–203.PubMed Horváth, J., Roeber, U., Bendixen, A., & Schröger, E. (2008a). Specific or general? The nature of attention set changes triggered by distracting auditory events. Brain Research, 1229, 193–203.PubMed
go back to reference Horváth, J., Sussman, E., Winkler, I., & Schröger, E. (2011). Preventing distraction: Assessing stimulus-specific and general effects of the predictive cueing of deviant auditory events. Biological Psychology, 87, 35–48.PubMedCentralPubMed Horváth, J., Sussman, E., Winkler, I., & Schröger, E. (2011). Preventing distraction: Assessing stimulus-specific and general effects of the predictive cueing of deviant auditory events. Biological Psychology, 87, 35–48.PubMedCentralPubMed
go back to reference Horváth, J., & Winkler, I. (2010). Distraction in a continuous-stimulation detection task. Biological Psychology, 83, 229–238.PubMed Horváth, J., & Winkler, I. (2010). Distraction in a continuous-stimulation detection task. Biological Psychology, 83, 229–238.PubMed
go back to reference Horváth, J., Winkler, I., & Bendixen, A. (2008b). Do N1/MMN, P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain reflecting the three stages of auditory distraction? Biological Psychology, 79, 139–147.PubMed Horváth, J., Winkler, I., & Bendixen, A. (2008b). Do N1/MMN, P3a, and RON form a strongly coupled chain reflecting the three stages of auditory distraction? Biological Psychology, 79, 139–147.PubMed
go back to reference Hughes, R. W., Hurlstone, M. J., Marsh, J. E., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2013). Cognitive control of auditory distraction: Impact of task difficulty, foreknowledge, and working memory capacity supports duplex-mechanism account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 539–553.PubMed Hughes, R. W., Hurlstone, M. J., Marsh, J. E., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2013). Cognitive control of auditory distraction: Impact of task difficulty, foreknowledge, and working memory capacity supports duplex-mechanism account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 539–553.PubMed
go back to reference Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2005). Auditory attentional capture during serial recall—violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 736–749.PubMed Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2005). Auditory attentional capture during serial recall—violations at encoding of an algorithm-based neural model. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 736–749.PubMed
go back to reference Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2007). Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds—support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1050–1061.PubMed Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., & Jones, D. M. (2007). Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds—support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 1050–1061.PubMed
go back to reference Jääskeläinen, I. P., Alho, K., Escera, C., Winkler, I., Sillanaukee, P., & Näätänen, R. (1996). Effects of ethanol and auditory distraction on forced choice reaction time. Alcohol, 13, 153–156.PubMed Jääskeläinen, I. P., Alho, K., Escera, C., Winkler, I., Sillanaukee, P., & Näätänen, R. (1996). Effects of ethanol and auditory distraction on forced choice reaction time. Alcohol, 13, 153–156.PubMed
go back to reference Jankowiak, S., & Berti, S. (2007). Behavioral and event-related potential distraction effects with regularly occurring auditory deviants. Psychophysiology, 44, 79–85.PubMed Jankowiak, S., & Berti, S. (2007). Behavioral and event-related potential distraction effects with regularly occurring auditory deviants. Psychophysiology, 44, 79–85.PubMed
go back to reference Jentzsch, I., & Dudschig, C. (2009). Why do we slow down after an error? Mechanisms underlying the effects of post-error slowing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 209–218. Jentzsch, I., & Dudschig, C. (2009). Why do we slow down after an error? Mechanisms underlying the effects of post-error slowing. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 209–218.
go back to reference Kähkönen, S., Ahveninen, J., Pekkonen, E., Kaakkola, S., Huttunen, R. J., & Jääskeläinen, I. P. (2002). Dopamine modulates involuntary shifting and reorienting: An electromagnetic study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 1894–1902.PubMed Kähkönen, S., Ahveninen, J., Pekkonen, E., Kaakkola, S., Huttunen, R. J., & Jääskeläinen, I. P. (2002). Dopamine modulates involuntary shifting and reorienting: An electromagnetic study. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113, 1894–1902.PubMed
go back to reference Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47–70. Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47–70.
go back to reference Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffman, J. (2006). Evidence of task-specific resolution of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 800–806. Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffman, J. (2006). Evidence of task-specific resolution of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 800–806.
