Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

28-08-2015 | Brief Report

Social Anxiety and Empathy for Social Pain

Auteurs: Karen W. Auyeung, Lynn E. Alden

Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research | Uitgave 1/2016

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

We examined whether dispositional social anxiety influenced empathy for individuals who experience aversive social events. Participants (N = 121) were randomly assigned to an experimental condition designed to increase state anxiety via social threat or to a control condition. They then observed videos of target individuals discussing high school events in which they were either socially included or excluded. Both participants and targets rated the emotions the targets felt when discussing those situations. Hierarchical linear modeling revealed that social anxiety was associated with greater accuracy for targets’ negative social emotions but only under conditions of social threat. These results suggest that individual differences in social anxiety may influence empathic accuracy for others’ social pain.
Voetnoten
1
The significant main effect of social anxiety indicated that social anxiety predicted greater NA accuracy, suggesting that overall, individuals with higher levels of social anxiety were more accurate at rating targets’ negative affect. While interesting, this main effect was qualified by the three-way interaction.
 
2
Analyses were also conducted using a discrepancy variable (i.e., the directional difference between participant and target ratings), where negative scores indicate that participants underestimated targets’ negative affect and positive scores indicate that participants overestimated. There was a significant two-way interaction within the exclusion videos, b = -.07, t = 2.38, p = .02. Follow-up analyses revealed that the slope of social anxiety was only significant within the experimental condition, b = .05, t = 2.28, p = .02. On average, individuals with low social anxiety underestimated target affect (M = -6.26, SD = 11.99) more than individuals with high social anxiety (M = −2.92, SD = 10.62).
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 69–93). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Clark, D. M., & Wells, A. (1995). A cognitive model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg, M. R. Liebowitz, D. A. Hope, & F. R. Schneier (Eds.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, assessment, and treatment (pp. 69–93). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Connor, K. M., Davidson, J. R. T., Churchill, L. E., Sherwood, A., & Weisler, R. H. (2000). Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN): New self-rating scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 379–386. doi:10.1192/bjp.176.4.379.CrossRefPubMed Connor, K. M., Davidson, J. R. T., Churchill, L. E., Sherwood, A., & Weisler, R. H. (2000). Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN): New self-rating scale. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 379–386. doi:10.​1192/​bjp.​176.​4.​379.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference DeWall, C. N., & Baumeister, R. F. (2006). Alone but feeling no pain: Effects of social exclusion on physical pain tolerance and pain threshold, affective forecasting, and interpersonal empathy. Attitudes and Social Cognition, 91, 1–15. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.1. DeWall, C. N., & Baumeister, R. F. (2006). Alone but feeling no pain: Effects of social exclusion on physical pain tolerance and pain threshold, affective forecasting, and interpersonal empathy. Attitudes and Social Cognition, 91, 1–15. doi:10.​1037/​0022-3514.​91.​1.​1.
go back to reference Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberger & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 646–718). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In N. Eisenberger & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 646–718). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
go back to reference Eisenberger, N. I. (2011). Social pain: experiential, neurocognitive, and genetic correlates. In A. Todorov, S. T. Fiske, & D. A. Prentice (Eds.), Social neuroscience: Toward understanding the underpinnings of the social mind (pp. 229–248). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Eisenberger, N. I. (2011). Social pain: experiential, neurocognitive, and genetic correlates. In A. Todorov, S. T. Fiske, & D. A. Prentice (Eds.), Social neuroscience: Toward understanding the underpinnings of the social mind (pp. 229–248). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.CrossRefPubMed Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gallese, V., Ferrari, P. F., & Ultimà, M. A. (2002). The mirror matching system: A shared manifold for intersubjectivity. Commentary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 35–36. Gallese, V., Ferrari, P. F., & Ultimà, M. A. (2002). The mirror matching system: A shared manifold for intersubjectivity. Commentary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 35–36.
go back to reference Goldin, P. R., Manber, T., Hakimi, S., Canli, T., & Gross, J. J. (2009). Neural bases of social anxiety disorder: Emotional reactivity and cognitive regulation during social and physical threat. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66(2), 170–180.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Goldin, P. R., Manber, T., Hakimi, S., Canli, T., & Gross, J. J. (2009). Neural bases of social anxiety disorder: Emotional reactivity and cognitive regulation during social and physical threat. Archives of General Psychiatry, 66(2), 170–180.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Harb, G. C., Heimberg, R. G., Fresco, D. M., Schneier, F. R., & Liebowitz, M. R. (2002). The psychometric properties of the interpersonal sensitivity measure in social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 961–980. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00125-5.CrossRefPubMed Harb, G. C., Heimberg, R. G., Fresco, D. M., Schneier, F. R., & Liebowitz, M. R. (2002). The psychometric properties of the interpersonal sensitivity measure in social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 961–980. doi:10.​1016/​S0005-7967(01)00125-5.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Heimberg, R. G., Mueller, G. P., Holt, C. S., & Hope, D. A. (1992). Assessment of anxiety in social interaction and being observed by others: The Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale. Behavior Therapy, 23, 53–73. doi:10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80308-9.CrossRef Heimberg, R. G., Mueller, G. P., Holt, C. S., & Hope, D. A. (1992). Assessment of anxiety in social interaction and being observed by others: The Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale. Behavior Therapy, 23, 53–73. doi:10.​1016/​S0005-7894(05)80308-9.CrossRef
