Top

Gepubliceerd in:

21-11-2018 | Review

Patient-reported outcomes in stroke clinical trials 2002–2016: a systematic review

Auteurs: Eboni G. Price-Haywood, Jewel Harden-Barrios, Christopher Carr, Laya Reddy, Lydia A. Bazzano, Mieke L. van Driel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 5/2019

Abstract

Objective

Given the global and economic burden of stroke as a major cause of long-term disability, patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data from clinical trials can elucidate differential benefits/harms of interventions from patients’ perspectives and influence clinical decision making in stroke care management.

Methods

This systematic review examines stroke-related randomized controlled trials (RCT) published in 12 high-impact journals between 2002 and 2016 for (1) associations between trial characteristics and the reporting of PRO measures; and (2) psychometric properties of PRO instruments used in these studies. The study combines clinical trials identified in a prior review with trials identified with an updated literature search.

Results

Only 34 of 159 stroke-related RCTs reported PRO measures. Among the 34 trials, most were published in rehabilitation and general medical journals, were conducted in the United States or Europe, were funded by government/non-industry sponsors, and focused on post-stroke care. Thirty-one PRO instruments were employed in these studies. Only 5 instruments were stroke-specific measures, whereas the remaining 26 instruments were generic measures. Eight instruments assessed functional status, 9 measured quality of life, and 14 assessed symptoms. The most common health domains measured were emotional status and physical function.

Conclusions

This study highlights the paucity of information from patients’ perspective in stroke-related RCTs. This trend may change over time as researchers increase adherence to reporting guidelines for clinical trial protocols.

vorige artikel How depressed is “depressed”? A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis of optimal cut points for the Beck Depression Inventory revised (BDI-II)

volgende artikel A Norwegian 15D value algorithm: proposing a new procedure to estimate 15D value algorithms

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Benjamin, E. J., Blaha, M. J., Chiuve, S. E., Cushman, M., Das, S. R., Deo, R., et al. American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. (2017). Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 135(10), e146–e603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Salinas, J., Sprinkhuizen, S. M., Ackerson, T., Bernhardt, J., Davie, C., George, M. G., et al. (2016). An international standard set of patient-centered outcome measures after stroke. Stroke, 47(1), 180–186.CrossRefPubMed

Food and Drug Administration. (2009). Guidance for industry: patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved 19 March, 2018, from https://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm193282.pdf.

Magin, P., Victoire, A., Zhen, X. M., Furler, J., Pirotta, M., Lasserson, D. S., et al. (2013). Under-reporting of socioeconomic status of patients in stroke trials: Adherence to CONSORT principles. Stroke, 44(10), 2920–2922.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ahmed, S., Berzon, R. A., Revicki, D. A., Lenderking, W. R., Moinpour, C. M., Basch, E., et al. International Society for Quality of Life Research (2012). The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: Implications for clinical practice and health care policy. Med Care, 50(12), 1060–1070.CrossRefPubMed

Stewart, A. L., & Ware, J. E. (1992). Measuring functioning and well-being: The medical outcomes study approach. Durham: Duke University Press.

Firth, D., & “Bias (1993). Reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika, 80, 27–38.CrossRef

van Straten, A., de Haan, R. J., Limburg, M., Schuling, J., Bossuyt, P. M., & van den Bos, G. A. M. (1997). A stroke-adapted 30-item version of the sickness impact profile to assess quality of life (sa-sip30). Stroke, 28, 2155–2161.CrossRefPubMed

Hilari, K., Byng, S., Lamping, D. L., & Smith, S. C. (2003). Stroke and aphasia quality of life scale-39 (saqol-39): Evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity. Stroke, 34, 1944–1950.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Watkins, C., Leathley, M., & Davies, A. (1998). The stroke expectations questionnaire (seq): Identification of patients’ ideas about recovery. Clinical Rehabilitation, 12, 173–175.

11.

Watkins, C., Leathley, M., & Davies, A. (1998). The stroke expectations questionnaire (seq): A predictor of outcome? Clinical Rehabilitation, 12, 173.

12.

Duncan, P. W., Wallace, D., Lai, S. M., Johnson, D., Embretson, S., & Laster, L. J. (1999). The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke, 30, 2131–2140.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Jenkinson, C., Fitzpatrick, R., Crocker, H., & Peters, M. (2013). The stroke impact scale: Validation in a uk setting and development of a sis short form and sis index. Stroke, 44, 2532–2535.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Botner, E. M., Miller, W. C., & Eng, J. J. (2005). Measurement properties of the activities-specific balance confidence scale among individuals with stroke. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27, 156–163.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Pal, J., Hale, L. A., & Skinner, M. A. (2005). Investigating the reliability and validity of two balance measures in adults with stroke. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 12, 308–315.CrossRef

16.