go back to reference Koch, I., & Brass, M. (2013). Task switching—maturation of a paradigm. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 221, 1–4. Koch, I., & Brass, M. (2013). Task switching—maturation of a paradigm. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 221, 1–4.
go back to reference Kujala, T., Tervaniemi, M., & Schröger, E. (2007). The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Biological Psychology, 74, 1–19.PubMed Kujala, T., Tervaniemi, M., & Schröger, E. (2007). The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Biological Psychology, 74, 1–19.PubMed
go back to reference Kunde, W. (2003). Sequential modulations of stimulus–response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 198–205. Kunde, W. (2003). Sequential modulations of stimulus–response correspondence effects depend on awareness of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 198–205.
go back to reference Laming, D. R. J. (1979). Choice reaction performance following an error. Acta Psychologica, 43, 199–224. Laming, D. R. J. (1979). Choice reaction performance following an error. Acta Psychologica, 43, 199–224.
go back to reference Lawo, V., Philipp, A. M., Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2012). The role of task preparation and task inhibition in age-related task-switching deficits. Psychology and Aging, 27, 1130–1137.PubMed Lawo, V., Philipp, A. M., Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2012). The role of task preparation and task inhibition in age-related task-switching deficits. Psychology and Aging, 27, 1130–1137.PubMed
go back to reference Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Li, C.-S. R., Huang, C., Yan, P., Paliwal, P., Constable, R. T., & Sinha, R. (2008). Neural correlates of post-error slowing during a stop signal task—a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1021–1029. Li, C.-S. R., Huang, C., Yan, P., Paliwal, P., Constable, R. T., & Sinha, R. (2008). Neural correlates of post-error slowing during a stop signal task—a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1021–1029.
go back to reference Li, B., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Zhang, M. (2013). Behavioral distraction by auditory deviance is mediated by the sound’s informational value: Evidence from an auditory discrimination task. Experimental Psychology, 60, 260–268. Li, B., Parmentier, F. B. R., & Zhang, M. (2013). Behavioral distraction by auditory deviance is mediated by the sound’s informational value: Evidence from an auditory discrimination task. Experimental Psychology, 60, 260–268.
go back to reference Ljungberg, J. K., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2012a). The impact of intonation and valence on objective and subjective attention capture by auditory alarms. Human Factors, 54, 826–837.PubMed Ljungberg, J. K., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2012a). The impact of intonation and valence on objective and subjective attention capture by auditory alarms. Human Factors, 54, 826–837.PubMed
go back to reference Ljungberg, J. K., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2012b). Cross-modal distraction by deviance: Functional similarities between the auditory and tactile modalities. Experimental Psychology, 59, 355–363.PubMed Ljungberg, J. K., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2012b). Cross-modal distraction by deviance: Functional similarities between the auditory and tactile modalities. Experimental Psychology, 59, 355–363.PubMed
go back to reference Ljungberg, J. K., Parmentier, F. B. R., Hughes, R. W., Macken, W. J., & Jones, D. M. (2012a). Listen out! Behavioral and subjective responses to verbal warnings. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 451–461. Ljungberg, J. K., Parmentier, F. B. R., Hughes, R. W., Macken, W. J., & Jones, D. M. (2012a). Listen out! Behavioral and subjective responses to verbal warnings. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 451–461.
