Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 6/2023

14-12-2022 | Original Article

Sensorimotor processing is dependent on observed speed during the observation of hand–hand and hand–object interactions

Auteurs: Damian M. Manzone, Luc Tremblay

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2023

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Observing a physical interaction between individuals (e.g., observing friends shaking hands) or between an object and an individual (e.g., observing a teammate striking or being struck with a ball) can lead to somatosensory activation in the observer. However, it is not known whether the speed of the observed interaction modulates such somatosensory activation (e.g., observing a teammate being struck with a slow vs. a fast-moving ball). In three experiments, participants observed a hand or object interact with another hand or object, all presented with a slow- or fast-moving effector. To probe sensorimotor processes during observation, participants were asked to react to an auditory beep (i.e., response time [RT] task) at the moment of observed contact. If observed contact led to increased somatosensory activation, RTs would decrease due to statistical and/ or intersensory facilitation. In all three experiments, RTs were lower when observing fast compared to slow motion stimuli, regardless of the moving (i.e., hand or ball) and target stimulus (i.e., hand or leaf). Further, when only an object (i.e., leaf) was the target, RTs did not differ between the moving hand and moving ball condition. In contrast, when an object (i.e., ball) was used as the moving stimulus, the magnitude of the speed effect (i.e., fast – slow RT difference) was significantly larger when the ball contacted a hand as compared to a leaf. Overall, these results provide novel evidence for a relationship between the observed kinematics of an object–human interaction and the sensorimotor processing in the observer.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Voetnoten
1
Due to a technical limitation of the programed created in PsyToolkit, response time could not be measured while the hand was moving across the screen (i.e., when the beep was presented at the 9th or 17th frame).
 
2
Post-hoc equivalence tests were also conducted for the non-significant main effect of Observed Touch in Experiments 1, 2, and 3 using two one-sided t-tests (TOSTs; Lakens et al., 2018). The equivalence bound set to ± 12.5 ms, which was the smallest difference in RTs across all three experiments for the main effect of speed. For experiment 1, the hand-to-hand and hand-to-leaf conditions difference was significantly greater than the lower bound (tL (17) = 2.3, p = 0.017) and significantly smaller than the upper bound (tU (17) = -3.2, p < 0.01; 90% CI [-9.6, 5.7]). For experiment 2, the hand-to-leaf and ball-to-leaf conditions difference was significantly greater than the lower bound (tL (18) = 2.7, p < 0.01) and significantly smaller than the upper bound (tU (18) = -1.8, p = 0.04; 90% CI [-7.3, 12.0]). For experiment 3, the ball-to-hand and ball-to-leaf conditions difference was significantly greater than the lower bound (tL (13) = 1.9, p = 0.04) and significantly smaller than the upper bound (tU (13) = -3.6, p < 0.01; 90% CI [-11.9, 4.2]). Thus, these analyses suggest that the RTs were both not significantly different (as per the ANOVAs) and statistically equivalent.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.CrossRefPubMed Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Perkić, G. (2021). Neck muscle vibration and visual background information influence separate processes of goal-directed aiming movements by neck muscle vibration and visual background information influence separate processes of goal-directed aiming movements. University of Toronto. Perkić, G. (2021). Neck muscle vibration and visual background information influence separate processes of goal-directed aiming movements by neck muscle vibration and visual background information influence separate processes of goal-directed aiming movements. University of Toronto.
Metagegevens
Titel
Sensorimotor processing is dependent on observed speed during the observation of hand–hand and hand–object interactions
Auteurs
Damian M. Manzone
Luc Tremblay
Publicatiedatum
14-12-2022
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2023
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-022-01776-7

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2023

Psychological Research 6/2023 Naar de uitgave