Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

19-11-2018 | Review | Uitgave 5/2019

Quality of Life Research 5/2019

How depressed is “depressed”? A systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis of optimal cut points for the Beck Depression Inventory revised (BDI-II)

Tijdschrift:
Quality of Life Research > Uitgave 5/2019
Auteurs:
Michael von Glischinski, Ruth von Brachel, Gerrit Hirschfeld
Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11136-018-2050-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Introduction

The Beck Depression Inventory revised (BDI-II) is widely used tool to screen for depression. The aim of the present study was to systematically review and synthesize studies that determined optimal cut points for the BDI-II.

Method

We identified 27 studies that tried to identify optimal cut points for the BDI-II. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS criteria. Cut points and their variability were analyzed descriptively, via simulation and synthesized with a diagnostic meta-analysis. Analysis was performed on all studies and subgroups based on the setting (psychiatric, somatic, healthy).

Results

Cut points identified as optimal ranged from 10 to 25 across all studies. Simulation-based estimations of the variability inherent in studies show that much of the between-study differences may be attributed to random fluctuations. Diagnostic meta-analysis across all studies revealed that a cut point of 14.5 (95% CI 12.75–16.44) is optimal, yielding a sensitivity of 0.86 and a specificity of 0.78. Analyses within the different settings suggest using sample-specific cut points, specifically 18.18 in psychiatric settings, and 12.9 in primary care settings and healthy populations.

Conclusion

Most studies aimed at determining optimal cut points fail to acknowledge that reported results are only estimates and subject to random fluctuations resulting in conflicting recommendations for practitioners. Taking into account these fluctuations, we find that practitioners should use different cut points to screen for depression in primary care and healthy populations (a score of 13 and higher indicates depression) and psychiatric settings (a score of 19 and higher indicates depression). Methods to describe this variability and meta-analysis to synthesize findings across studies should be used more widely.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Extra materiaal
Supplementary material 1 (R 41 KB)
11136_2018_2050_MOESM1_ESM.r
Supplementary material 2 (R 1 KB)
11136_2018_2050_MOESM2_ESM.r
Supplementary material 3 (R 2 KB)
11136_2018_2050_MOESM3_ESM.r
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 29 KB)
11136_2018_2050_MOESM4_ESM.docx
Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2019

Quality of Life Research 5/2019 Naar de uitgave