go back to reference Ljungberg, J. K., Parmentier, F. B. R., Leiva, A., & Vega, N. (2012b). The informational constraints of behavioral distraction by unexpected sounds: The role of event information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1461–1468.PubMed Ljungberg, J. K., Parmentier, F. B. R., Leiva, A., & Vega, N. (2012b). The informational constraints of behavioral distraction by unexpected sounds: The role of event information. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1461–1468.PubMed
go back to reference Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times. New York: Oxford University Press. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A., Mouloua, M., & Hawkins, H. L. (1996). Mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: Resource allocation or uncertainty reduction? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 725–737.PubMed Luck, S. J., Hillyard, S. A., Mouloua, M., & Hawkins, H. L. (1996). Mechanisms of visual-spatial attention: Resource allocation or uncertainty reduction? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 725–737.PubMed
go back to reference Macdonald, A. W., I. I. I., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulated cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835–1838.PubMed Macdonald, A. W., I. I. I., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulated cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288, 1835–1838.PubMed
go back to reference Mager, R., Falkenstein, M., Störmer, R., Brand, S., Müller-Spahn, F., & Bullinger, A. (2004). Auditory distraction in young and middle-aged adults: A behavioural and event-related potential study. Journal of Neural Transmission, 112, 1165–1176.PubMed Mager, R., Falkenstein, M., Störmer, R., Brand, S., Müller-Spahn, F., & Bullinger, A. (2004). Auditory distraction in young and middle-aged adults: A behavioural and event-related potential study. Journal of Neural Transmission, 112, 1165–1176.PubMed
go back to reference May, C. P., Kane, M. J., & Zacks, R. T. (1995). Determinants of negative priming. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 35–54.PubMed May, C. P., Kane, M. J., & Zacks, R. T. (1995). Determinants of negative priming. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 35–54.PubMed
go back to reference Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211–243.PubMed Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211–243.PubMed
go back to reference Melara, R. D., Wang, H., Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2008). Attentional origins of the Simon effect: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Brain Research, 1215, 147–159.PubMed Melara, R. D., Wang, H., Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2008). Attentional origins of the Simon effect: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Brain Research, 1215, 147–159.PubMed
go back to reference Melcher, T., & Gruber, O. (2009). Decomposing interference during Stroop performance into different conflict factors: An event-related fMRI study. Cortex, 45, 189–200.PubMed Melcher, T., & Gruber, O. (2009). Decomposing interference during Stroop performance into different conflict factors: An event-related fMRI study. Cortex, 45, 189–200.PubMed
go back to reference Munka, L., & Berti, S. (2006). Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential. Neuroscience Letters, 396, 177–181.PubMed Munka, L., & Berti, S. (2006). Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential. Neuroscience Letters, 396, 177–181.PubMed
go back to reference Näätänen, R. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 201–288. Näätänen, R. (1990). The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 201–288.
go back to reference Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Näätänen, R. (1992). Attention and brain function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
go back to reference Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A. W. K., & Mäntysalo, S. (1978). Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 42, 313–329.PubMed Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A. W. K., & Mäntysalo, S. (1978). Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 42, 313–329.PubMed
go back to reference Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 826–859. Näätänen, R., & Winkler, I. (1999). The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 826–859.
go back to reference Niemi, P., & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133–162. Niemi, P., & Näätänen, R. (1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 133–162.
go back to reference Nordby, H., Roth, W. T., & Pfefferbaum, A. (1988). Event-related potentials to breaks in sequences of alternating pitches or interstimulus intervals. Psychophysiology, 25, 262–268. Nordby, H., Roth, W. T., & Pfefferbaum, A. (1988). Event-related potentials to breaks in sequences of alternating pitches or interstimulus intervals. Psychophysiology, 25, 262–268.
go back to reference Notebaert, W., Houtman, F., Van Opstal, F., Gevers, W., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2009). Post-error slowing: An orienting account. Cognition, 111, 275–279. Notebaert, W., Houtman, F., Van Opstal, F., Gevers, W., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2009). Post-error slowing: An orienting account. Cognition, 111, 275–279.
go back to reference Núñez Castellar, E., Küin, S., Fias, W., & Notebaert, W. (2010). Outcome expectancy and not accuracy determines posterror slowing: ERP Support. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 270–278. Núñez Castellar, E., Küin, S., Fias, W., & Notebaert, W. (2010). Outcome expectancy and not accuracy determines posterror slowing: ERP Support. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 270–278.
go back to reference Paavilainen, P., Arajärvi, P., & Takegata, R. (2007). Preattentive detection of nonsalient contingencies between auditory features. Neuroreport, 18, 159–163. Paavilainen, P., Arajärvi, P., & Takegata, R. (2007). Preattentive detection of nonsalient contingencies between auditory features. Neuroreport, 18, 159–163.
go back to reference Paavilainen, P., Simola, J., Jaramillo, M., Näätänen, R., Winkler, I. (2001). Preattentive extraction of abstract feature conjunctions from auditory stimulation as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN). Psychophysiology, 38, 359–365. Paavilainen, P., Simola, J., Jaramillo, M., Näätänen, R., Winkler, I. (2001). Preattentive extraction of abstract feature conjunctions from auditory stimulation as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN). Psychophysiology, 38, 359–365.
