The psychometric properties of the Interpersonal Sensitivity Measure in social anxiety disorder☆
Introduction
The Interpersonal Sensitivity Measure (IPSM) was developed by Boyce & Parker (1989) as a self-report measure of the construct of interpersonal sensitivity, which they defined as “undue and excessive awareness of and sensitivity to, the behavior and feelings of others” (p. 342). This construct has also been described as a general sensitivity to social feedback, vigilance with regard to others' reactions, increased concern about the behavior and statements of others, and fear of perceived or actual criticism by others (Boyce, Hickie, Parker, & Mitchell, 1993). Interpersonal sensitivity is characterized by a sense of personal inadequacy and frequent misinterpretation of others' interpersonal behavior and results in discomfort in the presence of others as well as interpersonal avoidance and non-assertive behavior (Boyce & Parker, 1989; Davidson, Zisook, Giller, & Helms, 1989). Although the authors of the IPSM refer to this construct as ‘interpersonal sensitivity’, we suggest the more descriptive label of ‘interpersonal rejection sensitivity’ to avoid confusion with the common conception of interpersonally sensitive/aware individuals and better describe the fear and discomfort associated with perceived interpersonal rejection.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 1994) describes a subtype of major depressive disorder, atypical depression, which was first discussed 30 years ago as resistant to antidepressant medication (Rabkin et al., 1996). The current definition of atypical depression includes the frequent symptom of interpersonal rejection sensitivity, which is conceived of as a persistent personality characteristic. This personality attribute may be exacerbated by depressive episodes, may be a reflection of the sensitivity to rejection induced by depressive episodes, or may represent a vulnerability to depressive episodes. Given these connections between depression and interpersonal rejection sensitivity, Boyce and Parker (1989) proposed that interpersonal rejection sensitivity is a characteristic of the ‘depression-prone’ personality and consequently developed the IPSM to assess this risk factor for the development of depressive disorders.
The initial studies of the scale yielded good evidence in support of the psychometric properties of the IPSM (Boyce & Parker, 1989). In a clinical sample of depressed patients and a non-clinical student sample, internal consistency estimates for the total score were 0.86 and 0.85, respectively. Further, the six-week retest reliability of the IPSM in the student sample was 0.70. A high correlation with a measure of neuroticism (r=0.66), a moderate correlation with a measure of self-esteem (r=0.39), and a low correlation with a measure of emotional arousability (r=0.11) provided evidence for both the convergent and divergent validity of the IPSM. The internal consistency estimates for four of the five IPSM subscales (Interpersonal Awareness, Separation Anxiety, Timidity, and Fragile Inner Self) were comparable to those reported for the total score. However, this initial investigation yielded lower six-week retest reliability for the Need for Approval subscale (r=0.55) as well as relatively low alpha coefficients of 0.67 in the patient sample and 0.55 in the student sample (Boyce & Parker, 1989).
Since its development, the IPSM has been used primarily in studies of interpersonal rejection sensitivity as a risk factor for depression. Interpersonal rejection sensitivity appears to be associated with depressive disorders, especially non-melancholic depressive episodes (Boyce et al., 1993, Boyce et al., 1990). Although the IPSM is somewhat sensitive to mood states, interpersonal rejection sensitivity represents a more enduring personality characteristic (Boyce & Parker, 1989). Prospective studies have demonstrated the ability of the IPSM to predict the development of initial depressive episodes, the recurrence of depression six months following childbirth, and non-remission of depressive symptoms among depressed inpatients (Boyce et al., 1991, Boyce et al., 1992). Further, among college students, the IPSM was associated with low social and academic self-esteem, depressive symptoms and poorer academic performance (McCabe, Blankstein, & Mills, 1999). This study also assessed the reliabilities of the IPSM subscales and obtained results comparable to the original investigation, including an alpha of 0.56 for the Need for Approval subscale, markedly lower than the other subscales (αs>0.75).
Interpersonal rejection sensitivity also appears to be a central feature of social anxiety disorder (Liebowitz, Gorman, Fyer, & Klein, 1985). Social anxiety disorder, also known as social phobia (Liebowitz, Heimberg, Fresco, Travers, & Stein, 2000), is characterized by persistent fears of embarrassment in social interaction or performance situations (American Psychiatric Association, 1994). Characteristics of social anxiety correspond to many aspects of the definition of interpersonal rejection sensitivity: interpersonal vigilance, fear of rejection, misinterpretations of others' behavior, thoughts of inferiority, non-assertive behavior, and avoidance of interpersonal situations (Rapee, 1995; Turk, Lerner, Heimberg, & Rapee, 2001). These parallels are especially evident in the generalized subtype of social anxiety disorder. Although individuals with social anxiety disorder may have circumscribed fears of, for example, public speaking, patients with generalized social anxiety disorder experience social anxiety and fear of embarrassment in a broad range of social situations. Therefore, interpersonal rejection sensitivity may represent an underlying personality trait of individuals with social anxiety disorder, particularly the generalized subtype. The current study investigated the psychometric properties of the IPSM among patients with social anxiety disorder.