Turnbull, J. C., Kersten, P., Habib, M., McLellan, L., Mullee, M. A., & George, S. (2000). Validation of the frenchay activities index in a general population aged 16 years and older. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 1034–1038.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Wade, D. T., Legh-Smith, J., & Langton Hewer, R. (1985). Social activities after stroke: Measurement and natural history using the frenchay activities index. International Rehabilitation Medicine, 7, 176–181.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Schuling, J., de Haan, R., Limburg, M., & Groenier, K. H. (1993). The frenchay activities index. Assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke, 24, 1173–1177.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Uswatte, G., Taub, E., Morris, D., Light, K., & Thompson, P. A. (2006). The motor activity log-28: Assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology, 67, 1189–1194.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Uswatte, G., Taub, E., Morris, D., Vignolo, M., & McCulloch, K. (2005). Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity motor activity log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke, 36, 2493–2496.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Gladman, J. R., Lincoln, N. B., & Adams, S. A. (1993). Use of the extended adl scale with stroke patients. Age and Ageing, 22, 419–424.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Nouri, F., & Lincoln, N. (1987). An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 1, 301–305.CrossRef

23.

Lennon, S., & Johnson, L. (2000). The modified rivermead mobility index: Validity and reliability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22, 833–839.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Drummond, A. E., Parker, C. J., Gladman, J. R., Logan, P. A., & Group, T. S. (2001). Development and validation of the Nottingham leisure questionnaire (nlq). Clinical Rehabilitation, 15, 647–656.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Rimmer, J. H., Riley, B. B., & Rubin, S. S. (2001). A new measure for assessing the physical activity behaviors of persons with disabilities and chronic health conditions: The physical activity and disability survey. American Journal of Health Promotion: AJHP, 16, 34–42.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Washburn, R. A., Smith, K. W., Jette, A. M., & Janney, C. A. (1993). The physical activity scale for the elderly (pase): Development and evaluation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46, 153–162.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Dorman, P. J., Waddell, F., Slattery, J., Dennis, M., & Sandercock, P. (1997). Is the euroqol a valid measure of health-related quality of life after stroke? Stroke, 28, 1876.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Wilke, C. T., Pickard, A. S., Walton, S. M., Moock, J., Kohlmann, T., & Lee, T. A. (2010). Statistical implications of utility weighted and equally weighted hrql measures: An empirical study. Health Economics, 19, 101–110.PubMed

29.

Goldberg, D. P., & Hillier, V. F. (1979). A scaled version of the general health questionnaire. Psychological Medicine, 9, 139–145.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Goldberg, D. P., Gater, R., Sartorius, N., Ustun, T. B., Piccinelli, M., Gureje, O., et al. (1997). The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the who study of mental illness in general health care. Psychological Medicine, 27, 191–197.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Cheak-Zamora, N. C., Wyrwich, K. W., & McBride, T. D. (2009). Reliability and validity of the sf-12v2 in the medical expenditure panel survey. Quality of Life Research, 18, 727–735.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Gandek, B., Ware, J. E., Aaronson, N. K., Apolone, G., Bjorner, J. B., Brazier, J. E., et al. (1998). Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the sf-12 health survey in nine countries: Results from the iqola project. International quality of life assessment. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 1171–1178.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Bohannon, R. W., Maljanian, R., Lee, N., & Ahlquist, M. (2004). Measurement properties of the short form (sf)-12 applied to patients with stroke. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 27, 151–154.CrossRefPubMed

34.

McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E. Jr., Lu, J. F., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1994). The mos 36-item short-form health survey (sf-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care, 32, 40–66.CrossRefPubMed

35.

McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E. Jr., & Raczek, A. E. (1993). The mos 36-item short-form health survey (sf-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Medical Care, 31, 247–263.CrossRefPubMed

36.

McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E. Jr., Rogers, W., Raczek, A. E., & Lu, J. F. (1992). The validity and relative precision of mos short- and long-form health status scales and dartmouth coop charts. Results from the medical outcomes study. Medical Care, 30, Ms253–M265.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Garbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the beck depression inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8, 77–100.CrossRef

38.

Segal, D. L., Coolidge, F. L., Cahill, B. S., & O’Riley, A. A. (2008). Psychometric properties of the beck depression inventory II (BDI-II) among community-dwelling older adults. Behavior Modification, 32, 3–20.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Radloff, L. S. (1977). The ces-d scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRef

40.

Van Dam, N. T., & Earleywine, M. (2011). Validation of the center for epidemiologic studies depression scale–revised (cesd-r): Pragmatic depression assessment in the general population. Psychiatry Research, 186, 128–132.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Worm-Smeitink, M., Gielissen, M., Bloot, L., van Laarhoven, H. W. M., van Engelen, B. G. M., van Riel, P., et al. (2017). The assessment of fatigue: Psychometric qualities and norms for the checklist individual strength. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 98, 40–46.CrossRefPubMed

42.

Beurskens, A., Bultmann, U., Kant, I., Vercoulen, J., Bleijenberg, G., & Swaen, G. (2000). Fatigue among working people: Validity of a questionnaire measure. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 57, 353–357.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Lerdal, A., & Kottorp, A. (2011). Psychometric properties of the fatigue severity scale-rasch analyses of individual responses in a norwegian stroke cohort. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48, 1258–1265.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Nadarajah, M., Mazlan, M., Abdul-Latif, L., & Goh, H. T. (2016) Test-retest reliability, internal consistency and concurrent validity of fatigue severity scale in measuring post-stroke fatigue. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 53(5), 703–709.PubMed

45.