go back to reference Pacheco-Unguetti, A. P., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2013). Sadness increases distraction by auditory deviant stimuli. Emotion. doi:10.1037/a0034289 (Advance online publication). Pacheco-Unguetti, A. P., & Parmentier, F. B. R. (2013). Sadness increases distraction by auditory deviant stimuli. Emotion. doi:10.​1037/​a0034289 (Advance online publication).
go back to reference Parmentier, F. B. R. (2008). Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: The role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing. Cognition, 109, 345–362.PubMed Parmentier, F. B. R. (2008). Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: The role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing. Cognition, 109, 345–362.PubMed
go back to reference Parmentier, F. B. R., & Andrés, P. (2010). The involuntary capture of attention by sound: Novelty and post-novelty distraction in young and older adults. Experimental Psychology, 57, 68–76.PubMed Parmentier, F. B. R., & Andrés, P. (2010). The involuntary capture of attention by sound: Novelty and post-novelty distraction in young and older adults. Experimental Psychology, 57, 68–76.PubMed
go back to reference Parmentier, F. B. R., Elford, G., Escera, C., Andrés, P., & San Miguel, I. (2008). The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task. Cognition, 106, 408–432.PubMed Parmentier, F. B. R., Elford, G., Escera, C., Andrés, P., & San Miguel, I. (2008). The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task. Cognition, 106, 408–432.PubMed
go back to reference Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J. V., Andrés, P., & Barceló, F. (2011a). Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change. Cognition, 119, 374–380.PubMed Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J. V., Andrés, P., & Barceló, F. (2011a). Why are auditory novels distracting? Contrasting the roles of novelty, violation of expectation and stimulus change. Cognition, 119, 374–380.PubMed
go back to reference Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J. V., & Ljungberg, J. K. (2010a). Behavioral distraction by auditory novelty is not only about novelty: The role of the distracter’s informational value. Cognition, 115, 504–511.PubMed Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J. V., & Ljungberg, J. K. (2010a). Behavioral distraction by auditory novelty is not only about novelty: The role of the distracter’s informational value. Cognition, 115, 504–511.PubMed
go back to reference Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J., & Maybery, M. T. (2010b). The involuntary capture of attention by novel feature pairings: A study of voice–location integration in auditory sensory memory. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 279–284. Parmentier, F. B. R., Elsley, J., & Maybery, M. T. (2010b). The involuntary capture of attention by novel feature pairings: A study of voice–location integration in auditory sensory memory. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 279–284.
go back to reference Parmentier, F. B. R., & Hebrero, M. (2013). Cognitive control of involuntary distraction by deviant sound. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1635–1641.PubMed Parmentier, F. B. R., & Hebrero, M. (2013). Cognitive control of involuntary distraction by deviant sound. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1635–1641.PubMed
go back to reference Parmentier, F. B. R., Ljungberg, J. K., Elsley, J. V., & Lindkvist, M. (2011b). A behavioral study of distraction by vibrotactile novelty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1134–1139.PubMed Parmentier, F. B. R., Ljungberg, J. K., Elsley, J. V., & Lindkvist, M. (2011b). A behavioral study of distraction by vibrotactile novelty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 1134–1139.PubMed
go back to reference Parmentier, F. B. R., Turner, J., & Elsley, J. V. (2011c). Distraction by auditory novelty: The course and aftermath of novelty and semantic effects. Experimental Psychology, 58, 92–101.PubMed Parmentier, F. B. R., Turner, J., & Elsley, J. V. (2011c). Distraction by auditory novelty: The course and aftermath of novelty and semantic effects. Experimental Psychology, 58, 92–101.PubMed
go back to reference Parmentier, F. B. R., Turner, J., & Perez, L. (2013). A dual contribution to the involuntary semantic processing of unexpected spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. doi:10.1037/a0031550 (Advance online publication). Parmentier, F. B. R., Turner, J., & Perez, L. (2013). A dual contribution to the involuntary semantic processing of unexpected spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. doi:10.​1037/​a0031550 (Advance online publication).