The current investigation addressed several questions with regard to the psychometric attributes of the IPSM among patients with social anxiety disorder: (1) the internal consistency of the IPSM and its subscales; (2) the factor structure of the scale; (3) differences in IPSM scores between social anxiety disorder patients and non-anxious community participants; (4) its convergent (e.g. high interpersonal rejection sensitivity was expected to be associated with high anxiety about social interactions, more severe impairment, lack of expression of negative emotions such as anger towards others for fear of rejection, and an anxious attachment style) and divergent (e.g. the IPSM was expected to be only weakly related to anxiety sensitivity and to non-anxious insecure attachment styles and less related to observational fears than social interaction anxiety) validity; and (5) the sensitivity of the IPSM to treatment-related change among patients receiving cognitive-behavioral group therapy for social anxiety disorder. Important to the present context, research has demonstrated high rates of comorbidity between social anxiety disorder and depressive disorders (Kessler, Stang, Wittchen, Stein, & Walters, 1999; Schneier, Johnson, Hornig, Liebowitz, & Weissman, 1992). Therefore, the relationship of the IPSM to various external indicators of validity in social anxiety disorder patients above and beyond the influence of depressive symptoms was investigated.
Section snippets
Participants
Two groups of participants were included in this study: a social anxiety disorder group and a community control group. The social anxiety disorder group consisted of 201 treatment-seeking individuals with a principal DSM-IV diagnosis of social anxiety disorder. Participants were recruited through newspaper advertisements and local referral for social anxiety disorder treatments at three sites: (1) the Center for Stress and Anxiety Disorders of the University at Albany, State University of New
Preliminary analyses
The demographic characteristics of the four subsamples (Albany, Philadelphia, New York, and Community Control) are presented in Table 1. In comparisons of the three social anxiety disorder subsamples, no differences were found in age [F(2, 193)=0.79, ns], marital status [χ2(2, N=198)=1.45, ns], gender [χ2(2, N=201)=1.00, ns], or level of education [χ2(4, N=198)=7.20, ns]. Neither did these groups differ in the severity of their social anxiety symptoms as determined in the independent assessor
Discussion
Although the IPSM was originally developed as a measure of a trait of depression-prone personality (Boyce & Parker, 1989), interpersonal rejection sensitivity appears to be a relevant construct in the assessment of social anxiety. The results of this study provide initial evidence for the validity and internal consistency of the IPSM in a population of treatment-seeking individuals with social anxiety disorder.
Evidence for the convergent validity of the IPSM was obtained from significant
References (55)
- et al.
Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation
Clinical Psychology Review
(1988) - et al.
Specificity of interpersonal sensitivity to non-melancholic depression
Journal of Affective Disorders
(1993) - et al.
Symptoms of interpersonal sensitivity in depression
Comprehensive Psychiatry
(1989) - et al.
Assessment of anxiety in social interaction and being observed by others: The social interaction anxiety scale and the social phobia scale
Behavior Therapy
(1992) - et al.
Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1998) - et al.
Anxiety sensitivity, anxiety frequency and the predictions of fearfulness
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1986) - et al.
Assessment of contemporary social phobia verbal report instruments
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1998) Amos for windows. Analysis of moment structures (Version 4)
(1999)- et al.
The Hamilton scales and the Hopkins symptom checklist (SCL-90): A cross-national validity study in patients with panic disorders
British Journal of Psychiatry
(1992)
Cognitive therapy of depression
Comparative fit indexes in structural models
Psychological Bulletin
Interpersonal sensitivity and the one-year outcome of a depressive episode
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Development of a scale to measure interpersonal sensitivity
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Personality as a vulnerability factor to depression
British Journal of Psychiatry
Personality differences between patients with remitted melancholic and nonmelancholic depression
American Journal of Psychiatry
Reliability of DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders: Implications for the classification of emotional disorders
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Validation of the social interaction anxiety scale and the social phobia scale across the anxiety disorders
Psychological Assessment
The meaning and strategic use of factor analysis
A psychometric evaluation of the Beck depression inventory in adults with social anxiety disorder
Depression and Anxiety
Working models of attachment: Implications for explanation, emotion, and behavior
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
The anxiety disorders interview schedule for DSM-IV: Lifetime version (ADIS-IV-L)
Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders — patient edition (SCID-I/P, version 2.0)
Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments
Psychological Assessment
Factor structure of the state-trait anger expression inventory
Journal of Personality Assessment
Clinical validation of the quality of life inventory: A measure of life satisfaction for use in treatment planning and outcome assessment
Psychological Assessment
Cited by (99)
Environmental sensitivity predicts interpersonal sensitivity above and beyond Big Five personality traits
2022, Journal of Research in PersonalityRejection sensitivity and its relationship to schizotypy and aggression: current status and future directions
2022, Current Opinion in Behavioral SciencesCitation Excerpt :We considered both psychosocial factors and neural responses to social rejection in the context of individual differences in schizotypy and aggression. Before presenting our main observations and discussing their implications for future work, we note that in most of the reviewed behavioural studies RS was typically measured by self-report scales, such as the Adult Rejection Sensitivity questionnaire [1], the Interpersonal sensitivity scale [9] and the Patient Rejection Scale [10]. In some studies, RS was also measured experimentally, most commonly using a virtual ball-tossing task that mimics social rejection, known as the Cyberball task [11].
Converging evidence for enduring perceptions of low social status in individuals in remission from depression
2021, Journal of Affective DisordersThe Relationship Between Interpersonal Sensitivity and Emotion Regulation in Youths
2023, European Journal of Psychology Open
- ☆
Portions of this paper were presented at the 2000 meeting of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, New Orleans, LA, USA.
- 1
Present address: Department of Psychology, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.