go back to reference Mallot, M. A., Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., & Schmidt, N. B. (2009). Compensatory deficits following rejection: The role of social anxiety in disrupting affiliative behavior. Depression and Anxiety, 26, 438–446. doi:10.1002/da.20555.CrossRef Mallot, M. A., Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., & Schmidt, N. B. (2009). Compensatory deficits following rejection: The role of social anxiety in disrupting affiliative behavior. Depression and Anxiety, 26, 438–446. doi:10.​1002/​da.​20555.CrossRef
go back to reference Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., & Schaller, M. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “Porcupine Problem”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 42–55. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.42.CrossRefPubMed Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., & Schaller, M. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “Porcupine Problem”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 42–55. doi:10.​1037/​0022-3514.​92.​1.​42.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Masten, C. L., Gillen-O’Neel, C., & Brown, C. S. (2010). Children’s intergroup empathic processing: The roles of novel ingroup identification, situational distress, and social anxiety. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106, 115–128. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.01.002.CrossRefPubMed Masten, C. L., Gillen-O’Neel, C., & Brown, C. S. (2010). Children’s intergroup empathic processing: The roles of novel ingroup identification, situational distress, and social anxiety. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106, 115–128. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jecp.​2010.​01.​002.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Murray, S. L., Derrick, J. L., Leder, S., & Holmes, J. G. (2008). Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: A levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 429–459. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.429.CrossRefPubMed Murray, S. L., Derrick, J. L., Leder, S., & Holmes, J. G. (2008). Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: A levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 429–459. doi:10.​1037/​0022-3514.​94.​3.​429.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nordgren, L. F., MacDonald, G., & Banas, K. (2011). Empathy gaps for social pain: Why people underestimate the pain of social suffering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 120–128. doi:10.1037/a0020938.CrossRefPubMed Nordgren, L. F., MacDonald, G., & Banas, K. (2011). Empathy gaps for social pain: Why people underestimate the pain of social suffering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 120–128. doi:10.​1037/​a0020938.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Romero-Canyas, R., & Downey, G. (2013). What I see when I think it’s about me: People low in rejection-sensitivity downplay cues of rejection in self-relevant interpersonal situations. Emotion, 13(1), 104–117. doi:10.1037/a0029786.CrossRefPubMed Romero-Canyas, R., & Downey, G. (2013). What I see when I think it’s about me: People low in rejection-sensitivity downplay cues of rejection in self-relevant interpersonal situations. Emotion, 13(1), 104–117. doi:10.​1037/​a0029786.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Safren, S. A., Turk, C. L., & Heimberg, R. G. (1998). Factor structure of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 442–453.CrossRef Safren, S. A., Turk, C. L., & Heimberg, R. G. (1998). Factor structure of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 442–453.CrossRef
go back to reference Simpson, J. A., Ickes, W., & Grich, J. (1999). When accuracy hurts: Reactions of anxious-uncertain individuals to a relationship-threatening situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 754–769.CrossRef Simpson, J. A., Ickes, W., & Grich, J. (1999). When accuracy hurts: Reactions of anxious-uncertain individuals to a relationship-threatening situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 754–769.CrossRef
go back to reference Simpson, J. A., Kim, J. S., Fillo, J., Ickes, W., Rholes, W. S., Oriña, M., & Winterheld, H. A. (2011). Attachment and the management of empathic accuracy in relationship-threatening situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 242–254. doi:10.1177/0146167210394368.CrossRefPubMed Simpson, J. A., Kim, J. S., Fillo, J., Ickes, W., Rholes, W. S., Oriña, M., & Winterheld, H. A. (2011). Attachment and the management of empathic accuracy in relationship-threatening situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 242–254. doi:10.​1177/​0146167210394368​.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Smart Richman, L., & Leary, M. R. (2009). Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: A multimotive model. Psychological Review, 116, 365–383. doi:10.1037/a0015250.CrossRefPubMed Smart Richman, L., & Leary, M. R. (2009). Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: A multimotive model. Psychological Review, 116, 365–383. doi:10.​1037/​a0015250.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Taylor, C. T., & Alden, L. E. (2011). To see ourselves as others see us: An experimental integration of the intra and interpersonal consequences of self-protection in social anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 129–141. doi:10.1037/a0022127.CrossRefPubMed Taylor, C. T., & Alden, L. E. (2011). To see ourselves as others see us: An experimental integration of the intra and interpersonal consequences of self-protection in social anxiety disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 129–141. doi:10.​1037/​a0022127.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 227–242. doi:10.1177/0022022106297301.CrossRef Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 227–242. doi:10.​1177/​0022022106297301​.CrossRef
go back to reference Tibi-Elhanany, Y., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2011). Social cognition in social anxiety: First evidence for increased empathic abilities. The Isreal Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences, 48(2), 98–106. Tibi-Elhanany, Y., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2011). Social cognition in social anxiety: First evidence for increased empathic abilities. The Isreal Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences, 48(2), 98–106.
go back to reference Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D. (2000). Self–other agreement in personality and affectivity: The role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 546–558. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.546.CrossRefPubMed Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D. (2000). Self–other agreement in personality and affectivity: The role of acquaintanceship, trait visibility, and assumed similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 546–558. doi:10.​1037/​0022-3514.​78.​3.​546.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Social Anxiety and Empathy for Social Pain
Auteurs
Karen W. Auyeung
Lynn E. Alden
Publicatiedatum
28-08-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Cognitive Therapy and Research / Uitgave 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0147-5916
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2819
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-015-9718-0