go back to reference Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1966). Errors and error correction in choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264–272.PubMed Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1966). Errors and error correction in choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 264–272.PubMed
go back to reference Reiche, M., Hartwigsen, G., Widmann, A., Saur, D., Schröger, E., & Bendixen, A. (2013). Involuntary attentional capture by speech and non-speech deviations: A combined behavioral—event-related potential study. Brain Research, 1490, 153–160.PubMed Reiche, M., Hartwigsen, G., Widmann, A., Saur, D., Schröger, E., & Bendixen, A. (2013). Involuntary attentional capture by speech and non-speech deviations: A combined behavioral—event-related potential study. Brain Research, 1490, 153–160.PubMed
go back to reference Rinne, T., Särkkä, A., Dergerman, A., Schröger, E., & Alho, K. (2006). Two separate mechanisms underlie auditory change detection and involuntary control of attention. Brain Research, 1077, 135–143.PubMed Rinne, T., Särkkä, A., Dergerman, A., Schröger, E., & Alho, K. (2006). Two separate mechanisms underlie auditory change detection and involuntary control of attention. Brain Research, 1077, 135–143.PubMed
go back to reference Roeber, U., Berti, S., Müller, D., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2009). Disentangling effects of auditory distraction and of stimulus–response sequence. Psychophysiology, 46, 425–438.PubMed Roeber, U., Berti, S., Müller, D., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2009). Disentangling effects of auditory distraction and of stimulus–response sequence. Psychophysiology, 46, 425–438.PubMed
go back to reference Roeber, U., Berti, S., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2005). Response repetition vs. response change modulates behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distraction. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 451–456.PubMed Roeber, U., Berti, S., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2005). Response repetition vs. response change modulates behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distraction. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 451–456.PubMed
go back to reference Roeber, U., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2003). Auditory distraction by duration and location deviants: A behavioral and event-related potential study. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 347–357.PubMed Roeber, U., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2003). Auditory distraction by duration and location deviants: A behavioral and event-related potential study. Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 347–357.PubMed
go back to reference Roelofs, A. (2005). The visual–auditory color–word Stroop asymmetry and its time course. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1325–1336. Roelofs, A. (2005). The visual–auditory color–word Stroop asymmetry and its time course. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1325–1336.
go back to reference Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). The cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). The cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231.
go back to reference Roye, A., Jacobsen, T., & Schröger, E. (2007). Personal significance is encoded automatically by the human brain: An event-related potential study with ringtones. European Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 784–790.PubMed Roye, A., Jacobsen, T., & Schröger, E. (2007). Personal significance is encoded automatically by the human brain: An event-related potential study with ringtones. European Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 784–790.PubMed
go back to reference SanMiguel, I., Corral, M. J., & Escera, C. (2008). When loading working memory reduces distraction: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory–visual distraction paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1131–1145.PubMed SanMiguel, I., Corral, M. J., & Escera, C. (2008). When loading working memory reduces distraction: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory–visual distraction paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1131–1145.PubMed
go back to reference SanMiguel, I., Linden, D., & Escera, C. (2010a). Attention capture by novel sounds: Distraction versus facilitation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 481–515. SanMiguel, I., Linden, D., & Escera, C. (2010a). Attention capture by novel sounds: Distraction versus facilitation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 481–515.
go back to reference SanMiguel, I., Morgan, H. M., Klein, C., Linden, D., & Escera, C. (2010b). On the functional significance of Novelty-P3: Facilitation by unexpected novel sounds. Biological Psychology, 83, 143–152.PubMed SanMiguel, I., Morgan, H. M., Klein, C., Linden, D., & Escera, C. (2010b). On the functional significance of Novelty-P3: Facilitation by unexpected novel sounds. Biological Psychology, 83, 143–152.PubMed
go back to reference Santens, S., & Verguts, T. (2011). The size congruity effect: Is bigger always more? Cognition, 118, 94–110.PubMed Santens, S., & Verguts, T. (2011). The size congruity effect: Is bigger always more? Cognition, 118, 94–110.PubMed
go back to reference Schröger, E. (1996). A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 527–539.PubMed Schröger, E. (1996). A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 527–539.PubMed
go back to reference Schröger, E. (1997). On the detection of auditory deviations: A pre-attentive activation model. Psychophysiology, 34, 245–257.PubMed Schröger, E. (1997). On the detection of auditory deviations: A pre-attentive activation model. Psychophysiology, 34, 245–257.PubMed
go back to reference Schröger, E. (2005). The mismatch negativity as a tool to study auditory processing. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 91, 490–501. Schröger, E. (2005). The mismatch negativity as a tool to study auditory processing. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 91, 490–501.