Yesavage, J. A., & Sheikh, J. I. (2008). 9/geriatric depression scale (gds). Clinical Gerontologist, 5, 165–173.CrossRef

46.

Brown, L. M., & Schinka, J. A. (2005). Development and initial validation of a 15-item informant version of the geriatric depression scale. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20, 911–918.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Bjelland, I., Dahl, A. A., Haug, T. T., & Neckelmann, D. (2002). The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. An updated literature review. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 52, 69–77.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361–370.CrossRefPubMed

49.

Johnston, M., Pollard, B., & Hennessey, P. (2000). Construct validation of the hospital anxiety and depression scale with clinical populations. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 48, 579–584.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Snaith, R. P., & Taylor, C. M. (1985). Rating scales for depression and anxiety: A current perspective. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 19(Suppl 1), 17 s–20 s.CrossRef

51.

Winkens, I., Van Heugten, C. M., Fasotti, L., & Wade, D. T. (2009). Reliability and validity of two new instruments for measuring aspects of mental slowness in the daily lives of stroke patients. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 19, 64–85.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Wikberg, C., Nejati, S., Larsson, M. E., Petersson, E. L., Westman, J., Ariai, N., et al. Comparison between the montgomery-asberg depression rating scale-self and the beck depression inventory ii in primary care. The Primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders. 2015;17.

53.

McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., & Droppleman, L. F. (1971). Manual for the profile of mood states. San Diego: Educational and Industrial Testing Services.

54.

Lievaart, M., Franken, I. H., & Hovens, J. E. (2016). Anger assessment in clinical and nonclinical populations: Further validation of the state-trait anger expression inventory-2. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 72, 263–278.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Mahoney, J., Drinka, T. J., Abler, R., Gunter-Hunt, G., Matthews, C., Gravenstein, S., et al. (1994). Screening for depression: Single question versus GDS. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 42, 1006–1008.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Calvert, M., Blazeby, J., Altman, D. G., Revicki, D. A., Moher, D., & Brundage, M. D., CONSORT PRO Group. (2013). Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: The CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA, 309(8), 814–822.CrossRefPubMed

57.

Vodicka, E., Kim, K., Devine, E. B., Gnanasakthy, A., Scoggins, J. F., & Patrick, D. L. (2015). Inclusion of patient-reported outcome measures in registered clinical trials: Evidence from ClinicalTrials.gov (2007–2013). Contemporary Clinical Trials, 43, 1–9.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Mercieca-Bebber, R., Rouette, J., Calvert, M., King, M. T., McLeod, L., Holch, P., Palmer, M. J., & Brundage, M. (2017). International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) best practice for PROs—reporting taskforce. Preliminary evidence on the uptake, use and benefits of the CONSORT-PRO extension. Quality of Life Research, 26(6), 1427–1437.CrossRefPubMed

59.

Calvert, M., Kyte, D., Mercieca-Bebber, R., Slade, A., Chan, A. W., King, M. T., et al. (2018). Guidelines for inclusion of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trial protocols: The SPIRIT-PRO extension. JAMA, 319(5), 483–494.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Kane, R. L., & Radosevich, D. M. (LLC 2011). Conducting health outcomes research. Sudbury: Johns & Bartlett Learning.

61.

Cella, D., Nowinski, C., Peterman, A., Victorson, D., Miller, D., Lai, J.-S., et al. (2011). The neurology quality of life measurement initiative. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(10 Suppl), S28–S36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

62.

Gershon, R. C., Wagster, M. V., Hendrie, H. C., Fox, N. A., Cook, K. F., & Nowinski, C. J. (2013). NIH toolbox for assessment of neurological and behavioral function. Neurology, 80(11), S2–S6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

63.

Reeve, B. B., Wyrwich, K. W., Wu, A. W., Velikova, G., Terwee, C. B., Snyder, C. F., et al. (2013). ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Quality of Life Research, 22(8), 1889–1905.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Patient-reported outcomes in stroke clinical trials 2002–2016: a systematic review
Auteurs: Eboni G. Price-Haywood
Jewel Harden-Barrios
Christopher Carr
Laya Reddy
Lydia A. Bazzano
Mieke L. van Driel
Publicatiedatum: 21-11-2018
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2053-7

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2019

Modeling strategies to improve parameter estimates in prognostic factors analyses with patient-reported outcomes in oncology

Determining a transitional scoring link between PROMIS® pediatric and adult physical health measures

Change in quality of life among community-dwelling older adults: population-based longitudinal study

Correction to: Burden of caregivers of adult patients with schizophrenia in a predominantly African ancestry population

A note on the relationship between age and health-related quality of life assessment

Psychometric properties and factorial analysis of invariance of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) in cancer patients