go back to reference Schröger, E. (2007). Mismatch negativity: A microphone into auditory memory. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 138–146. Schröger, E. (2007). Mismatch negativity: A microphone into auditory memory. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 138–146.
go back to reference Schröger, E., Bendixen, A., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., & Roeber, U. (2007). Processing of abstract rule violations in audition. PLoS ONE, 2, e1131.PubMedCentralPubMed Schröger, E., Bendixen, A., Trujillo-Barreto, N. J., & Roeber, U. (2007). Processing of abstract rule violations in audition. PLoS ONE, 2, e1131.PubMedCentralPubMed
go back to reference Schröger, E., Giard, M.-H., & Wolff, Ch. (2000). Auditory distraction: Event-related potential and behavioral indices. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 1450–1460.PubMed Schröger, E., Giard, M.-H., & Wolff, Ch. (2000). Auditory distraction: Event-related potential and behavioral indices. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111, 1450–1460.PubMed
go back to reference Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998a). Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials. NeuroReport, 9, 3355–3358.PubMed Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998a). Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials. NeuroReport, 9, 3355–3358.PubMed
go back to reference Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998b). Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: A new distraction paradigm. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 71–87.PubMed Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998b). Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: A new distraction paradigm. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 71–87.PubMed
go back to reference Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2010). Response-repetition effects in task switching with and without response execution. Acta Psychologica, 135, 302–309.PubMed Schuch, S., & Koch, I. (2010). Response-repetition effects in task switching with and without response execution. Acta Psychologica, 135, 302–309.PubMed
go back to reference Shiu, L., & Pashler, H. (1994). Negligible effect of spatial precuing on identification of single digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1037–1054. Shiu, L., & Pashler, H. (1994). Negligible effect of spatial precuing on identification of single digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1037–1054.
go back to reference Shtyrov, Y., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Distributed neuronal networks for encoding category-specific semantic information: The mismatch negativity to action words. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 1083–1092.PubMed Shtyrov, Y., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Distributed neuronal networks for encoding category-specific semantic information: The mismatch negativity to action words. European Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 1083–1092.PubMed
go back to reference Sussman, E., Winkler, I., & Schröger, E. (2003). Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 630–637. Sussman, E., Winkler, I., & Schröger, E. (2003). Top-down control over involuntary attention switching in the auditory modality. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 630–637.
go back to reference Tilman, C. M., & Wiens, S. (2011). Behavioral and ERP indices of response conflict in Stroop and flanker tasks. Psychophysiology, 48, 1405–1411. Tilman, C. M., & Wiens, S. (2011). Behavioral and ERP indices of response conflict in Stroop and flanker tasks. Psychophysiology, 48, 1405–1411.
go back to reference Turatto, M., Benso, F., Galfano, G., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Nonspatial attentional shifts between audition and vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 628–639.PubMed Turatto, M., Benso, F., Galfano, G., & Umiltà, C. (2002). Nonspatial attentional shifts between audition and vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 628–639.PubMed
go back to reference Ullsperger, M., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). Subprocesses of performance monitoring: A dissociation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs. Neuroimage, 14, 1387–1401.PubMed Ullsperger, M., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). Subprocesses of performance monitoring: A dissociation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs. Neuroimage, 14, 1387–1401.PubMed
go back to reference Van Mourik, R., Oosterlaan, J., Heslenfeld, D. J., Konig, C. E., & Sergeant, J. A. (2007). When distraction is not distracting: A behavioral and ERP study on distraction in ADHD. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 1855–1865.PubMed Van Mourik, R., Oosterlaan, J., Heslenfeld, D. J., Konig, C. E., & Sergeant, J. A. (2007). When distraction is not distracting: A behavioral and ERP study on distraction in ADHD. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 1855–1865.PubMed
go back to reference van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2005). Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: a functional MRI study. Neuroimage, 27, 497–504. van Veen, V., & Carter, C. S. (2005). Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: a functional MRI study. Neuroimage, 27, 497–504.
go back to reference van Zuijen, T. L., Simoens, V. L., Paavilainen, P., Näätänen, R. & Tervaniemi, M. (2006) Implicit, intuitive and explicit knowledge of abstract regularities in a sound sequence: An event-related brain potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1292–1303. van Zuijen, T. L., Simoens, V. L., Paavilainen, P., Näätänen, R. & Tervaniemi, M. (2006) Implicit, intuitive and explicit knowledge of abstract regularities in a sound sequence: An event-related brain potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1292–1303.
go back to reference Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008). Automatic and controlled response inhibition: Associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 649–672. Verbruggen, F., & Logan, G. D. (2008). Automatic and controlled response inhibition: Associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 649–672.
go back to reference Wacongne, C., Changeux, J. P., & Dehaene, S. (2012). A neuronal model of predictive coding accounting for the mismatch negativity. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 3665–3678.PubMed Wacongne, C., Changeux, J. P., & Dehaene, S. (2012). A neuronal model of predictive coding accounting for the mismatch negativity. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 3665–3678.PubMed
go back to reference Wessel, J.R., Danielmeier, C., Morton, B., & Ullsperger, M. (2012). Surprise and error: Common neuronalarchitecture for the processing of errors and novelty. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 7528–7537. Wessel, J.R., Danielmeier, C., Morton, B., & Ullsperger, M. (2012). Surprise and error: Common neuronalarchitecture for the processing of errors and novelty. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 7528–7537.
go back to reference Wetzel, N., Berti, S., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2004). Distraction and reorientation in children: A behavioral and ERP study. NeuroReport, 15, 1355–1358.PubMed Wetzel, N., Berti, S., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2004). Distraction and reorientation in children: A behavioral and ERP study. NeuroReport, 15, 1355–1358.PubMed
go back to reference Wetzel, N., & Schröger, E. (2007). Cognitive control of involuntary attention and distraction in children and adolescents. Brain Research, 1155, 134–146.PubMed Wetzel, N., & Schröger, E. (2007). Cognitive control of involuntary attention and distraction in children and adolescents. Brain Research, 1155, 134–146.PubMed
go back to reference Wetzel, N., Schröger, E., & Widmann, A. (2013). The dissociation between the P3a event-related potential and behavioral distraction. Psychophysiology (in press). Wetzel, N., Schröger, E., & Widmann, A. (2013). The dissociation between the P3a event-related potential and behavioral distraction. Psychophysiology (in press).
go back to reference Wetzel, N., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2009). The cognitive control of distraction by novelty in children aged 7–8 and adults. Psychophysiology, 46, 607–616.PubMed Wetzel, N., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2009). The cognitive control of distraction by novelty in children aged 7–8 and adults. Psychophysiology, 46, 607–616.PubMed
go back to reference Wetzel, N., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2012). Distraction and facilitation—two faces of the same coin? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 664–674.PubMed Wetzel, N., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2012). Distraction and facilitation—two faces of the same coin? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 664–674.PubMed
go back to reference Winkler, I. (2007). Interpreting the mismatch negativity. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 147–163. Winkler, I. (2007). Interpreting the mismatch negativity. Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 147–163.
go back to reference Winkler, I., & Czigler, I. (1998). Mismatch negativity: deviance detection or the maintenance of the “standard”. NeuroReport, 9, 3809–3813. Winkler, I., & Czigler, I. (1998). Mismatch negativity: deviance detection or the maintenance of the “standard”. NeuroReport, 9, 3809–3813.
go back to reference Woods, D. L. (1992). Auditory selective attention in middleaged and elderly subjects: An event-related brain potential study. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 84, 456–468.PubMed Woods, D. L. (1992). Auditory selective attention in middleaged and elderly subjects: An event-related brain potential study. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 84, 456–468.PubMed
go back to reference Yeung, N., Cohen, J. D., & Botvinick, M. M. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111, 939–959. Yeung, N., Cohen, J. D., & Botvinick, M. M. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111, 939–959.
Metagegevens
Titel
The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review
Auteur
Fabrice B. R. Parmentier
Publicatiedatum
01-05-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0534-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2014

Psychological Research 3/2014 Naar de uitgave